Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
D~~sociative-recombination
G. K. Vinogradov, Yu. 6. Golubovskii, V. A. Ivanov,and Yu. M. Kagan
A. A. Zhdanov Leningrad State University
(Submitted April 4. 1973)
Zh. Tekh. Fiz.,5 2584-2590 (December 1973)
The dissociative recombination coefficient is measured in the positive column of a discharge in neon at pres-
sures 50-200 torr and electron densities c 10" cm-'. The recombination coefficient is found as a function of
the temperature over the temperature range 10.000-25.000'K; the function can be approximated by a (Te) -
r;O.".
display
+ in r p = ' ~ " ~
Fre =zoo
Fig. 1. Block diagram of the electrical power supply. Fig. 3. Schematic of the potential-display circuit.
23 Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys.. Vol. 18. No. 12. June 1974 Copyright @ 1974 American Institute o f Physics
the G5-7A generator, which a r e synchronized with the cur-
r e n t pulses.
C) A capacitor bank is the voltage-display device.
Figure 4 shows a characteristic for the circuit f o r a
d c input voltage. The working p a r t of the characteristic
i s outlined by the dashed lines.
The resolving time of the circuit i s a function of the
frequency of the voltage being studied; in o u r c a s e the rep- Fig. 5
etition frequency i s JX 200 112 and the resolving time i s
A T -- 5 . sec. The final equation is written conveniently a s
Since the pickup has an extremely high resistanceand
the probe c u r r e n t is essentially zero, t h e r e is no distor-
tion of the floating probe potential. The probe potential i s
measured by comparing the voltage to be measured with
J-
p Lf n, (r. Ordr
I n e ( r , tlrdr
0 '
a reference voltage TJ,, for which purpose a B3-33 dc pow-
e r supply is connected in s e r i e s with the potential-display
circuit. where El i s the field immediately after the c u r r e n t drop
In analyzing the operation of the potential-display c i r - (Fig. 6b).
cuit we assume that the input signal has the shapeshown The density ne(r, t) is found f r o m
in Fig. 5a. By adjusting the delay time of the s t r o b e p u l s e
we place this pulse a t t, (Fig. 5b). We adjust the voltage
Ur to make it equal to the voltage taken f r o m the probe,
U i n The r e s u l t i s a deflection of the needle of the indi-
cating device. The circuit can be used to m e a s u r e Win where i s the effective dissociative-recombination coef.
within an uncertainty a s low a s 0.3 V . f ic ient .
The electric field i s calculated f r o m the difference In Eq. (5) we have neglected the l o s s of charge due to
between the probe potentials: ambipolar diffusion to the wall and the appearance of
charge a s a r e s u l t of d i r e c t and stepwise ionization.
E([)= uin~( t ) - IlinzClJ
AL I W e have the familiar equation
-by
e l s incollisions with electrons and the subsequent ernis-
uout* v sion of resonance lines. Since the c r o s s section for t h w
transitions i s 7 s 1 0 - ~ ~ - 1 0 -c' m2,
~ the corresponding time
f o r these transitions under o u r experimental conditionsi9
;J 1 0 - ~ - 1 0 - s
~e c . Since the discharge time f o r the reso-
Fig. 4. Characteristic of the record-
nance lines under o u r conditions is a sec, W e
ing circuir.
find that the metastable atoms decay within 10-~-10-'
I
I s e c . This time is one o r two o r d e r s of magnitude short''
I than the density,decay time. The decaying population
'. 7 .5 uin, v metastable atoms during recombination cannot be impor-
- . - -L..- ---I. oh.,. vnl. 18. No. 12, June 1974 Vinogradov et al.
Fig. 6. Current ( a ) , longitudinal e l e c - Fig. 7. Longitudinal field (a), current
tric field (b). and electron density ( c ) (b), and electron density (c) as func-
as functions of the time. tions of the time.
t
tmt because the decay r a t e is o r d e r s of magnitude lower o r , after substituting into Eq. (4),
than the depopulation rate.
