There are all sorts of reasons why parents want their children to resemble them physically,

Christopher Peterson, Ph.D.

Home

Find a Therapist

Topic Streams

Get Help

Magazine

Tests

Psych Basics

Experts

The Scientific Fundamentalist

A Look at the Hard Truths About Human Nature
by Satoshi Kanazawa

Previous Post

Next Post

The Hypothesis

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives

Liberals think theyre more intelligent than conservatives because they are
Published on March 21, 2010 by Satoshi Kanazawa in The Scientific Fundamentalist Get new posts via email

If Liberals Are More Intelligent than Conservatives, Why Are Liberals So Stupid?

Subscribe to The Scientific Fundamentalist

Subscribe via RSS

Harriet Hayes: I dont even know what the sides are in the culture wars. Matt Albie: Well, your side hates my side because you think we think you are stupid, and my side hates your side because we think you are stupid. Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip, Nevada Day, Part I It is difficult to define a whole school of political ideology precisely, but one may reasonably define liberalism (as opposed to conservatism) in the contemporary United States as the genuine concern for the welfare of genetically unrelated others and the willingness to contribute larger proportions of private resources for the welfare of such others. In the modern political and economic context, this willingness usually translates into paying higher proportions of individual incomes in taxes toward the government and its social welfare programs. Liberals usually support such social welfare programs and higher taxes to finance them, and conservatives usually oppose them. Related Articles
The Arts: Dan Hoyle's Play, The Real Americans, is a Must-see Does Psychology Discriminate against Political Conservatives? Voting Your Personality Our Opinions About Torture Depend on the Person Who Is Tortured How Ideology Colors Morality Satoshi Kanazawa is an evolutionary psychologist at LSE and the coauthor (with the late Alan S. Miller) of Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters. more...

Defined as such, liberalism is evolutionarily novel. Humans (like other species) are evolutionarily designed to be altruistic toward their genetic kin, their friends and allies, and members of their deme (a group of intermarrying individuals) or ethnic group. They are not designed to be altruistic toward an indefinite number of complete strangers whom they are not likely ever to meet or interact with. This is largely because our ancestors lived in a small band of 50-150 genetically related individuals, and large cities and nations with thousands and millions of people are themselves evolutionarily novel. The examination of the 10-volume compendium The Encyclopedia of World Cultures, which describes all human cultures known to anthropology (more than 1,500) in great detail, as well as extensive primary ethnographies of traditional societies, reveals that liberalism as defined above is absent in these traditional cultures. While sharing of resources, especially food, is quite common and often mandatory among huntergatherer tribes, and while trade with neighboring tribes often takes place, there is no evidence that people in contemporary hunter-gatherer bands freely share resources with members of other tribes. Because all members of a hunter-gatherer tribe are genetic kin or at the very least friends and allies for life, sharing resources among them does not qualify as an expression of liberalism as defined above. Given its absence in the contemporary hunter-gatherer tribes, which are often used as modern-day analogs of our ancestral life, it may be reasonable to infer that sharing of resources with total strangers that one has never met or is not likely ever to meet that is, liberalism was not part of our ancestral life. Liberalism may therefore be evolutionarily novel, and the Hypothesis would predict that more intelligent individuals are more likely than less intelligent individuals to espouse liberalism as a value. Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as very liberal in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as very

The Scientific Fundamentalist

Recent Posts
The space-time continuum is the only thing unkind to women

Steven Pinker is the Einstein of psycholinguistics

Find a Therapist
Search for a mental health professional near you.

Why strict, conservative churches are strong

I couldnt have said it better myself

City or Zip

Once again, parents are more crucial to sons than to daughters

More of The Scientific Fundamentalist blog

Find Local:
Acupuncturists Chiropractors Massage Therapists Dentists and more!

Most Popular
Most Read Most Emailed

What Nonbelievers Believe

by David Niose

City or Zip

conservative in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.

2 3

How Your Greatest Insecurities Reveal Your Deepest Gifts

by Ken Page, L.C.S.W.

The How and Why of 100 Years of Happiness

by Howard S. Friedman, Ph.D.

Cheaters Always WinThe Paradox of Getting Ahead in America

by Stanton Peele

Are You with the Right Mate?

by Rebecca Webber

The Reappearance of the Christ and the Masters of Wisdom

Benjamin Creme

Even though past studies show that women are more liberal than men, and blacks are more liberal than whites, the effect of childhood intelligence on adult political ideology is twice as large as the effect of either sex or race. So it appears that, as the Hypothesis predicts, more intelligent individuals are more likely to espouse the value of liberalism than less intelligent individuals, possibly because liberalism is evolutionarily novel and conservatism is evolutionarily familiar. The primary means that citizens of capitalist democracies contribute their private resources for the welfare of the genetically unrelated others is paying taxes to the government for its social welfare programs. The fact that conservatives have been shown to give more money to charities than liberals is not inconsistent with the prediction from the Hypothesis; in fact, it supports the prediction. Individuals can normally choose and select the beneficiaries of their charity donations. For example, they can choose to give money to the victims of the earthquake in Haiti, because they want to help them, but not to give money to the victims of the earthquake in Chile, because they dont want to help them. In contrast, citizens do not have any control over whom the money they pay in taxes benefit. They cannot individually choose to pay taxes to fund Medicare, because they want to help elderly white people, but not AFDC, because they dont want to help poor black single mothers. This may precisely be why conservatives choose to give more money to individual charities of their choice while opposing higher taxes. Incidentally, this finding substantiates one of the persistent complaints among conservatives. Conservatives often complain that liberals control the media or the show business or the academia or some other social institutions. The Hypothesis explains why conservatives are correct in their complaints. Liberals do control the media, or the show business, or the academia, among other institutions, because, apart from a few areas in life (such as business) where countervailing circumstances may prevail, liberals control all institutions. They control the institutions because liberals are on average more intelligent than conservatives and thus they are more likely to attain the highest status in any area of (evolutionarily novel) modern life.

The Christ has returned, and his counsel will inspire the transformation of our crumbling civilization. Read more Kyo-Dophilus The beneficial probiotics in Kyo-Dophilus help maintain healthy digestion and a strong immune system. Read more

Anxiety Free A comprehensive formula with herbs and nutrients clinically proven to increase feelings of well-being. Read more

Current Issue
Are You with the Right Mate?
It is natural to wonder if your partner is the right one for you. MORE FROM THIS ISSUE ISSUE ARCHIVES SUBSCRIBE

170

Like Tweet

78k 1,858

StumbleUpon

Subscribe to Psychology Today now and get a free issue!

Tags: conservatives, culture wars, deme, encyclopedia of world cultures, ethnic group, general intelligence, genuine concern, human cultures, liberalism, liberals, political ideology, private resources, sarah paulson, social welfare programs, sunset strip, traditional cultures, traditional societies, volume compendium

Follow Psychology Today:

Twitter

FaceBook

Copyright 1991-2012 Sussex Publishers, LLC

Copyright 2002-2012 Sussex Directories, Inc.

About/Contact Privacy Policy Site Help/Customer Service Terms of Service

Therapy Directory Index Healthprofs Index Buildingpros Index