COVERpage - Final Submission - kaneEKANEET & Associates APPEAL 2009

FINAL Submission To United Nations International Court Of Justice Without
Prejudice
Grand Chief Kaneekaneet [Lawrence Agecoutay] & Associates Lawrence / Robert Agecoutay & Chester Girard
INTERNATIONAL LAW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW & PARAMOUNTCY CONFLICT OF LAWS March
9thth,2009
Canada
Federal Provincial
Government Regional
Parliament Government
Indigenous
Council
Of
Elders
Canada First Nations
Provincial Reserve
Government Government
Legislature Band Council
The New Indigenous Canada Charter is proposed as an opportunity to develop an agreement

between indigenous peoples of North Turtle Island with the new citizens from around the
globe who have landed and taken up permanent residence on these lands. The Indigenous
Council of Elders [ICE] is composed of Elder statespersons elected from the traditional land
boundaries; and, must be a majority of indigenous heritage. ICE is Trustee of all lands and
resources; and, is the final arbiter of decision-making regarding the political process and
creation of statutes. The existing Senate of Canada is absolved; and, is replaced by ICE. The
Submitted Without Benefit Of Counsel Truth Shall Always Prevail Above 1
decisions of ICE must be supported by a majority democratic vote from the custom /
Ignorance
Addressed From Anishinabe Sovereign Soto Nation Turtle Island North
traditional landholders.
Speaker : Grand Existing legislation will be integrated over
Chief Kitchi-Ostew-Kaneekanagoshick-Okimow-Wacon-Kaneekaneet time. Agecoutay]
[Lawrence This template is
Copyrighted TC75 2009
designed to remove the further acquisition of lands by hostile takeover or questions arising
due to perceived abandonment.
Prejudice
9thth,2009
Submitted : March 9th, 2009
Rules Of Order Not Declared By “Saskatchewan Court”
TO :
1. Elizabeth II – Queen / Canada

2. Governor-In-Council Canada
3. Lt Governor In Council Saskatchewan
4. The Appeal Court, Province Of Saskatchewan, Canada
5. The United Nations General Assembly & Credentials Committee
6. The UN International Court Of Justice, The Hague
7. The UN Human Rights Commission
8. The European Court Of Human Rights
9. The International Labour Organization
10.The Nobel Foundation
11.The International Red Cross Association; and,
12.Amnesty International
Absence Of Records In Preparation Of Submissions To Appeal Venues
• The following are produced and submitted in the absence of a full copy
of the transcripts of the original trial before M.J. Gerein, Saskatchewan
Queens Bench; regarding the Accused : Speaker : Grand Chief Kitchi-
Ostew-Kaneekanagoshick-Okimow-Wacon-Kaneekaneet [Lawrence
Agecoutay]; Robert Agecoutay; and, Chester Girard / or, in names as
they have made known to the “Court”.
Specifically, The Records, Pages 1- 212 have not been provided

Ignorance
Speaker : Grand Chief Kitchi-Ostew-Kaneekanagoshick-Okimow-Wacon-Kaneekaneet [Lawrence Agecoutay]
Prejudice
9thth,2009
Submitted : March 9th, 2009 Rules Of Order Not Declared By

“Saskatchewan Court”
Terra Nullius Papa Bulls And The Overwhelming Adverse Impact Upon Ordre Public
Ignorance Of Law Mistake Of Law Crown Canada Misdirection Of Law By Prejudicial Intent
Indigenous laws v. Crown Canada In The Matter Jurisdiction Of The Canada Constitution and Treaty 4
Conceptualizing Complicity In Alien Tort Cases & Exposing The UN To
Potential Suit
The Parties : “A”

Primary Application Before The United Nations International Court Of
Justice
Affidavit Of Truth : Sworn By: namely, As members of The Sovereign Soto Nation
In Turtle Island, North :
• Speaker : Grand Chief Kitchi-Ostew-Kaneekanagoshick-Okimow-Wacon-
Kaneekaneet [Lawrence Agecoutay]; Robert Agecoutay; and, Chester Girard
In The Matter Of Conflict Of Laws & Choice Of Laws : including [but, not limited to]
Lex Domicile; theory of statuta; rules on renvoi, lex fori, lex situs : The Military
Invasion Of Sovereign Indigenous Lands By A Hostile Claimed State-Nation Canada &
Elizabeth II- Queen & In Consequence The Arrest, Trial, Conviction, Beating &
Imprisonment Of The Accused; namely, Peoples Of The Sovereign Anishinabe Nation
Of Turtle Island North Grand Chief Kaneekaneet [Lawrence Agecoutay], Robert
Agecoutay & Chester Girard
Parties “B”
Fundamental Objections By Party “A” To Procedures Of Elizabeth II- Queen;
and her Assigns Canada : No Jurisdiction : Lex Cause : Elizabeth II- Queen and
Submitted Without Benefit Of Counsel Truth Shall Always Prevail Above
Ignorance 3
Prejudice
9thth,2009
her agent / assignee Canada – without good and just cause have executed arrests,
tortures, trials; and, imprisonment of these Parties, supra, without establishing
legitimate jurisdiction of its “courts”.
To The Attention Of Elizabeth II- Queen & The Claimed Corporate Canada
Petitioned To The Attention Of [but, not limited to] The Court Of Appeal
Saskatchewan Canada ; Assignee on behalf of Canada / Elizabeth II-Queen & To The
Attention Of The United Nations International Court Of Justice & The Organization Of
American States Human Rights Commission & Court
A Matter Of A War Crime By Elizabeth II – Queen and her Assignee Canada

In Association With A Practice Of Genocide Against The Parties “A”, supra and their
ancestors or relatives, friends; and associates for the good of the whole.
Introduction
Elizabeth II- Queen and her agent Canada – without good and just cause - have
executed a military invasion upon indigenous peoples of the paramount sovereign
state-nation Anishinabe of Turtle Island North; and, further have claimed a false
jurisdiction to try, convict, torture and imprison three parties who are citizen members
of this said sovereign nation Anishinabe Turtle Island North ; otherwise known as North
America. This matter is, herein, appealed to the international community for release,
relief and compensation.
Objectives Of This Party “A” Submission

1. Expose the absence of jurisdiction of the Crown Elizabeth II- Queen and her
Assignee Canada to establish a governing regime; and, including, the provision for a
judiciary
2. To expose the original trial and conviction of these accused parties as being without
merit or jurisdiction; and,
3. To appeal to international law jurisdictions; and, the internal Canadian judiciary
regime for relief from arrest, trial, conviction and imprisonment; and, therein, to
secure an immediate release from internment; a security against further invasion
and arrest; compensation for false imprisonment; return of business assets or a
reasonable compensation for loss of revenue resulting from the illegal business
Ignorance 4
Prejudice
9thth,2009
interruption; and, a public apology from Elizabeth II-Queen and her Assignee
Canada for these violations of fundamental human rights.
In these matters, it is submitted that there is no prevailing right of claim by any

jurisdiction of judiciary in “Canada” due to the inadequate constitutional formation by
fraudulent conspiracies of private enterprises to occupy and govern lands without
benefit of war, nor the abandonment of paramount allodial rights by indigenous
peoples. In these matters, submissions have been placed before Elizabeth II-Queen,
Canada the Supreme Court of Canada; the European Court Of Human Rights; and, the
Secretary General o the United Nations that state-nation credentials are inadequate as
presented by Canada to the League of Nations and the subsequent United Nations;
wherein, it is claimed a right of Canada to be recognized as state-nation; and,
thereafter, to enjoy the benefits of membership therein. Hence, the Supreme Court of
Canada has been petitioned to cease any further hearings; as these judgments may
inevitably be ruled ultra vires by the UN ICJ at the Hague. In consequence, this
proclamation injunction against the Supreme Court embraces any claimed jurisdiction
by its inferior bodies; including these judiciaries instituted within the boundaries of the
claimed province Saskatchewan.
Overriding and Prevailing Matter Of Intent Of Elizabeth II – Crown

The Accused / Convicted / Imprisoned sovereign Parties, herein, supra, proclaim
irrevocably and in truth before the world community that the intent of the business
activities, as charged; namely, the cultivation of hemp medicine and ancillary products
is an acceptable purpose for the benefit of the good of the whole.
Elizabeth II- Queen and her Assignee Canada have executed an injustice through the
production of false documents of state-nation incorporation. And, within this corrupt
conspiracy, this Monarch regime has claimed a right to produce and enforce certain
documents from its houses of parliament and legislature which purport to regulate the
activities of citizens and others within claimed territories. These claims to state-
nationhood are founded upon the proclamations from the Holy See Catholic Church
through its dictums of Terra Nullius [Romanus Pontifex and Inter Caetera] and the
Anglican Church / Government of England’s Supremacy Acts. These church laws,
as
enforced through military authority, specifically continue since the 14th century to
direct the Monarchs of Europe to enforce a policy of hatred to indigenous peoples of
other nations who are not Christian by faith; and, further, enforce a corporate dictum
which enshrines the inhumane policy that a non-Christian is a non-human; and,
therein, not competent to possess assets of real estate or resources; and, further, is
not competent to govern.
Ignorance 5
Prejudice
9thth,2009
In Canada the testimonies before “Royal Commissions” on aboriginal issues which

