100%(3)100% нашли этот документ полезным (3 голоса)
176 просмотров2 страницы
This paper denies that humans can control nature, cause global warming, global cooling, or climate change, and ask that we simply be better stewards of the planet we have.
This paper denies that humans can control nature, cause global warming, global cooling, or climate change, and ask that we simply be better stewards of the planet we have.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
This paper denies that humans can control nature, cause global warming, global cooling, or climate change, and ask that we simply be better stewards of the planet we have.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
I frequently see the last 10,000 years of Earth’s we acknowledge that global warming probably climate history based on core data from one took place at least five time before humans lake, or a glacier, or some other source. Given ever walked the earth. This implies to me that this 10,000 year dataset we are shown that global warming in a natural process that will mankind is causing global warming. occur whether humans are here on not. Said otherwise, humans are not the cause of I cringe every time I see a 10,000 year dataset climate change. for global warming but have diligently kept my mouth shut. I focus on exploration geology The belief that global warming is manmade and subsequently I try to stay away from the has nearly become a religion in itself, wherein subject of global warming because it is so the church of global warming is ready to politically charged. Despite the volatile nature torture the heretics. Heretics of the church of of the subject I am violating my own personal global warming are hatefully called “Deniers.” rule on global warming to ask a question. Is it Please don’t burn me at the stake, but I accept fair to blame “Global Warming” on mankind? the full scientific explanation including the Earth’s entire history—not the data cherry The 10,000 year data set is just a scratch on picking. the skin of the Cenozoic. Yes, this is the timeframe in which humans populated the As long as Earth is a living planet, it will be a earth; but the earth is much older than 10,000 dynamic planet. The city of New Orleans was years. built on silt, subsequently, the city is sinking at a rate of 2.5 centimeters per years, and there I personally cannot ignore the whole picture. is nothing we can do to stop it. Volcanoes are The Sauk Sequence shows us that global sea forming new islands in the South Pacific, and levels have changed dramatically six times there is nothing we can do to stop. It is since the Proterozoic, with drastic arrogant to believe that humans can control transgressions, and regressions. In addition to nature. these global changes in sea level, there are corresponding mass extinction events. It is fair In lieu of plans, summits, agreements, and to associate global sea level changes with other political activities that focus on stopping global temperature changes. a natural process, I think we should simply be better stewards of the planet we use, as we Life on our planet lives in a system of discuss how to live with global warming, or differential equations. It is also fair to believe global cooling, or whatever climate change we that our climate is a system of differential are dealt, and avoid becoming another mass equation with peaks of global warming and extinction statistic. global cooling that exceeds the 10,000 year dataset. This is not a denial that the development of human infrastructures have impacted the climate, but rather a request that