Dear Spring State Delegate, On behalf of the Northern California Junior State of America, we would like to welcome you

ou to Spring State 2013. This convention has always been notorious for its energy and fast-paced excitement. In the coming days, you will have the opportunity to debate and have open discussions on a number of important issues to help shape your own stances. While deciding the theme for this convention, the focus turned to the unbelievable amount of tumult in the United States and around the world. Though it has always been apparent that history is made each day, we wanted to turn our eyes to the future. Spring State, The Future of Freedom: Rights, Revolution, and Renewal, presents an opportunity to decide how the choices that are made today will shape the future of the world. With tensions between the US and North Korea ablaze, fighting in Syria continuing, and acts of terror again in the forefront of Americans minds, we stand with the unique chance to decide how we will respond to these trying times.

As Theodore Roosevelt said, In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing. This weekend presents you with the time to decide what the right thing to do is and we hope that you will venture outside of the walls of this convention and act upon your decision; be the people. In addition to the debates and stimulating activities, this convention also presents you with the opportunity to elect the officials who will run your state next year. Listen to the candidates, understand their platforms, and participate in the excitement that is campaigning.

We are so glad that you are joining us at this convention. We would also like to thank you for making this convention the extraordinary experience that it is and we truly hope you have a fantastic weekend. Sincerely, Arnela Colic Governor Karthik Prasad Lieutenant Governor William Du Speaker of the Assembly

The Northern California Junior State of America Proudly Presents Spring State 2013

The Future of Freedom: Rights, Revolution & Renewal

Skeleton Agenda Friday, April 26

Chapter Registration Registration desk Luggage Storage Sedona Block 1 Newport Beach Salon A Salon B/C Salon D/E Opening Session California Ballroom Dinner State Nominations California Ballroom Teach-Advisor Information Meeting Salon A Regional Caucus Salon 1- 3 Salon 4 Salon 5 Salon 7-9 Evening Activities Grand Ballroom Seattle/Portland Santa Barbara Newport Beach Sedona GGR GCR CVR EBR
Glow-in-the-Dark Dance Ninja Game Room Bluegrass Jammin Teacher-Advisor Reception

4:00-5:00 4:00-5:00 4:00-4:45

National Thought Talk: Have First Amendment protections gone too far? National Thought Talk: Is the two party system detrimental to the democratic process? National Thought Talk: What is the 21st century American identity? Speed Friending

5:00-5:45 5:45-6:55 7:00-8:00 7:00-8:00 8:05-8:30

9:00-12:00 9:00-12:00 9:00-12:00 9:00-12:00 9:45-11:45

Curfew No one is allowed out of his or her room past 12:15am.

12:15

Saturday, April 27
Block 2 Salon 3 Salon 4 Salon 5 Salon 6 Salon 7 Sierra Salon D/E Block 3 Salon 3 Salon 4 Salon 5 Salon 6 Salon 7 Salon B/C Salon A Salon D/E Seattle/Portland Block 4 Salon 3 Salon 4 Salon 5 Salon 6 Salon 7 Salon A Salon B/C Newport Beach Salon D/E Lunch Block 5 Salon 3 Salon 4
abolished. food. Debate en Espaol, Resuelto: El Servicio Postal de los Estados Unidos debe quitar servicios de correo en los Sbados. Debate 101 National Resolved: The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. Speed Chess: Resolved: Money can buy happiness. Genius Bar / JSA Summer School Information Session Resolved: U-turn signals should be implemented on all new automobiles. Resolved: The city of Oakland should designate a legal area for sideshows.

9:00-9:55

Resolved: Religion does more harm than good. Novice: Resolved: Violent video games do more harm than good. Resolved: Domestic terrorists should not be subject to all legal rights. Live Auction: Junior Date of America Genius Bar National Resolved: The Federal Assault Weapons Ban should be reinstated. Thought Talk: What is the effect filibusters have in the political process? Boston Massacre: Resolved: California should implement a sin tax on junk Mock Trial Mysteriobate: Resolved: It is rational to ________ ________. Resolved: The Pledge of Allegiance should be mandatory for all students. Speed Chess: Resolved:The vigilante acts of the hacker group Anonymous are justified. Resolved: Same-sex marriage should be legal BUT abortion should simultaneously be banned. Genius Bar Assembly Meeting Resolved: Individuals have the right to terminate their own lives. Formal Debate: Resolved: The United States patent system should be Thought Talk: Walter White: Good or evil?

10:00-10:55

11:00-11:55

12:00-1:25
Resolved: Major league baseball should utilize instant replay to review on-

1:30-2:25

field calls.

Salon 5

Resolved: California should eliminate the provisional drivers license BUT minors should receive double the points and fines for moving violations. Gubernatorial Debate

Salon 6 Salon 7 Salon A Sierra Salon D/E Santa Barbara/ Newport Beach Block 6 Salon 3 Salon 4 Salon 5 Salon 6 Salon 7 Salon A Salon B/C Sierra

Resolved: California should split into two seperate states. Genius Bar Assembly Meeting Thought Talk: What should crime-ridden cities do to reform corrupt and/0r ineffective police departments? Resolved: California should abolish the ballot initiative. Political Fair National Resolved: The USA PATRIOT act should be repealed. Resolved: The Federal government should bailout print media. Resolved: All primary and secondary school teachers should be required to keep guns in their classrooms. Resolved: The United States is the greatest country on earth. Genius Bar Senate Meeting Thought Talk: What public services, if any, should be privatized? National Resolved: The United States should become energy independent Activism Political Fair

2:30-3:25

by 2025. Salon D/E Newport Beach/ Santa Barbara

Block 7 Salon 3 Salon 4 Salon 5 Salon 6 Salon 7 Salon A Salon B/C Salon D/E Sierra Santa Barbara/ Newport Beach State Elections California Ballroom Dinner Regional Caucus Salon 1-3 Salon 4 Salon 5 Salon 7-9 Evening Activities

Resolved: In times of peace, Congressional salaries should be withheld until the Federal budget is balanced. Speed Chess: Resolved: End the Fed. Thought Talk: What do women really want? Resolved: Regina George deserved to get hit by the bus. Genius Bar/Chapter-of-the-Year Presentation Senate Meeting Crisis Scenario Resolved: Targeted killing is a morally permissible tool for National Security. National Resolved: A national right-to-work law should be passed. Political Fair

3:30-4:25

4:30-6:30 6:30-7:55 GGR GCR CVR EBR 8:00-8:30

Grand Ballroom 9:00-12:00 Seattle/Portland 9:00-12:00 Santa Barbara 9:00-12:00 Newport Beach 9:00-12:00 Sedona 9:45-11:45

The Governors Ball 007: A Bond Affair Ninja Game Room Bluegrass Jammin Teacher-Advisor Reception

Curfew No one is allowed out of his or her room past 12:15am.

12:15

Sunday, April 28
Regional Elections Salon 1 Salon 2 Salon 3 Salon 7 Block 8 Salon 3 Salon 4-6 Salon 7 Sedona Sierra Keynote Speaker California Ballroom Closing Session California Ballroom CVR GCR EBR GGR 8:40-9:55

National Resolved: The United States should provide military assistance to pro-democracy movements in the Middle East. Microbate: Resolved: Debates are a waste of time. Resolved: Women belong in the House. Resolved: Ted Mosebys children are really adopted. Genius Bar National Resolved: The democratization of American society is the result of technological advances in media and communications. National Resolved: United States should liberalize immigration quotas.

10:00-10:55

11:00-11:30 11:30-12:30

Contact the Debate Department System

Do you want to give a subsequent speech? Are you confused about what to say, or how to effectively present your speech? Do you have a great argument, but need a piece of evidence to back it up? Did your moderator make a significant error that is changing the course of the debate? Text the debate department mid-debate from your cell phone at (925) 261-6700. A debate staff member will respond to your text with advice or that needed piece of evidence.