speak to the inhumane and criminal travesties by Elizabeth II- Queen and her Assignee
Canada against the traditions and customs of indigenous peoples of Turtle Island
North; and, the discriminatory compensatory Residential Schools Victims settlements
are witness -, in conjunction to prevailing legislation creating the refugee camps called
Indian Reserves – to the prevailing, hostile assimilation policies and practices of this
rogue regime Canada.
The consequent arrest and conviction / imprisonment of the three parties Grand Chief
Kaneekaneet and his associates Robert Agecoutay and Chester Girard represents the
continued execution of policies contrary to the human rights as provided for through
the United Nations against the traditions of these said indigenous peoples of the
Anishinabe Nation of North Turtle Island.
There is no factum or allegation presented by the Crown in the Appeal application; nor,
within the original trial and conviction before the Saskatchewan Queen’s Bench of an
organized criminal network association connection or intent to conspire with these
elements that are contrary to good public policy either within indigenous peoples
jurisdiction; nor, within the context of the claimed state-nation Canada.
The Crown Elizabeth II- Queen and her Assignee Canada have purported to establish
certain Treaties with indigenous peoples of Turtle Island North; wherein, it is
entrenched that custom and tradition may be retained and practised by these
indigenous peoples, including those peoples of the territory named as Treaty 4 – which
has claimed to include the peoples of Grand Chief Kaneekaneet and his associates
accused, convicted and imprisoned. This said “Treaty 4” – although, without merit -
included a recognition doctrine providing for the protection and preservation of the
rights of indigenous peoples of the region identified as “Treaty 4” to enjoy its
maintenance and practises of their medicine chests.
Points At Issue
Section One : Jurisdiction
1. Nation-to-Nation Jurisdictions of Law : Issue Of Treaties
(A) Elizabeth II- Queen and her Assignee Canada enforce a nation-to-nation
relationship with the customary indigenous governing bodies within her claimed
territory

Ignorance 6
Prejudice
9thth,2009
(B) Elizabeth II- Queen and her Assignee Canada have claimed through subterfuge
and criminal conspiracies of known acts contrary to human rights [including the
specific disenfranchisement of indigenous peoples of the instituting provincial
regimes by private enterprises beyond their Admiralty Orders] to the
establishment of provincial regimes
(C) Elizabeth II- Queen and her Assignee Canada have disregarded their United
Nations Charter obligations by failing to register any “Treaty” with indigenous
peoples. In consequence it is reasonable to conclude that no “Treaties” exist;
and, therefore, no jurisdiction of state-nationhood has been negotiated from
indigenous peoples.
2. Admiralty Law v. Common Law

(A) Elizabeth II- Queen and her Assignee Canada, in arresting, trying, convicting,
and imprisoning the Accused parties, supra, have not identified on the face of
the record whether they are proclaiming a trial by Admiralty Law or by Common
Law
(B) In failing to proclaim the chosen jurisdiction of law, the Crown Canada has
prevented the Accused and their Counsel from determining the best course of
response to these charges of contrariness to the Criminal Code of Canada
3. International Law v. Common Law

(A) International Law provides for the jurisdiction of the Geneva Convention; which
establishes rules for the respectful treatment of prisoners
(B) Lawrence Agecoutay / Grand Chief Kaneekaneet has suffered broken bones;
biological invasion of scabies; and, forced medications contrary to his health
interests while within remand and prison. This is contrary to the Geneva
Convention provisions; and, constitutes a war crime
(C) The Accused / Convicted / Imprisoned persons claim entitlements under

international law; i.e., being residents of legitimate state-nations which have
been invaded upon and occupied by hostile foreign corporate forces
(D)Canadian common law jurisdiction is rejected; being the product of a nefarious
rogue regime, which has acquired recognition through the efforts of deceit and
malfeasance
4. Indigenous Law v. Canada Statutory Law

(A) Indigenous law is paramount to the claimed Canadian statutory laws. Each
province, including Saskatchewan are constructs through a regime of fraud and
corruption originating through the Hudson’s Bay Company

