Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

Case Report

Prenatal Sonographic
Findings Associated With
Nonmosaic Trisomy 9 and
Literature Review
Lami Yeo, MD, Regina Waldron, DMS, Susan Lashley, MD,
Debra Day-Salvatore, MD, PhD, Anthony M. Vintzileos, MD

T
risomy 9 was first reported in 1973 through blood lymphocyte testing in a
newborn male with multiple congenital anomalies.1 Since that time, only
approximately 30 cases of mosaic or nonmosaic trisomy 9 have been report-
ed2; therefore, this is a relatively rare chromosomal abnormality, constitut-
ing only 2.7% of all trisomic cases.3 Nonmosaic or complete trisomy 9 is a lethal
diagnosis, with most fetuses dying prenatally or during the early postnatal period.
Those who survive usually have mosaic trisomy 9 and have severe motor and mental
deficiencies. With mosaic trisomy 9, the prevalence and severity of malformations and
mental deficiency correlate with the percentages of trisomic cells in different tissues.4
Because most complete trisomy 9 cases end in spontaneous abortion in the first
trimester, there is a paucity of reports regarding the prenatal sonographic findings of
complete trisomy 9. To our knowledge, only 7 cases of nonmosaic trisomy 9 that were
specifically detected on prenatal sonography have been reported in the literature: first
trimester (n = 2), second trimester (n = 2), and third trimester (n = 3).3,5–9 There are dis-
tinct features associated with complete trisomy 9. Clinical and sonographic findings
that have been described include intrauterine growth restriction, central nervous sys-
tem abnormalities, cranial and facial anomalies, skeletal defects, congenital heart
defects, and urogenital abnormalities.6,8
The purpose of this report is to describe the prenatal sonographic findings in a sec-
ond-trimester fetus with trisomy 9 and also to review the sonographic findings of all
published cases of nonmosaic trisomy 9 that were specifically detected on sonography.

Received October 15, 2002, from the Division of


Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Case Report
Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University
of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey–Robert
Wood Johnson Medical School (L.Y., R.W., S.L.,
The patient was a 32-year-old Hispanic gravida 4, para 3
A.M.V.), and Institute for Genetic Medicine, St woman referred for routine sonography at 19.3 weeks’
Peter’s University Hospital (D.D.-S.), New Brunswick, menstrual age. The pregnancy was dated by a first-
New Jersey USA. Revision requested November 20,
2002. Revised manuscript accepted for publication
trimester scan. She had no notable obstetric history. The
December 18, 2002. patient had been offered midtrimester serum screening
Address correspondence and reprint requests to but declined.
Lami Yeo, MD, Department of Obstetrics, Gyne-
cology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of
Sonography showed a fetus with growth restriction
Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Medicine measuring 17.5 weeks overall, with the following mea-
and Dentistry of New Jersey–Robert Wood Johnson surements: biparietal diameter, 19.2 weeks; head circum-
Medical School, St Peter’s University Hospital, 254
Easton Ave, Medical Office Building, Fourth Floor,
ference, 17.4 weeks; abdominal circumference, 17.3
New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0591 USA. weeks; and shortened long bones ranging between 16

© 2003 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine • J Ultrasound Med 22:425–430, 2003 • 0278-4297/03/$3.50
Sonographic Findings in Nonmosaic Trisomy 9

anomaly; and small (15.5 weeks) rocker-bottom


feet with dorsiflexion at the ankles. The placenta
was located posteriorly, and the amniotic fluid
volume was within normal limits. The patient
was counseled that aneuploidy was highly sus-
pected and was offered genetic amniocentesis.
She proceeded with fetal karyotype testing, and
the results showed 47,XY, +9 (complete trisomy
9) in all 20 metaphase cells examined.
Subsequently, she returned for fetal echocar-
diography at 22.4 weeks’ menstrual age. In addi-
tion to the previously identified abnormalities,
this study showed an enlarged heart (occupying
≈40% of the chest), an atrial septal defect with a
single atrium, aortic stenosis, and possible
deep-set eyes. Examination for nares was diffi-
cult because of the small size of the nose. A
Figure 1. Sagittal scan of the fetal profile (trisomy 9) showing a sloping forehead, micropenis was also visualized. The patient gave
flat profile, small nose, and micrognathia. birth several days later after an induction due to
intrauterine fetal death, and gross examination
of the neonate confirmed low-set, malformed,
and 17 weeks. The following sonographic fea- small ears (they were also posteriorly rotated),
tures were observed: abnormal head shape abnormal facies (Fig. 3), camptodactyly with
(broad occipital area and narrowing of the pari- angulated fingers (Fig. 4), rocker-bottom feet
etal areas); ventriculomegaly and dangling with dorsiflexed ankles, and a micropenis, all of
choroid plexus; short ear length (14.3 weeks) and which were shown sonographically. Webbing of
low-set, misshapened ears, an abnormal facial the neck and widely spaced nipples were also
profile (sloping forehead, flat profile, small nose, seen. In particular, the facies showed hyper-
and micrognathia; Fig. 1); a large stomach; a vas- telorism, microphthalmia, a long philtrum, an
cular cystic area located to the left of the abdom- upper lip covering a receding lower lip, micro-
inal cord insertion site; a straight (versus curved) gnathia, a broad, flattened nose with a small tip,
intrahepatic portal vein; camptodactyly with
angulated fingers (Fig. 2); a suspected cardiac
Figure 3. Gross image of the face with trisomy 9 showing
abnormal, low-set ears, an upper lip covering a receding lower
Figure 2. Coronal sonogram of the fetal hand (trisomy 9) showing camptodacty- lip, micrognathia, a broad, flattened nose with a small tip, and
ly with angulated fingers. up-slanting, short palpebral fissures.

