Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 37

Cohabitation in Australia

David de Vaus
Keynote address Marriage & Relationship Education National Conference, Sept 25, 2003
Australian Institute of Family Studies

Issues
Levels and trends z What happens to cohabiting relationships? z What happens to marriages preceded by cohabitation? z Differences between cohabiting and marital relationships? z Who cohabits?
z
Australian Institute of Family Studies

Diversity among cohabiting couples


Convenient and temporary z Extension of steady, affectionate relationship z Trial marriage z Temporary alternative to marriage z Long term alternative to marriage
z

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Levels and trends

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Currently cohabiting
(% of couples)
z z z z

1986 1991 1996 2001

4.9% 6.7% 9.9% 12.4%

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Intact, step & blended families


(with children under 18)
Intact % Married Cohabiting 92.3 7.7 Blended % 61.5 38.5 Step % 47.0 53.0

Source: HILDA, 2001

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Ever cohabited
(% of ever partnered)
15-19 % Ever cohabited Only married 90.3 9.7 20-24 % 68.0 32.0 25-34 35-44 % % 38.7 61.3 26.0 74.0 45-54 % 15.2 84.8 55-64 % 8.1 91.9

Source: HILDA, 2001

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Premarital cohabitation (first marriages)


80 Per cent premarital cohabitation 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
1 00 -2 95 19 4 -9 90 19 9 -8 85 19 4 -8 80 19 9 -7 75 19 4 -7 70 19 9 -6 65 19 4 -6 60 19 e Pr
Source: HILDA, 2001

71 60 52 43 31 16 2 5 5

60 19

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Premarital cohabitation (Remarriages)


z z

1970s

1980s z 1990s
z

70.6% of 2nd marriages preceded by cohabitation 77.7% 72.3%

Rate for 1st marriages now just reaching remarriage level of 1970s
Australian Institute of Family Studies

What happens to cohabiting relationships?

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Average duration
(first cohabitations)
Year cohabitation began 1970-74 1975-79 1980-84 +0.4 years 1985-89 1990-94
Source: HILDA, 2001

Ends in marriage Ends in break-up (years) (years) 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.7 3.8 2.8 3.1 2.7 2.6 -1.2 years

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Survival after 5 years (females)


1990-94 19 30 Year cohab began 1985-89 15 29 1980-84 15 27 1975-79 14 22 1970-74 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 64 59 56 40 41

Breaking up more Leading to marriage less 56 (or taking longer)

Per cent Continuing


Source: HILDA, 2001

Married

Broken-up

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Long term cohabiting (women)


Cohabitation began in < 1970 1970-74 1975-79 1980-84 1985-89 1990-94
Source: HILDA, 2001

Still cohabiting in 2001 (%) 1.1 2.1 0.8 1.3 4.3 7.2

Converted to marriage by 2001(%) 81.3 72.3 67.4 63.0 61.1 46.3

Broken-up by 2001 (%) 17.6 25.5 31.8 35.6 34.5 46.5

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Premarital cohabitation & subsequent marriage stability

Australian Institute of Family Studies

The paradox
Expect that try before you buy should lead to greater marital stability z Living together first should filter out relationships that will not work z But these indirect marriages have had higher break up rates
z

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Break-up 5, 10, 15 & 20 years after marriage


% finally separated by 5 years (1990-95) 10 years
(1985-89)

Direct marriage (%) 10 16 26 30

Indirect marriage (%) 19 27 37 46

Gap (%) 9 11 11 16

15 years
(1980-84)

20 years
(1975-9)
Source: HILDA, 2001

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Why the gap?


z z z

Causal?

Cohabiting makes marriage less stable Duration of union Characteristics of cohabiting couples

Measurement method?

Selection?

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Break-up 5, 10, 15 & 20 years after UNION


% final Direct marriage separation after (%) 5 years (1990-95) 10 years
(1985-89)

Indirect marriage (%) 11 22 33 45

Gap (%) 1 (9) 6 (11) 7 (11) 15 (16)

10 16 26 30

15 years
(1980-84)

20 years
(1975-9)
Source: HILDA, 2001

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Remove selection effects


Country of birth z Education z Parental divorce z Religiousness z Age at which relationship began z Having child before marriage z NOT VALUES
z
Australian Institute of Family Studies

Probability of separation after 8 years of marriage (females)


Marriage cohort 1970-74 1980-84 1990-94
Source: HILDA, 2001

Direct marriage (%) 12.9 15.0 17.3

Indirect marriage (%) 23.9 20.0 16.6

Gap (%) 11.0* 5.0 -0.7

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Probability of separation after 8 years of union (females)


Marriage cohort 1970-74 1980-84 1990-94
Source: HILDA, 2001

Direct marriage (%) 12.2 14.3 16.6

Indirect marriage (%) 17.8 15.3 13.2

Gap (%) 5.6* (11.0) 1.0 (5.0) -3.4 (-0.7)

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Differences

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Breaking up
Marriage compared to cohabitation
(after 5 years) [Women]
1990-94 Year commenced 1985-89 1980-84 1975-79 1970-74 0
9 12 40 12 30

13

29

13

27

22

10

20 Per cent
Cohabiting

30

Cohabitations much more prone to ending More cohabitations breaking up within 40 50 5 years

Married

Source: HILDA, 2001

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Domestic violence
(from current male partner)
Form of violence Any violence last 12 months Emotional 12 months Any physical violence Threatened/attempted to hit Pushed, grabbed, shoved Choked Kicked, bit or punched
Source: Womens Safety Survey, 1996

Married (%) 3.6 4.1 7.7 3.9 5.2 0.6 1.4

Cohabiting(%) 11.2*** 7.9*** 11.4** 6.2* 9.7*** 3.2*** 2.7***

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Domestic violence (current male partner)


Cohabiting Cohabiting unemployed employed Form of violence male male Emotional abuse 12 months Physical assault Threatened/attempted physical assault Pushed, grabbed, shoved
Source: Womens Safety Survey, 1996

Married Married unemployed employed male male 14.4 11.9 6.8 5.9 9.4 8.1 4.5 5.9

22.2 22.2 16.7 7.7

8.3 8.6 5.6 7.7

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Mental Health
Probability of a disorder in last 12 months Married Cohabiting (actual) Cohabiting (adjusted for characteristics) Male (%) 11.2 22.5 12.7

Differences in mental health due to characteristics of cohabiting people not cohabiting itself Female(%) 13.8 25.8 10.4

Disorders included all mood, anxiety, alcohol and substance abuse disorders based on ICD-10 critieria Characteristics controlled: education, country of birth, age, employment, # of previous relationships, location, SES Source: National Survey of Well Being and Mental Health 1996

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Who cohabits?
2001

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Marital status
z

18 % of divorced or separated were cohabiting

z z

14.7% of never married 2.3% of widowed

Source: ABS 2001 Census

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Age
15-24 z 25-34 z 35-44 z 45-54 z 55+
z

7% of all individuals cohabiting 14.7% 8.4% 5.7% 1.9%

Source: ABS 2001 Census

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Religious affiliation (female)


z z z z z z z z z z

(% of partnered who cohabit) Catholic 10.4% Anglican 11.9% Baptist 6.3% Lutheran 10.6% Greek orthodox 3.1% Uniting 8.3% Fundamentalist groups 6.6% Islamic 2.5% Buddhist 9.0% No religion 24.1%
Australian Institute of Family Studies

Source: ABS 2001 Census

Occupation
(% of partnered who cohabit) Managers/admin Professional Associate Professional Trades Interm clerical/sales Labourer & related
Source: ABS 2001 Census

Men 9.3 12.7 13.0 17.0 15.7 19.3

Women 13.0 14.6 16.7 18.1 16.0 14.3

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Employment
(% of partnered who cohabit)
Works full time (%) Male Female 14.0 19.4 Works Not in labour part time Unemployed force (%) % % 17.4 10.9 25.3 21.8 14.0 10.8

Source: ABS 2001 Census

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Presence of children
(% in age group who have children in home)
100 90 80 70 Percent 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 25-29 30-34 35-39 Cohabiting 40-44 Married 45-49 50-54
34 56 50 51 78 64 89 90 81

63

60

34

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Summary (1)
Cohabitation increasing z Premarital cohabitation the norm z Long term cohabitation unusual z Cohabitation less stable than marriage
z

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Summary (2)
z

Marriages preceded by cohabitation higher separation rate. Due to:


way relationship duration is measured Characteristics of those who choose premarital cohabitation

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Summary (3)
z

Compared to marriages, cohabiting relationships display


Less stability More domestic violence


z

Only among unemployed cohabiting males Due to characteristics not cohabitation

Higher mental health disorders


z

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Concluding comments
Cohabitation not a single phenomenon z What does the rise of cohabitation mean?
z

Variation of pathways to marriage? Conditional relationships? Liquid love? Reflection of impermanence? Dealing with a risky society?
Australian Institute of Family Studies

Вам также может понравиться