Ignorance 7
Prejudice
9thth,2009
(B) Elizabeth II – Queen and her Assignee Canada have executed these claims of
provincial incorporation and subsequent national confederation by
disenfranchisement of indigenous peoples by chemical warfare [passing out to
indigenous peoples of plague infested and contaminated blankets and shirts] in
an effort to reduce prevailing indigenous populations
(C) Indigenous peoples have never abandoned their traditional territories in favour
of these criminal regimes; nor, have they acquiesced to releasing their allodial
land title rights in favour of the claim of the Monarch and the Assignee Canada
(D)Indigenous state-nation governance within Turtle Island North is accredited since
more than 8000 years BCE; and, these governing bodies have historically
provided a respect for the healing capabilities of the Creator through herbs and
other natural products. Grand Chief Kaneekaneet is a direct ancestor of chiefs
who attended and considered the applications of the Hudson’s Bay Company
representatives – and, he is a survivor of the infamous Residential Schools. He is
a sacred pipe carrier; who regularly consults with his indigenous Elders for
guidance in applying the wisdom offered to him through the Creator
(E) The claimed laws of Canada are, in many ways, contrary to the laws of Grand
Chief Kaneekaneet’s. And, Grand Chief Kaneekaneet and his associate accused
and convicted parties Mister Robert Agecoutay and Chester Girard do not accept
the proffered Indian Act of Canada as possessing jurisdiction to establish
“reserves” for “Indians”; and, therein to occupy through governance.
Section Two : Intent of Accused / Convicted and Imprisoned

1. Grand Chief Kaneekaneet and the co-accused and convicted, supra, have not
offered forward apologies to the Courts or Parole Boards due to their continued
allegiance to the fundamental principles of medicinal healing that they advocate
through the hemp products
2. The traditional healing nature of hemp is recognized within the medical

communities for the successful alleviation of levels of progressive Alzheimer’s.
Additionally, Kaneekaneet argues that the healing capabilities for heart, cancer and
diabetes are within the medicinal realms of hemp products.
3. There is no submission into factum of any allegations that there has been any
attempt by these accused men to cause harm to any person, indigenous or non-
indigenous; nor any youth through their chosen business of producing commerce
and trade through hemp production
4. There was no submission by the Crown in the Trial before Queen’s Bench that the
claimed THC quotient exceeding three kilograms existed at the time of seizure at
the production site greenhouses. Further, there was no submission on the record
from Health Canada that the seized plants do not continue to mature after the
initial harvesting by police
Ignorance 8
Prejudice
9thth,2009
Section Three : Trial At Queens Bench :
Section Four : Appeal Applications To Appeal Court Saskatchewan

1. Accused / Conviction Petition For Release
2. Crown / Public Prosecution Service Of Canada
Facts : For Reference : Transcripts of Pages 1 – 212 were not provided to the Accused
1. Crown Canada, The Judge: Mr. Justice Gerein / Court : 21st Day Of April : 2008
claimed to commence a “Court” into the Hearing of Charges upon Mister Lawrence
Agecoutay, Mister Chester Girard and Mister Robert Agecoutay
2. The jurisdiction of the “Court” was not provided for even when it was challenged by
the Accused Parties “A”; Judge Gerein received the objections and rejected them
without providing a good and just cause
3. Motions By the Accused Parties “A”
(a) P. 5: Court : will not hear matter of calling back jury candidates due to expense
(b)P. 5: Mr. Mulligan / counsel has not seen filed documentation
(c) P.12: Court : not addressing jurisdictions of warrants, searches or seizures
(d)P.13: Court : not considering whether or not treaties are legal or illegal
(e) P.13: Kaneekaneet / Agecoutay identifies sovereign Soto Nation – RCMP refused
to
enter
(f) P.16: Court : refuses to hear any more concerning “Court” jurisdiction
(g)P.16: Kaneekaneet / Agecoutay raises issue of “cestqua trust” : duty of care upon
Judge Gerein
(h)P.16: Absence of evident potential for prejudice in composure of jury to be
selected; namely, no evident capacity to consider international law matters –
especially since Judge Gerein will not raise these points to the jury
(i) P.16: Kaneekaneet / Agecoutay raises issue of international law jurisdiction; and,
M.J. Gerein refuses to consider these matters by avoidance and redirection
(j) P.19: Court / M.J. Gerein : “… I have read them [filed papers by Accused
regarding
crimes against humanity; war crimes and genocide]
(k) P.19-20: Kaneekaneet / Agecoutay clearly identifies himself to the Court as

