Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 144

<r

THE HAVERFORD LIBRARY COLLECTION


OF

CUNEIFORM TABLETS

HAVERFORD LIBRARY COLLECTION


OF

CUNEIFORM TABLETS
OR

DOCUMENTS FROM THE TEMPLE


ARCHIVES OF TELLOH

EDITED BY

GEORGE

A.

BARTON
MAWR COLLEGE

PROFESSOR IN BRYN

PART

NEW HAVEN YALE


:

UNIVERSITY PRESS
:

LONDON

HUMPHREY MILFORD

OXFORD UNIVERSITY

PRESS

MDCCCCXVIII

PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION


texts

This edition of the Haverford Library Collection has been issued in order that these might still be accessible to scholars. The author regrets that, owing to the expense
it

involved,

has not been possible to rewrite Part unchanged as has been done. Those who use the
this part

book

rather than to let the plates remain are requested to bear in mind that

appeared in 1905, and that, if he were at liberty to rewrite the volume to-day, it would be done quite differently. The texts will, it is hoped, be of use to scholars in their
Attention is called to the fact that the text on plate 16 of Part present form. corrected form on plate 154 of Part III. The first edition of this work was published by the John C. Winston
Philadelphia.
I

appears in

Company of

GEORGE

A.

BARTON.

Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania,


June, 1918.

ERRATA.
l'a?, e 10,
r

No. 220,
Xo. 144,
Xo. 193,
IV,

rev.,

place period at end of line


1.

3.

1'a.ne

10,

rev.,

3,

begin line with capital T.


read to instead of of.

1'age

i,

rev.

1.

7,

Page

iC, Col.

1.

9,

place

comma

instead of period at the end

of the line.

INTRODUCTION.
The one hundred and seventeen new
hundred
tablets,

texts here presented are the

first

of the

Haverford

Library Collection of cuneiform tablets to be published.


in

This collection, consisting of four


1

New York autumn of 1901 and presented to Haverford was purchased During the winter of College by T. Wistar Brown, President of the Corporation of that college. 1901-1902 a catalogue of the collection was prepared, but my departure for Palestine in June,
in the

autumn of 1903. Since then they have received such time as could be spared from other studies and the duties of instruction. As these conditions of work will make it impossible to complete the editorial labor upon the whole
1902,

made

further

work upon these

tablets impossible until the

has seemed best to issue the text in parts, so that the material may be accessible to scholars with as little delay as possible. With the last part a sign list and vocabcollection for

some

years,

it

ulary will be issued.

Although the tablets were purchased

in

New

York, there

is

reason to believe, as the

title

Since some peculiar claims have of this work indicates, that they came originally from Telloh. been made of late as to power to divine the original provenance of tablets purchased in the markets of the world, a few words

be in place concerning the reasons which lead me to believe that the Haverford Library Collection was once a part of the temple archives of Telloh. The present writer lays no claim to powers of divination beyond the ken of his fellow- workers. The

may

reasons, then, are as follows:


1.

In 1894 the

workmen

of

M. de Sarzec at Telloh discovered a chamber which contained


There were so

an immense number of tablets

estimated at thirty thousand.

impossible for M. de Sarzec and his assistants to properly care for them. accordingly stolen by the Arabs. In the campaigns of 1895, 1898, and 1900 somewhat similar
finds

many that it was Many tablets were

were made. 2
2.

Since 1894

many

tablets of the period before

Hammurabi,

tablets, too, of similar

varieties, form, clay

and palaeography,

have been offered for

sale in different parts of the

world.

has acquired many, which have been published in Cuneiform Texts From Babylonian Tablets in the British Museum, Parts I, III, V, VII, IX, and X. The Royal Museum at Berlin acquired some three hundred and ten, which were published in 1901 as
British

The

Museum

Heft
the

XVI
title

of the

Museum's Mittheilungen aus den

Tempelurkunden aus Telloh. appearance to those which came to the Louvre from Telloh, a part of which M. Thureau-Dangin published in his Tablettes chaldeennes infdites, 1897, and Recueil de tablettes chaldeennes, 1903. M.

Sammlungen by Reisner under These publications contain texts similar in nature and
Orientalischen

Thureau-Dangin assures

me

in a private letter that the

Louvre contains many unpublished tab-

'They were purchased of Mr. Gullabi Gulbenkian. A brief notice of the collection was published in the American Journal of Archeology, Vol. VI (1902), p. 36 ff. J Cf. Revue d'Assyriologie, Vol. Ill, No. iv, pp. 118 ff., Vol. IV, No. i, pp. 13 ff., ibid. No. iii, pp. 69 ff., Vol. V, No. iii, pp. 67 ff., Comptes rendus de V Academic des Inscriptions, 1896, pp. 355 ff., Rogers, History of Babylonia and Assyria, 1900, Vol. I, p.
238,

and M. Thureau-Dangin, Recueil de

tablettes chaldeennes, 1903, p. i.

lets of
lin.

the same kind as those contained in the publications of the

Museums

of

London and Ber-

The General Theological Seminary of New York City acquired in 1896, through the generosity of Dean Hoffman a collection of cuneiform tablets, a part of which consists of tablets Some of these were published by Radau similar in form and contents to those under discussion. The American Vice-Consul at Jerusalem, Mr. as an appendix to his Early Babylonian History.
,

Herbert Clark, has also a small collection of tablets of a similar character which he kindly permitted me to examine. They are evidently from the same source. A gentleman in Philadelphia
has also recently acquired a small collection of the same nature and style. The Haverford tablets, as may be seen from a comparison of those published below with those contained in the works mentioned, are of the same period and the same varieties. The only reasonable conclusion
is

that de Sarzec's discovery explains

why

so

many

such tablets have been offered for sale in

different parts of the world.


3.

An

internal study of the tablets supports this conclusion.


city

Girsu, Nina, Kinunir,


site of Telloh,

and Tigabba, all parts or suburbs of the mentioned more often than other towns.
texts bear the

which once flourished on the

are

gods of this

names of town, more frequently than those


it is

The theophorous proper names contained in these Ningirsu, Bau, Nina, Nana, Ninmar, Ningishzida, and Ninshah, all
of other deities.

For these reasons

believed that the sub-title of this

work

is justified.

In spite of

all

claims to the contrary, there is no infallible Assyriological wizard capable of discerning the provenance of tablets in the absence of objective evidence which will appeal to other specialists. It

not pretended that such a wizard resides chez nous. If, therefore, the above reasons do not convince the reader, he is at liberty to believe that the source of these tablets is unknown.
:

Haverford College who are not Assyriologists a few words about Telloh may not be out of place. Telloh is a mound more than four miles long in southern Babylonia, about sixty miles north of Mugheir, the Biblical Ur of the Chaldees. Excavations

For the benefit

of the friends of

were begun here by M. de Sarzec, the French consul at Bassorah, in March, 1877. De Sarzec dug for three months in 1877, more than three months in 1878, about four months in 1880, two

and many times afterward until his recent death. He has dug systematically, unearthing palaces and temples of the highest antiquity, and bringing to light a most remarkable city. Many inscribed objects have been recovered, the most remarkable of which

months and a

half in 1881

is

the so-called Stele of Vultures, bearing an inscription of


C.,

Eannadu who reigned about 4100


B. C.

B.

and eleven

diorite statues of

Gudea who ruled about 3000

Thousands

of tablets

have also been recovered.

From
was

these inscribed objects

we

learn that the city which created the


cities,

mound

of Telloh

called Shirpurla,

and that

it

consisted in reality of four other

Girsu, Nina, Erim,

and Uruazagga. Kinunir and Tigabba were also either parts of it or suburbs of it. Each settlement was originally independent. The oldest king of this region of whom we know, Urkagina,
about 4300 B. C., calls himself simply King of Girsu. Soon, however, one ruler governed all under the name Shirpurla. Early Babylonian history is a record of struggle for hegemony between
In this struggle Shirpurla at times had preeminence. Then her rulers called themselves kings. Often, however, Shirpurla was the vassal of another state; then her rulers
different cities.

called themselves Patesi.

Some

of these, like Gudea, were powerful

monarchs and practically

independent.

about 2400 B.

At the time from which our tablets come, the period of the third dynasty of Ur, C., the kings of Ur had usurped all power and the Patesi were mere shadows.

from the reigns of Dungi, Bur-Sin II, and Gimil-Sin of the third dynasty of Ur. The texts published in this part are with one exception dated. It was thought best to publish the dated tablets first. An attempt has been made to group the
tablets here published are

The

tablets bearing the

same date

together, but as the tablets are of different sizes the exigencies of

a different order necessary. Other considerations sometimes led me to depart from this order, but broadly speaking the texts below are grouped according to date. The language in which these tablets are written is Sumerian, the tongue of the pre-Semitic
space frequently
inhabitants of Babylonia.
It

made

has been shown that the inhabitants of Shirpurla were Semites, 8

but that they learned their writing from the Sumerians, and while they probably spoke Semitic the force of custom was such that down to the conquest by the city of Babylon they continued
to

employ the Sumerian


itself

for writing.
4

From

the earliest times, however, the native Semitic


e. g., in
is

idiom made
10, pi. 9

apparent.

Similar Semitic idiom appears in our texts:


"

No.

18,

IV,

the use of ana as a preposition instead of the use of a post-position

due to Semitic
"

Also in No. 324, 1. 2., pi. 19 we have: AZAG ka-lum, the money in full, kalum being the Semitic kalu, Hebrew, 73 A comparison of No. 61, IV, 10 (pi. i) with OBI. No. 125, 5,
idiom.
affords us a

new Sumerian

ideograph,

BA-AN-LIL

being synonymous with BA-TU,

"

to bring

in."