The Northern California Junior State of America Proudly Presents Spring State 2013

The Future of Freedom: Rights, Revolution, & Renewal

Full Agenda Friday, April 26

Chapter Registration Registration desk Luggage Storage Sedona Block 1 Newport Beach National Thought Talk: Have First Amendment protections gone too far?
Mod: Evan Coleman, York

4:00-5:00 4:00-5:00 4:00-4:45

The first amendment to the Constitution establishes the right citizens have to free speech. This right manifests itself in many ways in society. People exercise this right daily through the media, protests, and expressing ones opinion. As a nation, we are taught to share our voices with others to affect positive change. There is, however, a point when free speech becomes dangerous. People can speak out against the government, share undisclosed information, and expose harmful truths about society. Some argue that this free speech is crucial to our democracy, while othera believe that too much free speech may become a problem. Can absolute free speech pose a threat to the stability of the government or is it one of our unalienable rights? Salon A National Thought Talk: Is the two party system detrimental to the democratic process?
Mod: Samuela Zhang, Dougherty Valley

The United States government currently faces challenging gridlock in Washington, D.C. The two party system has taken over the political landscape, allowing little room for third parties and new platforms. Some believe that this leaves little room for candidates with newer platforms, limiting democratic process. With the two dominant parties unable to compromise, the government has become inefficient and thus ineffective. On the other side of the issue, some argue that the two party system is a

natural part of democracy and that factions are necessary to uphold our government. Is the two party system beneficial or detrimental to the democratic process? Salon B/C What is the 21st century American identity?
Mod: Isabella Blaney, Northgate

Over the past two centuries, American identity has been defined by the history of the nation. Waves of immigrants, free speech, and toleration have all led to a melting pot of races and nationalities. Economic freedom and the idea of the American dream have also influenced the national identity. In the 21st century, Americans confront many questions in the midst of a drastically changing nation. As the world becomes more globalized, Americans are forced to take a step back and question what their national identity is. How are we impacted by democracy? What is our place in the world? What makes you feel American? Salon D/E Speed Friending

New to JSA? Want to make friend? Come check out Speed Friending! Here you can meet other delegates, new and experienced, to help make you convention more interesting, smooth, and fun! Opening Session California Ballroom Dinner State Nominations California Ballroom
Teach-Advisor Information Meeting Salon A Salon 1-3 Salon 4 Salon 5 Salon 7-9

5:00-5:45 5:45-6:55 7:00-8:00

7:00-8:00

Regional Caucus

GGR GCR CVR EBR

Glow-in-the-Dark Dance Ninja Game Room Bluegrass Jammin Teacher-Advisor Reception

8:05-8:30

Grand Ballroom Seattle/Portland Santa Barbara Newport Beach Sedona

Evening Activities

9:00-12:00 9:00-12:00 9:00-12:00 9:00-12:00 9:45-11:45

Curfew

12:15

Saturday, April 27
Block 2 Salon 3 9:00-9:55 Debate en Espaol: Resuelto: El Servicio Postal de los Estados Unidos debe quitar servicios de correo en los Sbados.
Pro: Jennifer Rodriguez, Richmond Con: Deisy Villalobos, Richmond Mod: Nora Rodriguez, Pinole Valley Con More business directed towards private delivery services since they ship 24/7. Harder to send mail since only 5 business days are in effect. Less pay for postal workers.

Pro Costs less Tax Money.

Gives postal workers two days off. The postal service isnt as needed anyways, with e-mail and other forms of communication.

El Servicio Postal de los Estados Unidos trabaja debajo una lema que dice, Nieve, lluvia, ni noche puede parar el cartero de su servicio postal. Pero, una de las cosas que si puede pararlo en el futuro es mandando correo en los Sabados. Aunque es comun no recibir correo en los Domingos, el USPS decidio que servicio postal en los Sabados probablemente no es necesario, porque muchos ya utilizan e-mailing y uso compartido de archivos digitales. Aunque esto bajaria los taxes que el USPS gana, esto tambien haria mas dificil el mandar correo por el USPS, hasta mandando negocio a otro servicios postal como DHL, UPS, y FedEx. Debemos quitar el servicio postal de Sabado para cortar los precios de servicios postal? Salon 4 Salon 5 Debate 101 Learn the fundamentals of JSA debating National Resolved: The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional.
Pro: Mia Shackleford, Lowell Con: Stetler Brown, University Mod: Leonard Eisen, Pinole Valley

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is a law defining marriage as the legal union of one man and one woman. Signed into law in September of 1996 under President Bill Clinton, this act allows states to choose not to recognize same-sex marriages that occurred in another state. Nine states have legalized gay marriage, which has pushed this act into the spotlight in recent years. Many have demanded the repeal of this act, believing that it is unconstitutional. They argue that it does not comply with the Full Faith and Credit Clause, the denial of equal rights, and how federal government having a

definition of marriage violates the 10th amendment. However, some believe that DOMA is constitutional. They cite that this definition of marriage has been upheld throughout the existence of the United States of America and thus, there is no reason to change the status quo. They also cite religious texts and the typical family structure. Should DOMA be repealed or should it be upheld, leaving it to states to decide whether or not same-sex marriage should be legalized? Salon 6 Speed Chess: Resolved: Money can buy happiness.
Pro: Alexandra Costello, Piedmont Con: Arthur Shemitz, Alternative Family Education Mod: Madeleine Elliott, Piedmont Con Happiness existed before money. People who win the lottery tend to end up with very unhappy lives, and the more they win, the worse their lives get. Money is just a human invention to represent value, but happiness transcends the physical and the tangible.

Pro People that drive Ferraris and Lamborghinis seem to be very happy. People without homes or good clothes don't seem very happy. Scientifically, happiness is just chemical releases in the brain, which are triggered by experiences.

Means of exchange have always been prominent in society, whether it be seashells or dollar bills. People have always tried to buy happiness with all forms of money. Today, money can buy big houses, fast cars, good company, and the ability to do whatever you want. But do these things bring their purchasers happiness? Salon 7 Genius Bar / JSA Summer School Information Session

Still interested in attending a JSA Summer Program? We can help get you there! Sierra Resolved: U-turn signals should be implemented on all new automobiles.
Pro: Zack Rheinstein, Alternative Family Education Con: Tyler Harris, Benicia Mod: Gabrielle Pierotti, Alternative Family Education Con

Pro

Alerts approaching drivers to yield. Left turn signals already serve this purpose. Creates a safer roadway. Requires alterations to driving instruction. Prevents possible dangers that come with making a turn. Costs money to implement.

While car manufacturers and drivers alike have long maintained the use of the normal left and right turn signals, they have often forgotten about the other type of turn, arguably the most difficult: the U-turn. A common yet confusing turn, to say the least, the

U-turn has remained unrepresented in the world of car signals. Conducting a U-turn is a feat of sorts for new drivers, one that can easily become disastrous if done improperly. Would it be beneficial to implement a turn signal for the U-turn in order to warn of the possible difficulty and harm soon present in front of another driver, or is the current left turn signal sufficient? As many teenagers face the newfound difficulty of driving and seasoned professionals encounter difficulty with patience, the matter of safety and awareness must be brought into play. Will the U-turn signal effectively warn a following automobile that a true danger is approaching, or would this added appendage be a pointless expense for our future vehicles? Salon D/E Resolved: The city of Oakland should designate a legal area for sideshows.
Pro: Adrian Napolitano, Oakland Tech Con: Dagmawi Fasil, Oakland Tech Mod: Arbel Efraty, Lowell Pro Con

Designated areas would be managed by the city, therefore Who would pay for the designated spots for the performs would have to abide by the rules set by the city. sideshows? Prevent citizens not performing in the sideshow from being involved into an accident. Bridges a gap between the common public of Oakland and the so-called man. Often sideshows are surrounded with a crowd of underage teens drinking. Supporting the sideshow performers with a designated spot can create a weak push-over image the law enforcement of Oakland.

Popularized in movies and music about the Bay Area, stunts in and around cars like driftin, doughnuttin, and ghost ridin are all part of the automobile exhibition known as sideshows. The city of Oakland, California has a long tradition with this art form; however, these sideshows tend to be done informally and illegally. The casual organization of street stunts has become a serious hazard to the public. In the midst of one sideshow, a driver ran into a performing car and pinned it up against a pole. This led to the death of three and critical injuries to two others. For the safety of the public should the city of Oakland designate places for slideshows, or should it remain illegal due to the wild actions included? Block 3 Salon 3 10:00-10:55 Resolved: Religion does more harm than good.
Pro: Casey Monahan, Harbor Con: Akshaya Natarajan, San Mateo Mod: Nora Rodriguez, Pinole Valley Con Creates sense of community. Promotes education and generosity. Promotes beneficial charity work.

Pro Cause of many wars. Violence in the name of religion. Creates an us vs. them atmosphere.

Religion has brought us Mother Teresa and many other religious men and women who have dedicated their lives to service. Religion has also brought us the Spanish Inquisition and the Crusades, church-sanctioned slaughters. Even within a single subject, such as in the conquest of the Americas, conflict ensues; some members of the Catholic Church justify the abuse of the native inhabitants while others tried to protect their rights. Some feel that the very concept of religion makes us intolerant, while others feel that religion expresses the best impulses of humankind. Still others argue that religion is beautiful, though humans mess up its ideas in practice. In the end, does religion do more good than harm? Salon 4 Novice: Resolved: Violent video games do more harm than good.
Pro: Tyler Ho, Pinole Valley Con: Christopher Calciano, York Mod: Malakai Wade, Alternative Family Education Pro Many children who play violent video games exhibit violent tendencies. Waste of time; distracting from homework. Rude online communities, in-game bullying. Con Artistic freedom (game designers are entitled to their work). Millions of people play titles like CoD and Halo, there arent millions of murderers. As long as the ESRB laws are followed, gamers should be ideally mature enough for their games.

