Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CUNEIFORM TABLETS
CUNEIFORM TABLETS
OR
EDITED BY
GEORGE
A.
BARTON
MAWR COLLEGE
PROFESSOR IN BRYN
PART
UNIVERSITY PRESS
:
LONDON
HUMPHREY MILFORD
OXFORD UNIVERSITY
PRESS
MDCCCCXVIII
This edition of the Haverford Library Collection has been issued in order that these might still be accessible to scholars. The author regrets that, owing to the expense
it
involved,
has not been possible to rewrite Part unchanged as has been done. Those who use the
this part
book
rather than to let the plates remain are requested to bear in mind that
appeared in 1905, and that, if he were at liberty to rewrite the volume to-day, it would be done quite differently. The texts will, it is hoped, be of use to scholars in their
Attention is called to the fact that the text on plate 16 of Part present form. corrected form on plate 154 of Part III. The first edition of this work was published by the John C. Winston
Philadelphia.
I
appears in
Company of
GEORGE
A.
BARTON.
ERRATA.
l'a?, e 10,
r
No. 220,
Xo. 144,
Xo. 193,
IV,
rev.,
3.
1'a.ne
10,
rev.,
3,
1'age
i,
rev.
1.
7,
Page
iC, Col.
1.
9,
place
comma
of the line.
INTRODUCTION.
The one hundred and seventeen new
hundred
tablets,
first
of the
Haverford
New York autumn of 1901 and presented to Haverford was purchased During the winter of College by T. Wistar Brown, President of the Corporation of that college. 1901-1902 a catalogue of the collection was prepared, but my departure for Palestine in June,
in the
autumn of 1903. Since then they have received such time as could be spared from other studies and the duties of instruction. As these conditions of work will make it impossible to complete the editorial labor upon the whole
1902,
made
further
has seemed best to issue the text in parts, so that the material may be accessible to scholars with as little delay as possible. With the last part a sign list and vocabcollection for
some
years,
it
in
New
York, there
is
title
Since some peculiar claims have of this work indicates, that they came originally from Telloh. been made of late as to power to divine the original provenance of tablets purchased in the markets of the world, a few words
be in place concerning the reasons which lead me to believe that the Haverford Library Collection was once a part of the temple archives of Telloh. The present writer lays no claim to powers of divination beyond the ken of his fellow- workers. The
may
In 1894 the
workmen
of
impossible for M. de Sarzec and his assistants to properly care for them. accordingly stolen by the Arabs. In the campaigns of 1895, 1898, and 1900 somewhat similar
finds
were made. 2
2.
Since 1894
many
Hammurabi,
and palaeography,
world.
has acquired many, which have been published in Cuneiform Texts From Babylonian Tablets in the British Museum, Parts I, III, V, VII, IX, and X. The Royal Museum at Berlin acquired some three hundred and ten, which were published in 1901 as
British
The
Museum
Heft
the
XVI
title
of the
Tempelurkunden aus Telloh. appearance to those which came to the Louvre from Telloh, a part of which M. Thureau-Dangin published in his Tablettes chaldeennes infdites, 1897, and Recueil de tablettes chaldeennes, 1903. M.
Sammlungen by Reisner under These publications contain texts similar in nature and
Orientalischen
Thureau-Dangin assures
me
'They were purchased of Mr. Gullabi Gulbenkian. A brief notice of the collection was published in the American Journal of Archeology, Vol. VI (1902), p. 36 ff. J Cf. Revue d'Assyriologie, Vol. Ill, No. iv, pp. 118 ff., Vol. IV, No. i, pp. 13 ff., ibid. No. iii, pp. 69 ff., Vol. V, No. iii, pp. 67 ff., Comptes rendus de V Academic des Inscriptions, 1896, pp. 355 ff., Rogers, History of Babylonia and Assyria, 1900, Vol. I, p.
238,
lets of
lin.
Museums
of
The General Theological Seminary of New York City acquired in 1896, through the generosity of Dean Hoffman a collection of cuneiform tablets, a part of which consists of tablets Some of these were published by Radau similar in form and contents to those under discussion. The American Vice-Consul at Jerusalem, Mr. as an appendix to his Early Babylonian History.
,
Herbert Clark, has also a small collection of tablets of a similar character which he kindly permitted me to examine. They are evidently from the same source. A gentleman in Philadelphia
has also recently acquired a small collection of the same nature and style. The Haverford tablets, as may be seen from a comparison of those published below with those contained in the works mentioned, are of the same period and the same varieties. The only reasonable conclusion
is
why
so
many
An
and Tigabba, all parts or suburbs of the mentioned more often than other towns.
texts bear the
are
gods of this
The theophorous proper names contained in these Ningirsu, Bau, Nina, Nana, Ninmar, Ningishzida, and Ninshah, all
of other deities.
work
is justified.
In spite of
all
claims to the contrary, there is no infallible Assyriological wizard capable of discerning the provenance of tablets in the absence of objective evidence which will appeal to other specialists. It
not pretended that such a wizard resides chez nous. If, therefore, the above reasons do not convince the reader, he is at liberty to believe that the source of these tablets is unknown.
:
Haverford College who are not Assyriologists a few words about Telloh may not be out of place. Telloh is a mound more than four miles long in southern Babylonia, about sixty miles north of Mugheir, the Biblical Ur of the Chaldees. Excavations
of the friends of
were begun here by M. de Sarzec, the French consul at Bassorah, in March, 1877. De Sarzec dug for three months in 1877, more than three months in 1878, about four months in 1880, two
and many times afterward until his recent death. He has dug systematically, unearthing palaces and temples of the highest antiquity, and bringing to light a most remarkable city. Many inscribed objects have been recovered, the most remarkable of which
months and a
half in 1881
is
B.
and eleven
diorite statues of
Thousands
of tablets
From
was
we
mound
of Telloh
called Shirpurla,
and that
it
and Uruazagga. Kinunir and Tigabba were also either parts of it or suburbs of it. Each settlement was originally independent. The oldest king of this region of whom we know, Urkagina,
about 4300 B. C., calls himself simply King of Girsu. Soon, however, one ruler governed all under the name Shirpurla. Early Babylonian history is a record of struggle for hegemony between
In this struggle Shirpurla at times had preeminence. Then her rulers called themselves kings. Often, however, Shirpurla was the vassal of another state; then her rulers
different cities.
Some
independent.
about 2400 B.