426 J Ultrasound Med 22:425–430, 2003


Yeo et al

and up-slanting, short palpebral fissures. The cases detected on first-trimester sonography
patient declined autopsy of the neonate, and have been reported.7,9 Both had nuchal anoma-
birth weight was not available. lies (cystic hygroma and increased nuchal
translucency). One of these cases also had
Discussion abnormal reversed flow in the fetal venous sys-
tem, which has previously been reported to be
To our knowledge, only 7 cases of nonmosaic tri- associated with aneuploidy.10 Similar to our
somy 9 that were detected specifically on prena- findings, shortened long bones were also visual-
tal sonography have been reported in the ized in the case of Pinette et al.7 Growth restric-
literature (Table 1).3,5–9 Of these cases, 1 patient tion appears to be a very common finding, as
interrupted the pregnancy, 1 had a spontaneous reported by McDuffie.6 In reviewing various
abortion, 4 had intrauterine fetal death, and 1 reports, McDuffie6 found that of cases born after
had neonatal death on postnatal day 24. The 20 weeks’ gestation, 85% (11 of 13) were small for
prognosis for complete trisomy 9 is very poor. gestational age.6 Of the trisomy 9 cases detected
Embryos with trisomy 9 usually have sponta- on sonography, including our own, 75% (6 of 8)
neous abortion in the first trimester, and accord- had intrauterine growth restriction (Table 1).
ingly, it is rare for survival to occur to a viable We found the sonographic appearance of the
gestational age. Most of these cases have low hands to be peculiar and unique. Benacerraf et
birth weight, severe perinatal asphyxia, failure to al5 first reported clenched hands in their case
thrive, and profound growth and mental retarda- of trisomy 9 at 31 weeks, with rigid extension at
tion.5 Neonates will usually die in the immediate the metacarpal–first phalangeal joints but con-
neonatal period, and there is no long-term sur- traction at the proximal and distal interpha-
vival when complete trisomy 9 exists. McDuffie6 langeal joints. In the case described by
found that of surviving live-born infants, only Roshanfekr et al,3 gross examination of the
25% (3 of 12) lived beyond 1 week. neonate’s hands (not detected sonographical-
The clinical phenotype of trisomy 9 includes ly) revealed findings similar to ours: hands
low birth weight, developmental delay, and loosely clenched in a peculiar way, with fingers
abnormalities of the central nervous, craniofa- flexed at the distal interphalangeal joints. The
cial, cardiovascular, skeletal, and genitourinary fetus in our case also had peculiarly angulated
systems (Table 2).6,8 In addition, abnormalities fingers on sonography that appeared to be
of these systems have also been reported on pre- deviated laterally (Fig. 2). Joint anomalies,
natal sonography. To our knowledge, only 2 including an abnormal position of the digits,
have previously been described with trisomy
9.4 As Pinette et al7 described in their case, we
Figure 4. Gross image of the hand with trisomy 9 confirming
also found rocker-bottom feet in our fetus.
the sonographic findings of camptodactyly with angulated fin- We found cardiomegaly on sonography, and to
gers. Note that the fingers are deviated laterally. our knowledge, this is the first report of that
sonographic finding in a fetus with trisomy 9.
Benacerraf et al5 found this also, but only at
autopsy. Including our own case, 75% (6 of 8) of
the trisomy 9 cases had cardiac anomalies
detected on sonography. Congenital heart
defects are known to be found clinically in 60% of
patients with trisomy 9.2 Fifty percent of fetuses
with trisomy 9 (including ours) had central ner-
vous system malformations detected sono-
graphically. Intracranial anomalies have been
noted in 65% of patients with trisomy 92 and may
include hydrocephalus, a Dandy-Walker malfor-
mation, and subarachnoid cysts (Table 2).
The craniofacial features we visualized sono-
graphically (sloping forehead, narrow bifrontal
diameter, deep-set eyes, small nose, micro-

