Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Maine Republic Email Alert

. . . that I should bear witness unto the truth. John 18:33 // David E. Robinson, Publisher
. . . if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself for battle? I Corinthians 14:8

No.447
04/04/13

Creditors In Commerce on Proof of Claim


Creditors in Commerce teachings are clear about this: When it comes to getting your remedy in any situation where a claim is being made against you, your power lies in turning the claim upon the claimant. No remedy is to be found in arguing, defending, and/or ignoring.. Brandon Adams from Creditors in Commerce teaches this valuable lesson through his recordings and workshops. The way we bring resolution and remedy to the matter is by being in harmony with the claimant, by accepting their position but with our own conditions attached. We do this by asking a question; by conditionally accepting. This is a counteroffer, and very important, because a counteroffer has the legal effect of rejecting the offer. A contract is in motion, offer and counteroffer is taking place until an agreement is made. An agreement is made which is either expressed or implied, such as through silence, equals non-response, also called tacit acquiescence. In order that we do not acquiesce and depose our selves of our sovereign status, we conditionally accept the claim, upon proof of claim. If we are offered something like jail for instance, and if we can keep from going into freak-out mode or argue mode, we might recognize about us. This takes up a lot of our energy, puts us into dishonor, and doesnt usually produce the results we are looking for. In the counter offer or conditional acceptance our energies can be directed differently to accept their position, to accept their claim upon proof of claim in the form of a sworn statement made under penalty of perjury. this as just an offer. We are being offered jail, someone is offering us an opportunity to be corrected by the correctional facility, and if we do not say otherwise then weve tacitly agreed to the same. Some of us do not say otherwise even when we have been invited to. For example, allocution is where the judge asks you if you have anything to say before he passes sentence on you. In that moment you are being extended the opportunity to tell the court why it should not proceed against you. If you say nothing, it is then presumed that you are in agreement with the allegations or claims. In staying silent we lose, we are in dishonor. In arguing or defending we lose. Think about it, if you argue about someones unsubstantiated claims against you, are you not bringing those claims to life and handling them as if they are real? What are you defending against exactly? In reality we are defending against someone elses version or story In essence you are saying, I honor your position, all Im asking for is proof, present some verified evidence to prove your claim. This puts the burden of proof upon the one making the claims. If this party does not bring any substance to what they are saying, material proof to back up their claim, then all we are dealing with are allegationsmeaningless statements, unsubstantiated declarations that do not qualify as verified statements. So we need not argue anothers claim. We can make it easier for our selves by flipping it around and letting them present their substance behind their claim. When we ask for a verified statement we are asking the claimant to substantiate his claim by oath or affidavit. We are asking him to swear to the truth of their statements. We are asking for proof of claim. In the public, there has never been a claim against anyone that had anything of substance behind it.

Maine Republic Free State News, 3 Linnell Circle, Brunswick, Maine 04011 http://maine-patriot.com / drobin88@comcast.net

For example, the PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK or any other state is a corporation. This corporation cannot make sworn statements for it is a fictional entity, it is not a living thinking being, it is a fiction and has no substance to it. So where then is the real party in interest, the one making claim against you? No where to be found, there is no one. Without a sworn statement a claimants unverified declarations do not stand as evidence anywhere. Instead of automatically answering questions and accepting allegations without proof of claim, we can stand in our power and bring harmony to the situation. As a creditor youre not concerned with being right and proving another wrong. On the contrary, you are acting as an ambassador of peace, an agent of resolution who looks to bring settlement and who works to resolve the issue.

See: Creditors in Commerce: 1. The Way of the Creditor: http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/videos-watch-cic-lt-018.php 2. Contract = Law: http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/audio-contract-law.php 3. Miscellaneous Audios: http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/audio-miscellaneous.php 4. Atlanta 2010 Workshop: http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/audio-atlanta-2010.php 5. Boston 2010 Workshop: http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/audio-boston-2010.php 6. Audio of Workshops: http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/audio.php 7. FREE Videos: http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/videos-watch.php 8. Seminar videos: http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/videos.php SOURCE: http://understandcontractlawandyouwin.com/creditors-in-commerceproof-of-claim-explained/

The Re-Declaration of Independence of 2012: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1K7YeuziKA Back Issues: http://www.scribd.com/maine_patriot_press Books by the publisher: http://tinyurl.com/ctj3zsx

ad Christi potentium et gloriam (for the power and glory of Christ) 2 Maine Republic Free State News, 3 Linnell Circle, Brunswick, Maine 04011 http://maine-patriot.com / drobin88@comcast.net