Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Challenges
What are the most cost effective options for improving reliability while extending the life of our installed distribution equipment? How can we improve the safety and reduce the PPE requirements? Do we have any exposure to financial or legal liability if we do not make any improvements? Life extension goal is it short term or long term?
Long term cost of the decisions the cumulative cost over the targeted life extension will guide you to the right decision assuming other expectations are met.
Litigation exposure the arc flash studies are done. You know your incident energy levels and PPE requirement. Can you afford to do nothing? Budgets cost will drive the decision as much as the other needs Outage durations or unplanned outages what has the financial impact been due to unplanned outages, around the clock maintenance, expediting charges & losts production.
Evaluation Steps
Determine objectives safety upgrades, life extensions etc Understand budget and time constraints Understand what your current O&M cost are Establish current health and immediate needs of the installed gear internal evaluation or third party equipment assessment. Enter customer inputs into the cost analysis tool to determine full cost over targeted life extension. Evaluate the results and make the decision that supports budget and life extension goals.
Asset Assessment
Objectives
6 14 1
As Found As Left
14 15 2 14
Risk Category 8 3
214
211
50
100 # Units
150
200
250
Compares
Cost Comparison
Total Cost
Interactive Customer inputs their variables Address all the major components of the gear Cafeteria selection of upgrades Factors in maintenance requirements
A rc Resistant Gear
Ro ll in Replacement B reakers
Service
In-House Advantages
Factory expertise
Plating
Painting Latest drawings
Upgrades
Engineering support Warranty as new
Latest technology Reduced parts Reduced maintenance Reduced training Longer life cycle
Conventional
Wholesale change out Arc resistant protection Latest technology Engineering upgrades incorporated. Reduced maintenance Updated training Meets latest standards
Latest technology
Engineering upgrades incorporated.
Reduced maintenance
Updated training Meets latest standards
Demo Time
Financial Results
Cost Comparison
$800,000.00 $700,000.00
Total Cost
Conventional Gear
Service
Cycle Time
10 8 6 4 2 0
Facto ry Refurbhisment
In Ho use Refurbhisment
Ro ll in Replacement B reakers
Service
700000
600000
500000
Cumulative Cash
400000
300000
200000
100000
0 0 5 10 15 Year 20 25 30
Conclusion
Replacement Switchgear
Provides arc-flash protection Renews total system for long term life Improves technology and protection systems Refreshes training programs Reduces O&M cost Longer cycle time for change out Most expensive option - both up-front and over 30 years
Conclusion
Refurbishment & Upgrades
Proper refurbishment can extend breaker life for 30 years but the maintenance of keeping older technology could be challenged. Continued issues with training and parts inventory
Lowest short term cash out, but could be all on O&M budget
Conclusion
Replacement Breakers & Upgrades
Higher reliablity Improves safety Updates training and parts inventory Overall cost will be influenced by upgrades selected cafeteria selections
Please be sure to complete the workshop evaluation Professional Development Hours (PDHs) and Continuing Education Credits (CEUs):
You will receive a link via e-mail to print certificates for all the workshops you have attended during Automation & Power World 2011. BE SURE YOU HAVE YOUR BADGE SCANNED for each workshop you attend. If you do not have your badge scanned you will not be able to obtain PDHs or CEUs.