The whole class of tablets, to which the Haverford Library Collection belongs, are This holds good of the texts here published. It is business and administrative character.
tomary
in

of a cus-

some quarters

to undervalue such tablets in comparison with religious texts,


I

which

usually are of a mythological or magical character.


ious tablets,

would by no means undervalue the religbut would nevertheless maintain that the value of economic texts is quite as great.

the temple records and business documents from Babylonia have been published in sufficiently large numbers and have been adequately studied, it will be possible to form a picture of the economic environment of an ancient people such as can be

When

made of no other people of antiquity


less

known

to us,

and

this picture will, I believe,


political institutions.

prove to be of no

value to the study of religion


there

than to the study of

Not the

least valuable aspect of these texts is their

contribution to historical knowledge.

They come from a time when

was no

fixed era,

and

records were dated from important events. below will afford a good example of the

A glance
way
in

at the dates given in the register of tablets

which these business documents portray the of which we often political conditions of the times, giving us a record of wars, raids and conquests have no other information than that which such tablets afford.

Sometimes these tablets


which records that
This
six slaves of

relate to private business.

This

is

the case with No. 340,

pi. 36,

one

instance occurs in No. 183,


is

pi. 18,

man worked two months in the field of another. Another where one man receives four earthen-ware jars from another.
where we have the payment to the temple of the

partially the case with No. 334, pi. 36,

principal of a loan, the interest remaining unpaid. Sometimes the business transacted was, perhaps, of a political nature.

We

are in doubt

whether the

lists of

amounts

of grain, such as No. 18, pi. 9, translated below,

were records of

taxes paid in kind, or the payment of rents from fields of the temple estates, which had been The latter alternative is probably nearer the truth, since care was leased to various individuals.

taken to withdraw the seed grain, which had probably been advanced by the temple or the tenant
1

Cf. Cf.

the writer's Semitic Origins, pp. 185, 186; also 186

n.

1.

Radau, Early Babylonian History, pp. 145-147.

at the beginning of the season.

ments

of tracts of land to

The Haverford Library Collection contains records of the assigndifferent individuals. One of these, No. 193, pi. 30, is translated below.

Various phases of the management of the arable fields of the temple and the collection of income from them are recorded in No. 61, pi. i No. 24, pi. 16; No. 102, pi. 21 No. 26, pi. 22 No. 91, pi.
;

31; No. 81,


35- pl- 45-

pi.

32,

33; No. 393,

pi.

37; No.

20, pi. 40;

No. 60,

pi. 41; No. 63, pi. 42;

and No.
and

Connected with the temple were a large number of


officers of

priests, scribes,

women,

slaves,

The names of some of these are well known, although we cannot yet determine the functions of each. One class, the name of which occurs frequently in our tablets, One of these ( pl. 3, No. 17, IV, 12) takes an ox away from a herd. is in Sumerian A-RU-A.
various kinds.

Another

No. 45) offers an expensive list of sacrifices. In pl. 23, No. 29, cols. II, III, and IV, are a number of A-RU-A, each standing at the head of a list of women to whom amounts of wool for clothing were assigned. Apparently, therefore, the A-RU-A had charge of the de(pl.

15,

5 voted ones or the sacred women.

Evidently, they were

men

of dignity

and

authority."

contain records of the quantities of grain or other rations, 7 Such or the quantities of wool for clothing, which were assigned to the staff of temple officials.
are Nos. 379, pl. 2; 257,
pl. 28;
pl. 6;

A large number of these tablets

396, pl. 8; 29, pl. 23, 24; 54, pl. 24; 66, pl. 25; 74, pl. 26; 248,

30, pl. 29;

246, pl. 30; 68, pl. 43;

and

272, pl. 49.

Special messengers were sometimes sent out, for whom special provision of food, drink and oil was made. Such seems to be the meaning of No. 217, pl. 43. The temple apparently also owned a large number of boats to ply on the canals and bring in the produce of the fields.

No. 188,

pl.

49 (translated below), gives the

number

of these

and

their capacity at a certain date.


officer

they are attributed by the tablet to a certain man, but he was probably the in charge of them, since the temple kept a record of them. Connected with the temple estates were also extensive pasture lands. Herds of
It is true that

cattle,

sheep, goats and asses were each year entrusted to different shepherds to graze on these lands. At certain times "round ups" of these cattle were made, and a record of the state of the herds taken. Such records are contained in Nos. 17, pl. 3 (translated below); 370, pl. 20; and 80,
pl- 34. 35-

The shepherds were held


' '

to strict account for losses occurring through their neglect,

but were not responsible for losses by accident or wild beasts unless due to carelessness. 8 At the " round ups the increase of the herd was noted, as well as the losses. Animals taken away
for

any purpose, such

as labor or sacrifice, were not counted as losses, but were included under a

separate entry.

Tablets of the sheep-shearing time recorded the wool received from the sheep

of the flock, classed according to age.

Such

is

No.

3, pl.

38, 39.

In the tablets of these classes published in the present work one or two lexical items of In pl. 3, No. 17, IV, 3, RUG-RUG is used after a singular. interest may be noted. Radau
(Early Babylonian History, p. 349
ff.)

and and

RUG-RUG
(p.
Cf.

plural.
is

Our
is

text

is

notes that, except in the text OBI. 126 RUG, is singular proof that the rule was subject to other exceptions. A

more

interesting case

PUHAD-NU-UR.
no,
and 178-182.

Radau

(op. cit. p. 357)

renders

it

"sucking lambs,

"

399) argues that this


Code
of

right because in the enumeration of wools the

PUHAD-NU-UR

Hammurabi,

127,

No. 14313, I. 10 saysof an A-RU-A, NE ERIM E-dingir-NINA, "who is a man of the temple of Nina." 'Cf. Johns, Babylonian and Assyrian Laws, Contracts and Letters, 1904, ch. XX, on "The functions and organization of the temple." Cf. Code of Hammurabi, 263-267.

CTBM. X.

produced none. Reisner (Tempel Urkunden, p. 6) renders it "ungeschornes(?)." In No. 3, pi. 38, of our texts we find evidence that both are mistaken, since weights of the wool of the

PUHAD-NU-UR

are twice given,


life

(cf.

II,

and

III, 7).

Other phases of temple


for sacrifice at the

are reflected in these texts.


is

gives the provision for three feast days, while No. 229, pi. 49,

For example, No. 297, pi. 36, the record of two oxen appointed
office of

One
accounts.

tablet,

temple at Bau on certain days. No. 113, pi. 18, records the establishment of an
pi. 50,

makers), while another, No. 144,

food-making (or foodrecords the appointment of two clerks in an office of


is

One
Patesi

of the

most

interesting of the tablets here published


in the city-section Girsu

No. 220,

pi. 36.

It records

the establishment of a park

by the son

of the Patesi
9

UR-LAMA

the

whom M.
Most
of

Thureau-Dangin restored to history a few years ago. The text is translated below. the tablets which mention places at all mention those near Shirpurla, though a
Babylonian
10

number

of other

cities

are mentioned also.

No. 288,

pi. 30, is,

however, a record

of rations deposited at Susa.

These texts contain one or two items of historical


pi.

interest.

For example,

in

31, VIII, 7,

8,

we read
in

GU

ID KIS-GIM

GUB

[E]

dingir-DUN-GI LUGAL-E:
Cf. Reisner, op. cit.

No. 91, "on the


No. 117, No. 81,

bank

of the canal Kishgim, he built [the palace] of Dungi, the king."

VII. 23-26.
pi. 33,

The context

which

this stands will be


I

found chronologically valuable.


It reads:

VIII, 13, presents a date which


' '

have not noticed elsewhere.


year
after
ship,

MA-SU-SA-SAHAR
Dagon was
of E.
built.
is

dingir-DA-GAN BA-RU, "the

the

MU-US-SA MA-SU-SA-SAHAR of
it is,

MA
the

indicates that the structure

was a

but

perhaps, a variant

If so, this

where we read
'

MU

year after that mentioned in Reisner's Urkunden, No. 122, II, 4, E-SU-SA-SAHAR (dingir)-DA-GAN BA-RU, 11 "the year the E-SU-SA-

SAHAR of Dagon was built",


IX,
1

i.

and would be identical with the year mentioned in Reisner ibid., Probably these two years are the same as those which Radau finds in the E. A. HoffNo. 101, but
if

man

collection,
is

his transliteration

is

correct (the text


is

is

not published), the

wording
in

still

different there.

If this identification

correct, the date belongs to the reign

of Dungi.

It

may, however, be that the "ship" was made at a


this
is

different time

from the temple,

which case

new
is

date.

Another new date


the ship

found in No.

37, pi. 5,

MU MA-TEMEN-MUH
reign this year belongs
:

BA-G1M:
I -do

Temen-muh was

consecrated."

To what

The year not know.

"

another interesting date is that of No. 61, pi. i dingir-SIS-KI KAR-ZI- [DA"| E-AN-NA BA-AN-LIL, "the year Nan-nar Kar-zi-da was brought into the house of Anu. " This is probably a variant of OBI. No. 125, 5 a date in the reign of Dungi.
Still

MU

Translations of specimens of the various classes of tablets represented here are appended.
R6vue semitique, 1897, p. 74 ff. ideogram with the ideogram for Susa in Scheil's Textes elamites semitiques, passim; in de Morgan and Scheil's Delegation en Perse, Vol. II., pi. 12, and p. 59, and Vol. VI, p. 6. "This date occurs also in CTBM. IX, No. 18437. '-This date is also found in CTBM. VII, Nos. 13165, 18391, and 18397; IX, Nos. 13657, 18367, 19715, and 21137, also X, No. 21429. In VII, No. 12927 the year after this last is mentioned.
Cf.
10

Cf. the

10

THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PARK.


