Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Magna Carta Remains Intact : No Parliament, Judge or Monarch can alter it - lawfully.

Magna Carta Parliament, has no authority to abrogate Magna carta or the Bill of Rights. All Monarchs and their governments are bound by the Coronation Oath, sworn by the incoming monarch. The Magna Carta Winston Churchill Here is a law which is above the King and Parliament, and which even He and They must not and may not legally break. And in the event they or anyone else were to try to abrogate it, such attempt at abrogation shall have no force nor effect and can be safely ignored with no legal ill effect. In addition, in the event of successful attempts at abrogation of such liberties, customs, or rights, the King has commanded and do hereby compel any and all subjects to swear oath to join the barons to assail the properties and persons and families of those (saving the King, Queen and the royal children) who had successfully completed such abrogation, including but not limited to that of the individual Members of Parliament who had voted in favour of any such successful attempts at abrogation. This reaffirmation of a supreme law and its expression in a general charter is the great work of Magna Carta; and this alone justifies the respect in which men have held it. The maggots infesting Parliament, have abrogated our rights and freedoms by allowing the EU power over us unlawfully.

"We should recognise a hierarchy of Acts of Parliament: as it were "ordinary" statutes and "constitutional statutes". The special status of constitutional statutes follows the special status of constitutional rights. Examples are the Magna Carta, Bill of Rights 1689 Ordinary statutes may be impliedly repealed. Constitutional statutes may not" Divisional Court ruling in the case of the "Metric Martyrs" 2002, (sections 62 and 63) It follows therefore that any changes made were unlawful and therefore invalid. It is our common law that needs restoring and the right to defend our individual freedoms granted by Magna Carta, in a true Court of Law, in which, both the law and the controversy are examined by a randomly selected jury, who reach their verdit according to their conscience. Tyranny by government and the judiciary can only be prevented by the jury, which possesses the authority to nullify bad and unjust laws by refusing to convict. The lie: "There is no excuse for breaking the law!" is the cry of the tyrant, laws are made to protect society, not to punish it. In the days when we issued a summons it always stated, "That you did, without lawful authority, or reasonable excuse commit the offence of ..." for no Jury would convict someone who acted reasonably in the circumstances. Trials, without a jury are unlawful, if the Government seeks to remove our liberty or seize our property it must by Law (common law) prent its case to a jury. Fines and

seizures before conviction in a court of Common Law, by our peers (jury) are illegal and banned. The threat of fines before conviction in a court of law, void the offence. (Bill of Rights) Therefore, it is the enforcement of our 35 times ratified British Constitution that is required, the outlawing of the Law Society's use of Legalise to trick defendants and remove their Constitutional right to a trial by jury. We must restore the authority and powers of the Jury, which has been taken by the judges for themselves. A Judge has no lawful power in Common Law, to either judge, decide the penalty of those convicted, or select what evidence the Jury is allowed to see. Those powers belong to the jury, we are judged and sentenced by our peers. It is the independent and randomly selected twelve people who comprise a jury and are considered to hold, between them, the views of the 'country' that are the bedrock of democracy and freedom. Though wresting power back from the politicians and judiciary will be a battle, it is one that we cannot afford to lose.

Вам также может понравиться