At the time from which our tablets come, the period of the third dynasty of Ur, C., the kings of Ur had usurped all power and the Patesi were mere shadows.
from the reigns of Dungi, Bur-Sin II, and Gimil-Sin of the third dynasty of Ur. The texts published in this part are with one exception dated. It was thought best to publish the dated tablets first. An attempt has been made to group the
tablets here published are
The
same date
a different order necessary. Other considerations sometimes led me to depart from this order, but broadly speaking the texts below are grouped according to date. The language in which these tablets are written is Sumerian, the tongue of the pre-Semitic
space frequently
inhabitants of Babylonia.
It
made
but that they learned their writing from the Sumerians, and while they probably spoke Semitic the force of custom was such that down to the conquest by the city of Babylon they continued
to
for writing.
4
From
idiom made
10, pi. 9
apparent.
No.
18,
IV,
due to Semitic
"
Also in No. 324, 1. 2., pi. 19 we have: AZAG ka-lum, the money in full, kalum being the Semitic kalu, Hebrew, 73 A comparison of No. 61, IV, 10 (pi. i) with OBI. No. 125, 5,
idiom.
affords us a
new Sumerian
ideograph,
BA-AN-LIL
"
to bring
in."
The whole class of tablets, to which the Haverford Library Collection belongs, are This holds good of the texts here published. It is business and administrative character.
tomary
in
of a cus-
some quarters
which
would by no means undervalue the religbut would nevertheless maintain that the value of economic texts is quite as great.
the temple records and business documents from Babylonia have been published in sufficiently large numbers and have been adequately studied, it will be possible to form a picture of the economic environment of an ancient people such as can be
When
known
to us,
and
prove to be of no
Not the
was no
fixed era,
and
records were dated from important events. below will afford a good example of the
A glance
way
in
which these business documents portray the of which we often political conditions of the times, giving us a record of wars, raids and conquests have no other information than that which such tablets afford.
This
is
pi. 36,
one
pi. 18,
man worked two months in the field of another. Another where one man receives four earthen-ware jars from another.
where we have the payment to the temple of the
principal of a loan, the interest remaining unpaid. Sometimes the business transacted was, perhaps, of a political nature.
We
are in doubt
whether the
lists of
amounts
were records of
taxes paid in kind, or the payment of rents from fields of the temple estates, which had been The latter alternative is probably nearer the truth, since care was leased to various individuals.
taken to withdraw the seed grain, which had probably been advanced by the temple or the tenant
1
Cf. Cf.
n.
1.
ments
of tracts of land to
The Haverford Library Collection contains records of the assigndifferent individuals. One of these, No. 193, pi. 30, is translated below.
Various phases of the management of the arable fields of the temple and the collection of income from them are recorded in No. 61, pi. i No. 24, pi. 16; No. 102, pi. 21 No. 26, pi. 22 No. 91, pi.
;
pi.
32,
pi.
37; No.
No. 60,
and No.
and
priests, scribes,
women,
slaves,
The names of some of these are well known, although we cannot yet determine the functions of each. One class, the name of which occurs frequently in our tablets, One of these ( pl. 3, No. 17, IV, 12) takes an ox away from a herd. is in Sumerian A-RU-A.
various kinds.
Another
No. 45) offers an expensive list of sacrifices. In pl. 23, No. 29, cols. II, III, and IV, are a number of A-RU-A, each standing at the head of a list of women to whom amounts of wool for clothing were assigned. Apparently, therefore, the A-RU-A had charge of the de(pl.
15,
men
of dignity
and
authority."
contain records of the quantities of grain or other rations, 7 Such or the quantities of wool for clothing, which were assigned to the staff of temple officials.
are Nos. 379, pl. 2; 257,
pl. 28;
pl. 6;
396, pl. 8; 29, pl. 23, 24; 54, pl. 24; 66, pl. 25; 74, pl. 26; 248,
and
Special messengers were sometimes sent out, for whom special provision of food, drink and oil was made. Such seems to be the meaning of No. 217, pl. 43. The temple apparently also owned a large number of boats to ply on the canals and bring in the produce of the fields.
No. 188,
pl.
number
of these
and
they are attributed by the tablet to a certain man, but he was probably the in charge of them, since the temple kept a record of them. Connected with the temple estates were also extensive pasture lands. Herds of
It is true that
cattle,
sheep, goats and asses were each year entrusted to different shepherds to graze on these lands. At certain times "round ups" of these cattle were made, and a record of the state of the herds taken. Such records are contained in Nos. 17, pl. 3 (translated below); 370, pl. 20; and 80,
pl- 34. 35-
but were not responsible for losses by accident or wild beasts unless due to carelessness. 8 At the " round ups the increase of the herd was noted, as well as the losses. Animals taken away
for
as labor or sacrifice, were not counted as losses, but were included under a
separate entry.
Tablets of the sheep-shearing time recorded the wool received from the sheep
Such
is
No.
3, pl.
38, 39.
In the tablets of these classes published in the present work one or two lexical items of In pl. 3, No. 17, IV, 3, RUG-RUG is used after a singular. interest may be noted. Radau
(Early Babylonian History, p. 349
ff.)
and and
RUG-RUG
(p.
Cf.
plural.
is
Our
is
text
is
notes that, except in the text OBI. 126 RUG, is singular proof that the rule was subject to other exceptions. A
more
interesting case
PUHAD-NU-UR.
no,
and 178-182.
Radau
renders
it
"sucking lambs,
"
PUHAD-NU-UR
Hammurabi,
127,
No. 14313, I. 10 saysof an A-RU-A, NE ERIM E-dingir-NINA, "who is a man of the temple of Nina." 'Cf. Johns, Babylonian and Assyrian Laws, Contracts and Letters, 1904, ch. XX, on "The functions and organization of the temple." Cf. Code of Hammurabi, 263-267.
CTBM. X.
produced none. Reisner (Tempel Urkunden, p. 6) renders it "ungeschornes(?)." In No. 3, pi. 38, of our texts we find evidence that both are mistaken, since weights of the wool of the
PUHAD-NU-UR
(cf.
II,
and
III, 7).
gives the provision for three feast days, while No. 229, pi. 49,
For example, No. 297, pi. 36, the record of two oxen appointed
office of
One
accounts.
tablet,
temple at Bau on certain days. No. 113, pi. 18, records the establishment of an
pi. 50,
One
Patesi
of the
most
No. 220,
pi. 36.
It records
by the son
of the Patesi
9
UR-LAMA
the
whom M.
Most
of
Thureau-Dangin restored to history a few years ago. The text is translated below. the tablets which mention places at all mention those near Shirpurla, though a
Babylonian
10
number
of other
cities
No. 288,
however, a record
interest.
For example,
in
31, VIII, 7,
8,
we read
in
GU
ID KIS-GIM
GUB
[E]
dingir-DUN-GI LUGAL-E:
Cf. Reisner, op. cit.
bank
VII. 23-26.
pi. 33,
The context
which
MA-SU-SA-SAHAR
Dagon was
of E.
built.
is
the
MU-US-SA MA-SU-SA-SAHAR of
it is,
MA
the
was a
but
perhaps, a variant
If so, this
where we read
'
MU
year after that mentioned in Reisner's Urkunden, No. 122, II, 4, E-SU-SA-SAHAR (dingir)-DA-GAN BA-RU, 11 "the year the E-SU-SA-
i.
and would be identical with the year mentioned in Reisner ibid., Probably these two years are the same as those which Radau finds in the E. A. HoffNo. 101, but
if
man
collection,
is
his transliteration
is
is
wording
in
still
different there.
If this identification
of Dungi.
It
different time
which case
new
is
date.
found in No.
37, pi. 5,
MU MA-TEMEN-MUH
reign this year belongs
:
BA-G1M:
I -do
Temen-muh was
consecrated."
To what
"
another interesting date is that of No. 61, pi. i dingir-SIS-KI KAR-ZI- [DA"| E-AN-NA BA-AN-LIL, "the year Nan-nar Kar-zi-da was brought into the house of Anu. " This is probably a variant of OBI. No. 125, 5 a date in the reign of Dungi.
Still
MU
Translations of specimens of the various classes of tablets represented here are appended.
R6vue semitique, 1897, p. 74 ff. ideogram with the ideogram for Susa in Scheil's Textes elamites semitiques, passim; in de Morgan and Scheil's Delegation en Perse, Vol. II., pi. 12, and p. 59, and Vol. VI, p. 6. "This date occurs also in CTBM. IX, No. 18437. '-This date is also found in CTBM. VII, Nos. 13165, 18391, and 18397; IX, Nos. 13657, 18367, 19715, and 21137, also X, No. 21429. In VII, No. 12927 the year after this last is mentioned.
Cf.
10
Cf. the
10
Obv.
i. 2.
Obv.
i.
2.
600 shars of land planted with palm 100 shars of wooded land,
trees,
3.
3.
4.
5-
4.
5.
wooded
land,
6.
Rev.
i. 2.
6.
Rev.
i. 2.
Lugalsiggid,
DUMU
3. 4.
5.
son of
Ur-Lama
the Patesi,
3.
In Girsu,
GIR LUGAL-MA-GUR-US-SUKKAL
ITU EZIN-dingir-DUN-GI
4.
5.
Witness: Lugalmagurussukkal
Month Bui
the year the divine
6.
MU
Dingir-BUR-dingir-EN-ZU
LUGAL-E
6.
UR-BIL-LUM-KI BA-HUL
stroyed Urbillum.
AN APPOINTMENT
No. 144,
TO CLERKSHIPS.
PI. 50.
Obv.
i. 2.
MA-DUB-BA DUP-PU-DA
UR-dingir-BA-U SIS
Obv.
Office
of accounts
3.
GAL-KAL-LA
4.
5.
4.
5.
dingir-LAMA-URU-NA
Lamauruna
and Gir-Ninshah
son of
SA GIR-dingir-NIN-SAH
Rev.
i.
DUMU DA-DA
NI-GAL
Rev.
1. 2.
Dada
2.
has appointed.
the year Gimil-Sin, king of Ur, the temple
3.
MU
dingir-GIMIL-dingir-EN-ZU
LUGAL
3.
4.
MU-RU
4.
built.
Obv.
i.
CLXXVII
KA-LUM GUR
Obv.
i.
177 Talents
of dates,
2.
KI-UR-AB-BA-TA
2.
from Urabba
for a possession
3.
MU-GAR-RA-KU
UR-dingir-BABBAR SU-BA-TI ITU SE-KIN-KUD
Rev.
3.
4.
4.
1. 2.
Ur-Shamash
has received.
Rev.
i. 2.
Month Adar,
the vear the throne of Bel was erected.
3.
MU GU-ZA
dingir-EN-LIL
BA-GIM
LIST OF SHIPS.
No. 188,
PI. 49.
Obv.
i. 2.
Obv.
i.
ships of 50 talents,
i
3.
10 minus
ships of 40 talents,
10 ships of 30 talents
of
5.
Rev.
i. 2.
3.
USU-U GIR UR-GIS-ZIKUM DUMU GI-NI-MU ITU SE-KIN-KUD UD-BA V BA-NI MU HU-HU-NU-RI-KI BA-HUL
Ushu.
:
Rev
Witness
II
Obv.
i.
V KA GAS-GUB
Ill
Obv.
i.
Ka
of strong drink,
2.
KA GAR
2.
ka of food,
3.
IV GIN NI-GIS
3.
4. 5.
4 shekels of wood-oil
4.
5.
EN-SAM-MI-NI
Ill
II
Enshammini,
3
2
6.
KA GAS KA GAR
Rev.
Ka
of strong drink,
6.
i.
ka of food
oil
Rev.
i.
IV GIN NI
4 shekels of
2.
3.
2.
Akamagal
at Susa presented.
3. 4.
5.
4.
5.
HUL
RECEIPT FOR GRAIN.
No. 47, PL
17.
1
.
Obv.
i.
V SE GUR LUGAL
NI-DUB E-NE-LI-TA
MA-A-SI-GA
Obv.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
5.
DUB
UR-dingir-GAL-GIR
Rev.
4.
5.
i. 2.
of Ur-Galgir
Rev.
i. 2.
Witness Bazi.
Month Tammuz
the year Bur-Sin became king.
Seal.
3.
MU
BUR-dingir-EN-ZU
LUGAL
Seal.
1.
UR-dingir-GAL-GIR
1.
2.
?.
UR-Galgir,
Scribe,
2.
DUP-SAR
3.
DUMU
A-TU
son of Atu.
ALLOTMENT OF LAND.
No. 193,
PI. 30.
Obv.
2.
Obv.
i.
17
1 1
2.
3.
5.
XIV GAN 525 SAR GAN GIG II GAN DCCCC SAR GAN-A-KAL DCCC SAR GAN ID-BAD
NI-DA-MU-NI-GID
3. 4.
5.
12
2
shars of good land, shars of land planted with sahar, shars of land planted with gig,
Gan, 900 shars of flooded (?) land, 800 shars of land with a canal wall
(to)
6.
7.
6.
7.
Nidamunigid
Rev.
i. 2.
the 35
ii ii
man
of Eridu.
Rev.
i. 2.
3.
4.
3.
4.
14
Gan 50 shars of good land, Gan 500 shars of land planted with Gan 250 shars of land planted with Gan 500 shars of land planted with
adjoining
(?)
sahar,
vines,
sahar
6.
