Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
n1, 1997
The Speech
Although there are explanatory theories of consciousness based on physiology, evolution, material causes and even extraterrestrial interventions, Gebser points out that such explanations are speculative imputing to the expressions and civilizational phenomena factors which are not part of the phenomena. The only major theoretical conclusion that Gebsers correlation of various civilizational phenomena has suggested is that consciousness structures do not develop linearly but undergo mutations. There are historical periods during which all civilizational components undergo structural transformations expressed through various symbolic means such as, basic shifts in linguistic metaphors, death and birth of divinities, aesthetic expressions, social organizations and even physiological emphases. At the same time, Gebser is against any speculative derivation of such transformations from one set of phenomena. Using modern theories of V. von Weizsaecker in psychosomatics, Gebser points out that neither of the two components are treated as causally prior or more fundamental. By analogy, no particular, expressed civilizational component ought to be treated as the cause of or prior to all other phenomena. We, by the statements of many scholars, live in an age of transition. We live in a period between two worlds, one dead and one trying to be born. To understand this transition we must understand where it is were coming from, and somehow where we are going. As background we need to consider the assumptions involved in the notion of consciousness. The first
10
11
12
13