No. 220,
PI. 36.

Obv.

i. 2.

DC SAR GAN GIS-SAG C SAR GAN KI-GAL


BA-BI-ZI-MU NU-GIS-SAR SU-NIGIN DC SAR GAN GIS-SAG SU-NIGIN C SAR GAN KI-GAL

Obv.

i.

2.

600 shars of land planted with palm 100 shars of wooded land,

trees,

3.

3.

Babizimu being gardener,


a total of 600 shars of land planted with palms, a total of 100 shars of
as a park joined,

4.
5-

4.
5.

wooded

land,

6.

Rev.

i. 2.

GIS-SAR GID-DA LUGAL-SIG-GID

6.

Rev.

i. 2.

Lugalsiggid,

DUMU

3. 4.
5.

UR-dingir-LAMA PA-TE-SI GIR-SU-KI SA

son of

Ur-Lama

the Patesi,

3.

In Girsu,

GIR LUGAL-MA-GUR-US-SUKKAL
ITU EZIN-dingir-DUN-GI

4.
5.

Witness: Lugalmagurussukkal

Month Bui
the year the divine

6.

MU

Dingir-BUR-dingir-EN-ZU

LUGAL-E

6.

Bur-Sin the king, de-

UR-BIL-LUM-KI BA-HUL

stroyed Urbillum.

AN APPOINTMENT
No. 144,

TO CLERKSHIPS.
PI. 50.

Obv.

i. 2.

MA-DUB-BA DUP-PU-DA
UR-dingir-BA-U SIS

Obv.

Office

of accounts

3.

GAL-KAL-LA
4.
5.

Ur-Bau, brother of Galkalla,

4.
5.

dingir-LAMA-URU-NA

Lamauruna
and Gir-Ninshah
son of

SA GIR-dingir-NIN-SAH

Rev.

i.

DUMU DA-DA
NI-GAL

Rev.

1. 2.

Dada

2.

has appointed.
the year Gimil-Sin, king of Ur, the temple

3.

MU

dingir-GIMIL-dingir-EN-ZU

LUGAL

3.

4.

SIS-AB-KI-MA E E-dingir-GAL GIS-UH-KI

MU-RU

4.

the temple of the great god, Gish-uh

built.

RECEIPT FOR DATES.


No. 329,
PI. 47.

Obv.

i.

CLXXVII

KA-LUM GUR

Obv.

i.

177 Talents

of dates,

2.

KI-UR-AB-BA-TA

2.

from Urabba
for a possession

3.

MU-GAR-RA-KU
UR-dingir-BABBAR SU-BA-TI ITU SE-KIN-KUD
Rev.

3.

4.

4.
1. 2.

Ur-Shamash
has received.

Rev.

i. 2.

Month Adar,
the vear the throne of Bel was erected.

3.

MU GU-ZA

dingir-EN-LIL

BA-GIM
LIST OF SHIPS.

No. 188,

PI. 49.

Obv.

i. 2.

XXV MA LX GUR V MA L GUR


MA XL GUR X MA XXX GUR
X-LAL-I

Obv.

i.

25 Ships of 60 talents (burden),


5

ships of 50 talents,
i

3.

10 minus

ships of 40 talents,

10 ships of 30 talents
of

5.

Rev.

i. 2.

3.

USU-U GIR UR-GIS-ZIKUM DUMU GI-NI-MU ITU SE-KIN-KUD UD-BA V BA-NI MU HU-HU-NU-RI-KI BA-HUL

Ushu.
:

Rev

Witness

Urgishzikum, son of Ginimu

Month Adar, day sth the year Huhunuri was destroyed.

II

RECORD OF PROVISIONS FURNISHED.


No. 288.
PI. 30.

Obv.

i.

V KA GAS-GUB
Ill

Obv.

i.

Ka

of strong drink,

2.

KA GAR

2.

ka of food,

3.

IV GIN NI-GIS

3.
4. 5.

4 shekels of wood-oil

4.
5.

EN-SAM-MI-NI
Ill
II

Enshammini,
3
2

6.

KA GAS KA GAR
Rev.

Ka

of strong drink,

6.
i.

ka of food
oil

Rev.

i.

IV GIN NI

4 shekels of

2.

3.

A-KAM-A-GAL NINNI-ERIN-K1 GUB-NA


ITU SE-IL-LA MU HA-AR-SI-KI HU-MUR-TI-KI BA-

2.

Akamagal
at Susa presented.

3. 4.
5.

4.
5.

Month Nisan, the year Harshiand Humurti were destroyed.

HUL
RECEIPT FOR GRAIN.
No. 47, PL
17.
1
.

Obv.

i.

V SE GUR LUGAL
NI-DUB E-NE-LI-TA
MA-A-SI-GA

Obv.

Talents of grain royal quality,

2.

2.

has stored at Eneli

3.

3.

4.
5.

DUB

UR-dingir-GAL-GIR
Rev.

4.
5.
i. 2.

Maasiga on the account


son of Atu.

of Ur-Galgir

Rev.

i. 2.

UUMU A-TU GIR BA-ZI


ITU EZIN-NE-SU

Witness Bazi.

Month Tammuz
the year Bur-Sin became king.
Seal.

3.

MU

BUR-dingir-EN-ZU

LUGAL

Seal.
1.

UR-dingir-GAL-GIR

1.
2.
?.

UR-Galgir,
Scribe,

2.

DUP-SAR

3.

DUMU

A-TU

son of Atu.

ALLOTMENT OF LAND.
No. 193,
PI. 30.

Obv.
2.

XVII GAN DCLXXV SAR GAN-DAMAK XI GAN D SAR GAN SAHAR

Obv.

i.

17
1 1

2.

3.

5.

XIV GAN 525 SAR GAN GIG II GAN DCCCC SAR GAN-A-KAL DCCC SAR GAN ID-BAD
NI-DA-MU-NI-GID

3. 4.
5.

12
2

Gan 675 Gan 500 Gan 525

shars of good land, shars of land planted with sahar, shars of land planted with gig,

Gan, 900 shars of flooded (?) land, 800 shars of land with a canal wall
(to)

6.
7.

6.
7.

Nidamunigid

Rev.

i. 2.

MU EN-NUN-KI XXXV GAN L SAR GAN-DAMAK


XI GAN D SAR GAN SAHAR XI GAN CCL SAR GAN GIS GESTIN XIV GAN D SAR GAN SAHAR GID

the 35
ii ii

man

of Eridu.

Rev.

i. 2.

3.
4.

3.

4.

14

Gan 50 shars of good land, Gan 500 shars of land planted with Gan 250 shars of land planted with Gan 500 shars of land planted with
adjoining
(?)

sahar,
vines,

sahar

6.
7.

GAN DCCCC SAR GAN-DAMAK GID DCCCXXV SAR GAN ID-BAD


II

5.

Gan 900

shars of good land adjoining

(?),

6.
7.

825 shars of land with a canal wall


of Gal-Nintinigid.

GAL-clingir-NIN-TI-NI-GID

8.

MU

HA-AR-SI-KI

8.

the year of Harshi (and)

....

12

ESTABLISHMENT OF A FOOD-OFFICE.
No. 113,
PI. 18.

Obv.

i. 2.

MA-DUB-BA GAR-RA-AG
UR-dingir-A(?)

Obv.

i.

An
of

office

2.

food-making

3. 4.
5.

3-

Ur-A(?)
son of Nabashag

DUMU NA-BA-SAG
SA GAL-BI-MU GU ID NINA-KI GUB
NI-SU-U MU KI-MAS-KI BA-HUL
Rev.

4.
5.
i.

and Galbimu on the bank


of the canal of

Rev.

i.

Nina

set

2.

2.

3.

3.

(and) made firm. The year Kimash was

destroyed.

RECEIPT FOR EARTHEN JARS.


No. 183,
PI. 18.

Obv.

i.

IV

PES-HUM

Obv.

i.
2.

4 earthen jars

KI KIN-SA-MU-TA SU-SAR-MAL-IM-SE-RA-KU

3.

from Kinshamu, for Shusharmalimshera

SU-AB-BA
Rev.
i.

4.

Shuabba
son of Bazi
has received.

DUMU

BA-ZI

Rev.

i. 2.

2.

SU-BA-TI

3.

4.

ITU EZIN-dingir-BA-U MU KI-MAS-KI

3.

Month

Kisleu,

4.

year of Kimash.
IN TOLL.

RECORD OF GRAIN TAKEN


No. 185,
PI. 27.

Obv.

i.

2.

3.

4
5.

CXXIII SE GUR LUGAL SE AB-BU DUP-SAR-DA KARU ERIM-KI UR-RIN-E-NIGIN

Obv.

i. 2.

123 Talents of grain royal quality


grain (which) with Abbu, the scribe
at the granary of

3.

Erim

4.
5.

Ur-rinenigin
gained.

RUG-RUG-DAM
MU-US-SA KI-MAS-KI BA-HUL MU-USSA-BI
Rev.

Rev.

i.

i.

Two

years after

Kimash was

destroyed.

MEMORIAL OF BUILDING A WALL.


No. 349,
PI. 14.

Obv.

i. 2.

3.

DUP BAD(?) MU-BAD KALAM A-UR-A

Rev.

i. 2.

Record

of the wall(?)

(which) placed

3.

the people sent

KI KI-NU-NIR-KI NINA-KI Rev. i. SA TIG-AB-BA-KI 2. NI-GAL v MU UR-BIL-LUM-KI BA-HUL


4
.

4.

Rev.

from Kinunir, Nina and Tigabba.


(They) set
(it)

2.

up.

3.

The year Urbillum was destroyed.