“Kitchiostewkaneekanagosh—ickokimowwaconkaneekaneekaneet” : 7th
generation traditional and spiritual chief, and plenipotentiary for the
sovereign Soto Nation; and seventh generation traditional and head
Ignorance
Prejudice
9thth,2009
spiritual chief of the Anishinabe Federation of Sovereign Nations”
(l) P.20: Kaneekaneet / Agecoutay to Court / M.J. Gerein: “ if you don’t oppose then
it
is taken that you know everything in that document and you agree with
it”.
M.J. Gerein responded : “Okay. That’s good, thank you”
(m)P.21: Chester “Girard” called the Court’s attention to his rejection of identity
documents [birth certificate, et cetera]. Chester willed everything to Her
Majesty
(n)P.23: Court / M.J. Gerein agreed to recognize that “Girard” is not Chester’s name.
(o) P.24: Chester submits that it is the corporate party “ Chester Girard” charged by
the
Crown; not, the individual person Chester; and, that “Chester” is not
charged
[argument here is that Chester never knowingly accepted the duty of the
corporate entity created by the Crown upon him in order to establish debt
upon the name]. Editor’s note: Probable cause of this issue is one of antedate against
the
charges – removing the empowerment of the state-nation over the individual
(p)P.27: Matter is raised between Chester and Court / M.J. Gerein of disclosure and
jurisdiction. M.J. Gerein : “there is no matter of jurisdiction”. Chester then states
that he should “…just walk out …”
(q)P.28: Court / M.J. Gerein : “No … you try to walk out and there may be some
consequences”. Court / M.J. Gerein continues to reject dealing with issue
of
disclosure
(r) P.28: Court / M.J. Gerein : regarding disclosure and jurisdiction : “ … it may very
well be a valid argument, in time, yes”
(s) P.28: Chester: asks : “if my name is not on those court documents [charges] , am
I
obligated to be here ?” Court / M.J. Gerein : “ Yes, I understand that
question”
(t) P.29: Court / M.J. Gerein refuses to deal with issue of disclosure
(u)P.29: Mulligan / counsel for accused : “… it does sound to me as if these
gentlemen [Accused] are truly not capable of defending what is before the court,
and I wish to raise at this point the concern about counsel … it’s been a problem
getting counsel … because counsel have heard some of what your Lordship
heard this morning, and it hasn’t been possible to communicate. And, I’m just
concerned that we are about to embark on what is likely to be an awkward and
probably unfair trial, given what we’ve heard today?” Court / M.J. Gerein remarks
that he is concerned that the Accused will not find counsel. Mulligan’s concerns
are noted for the record.
(v) P.30: Kaneekaneet / Agecoutay to Court / M.J. Gerein: counsel interviewed
refused to “…go into the … Charter argument, they backed off”.
Ignorance 1
Prejudice
9thth,2009
(w)P.31: Kaneekaneet / Agecoutay to Court / M.J. Gerein: No lawyer due to expense:
legal aid inadequate; basic cost for constitutional challenge would be $50,000 v.
Legal aid provisions of circa $125-150/ hour
(x) P.31: Court / M.J. Gerein refuses to any further considerations about counsel
being
appointed [editor’s note: question now of duty of care for a fair and
complete
hearing may rest upon shoulders of M.J. Gerein]
(y) P.32: Court / M.J. Gerein refuses to provide funds for legal counsel
(z) P.33: Court / M.J. Gerein : Recognizes native ancestry of accused; the claim by
the
Accused for a fair and complete hearing before qualified jury. Both points
are
rejected. Court / M.J. Gerein rejects change of venue.
(Z.1) P.34: Court / M.J. Gerein rejects issue of court’s jurisdiction not being
established; and, fails to recognize nation-to-nation status of issues. And,
the
matter of name [Chester v. Chester Girard] is rejected. M.J. Gerein claims
jurisdiction to hear charges with jury
(Z.2) P.37: Kaneekaneet / Agecoutay to Court / M.J. Gerein: “… because of the
overwhelming criminal acts that have been portrayed on our [Soto] nation,
that now is the time to call in the provost martial (marshal). This is an act of
citing a right to be recognized and protected as a prisoner of war; and,
therein, to be protected by relevant international provisions for the safe
custody of such declared prisoners. M.J. Gerein was negligent as an officer
of
the “Court” in not acceding to this human right in this conflict of
paramountcy
between claimed state-nations. The UN provides avenues of retribution for
such lapses in the good administration of justice
(Z.3) P.37: Court / M.J. Gerein rejects issue of calling in the provost “martial” nee
marshal: “… I will not do so …”
: Editor’s note : Provost Marshal: Canadian Forces Provost Marshal is head of the
Canadian Forces National Investigation Service. In the British Armed Forces this marshal is the head
of military police; as it is in the United States Armed Forces. In the United Nations, the Provost
Marshal is established as head of military policing
4. Elizabeth II –Queen and her Assignees / Department Of Justice and the