7.
5.
Gan 900
(?),
6.
7.
GAL-clingir-NIN-TI-NI-GID
8.
MU
HA-AR-SI-KI
8.
....
12
ESTABLISHMENT OF A FOOD-OFFICE.
No. 113,
PI. 18.
Obv.
i. 2.
MA-DUB-BA GAR-RA-AG
UR-dingir-A(?)
Obv.
i.
An
of
office
2.
food-making
3. 4.
5.
3-
Ur-A(?)
son of Nabashag
DUMU NA-BA-SAG
SA GAL-BI-MU GU ID NINA-KI GUB
NI-SU-U MU KI-MAS-KI BA-HUL
Rev.
4.
5.
i.
Rev.
i.
Nina
set
2.
2.
3.
3.
destroyed.
Obv.
i.
IV
PES-HUM
Obv.
i.
2.
4 earthen jars
KI KIN-SA-MU-TA SU-SAR-MAL-IM-SE-RA-KU
3.
SU-AB-BA
Rev.
i.
4.
Shuabba
son of Bazi
has received.
DUMU
BA-ZI
Rev.
i. 2.
2.
SU-BA-TI
3.
4.
3.
Month
Kisleu,
4.
year of Kimash.
IN TOLL.
Obv.
i.
2.
3.
4
5.
Obv.
i. 2.
3.
Erim
4.
5.
Ur-rinenigin
gained.
RUG-RUG-DAM
MU-US-SA KI-MAS-KI BA-HUL MU-USSA-BI
Rev.
Rev.
i.
i.
Two
years after
Kimash was
destroyed.
Obv.
i. 2.
3.
Rev.
i. 2.
Record
of the wall(?)
(which) placed
3.
4.
Rev.
2.
up.
3.
RECORD OF A SACRIFICE.
No. 45, PL
15.
i. 2.
Obv.
i. 2.
IV UZ
Obv.
4 Goats,
15 she goats,
3 ewes,
5
i
V SU-KAR
HI'U'
3-
3.
4.
5.
V LU URU
i
4.
5.
rams,
PUHAD URU
he-lamb,
Rev.
i. 2.
Rev.
i.
35 kids,
2.
the
ARUA
of the goddess
NIN-E-NELI
3.
3. 4.
5.
has sacrificed.
5.
Month, Adar,
the year
Seal.
Obv.
i. 2.
VI
KAL
Obv.
6 Slaves
of
URU-TA-NU-TAM-MI
ITU GUD-DU-NE-SAR-SAR-TA ITU EZIN-dingir-NE-SU-KU ITU II KAM BAL-MA A-SA BA-RU-GAL
Urutunutammi
3.
4.
month Tammuz
Rev.
i.
Rev.
months,
2.
2.
3.
4.
3.
dug the
4.
king.
Obv.
i. 2.
II
SE AZAG-UD
Rev.
i. 2.
17
and
]/*
she,
AZAG KA-LUM
KI KALAM-IL-TA
LUGAL-dingir-NIN-GIR-SU SU-BA-TI
Rev.
money
in full,
3.
3.
i. 2.
from Kalamil
Lugal-Ningirsu has received.
Rev.
i.
2.
3.
MU
KI-MAS-KI BA-HUL
3.
PAYMENT OF
No. 334,
A LOAN.
PI. 36.
Obv.
i.
2.
Obv.
Shekels of silver
interest
2.
minus the
3.
3. 4.
from Ur-Galgirgalninan
Egalla has brought
in.
4.
Rev.
i. 2.
Rev.
i.
Witness: Ur-Lama.
2.
Month Ab
the year the divine Bur-Sin became king.
3.
3.
A
I.
"
ROUND-UP" OF CATTLE.
No.
17, PI. 3.
I. i. 2.
i. 2.
3.
4.
5.
36 Full-grown cows,
10 cows 3 (years old),
4 bullocks 3 (years old),
3.
4.
5.
10 cows
4 cows
2
(years old),
SAG LID AL KU
cows.
6.
GUD
II
6.
7.
II
GUD
II
I
RUG-RUG
I
7.
bullocks
i
8. 9.
10.
LID
8. 9.
10 minus
cows
i
(year old),
ii bullocks
3
(year old),
10.
1 1
.
11. 12.
GUB-BA-A-AN
are present.
GUD
III
12. 13.
There
i
is
missing
2
bullock
3 (years old).
13. I
14. 15.
16.
II.
i. 2.
GUD
II
bullock
(years old).
LAL-NI-A-AN SU-NIGIN XCV LID HI-A LID GUB-BA-A-AN. SU-NIGIN II LID HI-A
14. 15.
1
They
are missing.
Total 95 cattle
cattle are present.
6.
i. 2.
II.
Total
cattle
LAL-NI-A-AN
UR-SI-IL-LA
are missing
of Ur-sheilla's.
3.
3.
5.
4.
34 Full-grown cows,
4
KU
5.
cows
(years
old)
in
exchange
for full-
6.
7.
II
6.
7
i
LID
II
SAG
II
(LID)
AL KU
7.
cow
grown cow,
8. 9.
XII
GUD
8.
12 bullocks
(years old),
10. 11.
9.
10 cows
7
i
(year old),
i
10.
bullocks
(year old),
11.
bullock increase,
oxen,
14.
15.
1 6.
There
i
is
missing
full-grown cow,
15. I
1 6.
AMAR
13
calf.
17.
III.
i.
2.
3.
LAL-NI-A-AN SU-NIGIN LXXX LAL LID GUB-BA-A-AN SU-NIGIN II LID HI-A LAL-NI-A-AN
They
are missing.
i
LID HI-A
III.
17.
i
Total 80 minus
cattle
2.
3.
DINGIR-SUKKAL
SU-NIGIN LXX LID AL SU-NIGIN X LID III SU-NIGIN IV LID III SAG LID AL
4.
5.
5.
6.
7.
6.
KU
7.
full-grown cows,
8. 9.
10.
SU-NIGIN IV GUD SU-NIGIN XX LAL II LID III SU-NIGIN V LID II SAG LID AL
III
8. total 4
9.
total, 20
minus
2
cows
(years old),
KU
10. total, 5
cows
full-grown cows,
11.
12.
IV.
i.
2.
3.
4.
5. 6.
SU-NIGIN XX LAL II GUD SU-NIGIN II GUD II RUG-RUG SU-NIGIN XX LAL I LID I SU-NIGIN XX LAL II GUD I SU-NIGIN I GUD I RUG-RUG SU-NIGIN III GUD GIS SU-NIGIN III GUD LID LID GUB-BA-A-AN
II
will notice that the
20 minus
2
bullocks
2
(years old),
bullocks
IV.
i. 2.
total, 20
minus
minus
bullock
cow
(year old),
i
total, 20 total,
i
2
i
bullocks
(year old),
3.