RECORD OF A SACRIFICE.
No. 45, PL
15.
i. 2.

Obv.

i. 2.

IV UZ

Obv.

4 Goats,
15 she goats,
3 ewes,
5
i

V SU-KAR
HI'U'

3-

3.

4.
5.

V LU URU
i

4.
5.

rams,

PUHAD URU

he-lamb,

Rev.

i. 2.

XXXV BIR A-RU-A Dingir-NIN-E-NE-LI-KI


UM-A-GI-GI

Rev.

i.

35 kids,

2.

the

ARUA

of the goddess

NIN-E-NELI

3.

3. 4.
5.

has sacrificed.

5.

ITU SE-KIN-KUD MU-US-SA KI-MAS-KI BA-HUL


Seal.

Month, Adar,
the year
Seal.

Kimash was destroyed.

IP-TIR-KALAM DUMU UR-E-AN-NA.

Iptirkalam son of Ur-Eanna.

RECORD OP HIRED SLAVES.


No. 340,
PI. 36.

Obv.

i. 2.

VI

KAL

Obv.

6 Slaves
of

URU-TA-NU-TAM-MI
ITU GUD-DU-NE-SAR-SAR-TA ITU EZIN-dingir-NE-SU-KU ITU II KAM BAL-MA A-SA BA-RU-GAL

Urutunutammi

3.

from the month Sivan


to the
2

4.

month Tammuz

Rev.

i.

Rev.

months,

2.

2.

3.
4.

DUMU UR-SAG-GA MU Dingir-BUR-dingir-EN-ZU LUGAL

3.

field of Barugal son of Urshagga.

dug the

4.

The year the divine Bur-Sin became

king.

RECEIPT FOR MONEY.


No. 324,
PI. 19.

Obv.

i. 2.

XVII MISLA GIN LAL

II

SE AZAG-UD

Rev.

i. 2.

17

and

]/*

shekels of silver, less

she,

AZAG KA-LUM
KI KALAM-IL-TA
LUGAL-dingir-NIN-GIR-SU SU-BA-TI
Rev.

money

in full,

3.

3.
i. 2.

from Kalamil
Lugal-Ningirsu has received.

Rev.

i.

2.

3.

MU

KI-MAS-KI BA-HUL

3.

The year Kimash was destroyed.

PAYMENT OF
No. 334,

A LOAN.
PI. 36.

Obv.

i.
2.

V GIN AZAG-UD LAL-NI RUG-GA


KI UR-dingir-GAL-GIR-GAL-NIN-AN-TA E-GAL-LA BA-AN-LIL

Obv.

Shekels of silver
interest

2.

minus the

3.

3. 4.

from Ur-Galgirgalninan
Egalla has brought
in.

4.

Rev.

i. 2.

GIR UR-dingir-LAMA ITU SU-KUL


MU-US-SA Dingir-BUR-dingir-EN-ZU LUGAL.

Rev.

i.

Witness: Ur-Lama.

2.

Month Ab
the year the divine Bur-Sin became king.

3.

3.

A
I.

"

ROUND-UP" OF CATTLE.
No.
17, PI. 3.
I. i. 2.

i. 2.

3.

4.
5.

XXXVI LID AL X LID III IV GUD III X LID II


IV LID
VI.
II

36 Full-grown cows,
10 cows 3 (years old),
4 bullocks 3 (years old),

3.

4.
5.

10 cows
4 cows
2

(years old),

SAG LID AL KU

(years old) in exchange for full-grown

cows.
6.

GUD

II

6.

6 bullocks 2 (years old).

7.

II

GUD

II
I

RUG-RUG
I

7.

bullocks
i

(years old) increase,

8. 9.

10.

X LAL XI GUD I Ill GUD LID


LAL-NI
I

LID

8. 9.

10 minus

cows
i

(year old),

ii bullocks
3

(year old),

10.
1 1
.

bullocks (for) cows.

11. 12.

GUB-BA-A-AN

are present.

GUD

III

12. 13.

There
i

is

missing
2

bullock

3 (years old).

13. I
14. 15.
16.
II.
i. 2.

GUD

II

bullock

(years old).

LAL-NI-A-AN SU-NIGIN XCV LID HI-A LID GUB-BA-A-AN. SU-NIGIN II LID HI-A

14. 15.
1

They

are missing.

Total 95 cattle
cattle are present.

6.
i. 2.

II.

Total

cattle

LAL-NI-A-AN
UR-SI-IL-LA

are missing
of Ur-sheilla's.

3.

3.

5.

XXXIV LID AL IV LID III SAG LID AL


VII LID
I

4.

34 Full-grown cows,
4

KU

5.

cows

(years

old)

in

exchange

for full-

6.
7.

II

6.

7
i

grown cows, cows 2 (years old),

LID

II

SAG
II

(LID)

AL KU

7.

cow

(years old) in exchange for a full-

grown cow,
8. 9.

XII

GUD

8.

12 bullocks

(years old),

10. 11.

X LID I VII GUD I I GUD RUG-RUG


GUD-GIS GUB-BA-A-AN LAL-NI I LID AL

9.

10 cows
7
i

(year old),
i

10.

bullocks

(year old),

11.

bullock increase,

12. Ill 13. 14.

12. 3 full-grown 13. are present.

oxen,

14.
15.
1 6.

There
i

is

missing

full-grown cow,

15. I
1 6.

AMAR
13

calf.

17.

III.

i.

2.

3.

LAL-NI-A-AN SU-NIGIN LXXX LAL LID GUB-BA-A-AN SU-NIGIN II LID HI-A LAL-NI-A-AN

They

are missing.
i

LID HI-A
III.

17.
i

Total 80 minus

cattle

cattle are present.

2.

Total, 2 cattle are missing


of Dingir-sukkal's.

3.

DINGIR-SUKKAL
SU-NIGIN LXX LID AL SU-NIGIN X LID III SU-NIGIN IV LID III SAG LID AL

4.
5.

5.

Total 70 full-grown cows, Total 10 cows


Total, 4 cows
3 (years old), 3

6.
7.

6.

KU

7.

(years old) in exchange for

full-grown cows,
8. 9.

10.

SU-NIGIN IV GUD SU-NIGIN XX LAL II LID III SU-NIGIN V LID II SAG LID AL
III

8. total 4
9.

bullocks 3 (years old),

total, 20

minus
2

cows

(years old),

KU

10. total, 5

cows

(years old) in exchange for

full-grown cows,
11.

12.

IV.

i.
2.

3.

4.
5. 6.

SU-NIGIN XX LAL II GUD SU-NIGIN II GUD II RUG-RUG SU-NIGIN XX LAL I LID I SU-NIGIN XX LAL II GUD I SU-NIGIN I GUD I RUG-RUG SU-NIGIN III GUD GIS SU-NIGIN III GUD LID LID GUB-BA-A-AN
II
will notice that the

11. total, 12. total,

20 minus
2

bullocks
2

(years old),

bullocks

(years old) increase,


i

IV.

i. 2.

total, 20

minus
minus
bullock

cow

(year old),
i

total, 20 total,
i

2
i

bullocks

(year old),

3.

(year old) increase,

4.
5.

total 3 full-grown oxen,


total 3 bulls (for) cows,

6.

(these) cattle are present.

The reader

Babylonian totals are not always accurate.

7.

8. 9.

10.
11. 12.

SU-NIGIN I LID AL SU-NIGIN I GUD III SU-NIGIN I GUD II SU-NIGIN I AMAR LAL-NI-A-AN (GUD ZIG-GA-NE-NE A-RU-A-TA KI-BABA-A-GAR).

7.

Total
total total
total,
i
i

full-grown cow,

8.
9.

bullock 3 (years old), bullock


i

(years old),

10.
1 1
.

calf,

are missing.

12.

(A bullock they have taken away for the

Arua, Kibabaagar).
13.

13. 14.

LID GUB-BA NIN-KAL-LA


SIG GIR-SU-KI
UR-dingir-LAMA PA-TE-SI

The

cattle presented

14.

Ninkalla

15.
1

15. in Girsu.
1

6.

6.

UR-Lama
(being) Pates i.

17.
18.

17.
1 8.

MU-US-SA AN-SA-AN-KI BA-HUL

The year after Anshan was destroyed.

RECORD OF QUANTITIES OF GRAIN COLLECTED AS RENT OR TAXES.


No.
I. i. 2.

18, PI. 9.
I. i. 2.

GUR

SE LUGAL

The
are

talents of grain royal quality


filled

SI-NI-IB

out.

3.

SA-BI-TA

3.

Of
1

it

4.
5.

CLXXX DUB GAL-BI-MU


MU-GUB
UR-IM-NUN CXXVI XXXVIII PARAB KA GUR SE-KUL-TA GUR-RA CLXXX SE-AMAR BA-BAT
SU-NIGIN VII XLVIII PARAB
SA-BI-TA

4.
5.

80,

on the account of Gal-bi-mu,

presented

6.
7.

6.
7.

Urimnun.
126 Talents 38 and
$

ka

8. 9.

8. 9.

are withdrawn for seed grain.

The 180

(talents) of grain are

completed.
ka:

10. 11. 12. 13.


14. 15.

KA GUR

10.

A
of
5
i

total of 7 talents, 48
it

and

n.
12.

V DUB-BA-NI
I

(talents)

are in storage;

XXV KA GUR
DUMU
NA-BA-

13. 14.
15.

talent 25 ka

DUB-BI II A-AN DUB' UR-dingir-NINA

(on) his second account,


(viz:
)

the account of Ur-Nina son of Naba-

16.

SAG MU-GUB
LAL-NI
I

shag
1

6.

is

present.
is

17.
1

XXIII

PARAB KA GUR

17.
1

There

lacking

talent,

23

and

ka.

