Dear editor I am sending an article to you.

If you find it worth publication

please get it published. Please let me know about your decision about it

Evolutionary theory: a jumble of deceptions

M Mubashir Hassan

“O man! what has seduced thee from thy Lord Most Beneficent? Him
Who created thee. Fashioned thee in due proportion and gave thee a
just bias; In whatever Form He wills does He put thee together.” (Al-
Qur'an, 82: 6-8)

Darwin put forth the idea that originally there was a common ancestor
to all the species living today and due to the process of variation and
natural selection new species of animals emerged.
Within a few years of the publication of On the Origin of Species,
atheists found themselves subscribing to such views, though the
theory had no substantial proof to support it. (Even at present it
doesn’t have any proof).

Owing to propaganda, some people think that evolution is not

merely a theory but a proved fact. Media present evolution as an
accomplished fact of science. In text books evolutionary theory is
presented in such a way that the readers come to suppose that the
theory has been established. The views that oppose evolutionary
theory are not taken any notice of. And anyone who tries to
present the opposite view is regarded as ignorant, fanatic and
narrow minded.
 In fact, most people are not aware that there are well-qualified
and competent scientists who hold views against the theory and
who give scientific reasoning in support of their views. Professor
Albert Fleishman, professor of comparative anatomy at Earlangan
university says "The theory of evolution suffers from grave defects,
which are becoming more and more apparent as time advances. It
can no longer square with practical scientific knowledge, nor does
it suffice for our theoretical grasp of the facts. The Darwinian
theory of decent has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of
nature. It is not the result of scientific re-search, but purely the
product of imagination."

Despite being aware of the inherent weaknesses of their claims,

evolutionists hold on to it adherently and console themselves and
their followers by saying that with the progress of science, evidences
would be laid bare to support the theory of evolution. The truth,
however, is contrary to it: all the discoveries that have been made
since the publication of Darwin’s origin of species, are contradicting
with the assumptions of evolutionists.

If one were to believe the logic of the evolutionists, there must have
been intermediate forms between the animals which emerged from
one another e.g. evolutionists claim that reptiles emerged from fishes,
so there must have been some intermediate form between these two
life forms. But no intermediate form or any of their traces have so far
been unearthed nor is there any such hope.
As these intermediate forms have not been found out, these have
been regarded as “Missing Links” i.e. the links that have not been
found yet. And these would never be found for they do not exist.

The theory of evolution is replete with frauds and Hoaxes and many
a frauds have been employed to make it to appear as credible. The
sole reason behind it is that the evolutionists have no other
alternative to it. The only alternative is that the have to accept that
God has created all living creatures; which they are reluctant to do.
Here is just one of the many Hoaxes that have been played in the
name of Science.

In 1912 Charles Dawson, an amateur paleontologist, announced

that he had found a curious skull in a gravel pit near Piltdown,
England near Sussex. Arthur Smith Woodward, keeper of the
Department of Geology at the British Museum, took keen interest in it.
In December, 1912 Woodward displayed a reconstruction of the
strange fossil creature. It was a humanlike skull with a large, apelike
jaw and declared to be nearly a million years old and was presented
to the world as “Piltdown Man,". It was claimed to be the intermediate
creature between Ape and Man (missing link) and as such a grand
proof of the evolutionary theory.
The skull was given the scientific name Eoanthropus Dawson, or "Dawson's Dawn Man,"
and mentioned in textbooks as such.
Later the skull was kept in British museum for a long time until its discovery as a
scientific fraud.
Many scientists, however, doubted the authenticity of the skull from the very
beginning. These suspicions were finally justified in the 1950s, when modern chemical
analysis showed that the bones were actually from two different sources: The jaw
belonged to an orangutan and the skull to a human—neither of them much more than 600
years old. The parts of the Skelton of these two different creatures had been blended
together to give it an appearance of the skull of a single creature and had been stained to
give it an old appearance. And as such most of the people were deceived into believing
that the missing link had been found.
This was the not the first instance of scientific misconduct and certainly not the last.
Such frauds have always been played and people made to believe them. And what may
possibly be the reason behind this blind devotion to the theory of evolution.
He (Iblis) said "Seest Thou? This is the one whom thou hast honored above me! If Thou
wilt but respite me to the Day of Judgment I will surely bring his descendants under my
sway all but a few!" (Al Qur’an, 17:62)

The author can be e-mailed at: mubashir_07@rediffmail.com

Mubashir Hassan S/o M.A. Dar R/o Zirpora Bijbehara

Ph. No. 01932234181