Saskatchewan Queens Bench abdicated their international duties in law regarding
disputes between state-nations. And, again, the record establishes the Soto Nation
as credible in law before the claim by the rogue corporate body Canada – a
commercial entity with a public record of hatred for “Indians”; with prevailing
Ignorance 1
Prejudice
9thth,2009
assimilation policies that continue to administer refugee camps of more than 2
million Original Peoples; who generally live in abject poverty and environmental
malaise of polluted social amenities. And, where children are specifically
abandoned by the principal party Elizabeth II- Queen, the wardship holder with
responsibilities to children; and, who continues to reject the Children’s Charter of
Human Rights at the United Nations; and, who has been cited for negligence at the
UN’s 2009 Human Rights Commission convention in Geneva
5. The matter of a Constitutional challenge was not accepted by the “Court”. This
decision by M.J. Gerein demonstrates his incompetence in these matters of
fundamental rights of law; and, it further underlines his penchant for failing to grasp
the substantive issues of international law that applied in these charges
6. These said Charges – as named to be contraventions of the Canada Criminal Code

in the matter of producing and trafficking of cannabis marijuana per S.7(1) :
Controlled Drugs and Substances Act; and, a matter of possession of prohibited
weapons – are without merit where jurisdiction is not established. The Accused have
offered reasonable man accounts of explanations for the misconceptions of these
issues. The jury was not adequately instructed by the negligent M.J. Gerein; who
continued to maintain an obvious bias on the record against the Accused
ARGUMENT
The Records of the “Court” of M.J. Gerein have failed to establish the fundamentals of a
fair hearing in a matter of quest between international law and the claimed Crown law
of Canada.
The Accused were subjected to a series of denials that resulted in the “Court” of
Mister Justice Gerein failing to provide fundamental human rights to the Accused:
namely,
(A) To clearly know the charges and their jurisdiction upon the Accused
(B) To hold the “Court” before the Accused with competent counsel for the Accused
(C) To hold the “Court” in an atmosphere that provided the clear provisions of a hearing
not in a hostile environment perceived to be biased against the Accused
(D) To hold the “Court” as a common law matter public law matter within the internal
jurisdiction only of the Crown Canada; whereas, the Accused cited rights of
privilege to be accorded the protection of the United Nations and international
treaty law regarding the safety of “prisoners of war” when Kaneekaneet /
Agecoutay applied to Court / M.J. Gerein for Provost Marshal provisions; and, was
subsequently refused
(E) To hold a “Court” with balanced judgments considering its competence and
jurisdictions within the context of issues clearly within the realms of international
Ignorance 1
Prejudice
9thth,2009
law; and, in particular, not to create the question of bias on matters as raised
regarding points of human rights, genocide and alleged war crimes within reason
as established within the known public record
(F) To hold a “Court” as an officer of the law within the obligations of a charter member
of the United Nations; and, having accepted the obligations of the membership
Charter therein
(G) To have a UN Provost Marshal attend the “Court” when petitioned to do so by the
Accused – as in a petition for a legal counsel and protection against further physical
abuse while under arrest – as has been alleged by Grand Chief Kannekaneet
(H) The records of the trial before M.J. Gerein did not establish any clear evidence that
the harvested crop from the sovereign lands of Soto contained any cannabis
marijuana that would contravene the Canada Criminal Code
(I) The records of the “Treaty Four” that relates to the Pasqua and Soto Nations
provide clearly for the protection and preservations for the “Indians” of their
traditional medicine chests. Contrary testimony before the Gerein hearing did not
clearly contradict the Accused’s submissions on these points of right within
tradition. The matter of the jurisdiction of the proposed Treaty Four is clouded by
the historical
Records, which speak to dissatisfaction by attending “Indians”; the failure of the