From Armored Core to Zelda, violent video games have swept across the gaming world, easily taking up the majority of popular games on the market. Although nonviolent games such as the Portal games have become increasingly popular, society still finds itself immersed in gory, violent shooters such as Halo and Call of Duty. However, do we need to exhibit this sort of flagrant violence to younger audiences? According to the New York Times, both the shooters in Newtown, Connecticut; and Aurora, Colorado were both avid video gamers, and a possible link could be associated between the shootings and the violent gaming. If this is the case, violent video games are slowly corrupting American citizens, and like any threat to the American people, should be marked as a threat and be controlled. On the converse, however, it may just be a coincidence, and video games may be just like any other media source, like violent movies serving only to entertain the jingoistic eyes of their audience. Are video games an entertaining outlet, or an aggravator of violence and death? Salon 5 Resolved: Domestic Terrorists should not be subject to all legal rights.
Pro: Jonathan Chang, Armijo Con: Sumit Kumar, Foothill

Mod: Ema T. Barnes, Lowell Pro Can help ensure public safety. They are not felons. They dont deserve rights. Con All citizens have rights. Allows potential for abuse. Suspects may not be culprits.

After the capture of Dzhokar Tsarnaev, one of the men suspected of planting bombs at the 2013 Boston Marathon, the Federal Bureau of Investigations and Department of Justice stated that the young man would not be given his Miranda rights under the Public Safety clause. This legal precedent holds that when a detained subject may have information that could create, or prevent, harm to the public, the subject may be initially interrogated without having his legal rights explained. Furthermore, is the American justice system the best place for prosecution of domestic terrorists? Many feel that their acts are not those of crime, but those of war: enemy combatants not felons. Should domestic terrorists have access to complete legal rights? Will limiting the rights of this violent minority translate to a restriction of rights for the law-abiding majority? Live Auction: Junior Date of America Have you ever dreamed about going on a date with JSAers like Arnela Colic, Karthik Prasad, or Will Du? Come out to Junior Date of America, where you can have the once in a life time chance to bid on these JSAers and many more, including Aaron Pressman, Brad Davis, Reema Kakaday, Lilly Tahmasebi, Mari Galicer, and Ariel Barbieri-Aghib! Salon 6 Ariel Barbieri-Aghib: Ariel enjoys heated discussions about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict with republican zionists, as well as candle lit dinners spent discussing the current economic crisis. She also enjoys pictures of man eating cats (better known as tigers) and can be found dancing to Indian music long into the night. Arnela Colic: Arnela, also known as Boss Lady, is a senior at Leigh and NorCal Governor. She enjoys large cups of coffee, taking pictures of cats, and watching sloths sleep. When she's not running the world, she spends her time napping and watching Mad Men. Brad Davis: Brad Davis is a Junior at Armijo High School. He is 17, with a birthday on Valentine's Day. A patron of tennis and music, Brad likes to enjoy the finer things in life; which could also include you. If asked, Brad will not hesitate to sing or rap, especially if it is an NWA or Taylor Swift song. His ideal date would be comprised of two parts:

a) stimulating conversation, perhaps in a Santa Clara Coffee Shop or In-N-Out b) intelligent and meaningful dancing, perhaps at a JSA dance In the words of a man that thinks like me, and looks like me: "I am a helpless romantic and I love to spoil my girlfriends." - Orlando Bloom

Will Du: Whos William Du? To be honest, nobody knows. Some say that he does car commercials for lexus in Japan. Others claim that he assassinated President Lincoln. In reality he moonlights as President of the United States and daylights as Justice Sotomayor. Want to strike up conversation? William is an expert in identifying humans from dogs and solving complex math problems including 1+1 which of course adds up to 61239. In addition, he sings like an angel and if you ask nice enough, he will sing the entire Phantom of the Opera and Les Miserables from heart. In addition, he is extremely gifted with music. He can play the piano, guitar, oboe, cello, flute, and mandolin. However, he is limited to instruments that are produced by a deemed invisible, whatever that means. Furthermore, he like turtles. His favorite books include 50 Shades of Gray, Twilight, and The Sisterhood of Traveling Pants. Finally, William is a pathological liar. Mari Galicer: Mari is an an empowered woman who likes all types of men-- even libertarians. When she's not busy breaking glass ceilings or hanging out with Sheryl Sandberg, you can find her at home reading one of Hillary Clinton's autobiographies next to her many cats. She also enjoys red wine and long walks to the fridge. Reema Kakaday: Reema Kakaday is a high school junior and the NorCal JSA Activism Director who not only absolutely loves JSA and activism, but has a huge passion for dance, music, and baking! Outside of school, Reema can be found perfecting choreography in a dance studio, always listening to the 20/20 Experience, baking lemon bars, working on her photography, or studying for her upcoming tests. Shes a fun-loving, bubbly, smiley person who can always make your day better and brighter! Karthik Prasad:

We've all seen our dark-chocolatey Lieutenant Governor busy at work during conventions or sweeping up gavels in debates, but the question remains: what does Karthik Prasad do in his spare time? Well, when he isn't working his Senate to death or ceaselessly tormenting his wonderful President Pro-Tempore, Karthik relaxes by dressing like Iron Man and dancing like Obama after a long game of whack-a-republican. Karthik is also notorious for gossiping like he's on the set of Mean Girls. Rumor has it that his purple shirt is insured for $10,000.

Aaron Pressman: So you may have seen this guy debating before or helping his staff answer text messages at the debate department desk, but who is the real Aaron Pressman? Well, Aaron has been a hardcore master debater for quite some time. With his outstanding oral skills and language abilities, some would even call him a cunning linguist. But his qualities and skills dont stop there. Aaron is a down-to-earth guy who enjoys dates and having a good time . Outside of the Junior State of America, he fights crime and saves the world working for the Justice Society of America (JSA II). Most importantly, hes got 23 gavels. Care to bang one? Lilly Tahmasebi: Her business card says "I'll call you." Her passport requires no photo. She has won the JSA lifetime achievement award. Twice. Gavels present themselves to her. Moderators moderate themselves around her. She once had an awkward moment, just to see how it felt. Enemies list her as their emergency contact number. Devils advocate(s) ask her if they can speak. Her cereal never gets soggy, it just sits there, staying crisp, waiting for her. She has inside jokes with strangers. Her words carry so much weight that it breaks less interesting people's ears. If she gave you directions you would get lost 5 times and be 10 minutes early. She doesn't go to blocks, blocks go to her. She rarely goes on blind dates, but when she does, its for JSA. Salon 7 Genius Bar

This is your hub for all things related to The Quest. There will be computers set up to research questions should you get stuck during your journey.

Salon A

Thought Talk: What is the effect filibusters have in the political process?
Mod: Lea Finato, Leigh

In 1789, the first U.S. Senate adopted rules allowing the Senate to move the previous question, ending debate and proceeding to a vote. Aaron Burr argued that the motion regarding the previous question was redundant, had only been exercised once in the preceding four years, and should be eliminated. In 1806, the Senate agreed, recodifying its rules, and thus the potential for a filibuster sprang into being. Because the Senate created no alternative mechanism for terminating debate, the filibuster became an option for delay and blocking of floor votes. Today, the filibuster can be a weapon used for stalling bills and wasting precious time in the Senate. It can also be used to discuss matters of significant importance, such as recently when Senator Rand Paul held a filibuster challenging John Brennan's nomination confirmation vote for the position of Director of the CIA and demanding an answer from the Obama Administration to the question should a President be allowed to target, and kill an American by drone attack, on American soil, without due process?" This went on for almost 13 hours, and ranked as the 9th longest filibuster in US history. In this thought talk, we will discuss what effect the filibuster actually has on the political process. Whatever the outcome may be, it is clear that the filibuster has been a tradition in the Senate for many years. It is one of the most distinctive differences between the Senate and the House and, for better or for worse, holds a prominent position in the legislative process. Salon B/C National Resolved: The Federal Assault Weapons Ban should be reinstated.
Pro: Wyatt Lemons, Leigh Con: Kevin Covarrubias, Oakland Tech Mod: Delenne Franco, San Mateo

Following the mass shooting in Newtown, Connecticut many began to call for greater gun control legislation. As a result, they began to look to past legislation on this issue. In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which prohibited the manufacture and civilian use of semi-automatic firearms, also known as assault weapons. This ban expired in 2004. Those in favor of reinstating this legislation argue that there is no need for civilians to have such dangerous weapons and that it would reduce mass shootings and widespread violence. Many have come out against reinstating this ban. They cite the ineffectiveness of the previous weapons ban and state that it is not the guns that are the source of the problem. Should the Federal Assault Weapons Ban be reinstated or are there other ways to combat gun violence? Salon D/E Boston Massacre: Resolved: California should implement a sin tax on junk food.
Pro: Nina Dabit, Northgate Con: Marcos Nunez, Richmond

Mod: Lynn Vu, American Indian II Pro May lower obesity rates. Encourages purchase of local goods. Source for extra revenue. Con Limits the purchasing power of CA residents. People will still buy junk food; it will just raise the cost of living.