8.

UR-dingir-BA-U

8.

Ur-Bau:
66 talents, 30 ka.

19. 20. 21. 22.


II.
i.

LXVI

XXX KA GUR
XXX KA GUR
UR-dingir-NINA

19.

LAL-NI SE-KUL
SA-BI-TA

20. 21.
22.

There

is

lacking seed grain

from him.

LXVI

The 66

talents, 30 ka,

DUB

DUMU NA-BA-SAG

II.

i.

on the account of Ur-Nina son


are present
in the city.

of

Nabashag,

2.

MU-GUB
URU-KI
E-dingir-NIN-DAR-A

2.

3.

3.

4.
5.

4.
5.

(At) the temple of

Nindara

6.
7.

XCIX GUR SE-KUR-RA UD-BA-BAT


SA-BI-TA

99 talents,

6.
7.

the grain required

is

completed.

Of

it

8.
9.

XCIX GUR

8. 9.

99 Talents

10. 11.

DUB GAL-BI-MU MU-GUB


GAL-NA-AS-E-LA-KI

on the account of Galbimu


Galnashelaki son of Baa,

10. are present.

DUMU

BA-A

11.

i6

12. 13.
14.

CXXXVI GUR
LAL-NI SE-KUR

12.

136 talents.

13.

Seed-grain

is

lacking.

LXXIV XXVI SUSSAN KA GUR


SE-KUR-TA GUR-RA
SU-NIGIN CCLXX XXVI SUSSAN KA

14. 74 Talents 26 and $ ka


15.
is

15.
16.

withdrawn

for seed-grain.

16.

total of 270 talents 26

and

ka:

GUR
17.
1

SA-BI-TA

17. of it
1

8.

19.

III.

i. 2.

CLXXXV XL KA GUR DUB UR-dingir-NINA DUMU NA-BA-SAG LXXVI MISLU V KA GUR DUB MA-LI DUMU KI-RAM-MU
MU-GUB.
LAL-NI VIII CCLXXXVI SUSSAN

8.

19.

III.

i. 2.

185 talents 40 ka on the account of Ur-Nina son of Nabashag; talents 5 ka 76 and

on the account of Mali son of


are present.

Kirammu

3.

3.

KA

4.

There are wanting 8 talents 286 and J ka.

GUR
5.

6.
7.

UR-DUMU CXXXIV XL KA GUR


LAL-NI SE-KUL XXXI XLII MISLU

5.

Urdumu,
134 talents 40 ka.

6.
7.

Seed-grain

is

lacking.

8.
9.

KA GUR

8. 9.

31 Talents 42
is

and

ka

SE-KUR-TA GUR

withdrawn

for seed-grain.

10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.


1 6.

LX XXX KA SE-AMAR BA-BAT


CXXII KI-LUGAL-URU-DA SU-NIGIN CVIII LI1 MISLA KA
SA-BI-TA
CVIII LII

10. 11.

60 Talents 30 ka of grain are completed.


122,

from Lugaluruda.
1

GUR

12.

A total of
it

08 talents 52 and J ka:

13. of
14. 15.
1

DUB

MISLA KA GUR UR-dingir NINA DUMU NA-BA-SAG

108 talents, 52 and

ka

on the account of Ur-Nina son of Nabashag


presented

MU-GUB
UR-SAG-GA
E-dingir-DUMU-ZI
VIII

6.

17.
1

17.
1

Urshagga.

8.

8.

Temple

of

Tammuz
is

19. 20.

GUR
IV.

19. 20.
i. 2.

8 talents,

SE-KUR-RA UD-BA-AT

the grain required,

completed.

IV.

i.

2.

3.

4.
5.

DUP LXV .... CCXLI DUB NU-RU DUB GAL-BI-MU MU-GUB


KI
UR-dingir-BA-U

From Dub
65

....
Nuru
of

3. 4.
5.

241 (talents)

stored

up

on the account
Presented
(it)

Galbimu.

6.
7.

DUMU

PA-AL-E

6.
7. 8. 9.

Ur-Bau son
of

of Pa-al-e.

CCXLI V SE GAR-GAL-LA
SA-BI-TA

244 (Talents) of grain as a possession:


it

8. 9.

10.

CCXLIV DUB NU-TUG ANA GU GAL-BI-MU BA-A-GAR

244 (talents) on the account of Nutug.

10.

placed at the

call of

Galbimu,

n.
12.

MU-GUB
UR-dingir-LAMA DUMU HU-MU CXCII LXVII KA GUR-TA

11. are present. 12. 13.

Ur-Lama son

of

Humu

13.
14.

from 192 talents 67 ka


has
filled (it).

CCXXVI

XXX KA GUR

SU-KA

14. to 216 talents 30 ka 15.

15. 16. 17. 18. 19.

IM-SI-BA-TA

SU-NIGIN CCCCXIX LXXXVII


SA-BI-TA

KA GUR

16.

total of 419 talents 87 ka:

17. of it
1 8.

V GUR
GAL-BI-MU SU-BA-TI CCXLV XXVII KA GUR

5 talents

19.

Galbimu has

received.

20.

20.

245 Talents 27 ka

21. 22.
23. 24. 25. 26.

UR-dingir-NINA SU-BA-TI

DAMU MA-BA-&AG
KA GUR

21.
22.

Ur-Nina son of Nabashag


has received.

SU-NIGIN CCCIX XXVII

23.
24.

A
is

total of 309 talents 27

ka

MU-GUB
LAL-NI CLXIX MISLA

present.

GUR

25.

169 and $ talents are lacking.

GAR-TA

26. Garta,

27.
28.

LXXVI

VIII

MISLA KA GUR
V.

27. 28.
i

76 talents 8 and $ ka.

LAL-NI SE-KUL

Seed-grain

is

lacking.
. . . .

V.

I.

KA GUR SE-KUR-TA GUR-RA


SU-NIGIN CCLXII MISLA
SA-BI-TA
I

Talents

ka are with-

drawn
2.

for seed grain.


i

KA GUR

2.

A
of

total of 262 talents


it
i

ka:

345-

3.
I

LAL-NI CCLXII MISLA

KA GUR

4.
5.

262 talents

ka are lacking.

6.
7-

UR-dingir-BA-U DUMU KALAM-IL CCLV XXXIV KA GUR

Ur-Bau son

of Kalamil,

6.
7.

8. 9-

LAL-NI SE-KUL LXVII MISLA II MISLA

KA GUR

8. 9.

255 talents 34 ka. Seed grain is lacking. 67 and $ Talents 2 and $ ka


is

SE-KUR-TA GUR-RA
SU-NIGIN XXIII LVI MISLA
VIII

withdrawn

for seed-grain.

10.

KA GUR

10.

total of 23 talents 56

and J ka:

n. SA-BI-TA
12.

11. of it

BA-RU SU-BA-TI

12. 8 (talents) 13. 14.


15.
8,

Baru has received;

1314IS16.

DUB GAL-BI-MU SU-NIGIN XV GUR


VIII

on account of Galbimu.
total of 15 talents

A
is

MU-GUB
LAL-NI VI LVI MISLA

present.

KA GUR

6.

6 Talents 56

and % ka are lacking.

1718. 19.

UR-UD-E-GAR
E-dingir-MAL-LAM-HI

17.
1 8.

Urudegar
of the

temple of Malamhi:
talents.

20.
21.

22. 2324.
2526. 27.

cxcvi MISLA LAL"-NI SE-KUR CXCI XX KA GUR SE-KUR-TA GUR-RA CXXII SE-AMAR BA-BAT
S"U-NIGIN

19.

196 and $

Seed-grain

is

lacking.

20.

191 Talents 20 ka

21. are 22. 23.

withdrawn
(talents)

for seed grain.

122

of grain are completed.

CCX XX KA GUR
GAL-BI-MU SU-BA-TI

A
14

total of 210 talents 20 ka:

SA-BI-TA

24. of it 25.

XIV

XX KA

(talents)
is

20 ka Galbimu has received,

MU-GUB
LAL-NI CXCVI MISLA UR-E-SE
. . .

26. it

present.
talents are lacking.

GUR

27. 196 and


28. 29.

28.
29.

Ureshe,
196 talents
2

VI.

i. 2.

CXCVI II SUSSAN KA GUR SE-KUR-TA


.

and
. .

ka.
(are
.

VI.

i. 2.

For seed-grain.
Talents 27 ka

withdrawn)
. .

3-

CXXI XXX .... V XXVII KA GUR


LAL-NI SE-KUR. SU-NIGIN XXIII LIX SANABI
SA-BI-TA XVIII XXXII SANABI GAL-BI-MU SU-BA-TI

121 (talents) 30 ka.


5

3.

45-

4.

are lacking as seed -grain.

KA GUR

5.

A total of 23 talents
of
1

59 and

ka:

6.
7-

6.

it

KA GUR

7.

8 talents 32

and

<j

ka

8.
9-

8.
9.

Galbimu has
it is

received,

MU-GUB

present.

LAL-NI V XXVII n. GAR-SAM AS


10.

KA GUR

10.
1 1
.

Talents 27 ka are lacking.

Garshamash,
temple of Ama,

12.

E-dingir-AMA

12.

i8

13.
14.

15.
1

CCX KA SE-BA GESTIM-MA CIV CCLXXX KA SU-KA SU-NIGIN CVII CCXL MISLA GUR
SA-BI-TA

13.
14.

210 ka of grain-wine,
104 (talents) 280 ka of flour.

15.
1

A
of

total of 107 talents


it

and 240$

(ka):

6.

6.

17. 18.