4.
5.
6.
The reader
7.
8. 9.
10.
11. 12.
SU-NIGIN I LID AL SU-NIGIN I GUD III SU-NIGIN I GUD II SU-NIGIN I AMAR LAL-NI-A-AN (GUD ZIG-GA-NE-NE A-RU-A-TA KI-BABA-A-GAR).
7.
Total
total total
total,
i
i
full-grown cow,
8.
9.
(years old),
10.
1 1
.
calf,
are missing.
12.
Arua, Kibabaagar).
13.
13. 14.
The
cattle presented
14.
Ninkalla
15.
1
15. in Girsu.
1
6.
6.
UR-Lama
(being) Pates i.
17.
18.
17.
1 8.
18, PI. 9.
I. i. 2.
GUR
SE LUGAL
The
are
SI-NI-IB
out.
3.
SA-BI-TA
3.
Of
1
it
4.
5.
4.
5.
80,
presented
6.
7.
6.
7.
Urimnun.
126 Talents 38 and
$
ka
8. 9.
8. 9.
The 180
completed.
ka:
KA GUR
10.
A
of
5
i
total of 7 talents, 48
it
and
n.
12.
V DUB-BA-NI
I
(talents)
are in storage;
XXV KA GUR
DUMU
NA-BA-
13. 14.
15.
talent 25 ka
16.
SAG MU-GUB
LAL-NI
I
shag
1
6.
is
present.
is
17.
1
XXIII
PARAB KA GUR
17.
1
There
lacking
talent,
23
and
ka.
8.
UR-dingir-BA-U
8.
Ur-Bau:
66 talents, 30 ka.
LXVI
XXX KA GUR
XXX KA GUR
UR-dingir-NINA
19.
LAL-NI SE-KUL
SA-BI-TA
20. 21.
22.
There
is
from him.
LXVI
The 66
talents, 30 ka,
DUB
DUMU NA-BA-SAG
II.
i.
of
Nabashag,
2.
MU-GUB
URU-KI
E-dingir-NIN-DAR-A
2.
3.
3.
4.
5.
4.
5.
Nindara
6.
7.
99 talents,
6.
7.
is
completed.
Of
it
8.
9.
XCIX GUR
8. 9.
99 Talents
10. 11.
DUMU
BA-A
11.
i6
12. 13.
14.
CXXXVI GUR
LAL-NI SE-KUR
12.
136 talents.
13.
Seed-grain
is
lacking.
15.
16.
withdrawn
for seed-grain.
16.
and
ka:
GUR
17.
1
SA-BI-TA
17. of it
1
8.
19.
III.
i. 2.
CLXXXV XL KA GUR DUB UR-dingir-NINA DUMU NA-BA-SAG LXXVI MISLU V KA GUR DUB MA-LI DUMU KI-RAM-MU
MU-GUB.
LAL-NI VIII CCLXXXVI SUSSAN
8.
19.
III.
i. 2.
Kirammu
3.
3.
KA
4.
GUR
5.
6.
7.
5.
Urdumu,
134 talents 40 ka.
6.
7.
Seed-grain
is
lacking.
8.
9.
KA GUR
8. 9.
31 Talents 42
is
and
ka
SE-KUR-TA GUR
withdrawn
for seed-grain.
10. 11.
from Lugaluruda.
1
GUR
12.
A total of
it
13. of
14. 15.
1
DUB
ka
MU-GUB
UR-SAG-GA
E-dingir-DUMU-ZI
VIII
6.
17.
1
17.
1
Urshagga.
8.
8.
Temple
of
Tammuz
is
19. 20.
GUR
IV.
19. 20.
i. 2.
8 talents,
SE-KUR-RA UD-BA-AT
completed.
IV.
i.
2.
3.
4.
5.
From Dub
65
....
Nuru
of
3. 4.
5.
241 (talents)
stored
up
on the account
Presented
(it)
Galbimu.
6.
7.
DUMU
PA-AL-E
6.
7. 8. 9.
Ur-Bau son
of
of Pa-al-e.
CCXLI V SE GAR-GAL-LA
SA-BI-TA
8. 9.
10.
10.
placed at the
call of
Galbimu,
n.
12.
MU-GUB
UR-dingir-LAMA DUMU HU-MU CXCII LXVII KA GUR-TA
Ur-Lama son
of
Humu
13.
14.
CCXXVI
XXX KA GUR
SU-KA
IM-SI-BA-TA
KA GUR
16.
17. of it
1 8.
V GUR
GAL-BI-MU SU-BA-TI CCXLV XXVII KA GUR
5 talents
19.
Galbimu has
received.
20.
20.
245 Talents 27 ka
21. 22.
23. 24. 25. 26.
UR-dingir-NINA SU-BA-TI
DAMU MA-BA-&AG
KA GUR
21.
22.
23.
24.
A
is
ka
MU-GUB
LAL-NI CLXIX MISLA
present.
GUR
25.
GAR-TA
26. Garta,
27.
28.
LXXVI
VIII
MISLA KA GUR
V.
27. 28.
i
LAL-NI SE-KUL
Seed-grain
is
lacking.
. . . .
V.
I.
Talents
ka are with-
drawn
2.
KA GUR
2.
A
of
ka:
345-
3.
I
KA GUR
4.
5.
262 talents
ka are lacking.
6.
7-
Ur-Bau son
of Kalamil,
6.
7.
8. 9-
KA GUR
8. 9.
SE-KUR-TA GUR-RA
SU-NIGIN XXIII LVI MISLA
VIII
withdrawn
for seed-grain.
10.
KA GUR
10.
total of 23 talents 56
and J ka:
n. SA-BI-TA
12.
11. of it
BA-RU SU-BA-TI
1314IS16.
on account of Galbimu.
total of 15 talents
A
is
MU-GUB
LAL-NI VI LVI MISLA
present.
KA GUR
6.
6 Talents 56
1718. 19.
UR-UD-E-GAR
E-dingir-MAL-LAM-HI
17.
1 8.
Urudegar
of the
temple of Malamhi:
talents.
20.
21.
22. 2324.
2526. 27.
cxcvi MISLA LAL"-NI SE-KUR CXCI XX KA GUR SE-KUR-TA GUR-RA CXXII SE-AMAR BA-BAT
S"U-NIGIN
19.
196 and $
Seed-grain
is
lacking.
20.
191 Talents 20 ka
withdrawn
(talents)
122
CCX XX KA GUR
GAL-BI-MU SU-BA-TI
A
14
SA-BI-TA
24. of it 25.