As of late October 2012, the CDC had found that 24 percent of adults and 17.2 percent of children in the state of California were obese, amounting to over 15 million people. This constant growth of obese adults and children has caused a major concern, especially since California stands as the 12th least obese state in the U.S. (meaning 38 other states have higher obesity rates.) In an attempt to protect California residents and encourage them to choose proper eating habits, a sin tax could be established. On the other hand, as American people, we are entitled to the things we purchase and we should have an unalienable right to indulge in what our purchasing power provides us. As seen in the Whiskey Rebellion of 1791, the American people do not take kindly to their goods being overly taxed, regardless of the harmful effects. Does California need the sin tax as a helping hand to lower obesity across the board, or are we to stay true to our age old motto, no taxation without representation? Seattle/Portland Block 4 Salon 3 Mock Trial 11:00-11:55 Mysteriobate: It is rational to ________ ________.
Pro: Nick Whitaker, Piedmont Con: Quinton Grounds, York

Pro Were not Make it

Con going to that easy!

Thought you could look try to figure out the topic based on the blurb, eh? Nice try and best of luck! Salon 4 Resolved: The Pledge of Allegiance should be mandatory for all students.
Pro: Harry Yoon, Dougherty Valley Con: Mari Galicer, Lowell Mod: Mary Joplin, York Con Discriminates against religious groups. Wastes valuable class time. Mandate is excessive.

Pro American values must be taught and upheld. Many schools have a devoted time already. Boosts morale among students.

The Pledge of Allegiance is a symbol of nationalism, patriotism, and loyalty to the United States of America. It has been officially recognized since 1942, and since has had widespread use in American schools, sporting events, and government agencies. For many citizens it is a daily practice, a fact of life encouraging nationalism. However, some say that it discriminates against certain religious and non-religious groups because of the inclusion of the line one Nation under God. Does the Pledge of Allegiance hold enough patriotic value to merit its sanction in all US schools, or does its allegedly discriminatory nature make it by definition un-American? Salon 5 Speed Chess: Resolved: The vigilante acts of the hacker group Anonymous are justified.
Pro: Julian Arthur, Alternative Family Education Con: Calvin Chiu, Chinese Christian Mod: Madeleine Elliott, Piedmont Con People have right to privacy. Causes irreparable harm. Promotes extrajudicial vigilantism.

Pro Form of protest. Aim to avenge victims. Attack internet criminals.

The hacker group Anonymous, commonly referred to as hacktivists or people that promote activism through hacking, are well known for their vigilante acts against government corruption, Internet censorship, and homophobia as well as the wearing of Guy Fawkes masks to conceal their identities. They have attacked numerous groups such as the Syrian and U.S. governments, Facebook, a child pornography website, and the Westboro Baptist Church. They believe their acts are justified because they are in protest of groups they either strongly disagree with the views of or are widely opposed by much of the general public. Even so, are they justified in hacking a website purely because they do not agree with its views? Often times, these groups are either completely destroyed or have been caused irreparable damage due to the work of these unidentified hackers. Is this sort of protest an appropriate means to express an objection or is it an unwarranted and overzealous means of destruction? Salon 6 Resolved: Same-sex marriage should be legal BUT abortion should simultaneously be banned.
Pro: Paul Jeon, Dougherty Valley Con: Tyler Harris, Benicia Mod: Georgina Bailey, Harbor

Pro

Con

All men are created equal, and should be treated equally. Not all men are born into equal circumstances, and some people must live horrible lives because of this.

Those who have a chance at life, but are not born yet should have the same chance as everyone else. Abortions can be regulated when legal.

Domestic partnerships are a substitute for marriage. Abortions are immoral and shouldnt be legal.

In the past year, same sex marriage has been on the hot seat of the political scene. Should same sex couples be granted the same rights as heterosexual couples? Coincidentally, abortion has also been highly debated. When does life begin, the favorite question asked by both sides. Now is the time to make a choice-should we allow same sex couples the legal rights of marriage, while not allowing women the right to choose? Salon 7 Genius Bar

This is your hub for all things related to The Quest. There will be computers set up to research questions should you get stuck during your journey. Salon A Salon B/C Assembly Meeting Resolved: Individuals have the right to terminate their own lives.
Pro: Alexandra Costello, Piedmont Con: Rebecca Caccavo, Balboa Mod: Erika Castanon, Center

Pro It is a personal decision. Some cultures find it honorable.

Con Effects on family and friends are life-long. Undiagnosed depression underlies requests for assisted suicide.

Stops unnecessary pain and suffering of the terminally ill. Very few helped, a great many harmed.

Currently, there are legal consequences for attempting to commit suicide in most states in the U.S.A. However, there is much sympathy for the terminally ill who want to end their lives via assisted suicide instead of suffering until they die naturally. Do individuals have the right to terminate their own lives? Making assisted suicide legal would help thousands of terminally ill patients take control of their fate, saving money, time, and pain. On the other hand, with depression rates on the rise, making suicide legal could spark detremental results for American societies and individuals involved. Newport Beach Formal Debate: Resolved: The United States patent system should be abolished.
Pro: Evan Coleman, York Con: Travis Lanham, Leigh

The idea behind the patent system was to stimulate innovation by allowing inventors to stake a claim to their products and discoveries. In todays modern age, however, patents have grown into vague and obscure things that scare innovators from

creating anything, in the fear of breaching someone elses patent. For example, Apple sued Samsung for infringing on its round edged rectangle shape for smartphones, using their patent to glean one billion dollars of the company. The patent system as it stands no longer is a protector of the innovator, but an aggressor as well. Do the positives outweigh the negatives? Salon D/E Thought Talk: Walter White: Good or evil?
Mod: Cassady Bogatin, Berkeley High

Walter White. Heisenberg. The man you hate to love, and love to hatethe star of television show Breaking Bad. For five long years we have followed his desperate pursuit of wealth and powerbut to what end? Although it began as a simple means to provide for his tragically dysfunctional family, Mr. Whites suburban meth manufacturing habit has grown into a black market behemoth, and remains the only reason that any of us would ever care about anything that ever happened in Albuquerque. His means have been varied, his actions ambivalent, but there is no denying the concrete resolve with which Walter goes about his daily routine as an enterprising chemist. The only question, then, is whether or not he is justified in his actions (some of which are, admittedly, quite heinous.) Is Walter White a force of evil? Is he criminal scum who works for no reason other than to achieve his own selfish ends? Or, perhaps, is he a misunderstood philanthropist, simply a sick man hoping to provide for his family? As fellow character Gustavo Fring says, And a man, a man provides. And he does it even when he's not appreciated or respected or even loved. He simply bears up and he does it. Because he's a man. Lunch Block 5 Salon 3 12:00-1:25 1:30-2:25 Resolved: Major league baseball should utilize instant replay to review on-field calls.
Pro: Arbel Efraty, Lowell Con: Adrian Napolitano, Oakland Tech Mod: Dagmawi Fasil, Oakland Tech Con

Pro

Easier to make calls. It would slow down the game. Removes conflict of interest threat from umpires (they It takes the human aspect out of the game. cant ignore the obvious). There will still be bad calls that cannot be reviewed. It wont cost any extra; there are already cameras on field.

Baseball is one of Americas greatest pastimes alongside apple pie and freedom, but baseball comes with the opportunity for many poor calls. In the heat of the action, umpires have ended up making calls based on a poor field of sight, or the inability to see

within a commotion of players. With the use of instant replay, umpires will be able to carefully review plays, and having done so, administer the proper response. After decades of playing the game without instant replay, should we continue the tradition, or institute a system to keep the game fair? Salon 4 Resolved: California should eliminate the provisional drivers license BUT minors should receive double the points and fines for moving violations.
Pro: Christopher Calciano, York Con: Peter Lally, Piedmont Mod: Ashton DeLano, California

Pro Gives young drivers freedom to transport other people and drive whenever they need to. Will cause for young drivers to be extremely cautious, because all fines are doubled. Equality on the road is essential to keeping it safe.

Con Unnecessary financial burden on parents if minors get fined. They arent adults so they shouldnt be treated like adults. Minors have the highest rate of accidents, and it needs to be controlled somehow.

The provisional drivers license is provided to drivers between the ages of 16 and 18 for the first year they have their license. This is to ensure that younger drivers are allowed the privilege of operating motor vehicles and becoming more experienced while minimizing some of the risks of driving. For example, provisional drivers are prohibited from driving past 11pm and driving unlicensed persons under the age of 25. These restrictions sometimes serve as obstacles for young drivers who need to transport other people and need access to other prohibited rights as a result of possessing a provisional license. The solution to this problem would be doubling the points and fines for violations on minors. The point of the provisional license is to ensure the safety of younger drivers on the road, but fear of increased punishment for disobeying the driving laws may cause drivers with provisional licenses to be extra cautious, another deterrent to problems on the road. Should we keep the provisional license and the associated restrictions, or remove it and raise the stakes for minors on the road? Salon 5
head.