LXXXIV XXX KA GUR II SUSSAN(?) GUR(?) LUGAL SU-NIGIN


BU-BA

17.
1

84 talents 30 ka
2

8.

and

J talents of royal quality, the total of

Buba,
IQ. 20.

19.

MU-GUB

are present.
23 Talents 180

20.
21.

22. 23.
24.

CLXXX MISLA GUR GIR UR-SAG-GA-MU DUMU MA-LI GAR-SAM-AS DUMU KI -LUGAL
LAL-NI XXIII

and

(ka) are lacking.

21. 22. 23.

Urshaggamu son of Mali, Garshamash son of Kilugal (and)


Gir:

25.

26.

GAR-RA-AG-BI GIR GAL-HAL-NI SA KI-NU-NIR-KI NINA-KI MU SI-MU-UR-RU-UM-KI LU-LU-BU-KI A-DU [Xj-LAL-I KAM BA-HUL

the Garraagbi Gir (food-maker's overseer?),


Galhalni.

24.
25. 26.

In Kinunir of Nina.

The year Simurru and Lulubu were destroyed


for the Qth time.

REGISTER OF TABLETS.
Tablet No. in Haverford College Collection.
3-

Plate.

Description of Tablet.

Date.
in.
in.

38, 39.

Account
long,

tablet,
5

one side broken away, 6 and $ and $ in. wide at widest, i and }
It records a

The

year

Bur-Sin

de-

stroyed Urbillum.

thick at centre.*

"round up"
in.

of

sheep and goats.


4.

Tablet,
in.

and

f in. long,

and $

wide and

thick.

Receipt for grain.

The year after Urbillum was destroyed, reign


of Dungi.

11.

21.

Tablet, similar to No. 12, probably case tablet.


2 in.

long,

and f

in.

wide,

i in.

thick.

Record

Date the year Kimash was destroyed, reign


of Dungi.

of storing grain.
12.

44.

Case tablet; when shaken, the rattle of the inner


tablet can be heard.

1}

in.

long, if in. wide,

The year the ship "Antelope of the Deep" was


consecrated,
Gimil-Sin.
reign
of

in.

thick.

Receipt for grain.

21.

Case tablet, one corner of case broken away,

and f
List
16.
7.

in.

long,

of

kinds

of
12.

and f wood.

in.

wide, J

in.

thick.

The year after Kimash was destroyed reign


,

of Dungi.

Similar to No.

Probably a case tablet, of


2

mixed
and f

clay, reddish and white.


in.

in.

long,

The year Sumurru and Lulubu were destroyed


time,
for

wide,

in. thick.

Record of the exsesame (?).

the

9th

3.

change Account tablet, 4 and J i in. thick. Record

of seed

wheat

for

reign of Dungi.

in. long, 3

and $

in.

wide,

of a

"round up."
and $
in.

The year after Anshan was destroyed, reign


of Dungi.

18.

9.

Account
i

tablet, 5

and \

in.

long, 3

wide,

in.

thick at centre.

List of weights of grain.

The year Sumurru and Lulubu were destroyed


for

the

gth

time,

reign of Dungi.
20.

40.

Account
|
in.

tablet, 4

and
and

\ in.

long,

and $ and

in.

wide,

The

year

Bur-Sin

de-

thick.

List of quantities of grain.


\ in. long, 4
J in. wide,

stroyed Urbillum.

24.

16.

Account
i

tablet, 5
in.

The year Kimash was


destroyed,
reign
of

and |

thick at centre.

List of quantities of

26.

22.

wood, Account
i

reeds,

and

grain.
in.

Dungi.
long, 4

tablet, 5

and ^

and $

in.

wide,

in. thick.

List of quantities of land assigned

The year after Kimash was destroyed, reign


of Dungi.

to different men.
29. 23,
24.

Account

tablet, 5 in. long, 5

and

wide,

in. thick.

Two

years after

Kimash
reign

List of quantities of wool for clothing assigned to different temple officers.


30.
29.

was destroyed,
of Dungi.

Account
i

tablet, 4

and f

in.

long, 3

and f

in.

wide,

Two

years after

Kimash
reign

in. thick.

List of quantities of grain.

was destroyed,
of Dungi.

The measurements

for thickness all represent the thickest part of the tablet.


(19).

20
Tablet No.
35-

in

Haver-

ford College Collection.

Plate.

Description of Tablet.

Date

45

Account
i

tablet, 5

and

in.

long, 3

and f

in.

wide,

in. thick.

List of food, drink

and

oil for dif-

The year the throne of Sin was erected and


the year (the king) was
invested high priest of

ferent

months

the great abode of Ishtar


36.
14.

reign of Bur-Sin.

Tablet,
thick.

and f

in.

long,

and f

in.

wide,

in.

The year Kimash was


destroyed,

Receipt for grain.

reign

of

Dungi.
37-

Circular tablet,

and f

in. in

diameter,

i in.

thick

at centre,
goats.

in.

at edge.

List of sheep

and

The year the ship TEMEN-MUH was consecrated,

reign

un-

known.
38.
ii.

Fine case tablet,


i

and f

in.

long,

and f

in.

wide,
of a

The year Urbillum was


destroyed,

in. thick.
it.

Seal has

made a palimpsest
in. long, i

reign

of

part of
40.
ii.

Receipt for grain.


i

Dungi.

Probably case tablet,


wide, f
in. thick.

and f

and \

in.

The year Urbillum was


destroyed,

Receipt for grain.


Inscribed on one side only.

reign

of

Dungi.
41.

Probably case tablet.


3

and

J in. long, 2

and J

in.

wide,

and J

in.

The year after Kimash was destroyed, reign


of Dungi.

thick.
42.

Receipt for grain.


i

Similar to No. 12, probably a case tablet,


in

and

long, 2

and ^

in.

wide, f

in. thick.

Receipt

The year after the wall was built, reign of


Gimil-Sin.

for grain.
43-

Similar to No. 12; probably a case tablet,

and

The year Kimash was


destroyed,

in.

long,

and f

in.

wide,

i in.

thick.

Record

reign

of

of preserving seed-grain.
44.

Dungi.
2

Similar to No. 12; probably a case tablet.

and

in. long, 2 in.

wide,
of

and

in. thick.

Record
different

The year after Urbillum was destroyed, reigu


of Dungi.

of

quantities

grain

received

at

store-houses.
45-

Unbroken case
heard,
thick.

tablet, similar to No. 12.

When
in.

shaken, the rattle of the inner tablet can be


i

The year after Kimash was destroyed, reign


of Dungi.

and J

in.

long,

and f

in.

wide, f

Record of sheep and goats offered


probably a case tablet,
in.
i

in

sacrifice.

47-

Similar to No. 45

and

The year

after Urbillum

in.

long,

and f

wide, and f

in.

thick.

was destroyed,
of Dungi.

reign

12.

Record of storing grain. Account tablet, 4 and f in. long,


thick.

2 in.

wide,

in.

List of weights of grain.

The year after Urbillum was destroyed, reign


of

Dungi.
of

54-

24.

Merely

fragments

of

tablet.

Measurements,

The year Kimash was


destroyed,

impossible.

List of quantities of provisions for

reign

temple

officials.

Dungi.
long,
for
i

59-

39-

Tablet

and f

in.

and ^

in.

wide, f

in.

The

year

Bur-Sin
Urbillum.

de-

thick.

Receipt

grain.

stroyed

21

Tablet No. in Haverford College Collection.

Plate.

Description of Tablet.

Date.

60.

41.

Account
J
in.

tablet, 3

and f

in.

long, 2

and

J in. wide,

thick.

Account of quantities of

grain.

The year after Urbillum was destroyed, reign


of Dungi.

61.

i.

Account
long, 2

tablet, rapidly crumbling,

and J

in.

wide, f

in. thick.

and f in. Account of

The year Nannar

KAR-

ZI-DA
of

into the house

quantities of grain and food.

Anu was

brought.
of

Probably
Dungi.
63-

reign

42.

64.

39.

and $ in. long, 2 and } in. wide, in. thick. Account of quantities of wool. J Similar to Nos. 12 and 45; probably case tablet.
Account
tablet, 4
i

The

year

Bur-Sin

de-

stroyed Urbillum.

Accession year of BurSin.

and 4

in. long, i

and

in.

wide, f

in. thick.

Receipt for grain.


6523.

Similar to Nos. 12 and 45; probably a case tablet.


i

The year
Dungi.

Kimash was
reign
of

and f

in. long,

and

in.

wide, f

in. thick.

destroyed,

66.

25.

Record of grain stored up. Sun-dried account tablet, 4 and


|
in.

in.

long, 2

and

Two

years after

Kimash
reign

wide,

in.

thick.

List of rations(?) for

was destroyed,
of Dungi.

different individuals.
68.

43.

Account

tablet, 5

and

in. long, 2

and

f in. wide,

The

year

Bur-Sin

de-

I in. thick.

uals of wool for clothing


7426.

Assignment to different individand of food.

stroyed Urbillum.

Account
thick.

tablet, 4 in. long, 2

and f

in.

wide,

in.

Two

years after

Kimash
reign

List of weights, probably of foodstuffs,

was destroyed,
of Dungi.

assigned to different individuals.


75-

36.

Case tablet, case broken, few fragments of it remain, i and | in. long, i and J in. wide, $ in.
thick.

Accession year of BurSin.

Receipt for wool.


off.

76.

17.

Case tablet, case broken


long,
i

Case

and

in.

wide, f

in. thick.

and J in. Record of

The year
Dungi.

Kimash was
reign
of

destroyed,

storing grain.
80.

34, 35.

Account
i

tablet, 7
in.

and

and f in. long, 7 and f in. wide, Record of a great "round thick. and
asses.