translators on site; the corruption of the Hudson’s Bay Company in misrepresenting
its
claimed rights to lands of the Soto / Pasqua regions. The records clearly report that
there is doubt in the matter of authority by attending parties to be considered to
possess fundamental knowledge of contract law; and, the “Indians” were regarded
by
the Terms and Conditions of the Papal Bulls Romanus Pontifex and Inter Caetera and
the English Supremacy Acts as not being recognized by Order Of Punishment By
Death
To The Monarch where non-Christians claimed property and resource rights: that
non-
Christians were by the church and state laws to be considered as being “non-
human” –
and, therefore, not possessing any realm of competence to enter into any
contractual
obligation, to consider or endorse any document or treaty; to sign peace
agreements or
rights of passage what-so-ever. These said church laws are still prevailing since
1453
(J) No “Court” is competent to consider these matters of charge where they do not
establish fundamental knowledge with the Accused of their claimed jurisdiction and
Ignorance 1
Prejudice
9thth,2009
duty to fulfill the dictates of state-nation statutes. And, clearly the “Court” did hear
and recognize and respond to questions on these matters of fundamental rights
from the Accused, supra. In fact, a Court which proceeds to hold a “trial” under
such conditions and therein commits these Accused to imprisonment where they
have clearly sustained their ignorance of the law, creates a vector of significant
abuse of authority exercised by the state-nation against the Accused, supra.
Summary
Section “A” – Jurisdiction by Crown Canada was not established against the
protestations
of the prisoners of war, Accused, supra
Section “B” – The Accused were not provided with any clear definition of jurisdiction
by
the presiding jurist M.J. Gerein in Saskatchewan
Section “C” – The Accused were involved in a commercial enterprise which is
fundamentally endorsed as a humanitarian project to protect the
environment; provide new traditional and contemporary holistic healing
which is endorsed by the science studies in the contemporary medical
community
Section “D” – no contention was submitted and no evidence existed individually or as a
conjunctive group that the Accused were in a criminal conspiracy that the
general public community would reject if they were sufficiently informed
of
the comprehensive business plan in electric power generation; building
materials, tonics, lotions, clothing, and a coterie of ancillary commercial
venues for hemp-based products. The only matter of misfortune on record
is
that they were under-funded in enterprises that would create labour-
intensive employment and training to “Indians” and other non-natives
through the growth factors in an industry that was the founding
commercial
enterprise for the United States of America; and, was the major global
industry before the corrupt conspiracies of the plastics industry to lobby

to
governments world-wide to create statutory laws of criminality around this
industry that is fundamentally capable of replacing fossil fuels as a source
of
energy. Ignorance is not bliss in this case – for either of the Parties.

Ignorance 1
Prejudice
9thth,2009
Section “E” The Record failed to establish any agenda by the Accused that would
cause
naïve youth to be drawn into a world of addictions. On the contrary, these
business people –and, in particular, the record showed Kaneekaneet /
Agecoutay to be a concerned parent, who was struggling, as with his
brother Robert, with the ravishes of the legacies of Residential Schools
and
policies of assimilation that deprived peoples of their customs, traditions,
languages, historical hunting practices, resources and territories to the
extent that they suffer regular malnutrition, and early demise from
diseases
of heart, cancer and diabetes, suicide; and, fundamental loneliness
caused
by substantial social hatred generated through a federal policy of
continued
genocide. While Chester [a.k.a. Girard] is generally portrayed in the
Records
as non-native; there is reference in the documents to his Metis heritage –
which causes him abandonment and bias from both groups: “Indians”
and
non-natives; and, which is compounded by the evident bias of M.J. Gerein
in
the Record.
Application For Relief To The Accused, supra
Section One : Release of the Accused, supra

• Crown Canada shall exercise constitutional Governor-In-Council Prerogative Privilege
Forthwith; and, order the immediate release of the prisoners Accused, supra, to the
safe custody and protection of the Joint Cooperation Council of the International Red
Cross Association and Amnesty International; or, some other similar body as
supervised through the United Nations Human Rights Commission
Section Two : Protection of the Accused, supra

• Crown Canada will comply with international standards of justice in law; and, will,
forthwith comply with United Nations instructions for safe passage of the Accused
prisoners to their home base
Section Three : Non-Interference of the Accused, supra

• Crown Canada will comply with United Nations instructions regarding the non-
interference with the Accused, supra, their properties, families, associates, friends

Ignorance 1
Prejudice
9thth,2009
or colleagues in any manner of revengeful policies or practices; whether evident or
covert
Section Four : Compensation & Return Of Assets With Damages To The Accused,
supra
• Crown Canada will participate in a UN-supervised compensation for damages
resolution to the Accused, supra; including any third parties adversely affected by
the hostile actions of Crown Canada in these matters
Section Five : Expunge the Record of the Accused, supra