Gubernatorial Debate

Gubernatorial candidates Joshua Kisbye and Kevin Covarrubias go head-to-

Salon 6 states.

Resolved: California should split into two seperate

Pro: Calvin Chiu, Chinese Christian Con: Rassim Chettfour, Armijo

Mod: Ariel Barbieri-Aghib Pro Different political climates. Vast geographic differences. Easier to govern. Con Solution to a non-existent problem. Transition will be difficult. High costs to establishing a new government.

People of one of the largest states, both in population and in land, residents have long called for California's division into Northern and Southern California.With the breadth of political mindset and socioeconomic status, California is growing increasingly difficult to govern. If a partition were to occur, each state would still have populations between fifteen and twenty million, and the addition of two senators would help better represent these populations. However, is this move really necessary? If the state is difficult to govern, maybe it would be easier and more effective to reform and solve the problems, not to divide and ignore the problems. Geographically, politically, and even socially, the ends of California are hecka different. Should they be split? Genius Bar

Salon 7

This is your hub for all things related to The Quest. There will be computers set up to research questions should you get stuck during your journey. Salon A Sierra Assembly Meeting Thought Talk: What should crime-ridden cities do to reform corrupt and/0r ineffective police departments?
Mod: Samuel Zheng, Dougherty Valley

Crime is a perpetual silent contender for the top domestic ill that wont go away. Crime is complex because it involves factors beyond law enforcement such as the strength of the family, neighborhoods, schools, and churches. But crime is simple in the sense that government officials can reduce crime by doing their jobnamely, by making crime too unprofitable to practice. Yet many cities such as Oakland, Compton, and Detroit still have issues in controlling crime. In this thought talk, we will examine the role crime-ridden cities need to play in reforming their police departments. Salon D/E Resolved: California should abolish the ballot initiative.
Pro: Rachel Brodwin, Lick-Wilmerding Con: Julie Oatfield, Lowell Mod: Ema T. Barnes, Lowell Con Allows average citizens to be heard.

Pro The job of politicians.

The general populaces vote is easily influenced. Unnecessary in modern era.

Lobbies and SIGs can have a harder time convincing public. Necessary for strong democracy.

In California, the ballot initiative is a means for citizens to directly legislate. It provides the most powerful political representation for the average citizen. This progressive era reform was passed as a way to reduce the power of political machines that ran unchecked in power over state and city legislatures. However, these initiatives can also muddy the political process and increase the possibility for pork barreling unrelated laws on very popular legislation. While these laws provide results for vocalization of ideas, do they overly usurp our political process? Santa Barbara/
Newport Beach

Political Fair 2:30-3:25 National Resolved: The USA PATRIOT act should be repealed.
Pro: Mia Shackleford, Lowell Con: Jessica Weiss, Lowell Mod: Nora Rodriguez, Pinole Valley

Block 6 Salon 3

In October of 2001, President George W. Bush signed into law the USA Patriot Act, which stands for Uniting (and) Strengthening America (by) Providing Appropriate Tools Required (to) Intercept (and) Obstruct Terrorism. This act was a response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York and was designed to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world. The major provisions of this act included reducing restrictions in gathering intelligence and broadening the law enforcements discretion in detaining and deporting suspected criminals. Since its enactment, those who believe it is a violation of the fourth amendment due to the wiretaps, National Security Letters, and indefinite detentions of immigrants associated with this act have criticized this act. Those opposed also argue that this act has not been effective in finding intelligence. There are, however, many who do not think it should be repealed. They cite the numerous terrorist plots that this act has helped prevent and the importance of protecting America. So, should the Patriot Act be repealed or is it necessary to protect our country? Salon 5 Resolved: All primary and secondary school teachers should be required to keep guns in their classrooms.
Pro: Rachel Brodwin, Lick-Wilmerding Con: Nicole Garay, Redwood

Mod: Nora Perry, Piedmont

Pro

Con

Well-trained teachers will be more experienced than most Giving teachers guns simply adds more fuel to the fire. mass murderers. Teachers are most trusted people in our society. Unless well guarded at all times, students could steal the firearms and use them. 50 armed guards at the school can collectively stop any Teachers are people too, and are just as susceptible to gunman through sheer force of numbers. mental problems and anger issues.

When school shootings occur, leaders on both sides of the political spectrum try to think of solutions to prevent them from ever occurring again. Some groups have called for an increase of armed protection in schools, going as far as stating that there should be a gun in every classroom. Proponents argue that as soon as a gunman steps into a classroom, a teacher will draw and fire first, stopping the killer before he commits his rampage. However, opponents argue that a massacre could occur if a student were to find this gun, or if a teacher should be struck with mental illness. Would the arming of teachers reduce risk or cause it? Salon 6 Resolved: The United States is the greatest country on earth.
Pro: Quinton Grounds, York Con: Leonard Eisen, Pinole Valley Mod: Emma Maiden, Acalanes

Pro U.S.A. U.S.A. U.S.A.

Con Poor education system. High poverty rates. Highest rate of incarceration.

It is shouted both honestly and ironically, "America is the Greatest Country in the World." With such a rich history, amazing military might, massive economy, and excesses of freedom, how can the US not be the best? But there are some downfalls within this nation, debt, unemployment, war, poverty, and political stagnation. We have had some major issues in the past, and the present, and there will be many in the future. Perhaps too many to name ourselves the greatest country in the world. Salon 7 Genius Bar

This is your hub for all things related to The Quest. There will be computers set up to research questions should you get stuck during your journey. Salon A Salon B/C Senate Meeting Thought Talk: What public services, if any, should be privatized?

Mod: Erica Monicall, Piedmont

Who gainsand who loseswhen public assets and jobs are turned over to the private sector? The corporate right endlessly promotes privatization of public assets and public jobs as a cash-raising or cost-saving measure. Privatization means the public turnover to a private company of assets such as airports, roads, buildings, or contracts of a public function. Many cities contract out their trash collection. To raise cash, Arizona even sold its state capital building and leased it back. The justification for privatization is the old argument that private companies do everything better and more efficiently than government, and will find ways to cut costs. Over and over we hear that companies do everything for less cost than government. But it never seems to sink in that private companies dont do things unless the people at the top can make a bundle of cash; if the CEO isnt making millions, that CEO will move the company on to something else. When government does something, they dont have to pay millions to someone at the top. In this thought talk, we approach the question of which public services should be privatized, if any at all. Salon 4 Resolved: The Federal government should bailout print media.
Pro: Julie Oatfield, Lowell Con: Caitlin Lienkaemper, Lowell Mod: Kelly Bruner, Rodriguez

Pro $112 Billion per year industry in US. Print media has been centuries-old standard. Digital media destroys jobs.

Con US government already in $16 trillion debt. Print industry is dying (transfer to digital is natural). Print media can survive on its own.

For the past 500 years, printed media has been the standard for newspapers, periodicals, books, and all other forms of text-based publications. It is an institution accounting for over 30,700 companies producing $112 billion per year in the US alone. However, technological progress is driving much of this media from print to digital, where media can be produced and distributed more quickly, cheaply, and efficiently. Many American companies are finding it almost impossible to make this transition, which is resulting in the destruction of jobs, and the outsourcing of labor to server companies, which are often located in foreign countries. Is it the government's job to step in and save a dying industry, or should the economy regulate itself? Sierra National Resolved: The United States should become nergy independent by 2025.
Pro: Ali Esfahani, Dougherty Valley Con: Marc Cunningham, Lowell Mod: Lynn Vu, American Indian II

In his 2011 State of the Union address, President Obama proposed that 80 percent of electricity production should come from clean energy sources by 2025. Many wonder whether this goal is realistic and whether the United States is truly capable of complete energy independence in 12 years. Recently, Exxon Mobile reported that the United States was on track to be energy independent by 2025 due to the growing industry of natural gas, which is expected to overtake coal. Those who share the same opinion as Exxon also cite increased amounts of renewable energies such as solar and wind power. There are some, however, who believe that this plan not feasible. They argue that the United States is too dependent on foreign oil to become self sufficient and that there are not enough sources in the country to supply its energy needs. Will the United States become energy independent by 2025 or is this an unrealistic goal? Salon D/E Activism Want to learn more about activism? Come to the activism block, where we'll be talking about everything concerning activism, like how to get your school more involved, how Youth Advisory Boards will work, and who to contact to apply for internships. Activism truly presents you with an opportunity to be the people, so don't miss out! Newport/ Santa Barbara Block 7 Salon 3 Political Fair 3:30-4:25 Resolved: In times of peace, Congressional salaries should be withheld until the Federal budget is balanced.
Pro: Mary Joplin, York Con: Julie Oatfield, Lowell Mod: Alex Adams, University

Pro There would be more money that could go into other departments. Congress might actually get something done. Congressmen would understand how it feels to be unemployed.

