Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Award (MBNQA), Project Management, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Supply Chain Management (SCM), ISO Standards, 5S (Workplace Organization), Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), Quality Management, Business Process Reengineering (BPR), Project Management, etc. please ask them to send an email to
Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) If your friends would like to learn Kaizen (continuous improvement), Toyota
APICS-ID-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Acknowledgement: We got this material from a public domain, i.e., the Internet. If you would like to get more information, please visit
1. Indonesian Production and Operations Management Society (IPOMS). http://www.ipoms.or.id/mambo and then click Knowledge Resources. 2. Ahmad Syamil website http://www.clt.astate.edu/asyamil/
Core Values
Customer-driven Quality Leadership Continuous Improvement and Learning Employee Participation and Development Fast Response Design Quality and Prevention Long-range View of the Future Management by Fact Partnership Development Corporate Responsibility and Citizenship Results Orientation
Award Categories
1994
Manufacturing Service Small Business
2001
Business Service Small Business Education Health Care
MBNQA Winners
1988 1988Motorola Inc., Commercial Nuclear Fuel Division of Westinghouse Electric Corp., and Globe Metallurgical Inc. 1990 1990Cadillac Motor Car Division, IBM Rochester, Federal Express Corp., Corp., and Wallace Co. Inc. 1992 1992AT&T Network Systems Group/ Transmission Systems Business Unit, Texas Instruments Inc. Defense Systems & Electronics Group, AT&T Universal Card Services, Services, The RitzRitz-Carlton Hotel Co., Co., and Granite Rock Co. Co. 1994 1994AT&T Consumer Communications Services, Services, GTE Directories Corp., Corp., and Wainwright Industries Inc. 1996 1996ADAC Laboratories, Dana Commercial Credit Corp., Corp., Custom Research Inc., Inc., and Trident Precision Manufacturing Inc. 1998 1998Boeing Airlift and Tanker Programs, Solar Turbines Inc., and Texas Nameplate Co., Inc. Inc. 2000 2000Dana Corp.Corp.-Spicer Driveshaft Division, KARLEE Company, Inc., Operations Management International, Inc., Inc., and Los Alamos National Bank 1989 1989Milliken & Co. and Xerox Corp. Business Products and Systems 1991 1991Solectron Corp., Zytec Corp., and Marlow Industries 1993 1993Eastman Chemical Co. and Ames Rubber Corp
1995 1995Armstrong World Industries Building Products Operation and Corning Telecommunications Products Division 1997 19973M Dental Products Division, Solectron Corp., Merrill Lynch Credit Corp., Corp., and Xerox Business Services 1999 1999STMicroelectronics, STMicroelectronics, Inc.Inc.-Region Americas, BI, The RitzRitz-Carlton Hotel Co., L.L.C., L.L.C., and Sunny Fresh Foods
1994
Leadership, 95 Information and Analysis, 75 Strategic Quality Planning, 60 Human Resource Devel., 150 Management of Process Quality, 140 Quality and Operational Results, 180 Customer Focus/Satis., 300
2001
Leadership, 120 Information and Analysis, 90 Strategic Planning, 85 Human Resource Focus, 85 Process Management, 85 Business Results, 450 Customer and Market Focus, 85
Criteria Characteristics
Results oriented Non-prescriptive Assessment Diagnostic
A-D and R
Approach
how the application addresses the item appropriateness effectiveness evidence of innovation
Deployment
extent to which approach is applied use of approach in business requirements use of approach by all appropriate units
Results
outcomes current performance levels performance levels relative to comparisons/benchmarks rate and breadth of performance improvements demonstration of sustained improvement
Leadership
1.1 Senior Executive Leadership 1.2 Management for Quality 1.3 Public Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship
Leadership
Values and Expectations Empowerment and Innovation Performance Reviews Findings and Improvement Regulatory, Legal, Ethical Responsibilities Support of Key Communities
Leadership
Symbolism
is it talk or walk what is the visible role for management
Systems Results
hard to measure
Issues
is there to much going on at one time increase weight of category
Approach and deployment orientation Key is the choice of indicators to track and relationship to critical business drivers Applicant can improve scores simply through wordsmanship, clarity of submission During site visit easier to observe actuals than statements on application
Expect to see documented fundamentals Demonstrated understanding of industry On-site review best at determining validity of submission Shortcoming: deployment to suppliers Long-term planning not concrete wrt to rollout and method Components are satisfactory, burden on Great Northern Need more emphasis on long-term success and results
What about near-term programs? Timeline on result goals not clear Overly focused on individuals vs. teams Results and categories are ambiguous Warm fuzzies or real processes?
Wish upon a star Needs and feelings survey