XIV
XX KA
(talents)
is
MU-GUB
LAL-NI CXCVI MISLA UR-E-SE
. . .
26. it
present.
talents are lacking.
GUR
28.
29.
Ureshe,
196 talents
2
VI.
i. 2.
and
. .
ka.
(are
.
VI.
i. 2.
For seed-grain.
Talents 27 ka
withdrawn)
. .
3-
3.
45-
4.
KA GUR
5.
A total of 23 talents
of
1
59 and
ka:
6.
7-
6.
it
KA GUR
7.
8 talents 32
and
<j
ka
8.
9-
8.
9.
Galbimu has
it is
received,
MU-GUB
present.
KA GUR
10.
1 1
.
Garshamash,
temple of Ama,
12.
E-dingir-AMA
12.
i8
13.
14.
15.
1
CCX KA SE-BA GESTIM-MA CIV CCLXXX KA SU-KA SU-NIGIN CVII CCXL MISLA GUR
SA-BI-TA
13.
14.
210 ka of grain-wine,
104 (talents) 280 ka of flour.
15.
1
A
of
and 240$
(ka):
6.
6.
17. 18.
17.
1
84 talents 30 ka
2
8.
and
Buba,
IQ. 20.
19.
MU-GUB
are present.
23 Talents 180
20.
21.
22. 23.
24.
CLXXX MISLA GUR GIR UR-SAG-GA-MU DUMU MA-LI GAR-SAM-AS DUMU KI -LUGAL
LAL-NI XXIII
and
25.
26.
GAR-RA-AG-BI GIR GAL-HAL-NI SA KI-NU-NIR-KI NINA-KI MU SI-MU-UR-RU-UM-KI LU-LU-BU-KI A-DU [Xj-LAL-I KAM BA-HUL
24.
25. 26.
In Kinunir of Nina.
REGISTER OF TABLETS.
Tablet No. in Haverford College Collection.
3-
Plate.
Description of Tablet.
Date.
in.
in.
38, 39.
Account
long,
tablet,
5
one side broken away, 6 and $ and $ in. wide at widest, i and }
It records a
The
year
Bur-Sin
de-
stroyed Urbillum.
thick at centre.*
"round up"
in.
of
Tablet,
in.
and
f in. long,
and $
wide and
thick.
11.
21.
long,
and f
in.
wide,
i in.
thick.
Record
of storing grain.
12.
44.
1}
in.
in.
thick.
21.
and f
List
16.
7.
in.
long,
of
kinds
of
12.
and f wood.
in.
wide, J
in.
thick.
of Dungi.
Similar to No.
mixed
and f
in.
long,
wide,
in. thick.
the
9th
3.
of seed
wheat
for
reign of Dungi.
in. long, 3
and $
in.
wide,
of a
"round up."
and $
in.
18.
9.
Account
i
tablet, 5
and \
in.
long, 3
wide,
in.
thick at centre.
the
gth
time,
reign of Dungi.
20.
40.
Account
|
in.
tablet, 4
and
and
\ in.
long,
and $ and
in.
wide,
The
year
Bur-Sin
de-
thick.
stroyed Urbillum.
24.
16.
Account
i
tablet, 5
in.
and |
thick at centre.
List of quantities of
26.
22.
wood, Account
i
reeds,
and
grain.
in.
Dungi.
long, 4
tablet, 5
and ^
and $
in.
wide,
in. thick.
to different men.
29. 23,
24.
Account
and
wide,
in. thick.
Two
years after
Kimash
reign
was destroyed,
of Dungi.
Account
i
tablet, 4
and f
in.
long, 3
and f
in.
wide,
Two
years after
Kimash
reign
in. thick.
was destroyed,
of Dungi.
The measurements
20
Tablet No.
35-
in
Haver-
Plate.
Description of Tablet.
Date
45
Account
i
tablet, 5
and
in.
long, 3
and f
in.
wide,
in. thick.
and
ferent
months
reign of Bur-Sin.
Tablet,
thick.
and f
in.
long,
and f
in.
wide,
in.
reign
of
Dungi.
37-
Circular tablet,
and f
in. in
diameter,
i in.
thick
at centre,
goats.
in.
at edge.
List of sheep
and
reign
un-
known.
38.
ii.
and f
in.
long,
and f
in.
wide,
of a
in. thick.
it.
Seal has
made a palimpsest
in. long, i
reign
of
part of
40.
ii.
Dungi.
and f
and \
in.
reign
of
Dungi.
41.
and
J in. long, 2
and J
in.
wide,
and J
in.
thick.
42.
and
long, 2
and ^
in.
wide, f
in. thick.
Receipt
for grain.
43-
and
in.
long,
and f
in.
wide,
i in.
thick.
Record
reign
of
of preserving seed-grain.
44.
Dungi.
2
and
wide,
of
and
in. thick.
Record
different
of
quantities
grain
received
at
store-houses.
45-
Unbroken case
heard,
thick.
When
in.
and J
in.
long,
and f
in.
wide, f
in
sacrifice.
47-
Similar to No. 45
and
The year
after Urbillum
in.
long,
and f
wide, and f
in.
thick.
was destroyed,
of Dungi.
reign
12.
2 in.
wide,
in.
Dungi.
of
54-
24.
Merely
fragments
of
tablet.
Measurements,
impossible.
reign
temple
officials.
Dungi.
long,
for
i
59-
39-
Tablet
and f
in.
and ^
in.
wide, f
in.
The
year
Bur-Sin
Urbillum.
de-
thick.
Receipt
grain.
stroyed
21
Plate.
Description of Tablet.
Date.
60.
41.
Account
J
in.
tablet, 3
and f
in.
long, 2
and
J in. wide,
thick.
Account of quantities of
grain.
61.
i.
Account
long, 2
and J
in.
wide, f
in. thick.
KAR-
ZI-DA
of
Anu was
brought.
of
Probably
Dungi.
63-
reign
42.
64.
39.
and $ in. long, 2 and } in. wide, in. thick. Account of quantities of wool. J Similar to Nos. 12 and 45; probably case tablet.
Account
tablet, 4
i
The
year
Bur-Sin
de-
stroyed Urbillum.
and 4
in. long, i
and
in.
wide, f
in. thick.
The year
Dungi.
Kimash was
reign
of
and f
in. long,
and
in.
wide, f
in. thick.
destroyed,
66.
25.
in.
long, 2
and
Two
years after
Kimash
reign
wide,
in.
thick.
was destroyed,
of Dungi.
different individuals.
68.
43.