Con Everyone has a right to be paid if they work. They might go on strike. Congressmen do work in peacetime, and should be paid regardless.

Most Americans these days are frustrated with Congress' seeming lack of productivity. Our legislators do not seem capable of actually legislating. Some argue that we should save tax money and incentivize Congress to be effective by withholding their salaries until they balance the budget. However, others argue that Congress is slow only because they are discussing the complex and important values of Americans. They are representing our interests. Should they be penalized for standing up for the views of their constituents instead of compromising with politicians? Would withholding Congressional

salaries provide an increase to productivity, or is it merely a solution to a nonexistent problem? Salon 4 Speed Chess: Resolved: End the Fed.
Pro: Lucas Gruenwald, Lowell Con: Duncan Morrow, Foothill Mod: Kylea Rosen, Novato

Pro The Federal Reserve has been inflating the US dollar at high rates. Private institutions could handle the role of the Federal Reserve. Even with the Federal Reserve, there is a pattern of a Boom and Bust economy in US history.

Con The federal reserve helps stabilize inflation. Without the Federal Reserve, there would be no central US monetary policymaker. Without a central bank for the US, a panic could deplete all private banks of their available funds.

The Federal Reserve, or "The Fed, is the central banking system of the United States. It controls inflation rates, bails out failing banks, supervises all banks, and helps manage nationwide panics. The Fed has three goals: maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates; however, some argue that the economy could, given the opportunity, self-regulate. The Fed exists somewhat outside US government control, and it also loans money to the government, allowing them to pay off debts. Is the Fed really necessary, and does it do its job correctly? Salon 5 Thought Talk: What do women really want?
Mod: Brad Davis & Aaron Pressman, Directors of Debate

Life is full of a great many mysteriesStonehenge, Machu Picchu, the imminent continuation of CSI Miamibut of all lifes wonders, one has eclipsed the rest. From Galileo to Rousseau, Hobbes to Pusha T, many renowned philosophers have pondered the answer to what can only be considered the greatest question in the history of our existence: what do women really want? Since the dawn of time, man has struggled to understand his strange, confusing counterpart. Today, we hope to finally take a step toward finding an answer to this age old question. Salon 6 Resolved: Regina George deserved to get hit by the bus.
Pro: Kylea Rosen, Novato Con: Bilegt Baatar, Lowell Mod: JT Greenberg, Central

Pro Regina stole Cadys boyfriend. Regina wouldnt let Gretchen wear the white gold hoop earrings. Regina wore sweatpants on a Monday...

Con Regina is a master manipulator; her skill shouldnt be punished. Shes already fat from Calteen bars. Shes so fetch.

Regina George is the queen bee of The Plastics in the cult teen dramedy movie Mean Girls. A master of emotional manipulation and the coveted three way calling attack, Regina George gets hit by a school bus near the end of the film after getting into fight with protagonist Cady Heron. The question that has haunted us for almost a decade: Did Regina George really deserve to get hit by the bus? On one hand, Regina George is probably the most fetch and sassy diva ever. So fetch. On the other hand, why should Caesar just get to stomp around like a giant while the rest of us try not to get smushed under his big feet? Brutus is just as cute as Caesar, right? Brutus is just as smart as Caesar, people totally like Brutus just as much as they like Caesar, and when did it become okay for one person to be the boss of everybody because that's not what Rome is about! We should totally just STAB CAESAR! Salon 7 Genius Bar/Chapter-of-the-Year Presentations

This is your schools opportunity to showcase how awesome your chapter was this year and be named the Northern California Chapter of the Year. Salon B/C Crisis Scenario
Mod: Arnela Colic, Leigh

You have recently been informed that a North Korean fighter jet is en route to the United States and is going to cross over Hawaii in approximately 8 minutes. Time to intercept is 8 minutes as well, and at intercept we will be able to tell what materials, if anything, are onboard the plane. We do not have radio contact with the airplane, and North Korea is denying that there is any plane that has left their country, even though it is clearly their design. Navy ships stationed throughout the Pacific may have a clean shot at the plane, and likely could shoot it down before it crossed over Hawaii. This leaves this room with a single question: you have 8 minutes to decide whether the US Navy should shoot down this plane, having no idea what is on it, or wait until it crosses over Hawaii. And this is just the beginning. The decisions are all up to you. Salon D/E Resolved: Targeted killing is a morally permissible tool for National Security.
Pro: Karthik Prasad, Northgate Con: Nils Franco, York Mod: Jonah Demars, Alternative Family Education

The 21st century has witnessed a rise in drone warfare led by the United States. After millions of dollars invested in developing this powerful military technology and many lives lost as a result, President Obama and his administration are in the process of drawing up a drone warfare rulebook to set up the circumstances in which target by an

unmanned drone is justified. This has led many to wonder whether drone warfare can be justified and whether it is a blatant violation of human rights. Those against this type of warfare argue that it dehumanizes war while violating international law and peace. Those in favor of this type of warfare argue that it is an efficient and effective means to achieving the United States goals. Ultimately, is drone warfare a violation of human rights? Sierra National Resolved: A national right-to-work law should be passed.
Pro: Ashton DeLano, California Con: Gabrielle Pierotti, Alternative Family Education Mod: Malakai Wade, Alternative Family Education

Right-to-work laws are statutes that prohibit union security agreements, payment of union dues, and fees as a condition of employment. These laws are designed to provide a contract between employers and labor unions and to prevent the exclusion of workers who are not part of a union. In 1947, the Taft-Hartley Act prohibited closed shop, which compels businesses to hire union-only workers, as well as union shop, which requires union membership after a given duration of employment. This act also allowed for states to enact right-to-work laws. Currently, twenty-four states have such laws, which has led some to advocate for a national right-to-work law. Those for this law argue that it secures the right of employees to decide whether they want to join a union without being threat of losing their job. Those who believe the United States should not pass this law acknowledge that it is up to states to decide whether they should implement such a law and that this law would weaken unions that are necessary for American success. Should a national right-to-work law be passed or should this remain a state decision? Santa Barbara/ Newport Beach State Elections
California Ballroom

Political Fair 4:30-6:30 6:30-7:55

GGR GCR CVR EBR
The Governors Ball 007: A Bond Affair Ninja Game Room

Dinner
Salon 1-3 Salon 4 Salon 5 Salon 7-9

Regional Caucus

8:00-8:30

Evening Activities
Grand Ballroom Seattle/Portland Santa Barbara

9:00-12:00 9:00-12:00 9:00-12:00

Newport Beach Sedona

Bluegrass Jammin Teacher-Advisor Reception

9:00-12:00 9:45-11:45

Curfew

No one is allowed out of his or her room past 12:15am.

12:15

Sunday, April 28
Salon 1 Salon 2 Salon 3 Salon 7

Regional Elections

CVR GCR EBR GGR

8:40-9:55

Block 8 Salon 3

10:00-10:55 National Resolved: The United States should provide military assistance to pro-democracy movements in the Middle East.
Pro: Jessica Weiss, Lowell Con: Peter Lally, Piedmont Mod: Jonah Demars, Alternative Family Education

During the spring of 2011, a series of revolts occurred in the Middle East, as series that has become known as the Arab Spring. The world watched as countries in the Middle East rose up against their dictators and existing leaders to establish new governments in the hands of the people. The United States and other democratic nations watched these protests intently, seeing opportunity for future democracies. Those in favor argue that to have more democracies in the world would benefit the United States economically and would lead to a more stable Middle East. They also think that, as a superpower, it is the responsibility of the United States to aid democratic uprisings. Those against military assistance in the Middle East believe democracy should be a grassroots movement and that it is not the role of the United States to get involved in the internal uprisings of the Middle East. Should the United States provide military assistance to pro-democracy in the Middle East? Salon 4-6 Microbate: Resolved: Debates are a waste of time. Resolved: Women belong in the House. Resolved: Ted Mosbys children are really adopted.
Presented by Members of Cabinet Con Stimulate thought.

Pro They take too long.

I would rather dance than debate. Women are excellent cooks. Women deserve equal political representation. Ted is a loser. Adoptions are heartwarming.

Good way to fill up a block. Women are amazing. Women belong in the Senate too. Umbrella women. Why would it be called How I Met Your Mother?