• Crown Canada and Saskatchewan will expunge all records regarding the integrity of
the Accused, supra; especially, in matters of any criminal wrong-doing arising from
the charges that have led to these incarcerations
Section Six : Consequences for Crown Canada By the United Nations For Hostile
Invasion
• Crown Canada will voluntarily sponsor the legal counsel expenses and reasonable
costs to these Accused, supra, for a Petition for Resolution before the United
Nations International Court Of Justice in the Hague on these matters of
paramountcy between “Indians” and non-natives in Turtle Island North / Canada
Section Seven : Public Apology To The Accused, supra, by Elizabeth II – Queen and
her
Assignee Canada and the province of Saskatchewan
• Elizabeth II-Queen and her Assignee Crown Canada will provide an adequate and
complete Public Press Release Apology on these matters of the release of the
Accused, supra; and, will cooperate with the United Nations Human Rights
Commission – with the assistance of the International Red Cross Association and
Amnesty International - in the context of this said Apology.
Failure To Comply By Elizabeth II- Queen and her Assignee Canada /

Saskatchewan
• The Accused will petition the United Nations to proceed with providing a Special
Forces Unit to cause the release of the Accused, supra through such Security
Council actions as sanctions and specific combat provisions as necessary to achieve
the release and security of these Accused, supra

Ignorance 1
Prejudice
9thth,2009
As Submitted in Truth
The Accused, supra
• Speaker : Grand Chief Kitchi-Ostew-Kaneekanagoshick-Okimow-Wacon-
Kaneekaneet [Lawrence Agecoutay]; Robert Agecoutay; and, Chester Girard / or,
in names as they have made known to the “Court”.

Ignorance 1

COVERpage - Final Submission - kaneEKANEET & Associates APPEAL 2009

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

COVERpage - Final Submission - kaneEKANEET & Associates APPEAL 2009

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

FINAL Submission To United Nations International Court Of Justice Without

The New Indigenous Canada Charter is proposed as an opportunity to develop an agreement

Submitted : March 9th, 2009

Rules Of Order Not Declared By “Saskatchewan Court”

1. Elizabeth II – Queen / Canada

Absence Of Records In Preparation Of Submissions To Appeal Venues

Specifically, The Records, Pages 1- 212 have not been provided

Submitted Without Benefit Of Counsel Truth Shall Always Prevail Above 2

Submitted : March 9th, 2009 Rules Of Order Not Declared By

The Parties : “A”

A Matter Of A War Crime By Elizabeth II – Queen and her Assignee Canada

Objectives Of This Party “A” Submission

In these matters, it is submitted that there is no prevailing right of claim by any

Overriding and Prevailing Matter Of Intent Of Elizabeth II – Crown

In Canada the testimonies before “Royal Commissions” on aboriginal issues which

Submitted Without Benefit Of Counsel Truth Shall Always Prevail Above

2. Admiralty Law v. Common Law

3. International Law v. Common Law

(C) The Accused / Convicted / Imprisoned persons claim entitlements under

4. Indigenous Law v. Canada Statutory Law

Submitted Without Benefit Of Counsel Truth Shall Always Prevail Above

Section Two : Intent of Accused / Convicted and Imprisoned

2. The traditional healing nature of hemp is recognized within the medical

Section Three : Trial At Queens Bench :

Section Four : Appeal Applications To Appeal Court Saskatchewan

(k) P.19-20: Kaneekaneet / Agecoutay clearly identifies himself to the Court as

4. Elizabeth II –Queen and her Assignees / Department Of Justice and the

6. These said Charges – as named to be contraventions of the Canada Criminal Code

Records, which speak to dissatisfaction by attending “Indians”; the failure of the

industry before the corrupt conspiracies of the plastics industry to lobby

Submitted Without Benefit Of Counsel Truth Shall Always Prevail Above

Application For Relief To The Accused, supra

Section One : Release of the Accused, supra

Section Two : Protection of the Accused, supra

Section Three : Non-Interference of the Accused, supra

Submitted Without Benefit Of Counsel Truth Shall Always Prevail Above

Section Five : Expunge the Record of the Accused, supra

Failure To Comply By Elizabeth II- Queen and her Assignee Canada /

Submitted Without Benefit Of Counsel Truth Shall Always Prevail Above

Submitted Without Benefit Of Counsel Truth Shall Always Prevail Above

Вам также может понравиться