The year the divine Dungi,

the

mighty hero,

up"

of cattle

king of Ur, king of the four quarters, devas-

81.

32, 33.

Account
in.

tablet,

one edge broken away.


7

and f
Ac-

and destroyed Kimash and Humurti. The year after the ship
tated

long at one edge,

and

J at the other, 5 in.


in. thick.

SU-SA-SAHAR
gon was
of
built,

of

Da-

wide at widest part, i and 9-16 count of quantities of grain.


84-

reign

48.

Account
J

tablet, 4

and

in.

long, 2 in. wide,

and

Dungi (?). The year Huhunuri was


destroyed,

in. thick.

List of weights of wool for clothing.

reign

of

Bur-Sin.
90. 44.

Account
|
in.

and f in. long, tablet, Measurements of thick.


2

and

} in.

wide,

No

date, but as Bur-Sin

fields

assigned to

occurs as a divine ele-

different

men.

ment
it

in

was

a proper name, written after

his

accession.

22
Tablet No. in Haverford College Collection.
91. 31.

pl

Description of Tablet.

Date.
all
i

Account tablet

in 8 cols.
in.

Nearly

of

cols,

Several dates in the reign


of

broken away. 6 thick. Account

long, 4 in. wide,

and

J in.

of

quantities

of

grain fur-

Dungi are mentioned. The latest


is

nished while the palace of Dungi was being built.

date

the

year the

throne of
erected,

Bel(?)

was
of

which brings
the
reign

us

into

Bur-Sin.
too.

Sun-dried tablet,
wide, |
in.

and

in.

long,

and

in.

Two

years after

Kimash
reign

thick.

One edge broken and one end

was

destroyed,

broken away.
21.

List of weights of grain from

of Dungi.

different farmers.
102.

Sun-dried tablet, bottom broken away.


J in. long,
i

and
Acdif-

Two

years after

Kimash
reign

and

f in. wide, J in. thick.

was destroyed,
of Dungi.

count of quantities of grain produced by


ferent farmers.
18.

"3-

Sun-dried tablet,
| in. thick.
food-store.

and f in. long, i and \ in. wide, Record of the establishment of a


i

The year Kimash was


destroyed,

reign

of

Dungi.
in.

141

18.

Tablet,
thick.

and.

long,

and \

in.

wide, f

in.

Record of the storing

of grain.

The year Simurru and Lulubu were destroyed


for the gth time,

reign

of Dungi.
14318.

Tablet,
thick.

and

in.

long,

and \

in.

wide, f

in.

Record of storing up

grain.

The year Simurru and Lulubu were destroyed


for the gth time, of Dungi.

reign

144

SO-

Tablet,
thick.

and J in. long, i and in. wide, f in. Record of the appointment of two sec-

The year Gimil-Sin, king


of Ur, built the

temple
Gi-

retaries.

of

the great god

shuh.
149.

Tablet,

and ^

in.

long,

and 3-16

in.

wide, %

The year Dur-Mada was


built,

in. thick.

Receipt for grain.


fine

reign of Dungi.

IS

Tablet of coarse clay, containing

gravel;

and ^

in.

long,

and ^

in.

wide, f

in. thick.

Re-

The year Simurru and Lulubu were destroyed


for the 9th time of Dungi.
,

ceipt for grain.

reign

158-

10.

Sun-dried tablet,
f
in. thick.

and f in. long, i and i in. wide, Record of quantities of grain from
i

The year after Simurru and Lulubu were destroyed


time,
for

different individuals.

the

9th

reign of Dungi.

171.

IO.

Tablet,
thick.

and \

in.

long,

and

i in. wide, | in.

Receipt for grain.

The year Simurru and Lulubu were destroyed


for the 9th time,

reign

of Dungi.
172.
II.

Tablet,
thick.

and $

in.

long,

and

in.

wide,

in.

Receipt for grain.

The year Simurru and Lulubu were destroyed


for the 9th time,

reign

of Dungi.

Tablet No. in Haverford College Collection.

Plate.
6.

Description of Tablet.

Date.
i

Tablet of reddish clay,


in.

and

f in. long,

and

The year Shashru was


destroyed,

wide, f

in.

thick.

Receipt for grain.

reign

of

Dungi.
181.
12.

Tablet,
thick.

and J

in.

long,

and

f in. wide,

in.

The year Urbillum was


destroyed,

Receipt for grain.

reign

of

Dungi.
183.
18.

Tablet,
thick.

and } and \

in.

long,

and
and

4 in. wide,

n.

The year of Kimash


reign
of

(sic

!)

Receipt for earthern


i

jars.

Dungi.

184.

13-

Tablet,
thick.

in.

long,

J in. wide,

n.

The year Urbillum was


destroyed,

Receipt for grain.

reign

of

Dungi.
185.
27.

Tablet,
thick.

and

f in. long,

and

\ in. wide, $ in.

Two

years after

Kimash
,

Record of grain gained at a store-house.

was destroyed
of Dungi.

reign

186.

27.

Tablet,
thick.

and

in.

long,

and

{ in. wide, f in.

Two

years after

Kimash
,

Record of grain received and stored.

was destroyed
of Dungi.

reign

187.

27

Tablet,
in.

and

J in. long,

and 3-16

in.

wide, 9-16

Two

years after

Kimash
,

thick.

Record of the barter of

flour for wool.

was destroyed
of Dungi.

reign

188.

49.

Tablet,
thick.

and

I in. long,

and $

in.

wide, f

in.

The year Huhunuri was


destroyed,
Bur-Sin.

List of the tonnage of different ships.

reign

of

30.

Sun-dried tablet,
|
in.

and \
in.

in.

long,

and f

in.

wide,

The year Harshi and


Reign
of

thick.
i

Record of measurements
long,
i

of land.

Dungi (?).
Bur-Sin
de-

196.

13-

Tablet,
thick.

and 9-16 and \

and

\ in. wide, J in.

The

year

Receipt for grain.


i

stroyed Urbillum.

200.

13-

Tablet,
thick.

in.

long,

and ^

in.

wide, f

in.

Receipt

for grain.

The year Simurru and Lulubu were destroyed


for the 9th time,

reign

of Dungi.
202.
12.

Tablet,
thick.

and

J in. long,

and

\ in. wide, \ in!

Receipt for grain.

The year Simurru and Lulubu were destroyed


for the 9th time,

reign

of Dungi. 204.
19.

Sun-dried tablet,
i

much

broken,

and \

in.

long,

(The year) Kimash (was


destroyed),

and

\ in. wide, \ in. thick.

reign of
Bur-

Dungi.
206.
44.

216.

14.

and $ in. long, i and f in. wide, 11-16 in. Record of a crop of grain. thick. in. long, i and \ in. wide, Sun-dried tablet, i and
Tablet,
i

Accession year of
Sin.

The year Urbillum was


destroyed,

in.

thick.

Record

of quantities of grain.

reign

of

Dungi.
217.
43.

Tablet,
thick.

and f

in.

long,

and f

in.

wide,

f in.
oil

The

year

Bur-Sin

de-

List of quantities of food, drink

and

stroyed Urbillum.

assigned to different "messengers."


220.
36.

Tablet,
thick.

and 13-16 in. long, i and $ Record of the formation

in.

wide, f

in.

The

year

Bur-Sin

de-

of a

park

in

stroyed Urbillum.

Girsu by a son of the Patesi.

Tablet No. in Haverford College Collection.

Plate.
4.

Description of Tablets.

Date.
in.

223.

Reddish tablet,
\
in.

and J

in. long, i

and f

wide,
in

thick.

List of sheep

and kids received

The year after Anshan was destroyed, reign


of Dungi.

the 5th and 6th months.


229.
49.

Tablet,
thick.

and f in. long, i and \ in. wide, 9-16 in. Record of oxen prepared for the temple
separate days.

The year Huhunuri was


destroyed,
Bur-Sin.

reign

of

of
23
1
-

Bau on two

49.

Tablet, an almost

illegible palimpsest because the scribal seal was rolled over it in every part above

The year Huhunuri was


destroyed,-

reign

of

the original writing,


in.

and ^

in. long, i

and \
in.

Bur-Sin.

wide, \
i

in. thick.
in.

Receipt for money.


i

232.

44.

Tablet,
thick.

and

long,

and f

in.

wide, f

The year the king was

Records of weights of produce (?).

made high

priest

of

234-

47.

Palimpsest, similar to No. 231;

and \
grain.
23549.

in.

wide, \

in. thick.

and f in. long, i Record of grinding


i

Anu, The year Huhunuri was


destroyed,
Bur-Sin.

reign of Bur-Sin.

reign

of

Palimpsest, like preceding,

and

in.

long,

Accession year of GimilSin.

and f
23747.

in.
i

wide,

in. thick.
i

Receipt(?) for sheep.


in.

Tablet,
thick.

and

f in.

List of "
first

and f long, food, drink and

wide,

in.

The

year

Bur-Sin

de-

oil for

various

stroyed Urbillum.

"messengers.
244.
28.

fragment;

half of tablet broken away.


in.

Contains reference to the

and \

in.

long, 3

wide,

in. thick.

Record

year after Kimash was


destroyed and the year
after

of quantities of grain.

that,

reign

of

Dungi.
246.
30.

Account
thick.

tablet, 4

and \

in.

long,

in.

wide, J

in.

The

year

Harshi

and
deof

List

(probably of quantities of grain)

Humurti
stroyed,
Dungi.

were
reign

assigned to different individuals.

248.

28.

Account
2

tablet,
| in.

and

bottom broken away. 4 in. long, Record of quanwide, \ in. thick.

The year

after

Kimash,

reign of Dungi.

tities of

grain assigned to different individuals

for food.

253-

46.

Account
\

tablet, 4

and

$ in. long, 2

and f

in.

wide,

The

year

Bur-Sin

de-

in. thick.

List of

measurements

of fields,

stroyed Urbillum.

weights
2576.

(of grain)

and temple attendants.


but case

Account
is,

tablet, originally a case tablet,


3

The year Shashru


destroyed
,

was
of

except a fragment, destroyed.


2

and J

in.

re

gn

long, and \ of wool for


271.
14.

in.

wide, f

in. thick.

List of weights

Dungi.

clothing.
2 in. long,
i

Sun-dried tablet,
in.

and f

in.

wide, f

thick.

Record of storing grain.

The year Simurru and Lulubu were destroyed


for the 9th time,

reign

of Dungi.
272.
49.

Tablet,

and \

in.

long,

in.

wide, f

in.

thick.

The year Huhunuri was


destroyed
Bur-Sin.
reign
of

List of quantities of wool for different kinds


of garments.

25

Tablet No. in Haverford College Collection.

Plate.

Description of Tablet.

Date.
in.

276.

36.

Tablet,
thick.

and f
and f

in.

long,

and J
in.

wide, }

in.

Accession year of BurSin.

List of quantities of wool for clothing.


i

281.

50.

Tablet,
thick.

in.

long,

and

wide, 11-16
oil,

in.

The year the king was


declared

List of weights of dates,

etc.

by

de-

cision to be high priest

of

Nannar,

reign

of

Dungi.
283.
50.

Tablet,
thick.

and

i in. long,

and

i in. wide, f in.

The year he was made by


Bur-Sin, the beloved,
to be his high priest.

List of goats

and lambs. and

285.

50.

Tablet,
thick.

and f

in.

long,

in.

wide, \

in.

The year the king was

Receipt for sheep.

made
of

great high priest


,

Eridu

re

g n of

Bur-Sin.
288.
30.

Tablet,

and f in. long, i and i in. wide, f in. thick. Record of food, drink, and oil provided by two men.
i i

The year Harshi and Humurti were destroyed,


reign of Dungi. Accession year of BurSin.

297.

36.

Tablet,
thick.

and f in. long, i and i in. wide, J Record of food and drink provided

in.

for

the 24th and 26th of the

month EZIN-DUNGI
and ^
in.

and the 6th of the month EZIN-BAU.


300.

Tablet of blackish clay,


\
in.

long,

and and

The year the king was

in-

wide,

in. thick.

Receipt for sheep

vested high priest of

kids.

Anu and Nannar


second time,
Dungi.

the

reign of

301.

Palimpsest, similar to No. 231;


i

and $

in.

long,

and f

in.

wide, %

in. thick.

Receipt for grain.

The year Shashru was r e i g n of destroyed


,

Dungi.

35-

19.

Palimpsest, similar to No. 231.


i

and f

in.

long,

and \

in.

wide, f

in.

thick.

Receipt for grain.

The year Kimash was r e i g n of destroyed


,

Dungi.
30910.

Tablet of a coarse clay, containing gravel,


|
in.

and

long,

and f

in.

wide, f

in. thick.

Record

The year Simurru and Lulubu were destroyed


for the 9th time, of Dungi.

of a gift of grain.

reign

3"-

19.

Palimpsest, similar to No. 231.


i

and f
thick.

in. long,

and 11-16 and }

in.

wide,

in.

Receipt

The year after Kimash was destroyed, reign


of Dungi.

for grain.

314-

Tablet,

in.

long,

and

in.

wide, f

in.

thick.

Receipt for grain.

The year Shashru was r e g n of destroyed


,

Dungi.
Sun-dried tablet,
i in. thick.
i

and

in.

long,

and }

in.

wide,

The year the king was


established
lord

Receipt for six ship-loads of grain


3 at
in.

of

at Girsu,

and

Nippur.
i

Eridu
in.

reign of Dungi.

324-

19.

Tablet,
thick.

and |

long,

and $

wide, J

in.

Receipt for money.

The year Kimash was destroyed reign of


,

Dungi.

26
Tablet No. in Haverford College Collection.

Plate.

Description of Tablet.

Date.
still

44-

Originally a case tablet a bit of the case


;

clings
in.

The

year

Bur-Sin

de-

to

it;

and $

in.

long,

and J and J

in.

wide, ^

stroyed Urbillum.

thick.
47-

Receipt for grain.

Tablet,
thick.

and $

in.

long,

in.

wide,

in.

Receipt for dates.

The year the throne of Enlil was erect nl,


reign of Bur-Sin.

332.

27.

Palimpsest, similar to No. 231.


i

and

in. long,

The year
Dungi.

Kimash was

and

in.

wide, 9-16

in.

thick.

destroyed,

reign of

334-

36.

Tablet,

and

f in. long,

and \

in.

wide, f

in. thick.

Second year of Bur-Sin.

Record of the payment of the principal of a loan of money without the interest.
337-

Tablet,
thick.

and 7-16

in.

long,

and \

in.

wide, f

in.

The year the

Patesi erec-

Receipt for grain.

ted the throne of the

land and Shashru was


destroyed,
re
i

g n of

Dungi.
340.
36.

Tablet,
thick.

and f in. long, i and in. wide, f in. Record of six slaves of one man who
in the field of another.
in. thick.

Accession year of
Sin.

Bur-

worked two months


342.
48.
2 in.
i

and f in. wide, Tablet, long, Receipt for amounts of money.


Tablet,
i

Year the throne

of Enlil

was

erected,

reign of

Bur-Sin.
345-

and f

in.

long,

and \
oil

in.

wide, f

in. thick.

The year Harshi and Humurti were destroyed,


reign of Dungi.

Record of food, drink and ferent men.


34914-

furnished four dif-

Tablet,
thick.

and f in. long, i and \ Record of the erection and f in.

in.

wide, f

in.

The year Urbillum was


destroyed,

of a wall.

reign of

Dungi.
355-

Tablet crumbling,
in.

long,

and

in.

wide,

The year Gimil-Sin, the


king

thick.
is
i

Receipt, the word denoting for

....

what
361.
48.

broken away.
in.

Tablet,
thick.

and

long,

and J

in.

wide,

in.

The year the king was


established high priest
of

Receipt for quantities of food, drink,

and

oil.

Anu and

Ishtar,

reign of Bur-Sin.
3 6 4-

Tablet,

and f in. long, 2 in. wide, i in. Record of amounts of grain stored up.
2

thick.

The year Urbillum was r e i g n of destroyed,


Dungi.

37-

20.

Account
thick.

tablet, 3

and f

in.

long,

in.

wide, f

in.

Two

years after

Kimash
reign

List of cattle under charge of different

was

destroyed,

herdsmen.
376.
47-

of Dungi.

Account

tablet, 3

and f

in.

long,

and f

in.

wide,

The

year

Bur-Sin

de-

I in. thick.

List of quantities of food for various

stroyed Urbillum.

individuals.

379<r

Account
3

tablet, sun-dried,
in.

bottom broken away;


J in.

and f

long, 2

and

wide

f in. thick.

The year Nannar KARZI-DA was established


,

List of food-supplies for various temple officials

reign of

Dungi (?).

and

slaves.

27

Tablet No. in Haverrord College Collection.

P1

Description of Tablet.

Date.

380.

20.

Account
i

tablet, obverse defaced; 3


J in.

and

} in. long,

The

year

Kimash was
re
i

and

wide,

in. thick.

List of rations of

destroyed,

g n of

grain assigned to different individuals for six

Dungi.

months.
39337-

Account
f
in

tablet, 3

and

J in. long, 2

and \

in.

wide,

Accession year of
Sin.

Bur-

in. thick.

Record of quantities of grain raised different fields, and slaves who worked in

them.
396.
8.

Account
i

tablet, 4

in.

thick,

and f in. long, 3 and f in. wide, somewhat broken at lower end.

The year Shashru was


destroyed
,

re

gn

Quantities of wool for clothing assigned to different temple attendants. 400.


10.

Dungi.

Tablet
thick.

and

-J-

in. long,

and \

in.

wide,

-J

in.

Record of storing three talents

of wheat.

The year Simurru and Lurubu were destroyed


for the Qth time,

reign

of Dungi.

HLA.

7.

u->-

W#m 1

MM

TT

te**f

~^\

if

IT

fit

///////////

n
//

P.

fi

'

Jot.

'W^tarSfer fAA Jr
fcnsBp/^r t-B*^

m
t
^r

&u.

*^5pj

>*>%g^w^
Errv^m

/3rwwwr

HL
ifrEflu^BffCTtpy

^^^if
TV.

<r

<r

<r

<r

H-U4

3/1

nr

s^.

X=^E3gy

Vgsjrm&F&g ^HH-*3?-^-=-

H-L 4*

c s-

^ICSSJ

jr^minm/m^m
fr/MBf

t^fe^fr^Pff

!?<<,.

<r

rm"-^HWmu
Wft

5M

^iSSjlBfr

TM

ay ^F- ir

mmmm

w*<g<^y

fefc>>flrint3rea

r^^ttMV*

55

*'*

81

Wstnm&r.w

330.

tr

'HOT

teHtgj^Ka***

HL -&.

3.

^mts^y^'

.ffH^tH

5^1

m
TT

fflB8>-

n?

m
2.

^TTEH

TF-ba-TETi

Tf

<

HL4

to.

C3.

IP

or

Oc

o
<*
(tr

ffil

B
4

III

1
p

b-

376.

l
, in

fc

University of Toronto

Library
IO

CD

0)

DO NOT REMOVE THE CARD FROM


THIS

POCKET
Acme
Library Card Pocket
Pat. "Ref. Index File"

Under

Made by LIBRARY BUREAU

Вам также может понравиться