Time to waste time! In this fast paced microbate, the resolution will determine how relevant debating is. Is it talking in circles, or actually applied some sort of rhetoric strategies to convince an audience? On a more misogynistic note, the next debate talks about the role of women in society. Although we have the outlying independent women who dont need no man, this resolution seeks to take us back to a more traditional time where the women remain as the homemakers in society. Oh wait - it is advocating the need for women to be in the House of Representatives! Last but not least, the third resolution gets into a question we have all wanted answered. In the show How I Met Your Mother viewers watch Ted Mosby tell his children the story of how he met their mother. The audience has been left absolutely clueless as to whom the mother might be; which has caused for some speculation; maybe there is no mother! Ted could just be making a long-winded story to express how he adopted the two, or we can actually look forward to a good conclusion to How I Met Your Mother. Salon 7 Genius Bar

This is your hub for all things related to The Quest. There will be computers set up to research questions should you get stuck during your journey. Sedona National Resolved: The democratization of American society is the result of technological advances in media and communications.
Pro: Paul Jeon, Dougherty Valley Con: Ryan Thomas, Leigh Mod: Alex Adams, University

Throughout the history of the United States, the citizenry of the country has become increasingly involved in the political and social matters of government. When the Constitution was first written, it was largely in the hands of the elite. However, many more have a voice in American society today. This suggests an important factor has contributed to the democratization of American society over the past two hundred years. Many claim this factor is technological advances in the media. They argue that as technology such as phones and computers have started to play a larger role in peoples lives through phones and computers, they have more access to information, thereby involving them in the political affairs of country. On the contrary, some might state that society is not fully democratized and that technology has made people more aware of issues, but those who pay attention to politics would have done so regardless of whether

or not they would have had the technology. Do you believe the democratization of American society is the result of technological advances or is American society not even fully democratized? Sierra National Resolved: United States should liberalize immigration quotas.
Pro: Evan Coleman, York Con: Marcos Nunez, Richmond Mod: Leonard Eisen, Pinole Valley

In 1921, the Emergency Immigration Act was passed, the first law in the United States to place a quota on the number of applicants allowed into the country. Although the Immigration Act of 1965 did away with this act as well as other immigration legislation that passed during this time, there are still quotas for many types of immigrant visas. Each year, only 226,000 immigrants can receive family-based visas; 55,000 can receive green cards in a lottery; and 90,000 are permitted to enter as refugees. Some feel that more immigrants should be allowed to legally enter the country. They argue that immigrants are essential to the economy and to permit more to enter legally would help combat the issues that arise with illegal immigration. Those against the liberalization of immigration quotas feel that it is necessary to put restrictions on the number of people who enter the country because there are limited resources in America. Should the immigration quotas be liberalized or should they remain as they are now? Keynote Speaker
California Ballroom

11:00-11:30

Janine Zacharia was Jerusalem Bureau Chief and Middle East Correspondent for the Washington Post from December 2009 through April 2011. During her time at the Washington Post, she reported widely throughout the Middle East beyond Israel, the West Bank and Gaza Strip, including assignments in Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Turkey. She reported on the uprisings in Egypt and Bahrain as they began in early 2011. From 2005-2009, Ms. Zacharia worked as chief diplomatic correspondent for Bloomberg News based in Washington. During this period, she traveled to more than 40 countries with then U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and other senior administration and military officials. Ms. Zacharias earlier career included five years as Washington bureau chief for the Jerusalem Post, and five years in Jerusalem working for various news outlets including the Reuters news agency. She was a regular contributor to the New Republic and has appeared routinely as a cable news analyst on MSNBC, CNN and other networks. She was also a regular panelist on Gwen Ifills Friday evening roundtable, Washington Week in Review. During the 2008-2009 academic year, Ms. Zacharia was awarded a Knight Journalism Fellowship at Stanford

University. She earned her Bachelors of Arts degree in Literary Studies from Middlebury College and is originally from Long Island. Bio courtesy of Stanford University Closing Session
California Ballroom

11:30-12:30

Write for the Junior Statement

The Junior Statement is a monthly magazine that is sent to tax paid JSA members and teacher advisers across the nation and is publicly available for viewing online through the national JSA website. Its contents consist of student-written submissions that range from reports about JSA events, conventions, and chapters to general opinion articles about divisive issues. Contact Editor-in-Chief, Anthony Kayruz, at akayruz@jsa.org if interested in submitting pieces for publication.

Speed Chess Official Rules

The speed chess debate is relatively new to the Northern California state. This format will allow for a fast-pace, heated debate, while still maintaining a civilized environment. The main pro and con speakers will EACH be given a total of six (6) minutes to present their cases. The pro speaker shall go first. When she is done speaking, she shall hit her gavel, so as to signal to the timekeeper to stop her clock. The con speaker shall then do the same. The speaker holding the floor will alternate between the main pro and the main con speakers until time runs out. After both speakers have exhausted their six (6) minutes in the speed chess round, a round of subsequent speeches shall begin. Each subsequent speaker will be given a total of two (2) minutes to give her speech. Subsequent speeches will alternate pro and con, following standard JSA rules of parliamentary procedure. When there is a motion to the previous question, a second round of speed chess will follow. This time, each main speaker will be given a total of two minutes. The main speaker for the pro will start, and the same rules as the first round of speed chess will apply. The debate will end with closing speeches from the con and then the pro main speakers. Each main speaker will have two (2) minutes to give his or her closing speech. Standard JSA rules of parliamentary procedure will apply during closing arguments. Should one speaker exhaust all of his time before another, the speaker with time remaining has three options. He may yield it to the chair, use it to give a speech of his own, or use it to take questions from the audience. If the speaker chooses to take questions from the audience, both the questions and the answers will count against the speakers time. Should both of the speakers have time remaining when they have finished their arguments in the speed chess round, they will take questions from the audience. These questions may be directed at either one or both of the debaters. The actual question will not count against the speakers time, but the answer will. Once a debater runs out of time, no more questions may be directed at that particular person. At any point, if a debater who still has time left wishes to return to giving a speech during the speed chess round, she may. If there is a motion to extend the speakers time for the speed chess round, both speakers times must be extendednot just one.

Formal Debate Official Rules

The formal debate is brand new to NorCal JSA this year, with the intention of fostering a more competitive atmosphere between speakers. Formal debate differs from normal JSA debate in a few ways. First off, all rounds are judged by an impartial moderator and at least one extra judge. These judges shall evaluate all speakers based on their abilities to address the issues, offer solutions or alternatives, refute their opponent's arguments, and engage the audience. Judges will also fill out a grading sheet for each of the speakers, so as to ensure a fair process and provide constructive feedback. Another major difference is that the opposing speaker may interrupt a speech to ask for a Point of Information (POI), which count against the speakers time. This can be a question or statement for the speaker, and may be asked at any point, except for the first and last minute of a main speech, and the first and last thirty seconds of a subsequent speech. Students who plan to give a subsequent speech are strongly encouraged to prepare in order to ensure high-quality arguments. In addition, audience members with the highest quality and quantity of notes will be favored when choosing a subsequent speaker. Most importantly, you may be asked to cite your source, so make sure you know where your statistics and examples came from.

Letter from the Debate Department

This year, the Debate Department is continuing its experiment with a relatively new Best Speaker Ballot system. In the past, there was a noticeable relationship between the best speaker winner and the side of the debate in which the majority of students agree. For this reason, the debate department decided to reform the ballots so that they contain an evaluation system. This evaluation system will allow voters to rate the speakers based on their performance in two categories: Substance and Style. Although it will involve a subtle increase in the amount of work for voters, the debate department strongly believes that these measures are necessary to promote fair debates. Many speakers work hard in preparation for these debates, and it is not fair when they outperform all other speakers, but still do not receive the gavel. For these reasons, we ask all of you to please leave your opinions at the door when selecting a Best Speaker. A common misconception is that the best speaker should be the main speaker on the side with which you agree. Although this can be tempting, it is very important to vote for the person who did the best job. If you follow this system correctly, you will probably find yourself voting for a speaker on the side you oppose about fifty percent of the time. Furthermore, we ask that you do not take friendships into consideration when voting. We understand that this can be difficult, so we have removed the name slot on the ballot in order to keep votes confidential. If you still feel obligated to vote for your friend who you know did not do the best, try to picture how you would feel if you lost the gavel simply because your opponent brought a large chapter to the debate. If you still feel that there is no way that you can remain impartial when voting, we ask that you simply abstain. Finally, we request that you abstain from voting if you were not present for the vast majority of the debate. If you miss one of the opening speeches, this can greatly disadvantage the debater who spoke during your absence. Remember that voting for best speaker is entirely optional, and you always have the option to abstain.