Account
tablet, 5
and
in. long, 2
and
f in. wide,
The
year
Bur-Sin
de-
I in. thick.
stroyed Urbillum.
Account
thick.
and f
in.
wide,
in.
Two
years after
Kimash
reign
was destroyed,
of Dungi.
36.
Case tablet, case broken, few fragments of it remain, i and | in. long, i and J in. wide, $ in.
thick.
76.
17.
Case
and
in.
wide, f
in. thick.
The year
Dungi.
Kimash was
reign
of
destroyed,
storing grain.
80.
34, 35.
Account
i
tablet, 7
in.
and
and f in. long, 7 and f in. wide, Record of a great "round thick. and
asses.
the
mighty hero,
up"
of cattle
81.
32, 33.
Account
in.
tablet,
and f
Ac-
and destroyed Kimash and Humurti. The year after the ship
tated
and
SU-SA-SAHAR
gon was
of
built,
of
Da-
reign
48.
Account
J
tablet, 4
and
in.
and
in. thick.
reign
of
Bur-Sin.
90. 44.
Account
|
in.
and
} in.
wide,
No
fields
assigned to
different
men.
ment
it
in
was
his
accession.
22
Tablet No. in Haverford College Collection.
91. 31.
pl
Description of Tablet.
Date.
all
i
Account tablet
in 8 cols.
in.
Nearly
of
cols,
and
J in.
of
quantities
of
grain fur-
date
the
year the
throne of
erected,
Bel(?)
was
of
which brings
the
reign
us
into
Bur-Sin.
too.
Sun-dried tablet,
wide, |
in.
and
in.
long,
and
in.
Two
years after
Kimash
reign
thick.
was
destroyed,
broken away.
21.
of Dungi.
different farmers.
102.
and
Acdif-
Two
years after
Kimash
reign
and
was destroyed,
of Dungi.
"3-
Sun-dried tablet,
| in. thick.
food-store.
reign
of
Dungi.
in.
141
18.
Tablet,
thick.
and.
long,
and \
in.
wide, f
in.
of grain.
reign
of Dungi.
14318.
Tablet,
thick.
and
in.
long,
and \
in.
wide, f
in.
Record of storing up
grain.
reign
144
SO-
Tablet,
thick.
and J in. long, i and in. wide, f in. Record of the appointment of two sec-
temple
Gi-
retaries.
of
shuh.
149.
Tablet,
and ^
in.
long,
and 3-16
in.
wide, %
in. thick.
reign of Dungi.
IS
gravel;
and ^
in.
long,
and ^
in.
wide, f
in. thick.
Re-
reign
158-
10.
Sun-dried tablet,
f
in. thick.
and f in. long, i and i in. wide, Record of quantities of grain from
i
different individuals.
the
9th
reign of Dungi.
171.
IO.
Tablet,
thick.
and \
in.
long,
and
reign
of Dungi.
172.
II.
Tablet,
thick.
and $
in.
long,
and
in.
wide,
in.
reign
of Dungi.
Plate.
6.
Description of Tablet.
Date.
i
and
f in. long,
and
wide, f
in.
thick.
reign
of
Dungi.
181.
12.
Tablet,
thick.
and J
in.
long,
and
f in. wide,
in.
reign
of
Dungi.
183.
18.
Tablet,
thick.
and } and \
in.
long,
and
and
4 in. wide,
n.
(sic
!)
jars.
Dungi.
184.
13-
Tablet,
thick.
in.
long,
J in. wide,
n.
reign
of
Dungi.
185.
27.
Tablet,
thick.
and
f in. long,
and
Two
years after
Kimash
,
was destroyed
of Dungi.
reign
186.
27.
Tablet,
thick.
and
in.
long,
and
Two
years after
Kimash
,
was destroyed
of Dungi.
reign
187.
27
Tablet,
in.
and
J in. long,
and 3-16
in.
wide, 9-16
Two
years after
Kimash
,
thick.
was destroyed
of Dungi.
reign
188.
49.
Tablet,
thick.
and
I in. long,
and $
in.
wide, f
in.
reign
of
30.
Sun-dried tablet,
|
in.
and \
in.
in.
long,
and f
in.
wide,
thick.
i
Record of measurements
long,
i
of land.
Dungi (?).
Bur-Sin
de-
196.
13-
Tablet,
thick.
and
The
year
stroyed Urbillum.
200.
13-
Tablet,
thick.
in.
long,
and ^
in.
wide, f
in.
Receipt
for grain.
reign
of Dungi.
202.
12.
Tablet,
thick.
and
J in. long,
and
reign
of Dungi. 204.
19.
Sun-dried tablet,
i
much
broken,
and \
in.
long,
and
reign of
Bur-
Dungi.
206.
44.
216.
14.
and $ in. long, i and f in. wide, 11-16 in. Record of a crop of grain. thick. in. long, i and \ in. wide, Sun-dried tablet, i and
Tablet,
i
Accession year of
Sin.
in.
thick.
Record
of quantities of grain.
reign
of
Dungi.
217.
43.
Tablet,
thick.
and f
in.
long,
and f
in.
wide,
f in.
oil
The
year
Bur-Sin
de-
and
stroyed Urbillum.
Tablet,
thick.
in.
wide, f
in.
The
year
Bur-Sin
de-
of a
park
in
stroyed Urbillum.
Plate.
4.
Description of Tablets.
Date.
in.
223.
Reddish tablet,
\
in.
and J
in. long, i
and f
wide,
in
thick.
List of sheep
Tablet,
thick.
and f in. long, i and \ in. wide, 9-16 in. Record of oxen prepared for the temple
separate days.
reign
of
of
23
1
-
Bau on two
49.
Tablet, an almost
illegible palimpsest because the scribal seal was rolled over it in every part above
reign
of
and ^
in. long, i
and \
in.
Bur-Sin.
wide, \
i
in. thick.
in.
232.
44.
Tablet,
thick.
and
long,
and f
in.
wide, f
made high
priest
of
234-
47.
and \
grain.
23549.
in.
wide, \
in. thick.
reign of Bur-Sin.
reign
of
and
in.
long,
and f
23747.
in.
i
wide,
in. thick.
i
Tablet,
thick.
and
f in.
List of "
first
wide,
in.
The
year
Bur-Sin
de-
oil for
various
stroyed Urbillum.
"messengers.
244.
28.
fragment;
and \
in.
long, 3
wide,
in. thick.
Record
of quantities of grain.
that,
reign
of
Dungi.
246.
30.
Account
thick.
tablet, 4
and \
in.
long,
in.
wide, J
in.
The
year
Harshi
and
deof
List
Humurti
stroyed,
Dungi.
were
reign
248.
28.
Account
2
tablet,
| in.
and
The year
after
Kimash,
reign of Dungi.
tities of
for food.
253-
46.
Account
\
tablet, 4
and
$ in. long, 2
and f
in.
wide,
The
year
Bur-Sin
de-
in. thick.
List of
measurements
of fields,
stroyed Urbillum.
weights
2576.
(of grain)
Account
is,
was
of
and J
in.
re
gn
in.
wide, f
in. thick.
List of weights
Dungi.
clothing.
2 in. long,
i
Sun-dried tablet,
in.
and f
in.
wide, f
thick.
reign
of Dungi.
272.
49.
Tablet,
and \
in.
long,
in.
wide, f
in.
thick.
25
Plate.
Description of Tablet.
Date.
in.
276.
36.
Tablet,
thick.
and f
and f
in.
long,
and J
in.
wide, }
in.
281.
50.
Tablet,
thick.
in.
long,
and
wide, 11-16
oil,
in.
etc.
by
de-
of
Nannar,
reign
of
Dungi.
283.
50.
Tablet,
thick.
and
i in. long,
and
List of goats
285.
50.
Tablet,
thick.
and f
in.
long,
in.
wide, \
in.
made
of
Eridu
re
g n of
Bur-Sin.
288.
30.
Tablet,
and f in. long, i and i in. wide, f in. thick. Record of food, drink, and oil provided by two men.
i i
297.
36.
Tablet,
thick.
and f in. long, i and i in. wide, J Record of food and drink provided
in.
for
month EZIN-DUNGI
and ^
in.
long,
and and
in-
wide,
in. thick.
kids.
the
reign of
301.
and $
in.
long,
and f
in.
wide, %
in. thick.
Dungi.
35-
19.
and f
in.
long,
and \
in.
wide, f
in.
thick.
Dungi.
30910.
and
long,
and f
in.
wide, f
in. thick.
Record
of a gift of grain.
reign
3"-
19.
and f
thick.
in. long,
in.
wide,
in.
Receipt
for grain.
314-
Tablet,
in.
long,
and
in.
wide, f
in.
thick.
Dungi.
Sun-dried tablet,
i in. thick.
i
and
in.
long,
and }
in.
wide,
of
at Girsu,
and
Nippur.
i
Eridu
in.
reign of Dungi.
324-
19.
Tablet,
thick.
and |
long,
and $
wide, J
in.
Dungi.
26
Tablet No. in Haverford College Collection.
Plate.
Description of Tablet.
Date.
still
44-
clings
in.
The
year
Bur-Sin
de-
to
it;
and $
in.
long,
and J and J
in.
wide, ^
stroyed Urbillum.
thick.
47-
Tablet,
thick.
and $
in.
long,
in.
wide,
in.
332.
27.
and
in. long,
The year
Dungi.
Kimash was
and
in.
wide, 9-16
in.
thick.
destroyed,
reign of
334-
36.
Tablet,
and
f in. long,
and \
in.
wide, f
in. thick.
Record of the payment of the principal of a loan of money without the interest.
337-
Tablet,
thick.
and 7-16
in.
long,
and \
in.
wide, f
in.
Patesi erec-
g n of
Dungi.
340.
36.
Tablet,
thick.
and f in. long, i and in. wide, f in. Record of six slaves of one man who
in the field of another.
in. thick.
Accession year of
Sin.
Bur-
of Enlil
was
erected,
reign of
Bur-Sin.
345-
and f
in.
long,
and \
oil
in.
wide, f
in. thick.
Tablet,
thick.
in.
wide, f
in.
of a wall.
reign of
Dungi.
355-
Tablet crumbling,
in.
long,
and
in.
wide,
thick.
is
i
....
what
361.
48.
broken away.
in.
Tablet,
thick.
and
long,
and J
in.
wide,
in.
and
oil.
Anu and
Ishtar,
reign of Bur-Sin.
3 6 4-
Tablet,
and f in. long, 2 in. wide, i in. Record of amounts of grain stored up.
2
thick.
37-
20.
Account
thick.
tablet, 3
and f
in.
long,
in.
wide, f
in.
Two
years after
Kimash
reign
was
destroyed,
herdsmen.
376.
47-
of Dungi.
Account
tablet, 3
and f
in.
long,
and f
in.
wide,
The
year
Bur-Sin
de-
I in. thick.
stroyed Urbillum.
individuals.
379<r
Account
3
tablet, sun-dried,
in.
and f
long, 2
and
wide
f in. thick.
reign of
Dungi (?).
and
slaves.
27
P1
Description of Tablet.
Date.
380.
20.
Account
i
and
} in. long,
The
year
Kimash was
re
i
and
wide,
in. thick.
List of rations of
destroyed,
g n of
Dungi.
months.
39337-
Account
f
in
tablet, 3
and
J in. long, 2
and \
in.
wide,
Accession year of
Sin.
Bur-
in. thick.
Record of quantities of grain raised different fields, and slaves who worked in
them.
396.
8.
Account
i
tablet, 4
in.
thick,
and f in. long, 3 and f in. wide, somewhat broken at lower end.
re
gn
Dungi.
Tablet
thick.
and
-J-
in. long,
and \
in.
wide,
-J
in.
of wheat.
reign
of Dungi.
HLA.
7.
u->-
W#m 1
MM
TT
te**f
~^\
if
IT
fit
///////////
n
//
P.
fi
'
Jot.
'W^tarSfer fAA Jr
fcnsBp/^r t-B*^
m
t
^r
&u.
*^5pj
>*>%g^w^
Errv^m
/3rwwwr
HL
ifrEflu^BffCTtpy
^^^if
TV.
<r
<r
<r
<r
H-U4
3/1
nr
s^.
X=^E3gy
Vgsjrm&F&g ^HH-*3?-^-=-
H-L 4*
c s-
^ICSSJ
jr^minm/m^m
fr/MBf
t^fe^fr^Pff
!?<<,.
<r
rm"-^HWmu
Wft
5M
^iSSjlBfr
TM
ay ^F- ir
mmmm
w*<g<^y
fefc>>flrint3rea
r^^ttMV*
55
*'*
81
Wstnm&r.w
330.
tr
'HOT
teHtgj^Ka***
HL -&.
3.
^mts^y^'
.ffH^tH
5^1
m
TT
fflB8>-
n?
m
2.
^TTEH
TF-ba-TETi
Tf
<
HL4
to.
C3.
IP
or
Oc
o
<*
(tr
ffil
B
4
III
1
p
b-
376.
l
, in
fc
University of Toronto
Library
IO
CD
0)
POCKET
Acme
Library Card Pocket
Pat. "Ref. Index File"
Under