J Ultrasound Med 22:425–430, 2003 427


Sonographic Findings in Nonmosaic Trisomy 9

Table 1. Sonographically Detected Cases of Nonmosaic Trisomy 9 (N = 7)


Gestational Age
Report (Menstrual Age), wk Testing Sonographic Findings Outcome

Benacerraf et al (1992)5 Case 1: 16 Amnio Case 1: IUGR, congenital Case 1: TOP


heart defect, intrathoracic
mass, hydronephrosis
Case 2: 31 Case 2: IUGR, ventriculomegaly, Case 2: delivery at
NTD, microcephaly, clubfeet, 41 wk, neonatal
death at 24 d
VSD, clenched hands,
polyhydramnios
McDuffie (1994)6 34 FBS IUGR, DWM, single atrium, IUFD (37 wk)
SUA, liver calcifications, abnor-
mal UA Doppler velocimetry
Roshanfekr et al (1998)3 35 Amnio IUGR, SUA, abnormal UA IUFD (37 wk)
Doppler velocimetry
Pinette et al (1998)7 11.7 Amnio Hydrops, cystic hygroma, short IUFD (>17 wk)
long bones, rocker-bottom feet,
decreased cranial calcification
Sandoval et al (1999)8 21, 23 FBS IUGR, polycystic horseshoe kidney, IUFD (33 wk)
absent bladder, anhydramnios,
ASD, dysmorphic facies, microph-
thalmia, cerebellar vermian defect,
UV varix (intra-abdominal)
Murta et al (2000)9 12 CVS Increased NT (9.1 mm), reversed IUFD (>13 wk)
flow in the UV/DV/IVC, bilateral
pyelectasis, EIF, VSD, EB
This study 19, 22 Amnio IUGR, short long bones, abnormal Delivery at 23 wk
head shape, ventriculomegaly,
low-set, malformed, short ears,
abnormal facial profile, large
stomach, intra-abdominal vascular
cystic area, straight portal vein,
abnormal hands, cardiac defects,
rocker-bottom feet, small penis
Amnio indicates amniocentesis; ASD, atrial septal defect; CVS, chorionic villus sampling; DV, ductus venosus; DWM, Dandy-Walker
malformation; EB, echogenic bowel; EIF, echogenic intracardiac focus; FBS, fetal blood sampling; IUFD, intrauterine fetal death;
IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; IVC, inferior vena cava; NT, nuchal translucency; NTD, neural tube defect; SUA, single umbil-
ical artery; TOP, termination of pregnancy; UA, umbilical artery; UV, umbilical vein; and VSD, ventricular septal defect.

gnathia, and low-set, small, malformed ears) are As a known phenotypic feature described for tri-
characteristic anatomic features of trisomy 9.4 somy 9, we visualized a micropenis (shortened
Sandoval et al8 also detected dysmorphic facies with a small amount of penile tissue visualized),
in their case at 23 weeks. It is known that about to our knowledge the first such case reported on
65% of patients with trisomy 9 have micro- sonography in a fetus with trisomy 9. Assessment
cephaly with narrow temples, whereas microph- of the urinary system could not be made because
thalmia and deep-set eyes are seen in 50%.2 the patient declined autopsy. It is known that uro-
Wooldridge and Zunich11 reviewed a large series genital abnormalities are seen in 65% of trisomy 9
of cases and found craniofacial anomalies to be cases.2 To our knowledge, this is the first report of
present in all cases of trisomy 9. Another study the sonographic appearance of a large stomach
that examined 15 cases of complete trisomy 9 and straight portal vein in a fetus with trisomy 9.
also found craniofacial abnormalities to be pre- The cases described in the literature, including
sent phenotypically in 100%.12 We found the our own, confirm that although the karyotype is
head shape and facial profile to be distinctive important and essential for diagnosis, the pres-
sonographically. ence of abnormal sonographic findings serves as

428 J Ultrasound Med 22:425–430, 2003


Yeo et al

Table 2. Clinical Phenotypic Characteristics of Nonmosaic Trisomy 9


Organ Systems Features
Central Nervous Hydrocephalus, Dandy-Walker malformation, subarachnoid cysts
Craniofacial Microcephaly, dolicocephaly, prominent occiput, wide fontanels/sutures,
microphthalmia/anophthalmia, deep-set eyes, small, up-slanting palpebral fissures,
broad, flat, bulbous nose, low-set, rotated, malformed ears, micrognathia, cleft lip/
palate, short or webbed neck
Cardiovascular ASD, VSD, DORV, PDA, arterial coarctation, persistent left SVC, bicuspid pulmonic valve,
hypoplastic LA or LV, pulmonic stenosis, SUA
Skeletal Short long bones, joint dislocation, abnormal hands/feet, abnormal ribs/clavicles,
hypoplastic pelvic bones
Genitourinary Hypoplastic genitalia, cryptorchidism, hypospadias, double collecting system, subcapsular
renal cyst, hydronephrosis, duplication renal artery, renal hypoplasia/aplasia
Other Growth restriction, developmental delay
ASD indicates atrial septal defect; DORV, double-outlet right ventricle; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; LA, left atrium; LV,
left ventricle; SUA, single umbilical artery; SVC, superior vena cava; and VSD, ventricular septal defect.