The ballots will specify the criteria for voting in further detail. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask one of the Directors of Debate, one of the Debate Staff members, or the moderator at your debate. You may also use the Text the Debate Department service to ask any questions regarding the selection of best speakers. Most importantly, enjoy the debates, and have an excellent convention! Sincerely, The Debate Department Northern California Junior State of America

The Quest
JSAgent: This is your guide to completing The Quest. There are 20 questions in all and each correct answer will award you one point. To earn extra points, you may complete any or all of the tasks listed at the bottom of The Quest Map page. Your Mission: Beginning with the first location, visit each of the areas listed IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER and answer the question that awaits you. At each location, there will be a specific colored marker that you must use to place a check in the box labeled check, this will tell us that you did in fact go to all of the question points. If you do not know the answer to a question you may work with a team, look it up in the Genius Bar room (located in Salon 7), or ask the Governor (Arnela Colic), Lt. Governor (Karthik Prasad), or Speaker (William Du). The Rules: 1. You must complete the questions in the order that they are listed. 2. You may not play during blocks. You may look up answers but under no circumstances may you roam the halls during scheduled blocks in an attempt to find the next question. 3. You may play during the nighttime activities and mealtimes. Breaking any of the rules will result in the immediate termination of your mission. Keep your eyes open because at any moment I might decide to add bonus questions or tasks to your quest; you must be prepared for anything. The Quest ends at 9:00 PM on Saturday. At this time, all Quest Map sheets must be turned in to your respective tracks box which can be found at the registration desk in the lobby. I wish you the best of luck as you embark on The Quest. Arnela Colic Northern California Governor

The Quest Map: Track A YOUR NAME: ________________________________________________________ YOUR SCHOOL:______________________________________________________ Check # Location 1 Salon 3 2 Salon 4 3 Salon 5 4 Salon 6 5 Salon 7 6 Newport Beach 7 Salon A 8 Salon B/C 9 Santa Barbara 10 Debate Desk in Lobby 11 Seattle/Portland 12 Registration Desk 13 See Governor Arnela 14 See Lieutenant Governor Karthik 15 See Speaker William 16 See Convention Coordinator Bahar 17 See Convention Coordinator Lilly 18 See Debate Director Aaron 19 See Debate Director Brad 20 See Communications Director Jorge Answer

Extra Points: Each of the following tasks is worth three extra points. To be awarded these points, you must show proof of completion of the task to any one of the people listed as question holders or anyone seated at the registration desk.

1. Collect information from five different booths at the political fair 2. Tweet a debate decision with the hashtag #bethepeople 3. Post a photo taken at Spring State on Instagram, tag @juniorstateofamerica and include
Initials of person verifying: #bethepeople in the caption [Select pictures will be reposted on the JSA Instagram Page] Initials of person verifying: 4. Watch the gubernatorial debate in Block 5, Salon 5 Initials of the Moderator: 5. Attend the JSA Summer School Session in Block 6, Salon A / Initials of Moderator: Initials of person verifying:

The Quest Map: Track B YOUR NAME: ________________________________________________________ YOUR SCHOOL:______________________________________________________ Check # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Location Salon 7 Salon 6 Salon 3 Salon 5 Salon 4 Seattle/Portland Debate Desk in Lobby Registration Desk Newport Beach Salon A Santa Barbara Salon B/C See Communications Director Jorge See Debate Director Brad See Debate Director Aaron See Governor Arnela See Lieutenant Governor Karthik See Speaker William See Convention Coordinator Bahar See Convention Coordinator Lilly Answer

Extra Points: Each of the following tasks is worth three extra points. To be awarded these points, you must show proof of completion of the task to any one of the people listed as question holders or anyone seated at the registration desk. 1. Collect information from five different booths at the political fair Initials of person verifying: 2. Tweet a debate decision with the hashtag #bethepeople Initials of person verifying: 3. Post a photo taken at Spring State on Instagram, tag @juniorstateofamerica and include #bethepeople in the caption [Select pictures will be reposted on the JSA Instagram Page] Initials of person verifying: 4. Watch the gubernatorial debate in Block 5, Salon 5 Initials of the Moderator: 5. Attend the JSA Summer School Session in Block 6, Salon A Initials of Moderator:

The Quest Map: Track C YOUR NAME: ________________________________________________________ YOUR SCHOOL:______________________________________________________ Check # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Location Salon A Salon B/C Salon 7 Salon 6 Salon 3 See Governor Arnela See Debate Director Brad See Convention Coordinator Bahar Registration Desk Salon 5 See Speaker William Salon 4 See Lieutenant Governor Karthik Debate Desk in Lobby See Convention Coordinator Lilly Seattle/Portland See Communication Director Jorge Santa Barbara Newport Beach See Debate Director Aaron Answer

Extra Points: Each of the following tasks is worth three extra points. To be awarded these points, you must show proof of completion of the task to any one of the people listed as question holders or anyone seated at the registration desk. 1. Collect information from five different booths at the political fair Initials of person verifying: 2. Tweet a debate decision with the hashtag #bethepeople Initials of person verifying: 3. Post a photo taken at Spring State on Instagram, tag @juniorstateofamerica and include #bethepeople in the caption [Select pictures will be reposted on the JSA Instagram Page] Initials of person verifying: 4. Watch the gubernatorial debate in Block 5, Salon 5 Initials of the Moderator: 5. Attend the JSA Summer School Session in Block 6, Salon A Initials of Moderator:

California Institute on Leadership & Politics

August 11-14, 2013 University of California at Davis

Explore todays pressing policy challenges with the decision makers who are shaping our future!
Join us for the 2013 California Institute on Leadership and Politics. This fast-paced 4-day exploration of California politics will immerse you in a world of civics, interacting with elected officials, policy makers, business leaders, lobbyists, and others. Through debates, simulations and other activities, you will improve your leadership and public speaking skills, as well as learn more about the politics, policies, and people that govern California. A daily speakers program allows you to meet and question top political players in an open environment. Guests might include the Governor and staff members, members of the Legislature, city officials, interest group leaders, reporters, high-powered lobbyists, and university scholars. Staying in the dorms at UC Davis will give you a taste of college life, as you meet and interact with other high school students from across the state.

Topics to be explored:
California in Crisis: How Do We Balance the Budget? Immigration and Its Impact The New Politics of Energy and the Environment Education in the Golden State: A Report Card The Governor, the Legislature and Special Interest Groups Who is really in charge? Crime and Punishment in California

FScholarships

Available!

www.jsa.org/summer

For more information visit:

California Institute on Leadership & Politics

August 11-14, 2013 University of California at Davis A Typical Day at the Institute:
8:00 a.m. Buses depart for the State Capitol. 9:00 - 11:00 a.m. Meet in Governors office with the Chief of Staff and Press Secretary. 11:00 - 11:45 a.m. Question the top political reporters in the state. Focus on the role of the media in elections. 11:45 a.m. - 12:45 p.m. Lunch in the Capitol. 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. Meet in Senate Committee Room with Senate Education Committee Chair, lobbyists for the Teachers Association and the Governors Education Advisor. 3:00 - 4:00 p.m. Break into small groups to plan a grassroots campaign. 4:00 p.m. Buses return to the university. 4:30 - 7:00 p.m. Dinner and free time on campus. 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. Evening briefing and discussion. 9:00 - 11:00 p.m. Free time to look over tomorrows schedule and relax. 11:00 P.M. Curfew.

How to Apply:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Go to www.jsa.org/summer/apply Create a MyJSA account, if you do not already have one. Log in to MyJSA and review and update all information in the Personal Data section. Click on Start a New Institute or Symposium Application from the right side bar, and select the California Institute. Answer each of the following short essay questions: a) Describe your extracurricular activities and any leadership positions, and b) What political issue(s) are you most passionate about?

Program Fees:
Registration fees for this 4-day program is $495 and includes tuition, academic materials, room and board. Scholarship funds are available on a limited basis to eligible students. These funds are made possible through grants from the organizations listed below, as well as from JSAs individual and corporate sponsors.

Questions:
If you have any questions, please contact Jaime Contreras at jcontreras@jsa.org or (650)393-7644.

Sponsors:
JSA would like to thank the following organizations for sponsoring the California Institute on Leadership and Politics.

Convention Rules
1. All rules for school field trips prevail. Use of illegal drugs or alcohol is not permitted. Students also will be sent home if they are in a room where drugs or alcohol are present. The use of tobacco products is not allowed. To ensure these rules are obeyed, the Teacher-Advisor and The Junior Statesmen Foundation must approve the attendance of each delegate. Punishments may include dismissal from the Convention. 2. At regional caucuses students must meet with their TeacherAdvisor/Chaperone for roll call and may not leave the hotel afterward. At curfew, Teacher-Advisors will check delegates at their rooms. Pizza deliveries are not permitted after curfew. Delegates are also required to meet with the TA at other designated times. 3. Delegates MUST attend all conference activities. 4. At no time may young men and women be in each others room. 5. Delegates may not leave the convention hotel without the permission of their TA. During mealtime, with their TAs permission delegates may leave the hotel to eat in designated areas. 6. Delegates must wear their nametags above the waist in visible location at all times. 7. All students assigned to a room are responsible for any charges made to the room. All students assigned to a room are also responsible for the condition of the room. Room service and other items may not be charged to a students room. No delegate may change rooms without the permission of The Junior Statesmen Foundation staff members at the event. The hotel staff will house four students in each room with two large double beds. 8. No student may drive a car to the convention or ride in a student driven car during the convention. 9. Visitors are not allowed in the convention hotel. Delegates are not allowed to associate with any visitor who is not an official guest of the Junior Statesmen program. 10. Students are expected to dress appropriately. Delegates should respect the right of other hotel guests and not do anything to damage the reputation of the Junior Statesmen program. Students must not open or throw anything out of a window. Students must stay off balconies.