Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Doc # AP - 02 - 9001
Issue # 01
Page 1 of 9
ASSIGNEE
NAME
TITLE
PREPARED BY
QA OFFICER
REVIEWED BY
QA SUPERVISOR
APPROVED BY
SALIL SAKSENA
S.QA MANAGER
SIGN./DATE
HISTORY OF CHANGE
ISSUE #
ISSUE
DATE
PAGE #
SUMMARY OF CHANGE
T3A INDUSTRIAL
Doc # AP - 02 - 9001
Issue # 01
Page 2 of 9
1. OBJECTIVE:
1.1.
To provide the management of all risks that may affect in quality system.
2. SCOPE:
2.1.
Applied to different
aspects
of
pharmaceutical
3. RESPONSIBILITY:
3.1.
Departments manager or designee: Nomination of the QRM team members each manager in
his position, following up with the QRM team leader the activity of QRM team
members.
3.2.
QRM team leader or designee: Following up the activities of the QRM team members.
3.3.
QRM team members: Carrying out the objectives and tasks that decided in the meetings
with in the due dates.
3.4.
QRM Co-ordinator or designee: Preparing the required documents, Issuing of the controlled
documents.
3.5.
4. PROCEDURE:
4.1.
4.1.1. QRM team in T3A factory consists of two divisions. One for Ceph factory and other for
Pharma factory.
4.1.2. Each team is cross function team (team members are from different departments) and the
members shall have specific knowledge and expertise regarding the product and
process.
4.1.3. The plant manager shall nominate the QRM team leader.
4.1.3.1.Ceph QRM team members shall include:
4.1.3.1.1.One member or more from Ceph QC department.
4.1.3.1.2.Two members or more from Ceph production department.
4.1.3.1.3.One member or more from maintenance department.
4.1.3.1.4.One member or more from R&D department.
T3A INDUSTRIAL
Doc # AP - 02 - 9001
Issue # 01
Page 3 of 9
4.2.1. QRM team shall prepare a manufacturing flow diagram for each product or the products that
have same dosage form and the same sequence of stages, the stages starting from
materials receiving up to finished product handling, each stage consist of many
sequenced processes.
T3A INDUSTRIAL
Doc # AP - 02 - 9001
4.3.
Issue # 01
Page 4 of 9
Risk Assessment:
QRM team shall define the processes as shown in the flow diagram.
4.3.1.2.
Each process shall be has a potential risk(s), The QRM team shall list all the risks that
may be reasonably expected to occur at each step of production.
QRM team shall compare the identified and analyzed risk against given
risk acceptance criteria.
4.3.3.2.
The "risk score" shall be used to further define descriptors in risk ranking.
4.3.3.2.1. Risk ranking process shall be carried out based on three item which are
(Frequency/Probability), (Scale/Duration), and (Severity of the risk).
4.3.3.2.2. Each item has five scale degrees ranged from 1 to 5 as shown:
Rank Frequency / Probability
Scale / Duration
Severity
VS volume/quantity (Instance)
Always happen
(continual)
4.3.3.2.3. From the above ranking system calculate the potential risk degree by summations of all
the parameters together and dividing the result by 15.
4.3.3.2.4. Risk class is determined according to the ranking results as follows :
T3A INDUSTRIAL
Doc # AP - 02 - 9001
Issue # 01
Page 5 of 9
Ranking result
Class
(Below 40) %
(low)
(40-80) %
M (Medium)
(Above 80) %
(High)
Example: consider the aspect (X) which often happens once per day with high volume with low
severity:
4.4.
Risk
Frequency
Scale
Severity
Ranking
Class
10/15
66
M (Medium)
Risk control:
4.4.4.5.
T3A INDUSTRIAL
Doc # AP - 02 - 9001
Issue # 01
Page 6 of 9
Risk acceptance can be a formal decision to accept the residual risk or it can be a
passive decision in which residual risks are not specified.
4.4.5.2.
For some types of harms, even the best quality risk management practices might not
entirely eliminate risk.
4.4.5.3.
4.4.5.4.
This (specified) acceptable level shall depend on many parameters and shall be decided
on a case-by-case basis.
4.5.
Risk Review:
4.5.2. The output/results of the risk management process shall be reviewed to take
into account new knowledge and experience.
4.5.3. Once a quality risk management process has been initiated, that
process shall continue to be utilized for events that might impact the
original quality risk management decision, whether these events are
planned (e.g. results of product review, inspections, audits, change
control) or unplanned (e.g. root cause from failure investigations, recall).
The frequency of any review shall be based upon the level of risk.
5. ATTACHMENT:
5.1.
5.2.
5.3.
Risk Assessment.
T3A INDUSTRIAL
Doc # AP - 02 - 9001
5.1.
Issue # 01
Page 7 of 9
Member name
Date: ..........
Department
Signature
.......... ...
...
.......... .
...
.......... .
...
..........
...
..........
...
..........
...
..........
...
.......... ..
...
.......... ..
...
..........
...
.......... .
...
..........
...
..........
...
Position
T3A INDUSTRIAL
Doc # AP - 02 - 9001
Issue # 01
Page 8 of 9
Name
Dept.
Sign.
Remark
............................................................. ..
..
............................................................. ..
..
............................................................. ..
..
............................................................. ..
..
............................................................. ..
..
............................................................. ..
..
............................................................. ..
..
Responsible for
Due date
.................................
...............................................................................
..........................
.................................
...............................................................................
..........................
.................................
...............................................................................
..........................
.................................
...............................................................................
..........................
.................................
...............................................................................
..........................
.................................
...............................................................................
..........................
.................................
...............................................................................
..........................
.................................
...............................................................................
..........................
.................................
...............................................................................
..........................
Page (
) of (
T3A INDUSTRIAL
Doc # AP - 02 - 9001
5.3.
Issue # 01
Page 9 of 9
(*) L = Low
Potential Risk
M = Medium
Reasons
Impact
H = high
Page ( ) of ( )
Class*
Rank
Process
Frequency / Probability
Scale / Duration
Severity
Control
Reduction
L M H
Acceptance
(According To)