important additional information that lends information for future genetic counseling.
support to the karyotypic diagnosis of trisomy 9. Therefore, any pattern of sonographic malfor-
Saura et al13 concluded in their review that every mations that includes growth restriction, central
case of nonmosaic trisomy 9 diagnosed via nervous system or craniofacial defects, and car-
amniocentesis was always associated with sono- diovascular, skeletal, and genitourinary abnor-
graphic abnormalities.13 malities should lead one to suspect autosomal
When we evaluated this case initially on trisomy, including trisomy 9.
sonography, our suspicion of fetal aneuploidy
was for trisomy 18, because there was References
intrauterine growth restriction, an abnormal
head shape, cranial findings, cardiac defects, 1. Feingold M, Atkins L. A case of trisomy 9. J Med
shortened ear length, and abnormal hand pos- Genet 1973; 10:184–187.
turing. Benacerraf et al5 also noted that there
2. Gorlin RJ, Cohen MM, Hennekam, RC. Syndromes
are often similarities among the sonographic
of the Head and Neck. 4th ed. New York, NY:
characteristics of trisomies 9 and 18. However,
Oxford University Press; 2001.
although fetuses with trisomy 18 often have
completely clenched hands, we found our 3. Roshanfekr D, Dahl-Lyons C, Pressman E, Ural S,
fetus to have different hand features. Never- Blakemore K. Complete trisomy 9 in a term fetus: a
theless, when fetal sonographic abnormalities case report. J Matern Fetal Med 1998; 7:247–249.
are present that are indicative of trisomy 18,
4. Jones KL. Smith’s Recognizable Patterns of Human
trisomy 9 should also be included in the differ-
Malformation. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co;
ential diagnosis.
1997.
Because trisomy 9 is a lethal diagnosis, it is
important to make this diagnosis prenatally, 5. Benacerraf BR, Pauker S, Quade BJ, Bieber FR.
inasmuch as this may affect obstetric manage- Prenatal sonography in trisomy 9. Prenat Diagn
ment, including the mode of delivery. In the lit- 1992; 12:175–181.
erature, complete trisomy 9 has been shown to
6. McDuffie RS. Complete trisomy 9: case report with
be a fatal diagnosis. For instance, in the cases
ultrasound findings. Am J Perinatol 1994; 11:80–84.
with a diagnosis on the basis of prenatal sonog-
raphy (except for the 2 cases in which the preg- 7. Pinette MG, Pan Y, Chard R, Pinette SG, Blackstone
nancies were terminated), all fetuses with J. Prenatal diagnosis of nonmosaic trisomy 9 and
trisomy 9 either died in utero or after birth. related ultrasound findings at 11.7 weeks. J Matern
Detection of an abnormal karyotype is also Fetal Med 1998; 7:48–50.
important for providing patients with accurate

J Ultrasound Med 22:425–430, 2003 429


Sonographic Findings in Nonmosaic Trisomy 9

8. Sandoval R, Sepulveda W, Gutierrez J, Be C, Altieri E.


Prenatal diagnosis of nonmosaic trisomy 9 in a fetus
with severe renal disease. Gynecol Obstet Invest
1999; 48:69–72.

9. Murta C, Moron A, Avila M, Franca L, Vargas P.


Reverse flow in the umbilical vein in a case of trisomy
9. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16:575–577.

10. Matias A, Montenegro N, Areias J, Brandao O.


Anomalous fetal venous return associated with
major chromosomopathies in the late first trimester
of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;
11:209–213.

11. Wooldridge J, Zunich J. Trisomy 9 syndrome: report


of a case with Crohn’s disease and review of the lit-
erature. Am J Med Genet 1995; 56:258–269.

12. Arnold GL, Kirby RS, Stern TP, Sawyer JR. Trisomy 9:
review and report of 2 new cases. Am J Med Genet
1995; 56:252–257.

13. Saura R, Traore W, Taine L, et al. Prenatal diagnosis


of trisomy 9: six cases and a review of the literature.
Prenat Diagn 1995; 15:609–614.

430 J Ultrasound Med 22:425–430, 2003

Вам также может понравиться