Accordingly for a certain time interval after the cur- - i n ( r . 0)rdr
,I
drop, direct and stepwise ionization a r e unimportant.
st cording to Fig. 6b the field E and thus the temperature n (r. 0 ) rdr
1
T~ increase a s time elapses so that ionization can become i + n ( r , 0 )j a (7) dz
important after a certain time. Here, it i s important to 0
'2s Sov. Phyr. Tech. Phys.. Vol. 18. No. 12, June 1974 Vinogradov e t al. 1625
Fig. 9. Relative functional dependence of t h e recombination coefficient on Fig. 10. Effective recombination coefficient as a function of the pressure.
the temperature. p, tort: 1) 200: 2) 75: 3) 50. T h e points show t h e coefficients c a l c u l a t e d from the data of ref. lo.
smoothly.' F o r this purpose a switching device is con- . 6 . Some of the experimental results are shown in
nected in parallel with the discharge tube in the control Fig. 8 a s the values of @(Te)for various p r e s s u r e s . 1-1,~
circuit. quantity a has this functional dependence of the pressurc
because the recombination coefficient which we measure
The small initial drop in the current r e s u l t s f r o m
is an effective recombination coefficient, taking into ac-
shunting of the current to the switch, while the subsequent
count both the relative density of molecular ions and in-
smooth decay r e s u l t s from the recombination of charged
verse transitions f r o m the excited state to the continuum.3
particles.
Ln addition to a functional dependence on the pressure, we
The value of the current after the slight initial jump observe a weak functional dependence on the discharge
is current. When we convert these results to relative units,
assuming als,ooo = 1. we find essentially the samedecrease
in o/eff a s a function of the temperature f o r all the experi-
mental conditions; this functional dependence is described
by T , ~ .over~ ~ the temperature range studied (Fig. 9). ~t
and we have i s interesting to compare o u r r e s u l t s with those of ref.
10; f r o m Fig. 10 we s e e that the effective recombination
R
i ( t )= c o n s t dF 5 n ( r , t ) rdr. coefficient falls off with increasing p r e s s u r e .
0
The solution of Eq. (5) in this c a s e is 'G. K. Vinogradov. Yu. 8.Golubovskii.V. A. Ivanov, and Yu. M. Kagan.
Zh. Tekh. Fiz.. 2,2186 (1973) [Sov. phys. - T e c h . Phys.. 18.1378(1974)].
'YU. 8 . Golubovskii (I*. 8. Golubovskij) Yu. M. Kagan (lu. h.I. K ~ g r n l ,
a n d P. Michel. Beitr. Plasrnaphys.. 11, 1 2 1 (1971).
'YU. B. Golubovskii. V. A. Ivanov. a n d Yu. M. Kagan. Opt. Spektrosk..z,
Then 213 (19731.
'0. H. Nestor a n d H. N. Olren, in: Ergebnisre der Plasrnaphysik und der
Gaselektronik (ed. R. Rornpe and ht. Steenbek), Akademieverlag, Berlin
(1961).
%u. 8. Golubovskii, Yu. kl. Kagan, and R. I. Lyagushchenko, Zh. Eksp.
57.
Teor. Fiz.. 2122 (1969) [Sov. Fhys. -jETP, 30. 1204 (1970)l.
'5. C. BIOWn, Basic Data of Plasma Physics, ~ i l e y ( 1 9 6 1 ) .
'A. V. Pl~elps. Phys. Rev.. 114. 1 0 1 1 (1059).
'YU. B. Golubovskii (Ju. B. Golubovskijl, Yu. M. Kagan (Ju. hl. ~ a g a n ) . a n d
A s in the f i r s t method, we calculate the function 4 P. Michel, Reitr. Plasrnaphys.. 5, 442 31968).
for the measured radial distribution a s a function of the %I. M. Kagan and R. I. Lyagushchenko, Lh. TeCh. Fiz., 40, 2013 (11170)
parameter no a t . The function 4 is plotted, and the mea- -
[Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys., 2, 1568 (1971Jl.
s u r e d values of i(t)/i. a r e used to find m . "I. Fhilbrick. F . Y. hlehr. ~ n XI.
d A. Blondi. Phyr. Rev.. 1S1. 271 (1969).
.
a
.,
- ---. DL... T P C ~ . Phvs.. vol. 18. No. 12, June 1974 Vinogradov e t al.