Contrary to what similarities between the Adaptive and Extreme PMLC models might suggest, their differences indicate

that both are intended to be used in completely different types of projects and conditions. Drawing from Wysockis (2009) analysis, w hat follows is an explanation of their similarities and differences, followed by a discussion of what the conditions for using each model might be. Similarities between Adaptive and Extreme PMLC models In both models the solution or outcome is not clear at the beginning of the project Client involvement and feedback during the sequencing of phases is essential for both models As in all PMLC models, the five process groups are sequenced during both models For both models the planning processes are kept to a functional minimum to allow high-speed progress towards a solution Being both complex models, their management teams must be creative, adaptable and knowledgeable enough to drive improvements between iterations After each iteration, a solution and features must be clearly defined Both are uncertainty and risk-high models

Differences between Adaptive and Extreme PMLC models Though both models advances towards a solution through discovery, for the Adaptive PMLC model the goal is partially known while for the Extreme PMLC model the goal is unknown Meaningful client involvement in the decisions that will keep the project moving forward are key on the Adaptive PMLC model; however, for Extreme PMLC models, the client decides when a solution has been reached Adaptive PMLC models would reach an acceptable solution at the end of the processes; however, Extreme PMLC models might produce a solution that does not have any business value

Having explained their main similarities and differences, it can now be discussed in what conditions these models would better fit a project. Though initially used for software development, the Adaptive PMLC model has been successfully implemented to product development, process design, and process improvement projects (Wysocki, 2009, p.385). Giving that discovery and learning are its drivers to defining a solution and that meaningful client involvement is required, a thorough analysis and education of the client might be necessary. It is to note that an approach of the Adaptive PMLC mode, called Adaptive Project Framework (APF), has the characteristic of adjusting scope at each iteration, therefore optimizing the business value of the outcome. On the other hand, an Extreme PMLC model is more appropriate for R&D projects, where findings during the five phases might shift the project direction, therefore forcing to keep options open based on their priority. Reference List Wysocki, R.K. (2009) Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme. 5th ed. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing.