Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

5/20/13

Ravi Philemon News Feed Messages My SG Events Online/Offline Bitstrips DC Birthdays Organic Church App Center Marketplace Poll See More...
9+ 9+ 2 5

Updates: MOM maintains blog post accusation is "accurate"


Search for people, places and things
9+

Home 18

Post

Updates: MOM maintains blog post accusation is "accurate"


by Andrew Loh (Notes) on Monday, May 20, 2013 at 12:23pm Get Notes via RSS
1

9+

The following is the latest exchanges between me and Ms Farah Abdul Rahim, director corps comms and press secretary to the Acting Minister of the Ministry for Manpower. It regards an article on the MOM blog which criticised me for not providing MOM with the details of several dormitories. You can read about it here: http://andrewlohhp.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/my-email-to-mom-minister-about-accusation-on-moms-blog/ -------------------Here is the email from Farah Abdul Rahim on 20 May 2013 and my reply to her below: Dear Andrew,

Report
Sponsored Adrian Ng likes edge

edge Like

Adrian Ng likes Bayou Lagoon P Resort.

Bayou Lagoon Pa Resort Like Upgrade your stay. starwood-ap.com

Turn on Chat Andrew Loh Nizam Ismail

Thank you for your email. On behalf of MOM, we would like to thank you for your efforts in flagging such unacceptable accommodation. The facts we had presented in our Manpower Blog are accurate. In your first email to me on 22nd April, you had referred me and my colleagues to the blogs and articles, but there were no specific addresses mentioned in them, as per your published email correspondence between us (below).

Save at least 20% when you book a or villa at our hot and resorts in AP

Free NLP Training

Chat

Learn you can ac SUCCESS in you Be Motivated, Confident, Driven using NLP. Bn G Lc Ow and Bernard Lim NLP Singapore - Mind Kinesis NLP Academy .

Take the 30-Day Challenge Achieve the 6 sig Optimal Health w Purina ONE. Sta win a trip to Aust

It was only upon a request from Ms Chin from our Foreign Manpower Management Divisions Customer Responsiveness Branch that you responded with specific addresses, and information from Google Earth, as per your published correspondence between Ms Chin and yourself (below):

Like Khalil Adis and Leon Boyd PetsPlace.

Stylish living @ Hillion simlian.com.sg Check out the lat condo launch in Panjang. Visit ou showroom today Private tutors

Trusted by 4080+ students. Quick response. MOE/F time tutors. Free search.

You had also mocked our request for more specific information in your Facebook entry (as reproduced below, which has since been removed).

Bn G Lc Ow likes Ace Tutors

www.facebook.com/notes/andrew-loh/updates-mom-maintains-blog-post-accusation-is-accurate/10151662241720460

1/4

5/20/13

Updates: MOM maintains blog post accusation is "accurate"

We note your explanation that what you posted on your personal Facebook page was a rant out of frustration. As highlighted in our Manpower blog, our officers are doing good work on the ground, and saying otherwise is certainly unhelpful. We accept your apology to MOM officers for disparaging their work. We do appreciate public tip-offs, and we do need specific addresses as far as possible, as this will in turn enable us to conduct the inspections in as timely a manner as possible, to help any affected workers. This will also enable our resources to be used prudently. Thank you. Farah Abdul Rahim Director, Corporate Communications Press Secretary to Minister

----------------

My reply to Farah Abdul Rahim, copied to the Acting Minister Tan Chuan Jin.

Dear Farah, Thank you for the reply. Please note that the screenshot of my Facebook page you provided, includes a picture, with the word "Unbelievable", which is not from me. The blog post by "Yusri" on the MOM blog gives the impression that I withheld information from MOM. Indeed, your latest email makes the same claims - that the "facts we had presented in our Manpower Blog are accurate." On the contrary, the facts are that I had provided MOM with the information which I had, and that I promptly provided further information when asked. The sequence of email exchanges shows this. Allow me to list this down, with time and dates: First email to Farah Abdul Rahim - 21 April, 12:27pm (Sunday) Reply from Farah Abdul Rahim - 21 April, 11:49pm (Sunday) Reply from me to Farah Abdul Rahim - 22 April, 9:34am (Monday) Reply from Chin Yen Eu - 24 April, 9:14am (Wednesday) Reply from me to Chin Yen Eu - 24 April, 10:41am (Wednesday) Follow-up email to Chin Yen Eu - 26 April, 4:04pm (Friday) Follow-up email to Chin Yen Eu - 8 May, 11:24am (Wednesday) Reply from Chin Yen Eu - 8 May, 6:40pm (Wednesday) Reply to Chin Yen Eu - 10 May, 1:23pm (Friday)

In more details, the email exchanges and the kind of information provided: 21 April: Two links to two articles which provided the following information: - A 7-minute video of the insides of 4 overcrowded dormitories - Pictures of overcrowded dorms - "Room packed with double-decker beds" - 4 dormitories with 30-40 people in each dorm - Road name, "Kaki BUkit Industrial Terrace" 21 April:- Farah Abdul Rahim replied to ask for "more details... on the location, details and all".

www.facebook.com/notes/andrew-loh/updates-mom-maintains-blog-post-accusation-is-accurate/10151662241720460

2/4

5/20/13

Updates: MOM maintains blog post accusation is "accurate"


22 April: I replied to Farah Abdul Rahim with the following information: - Address of dorms, Kaki Bukit Industrial Terrace, the row of shophouses at the end of that street. The dorms house 30 to 40 people in each one, complaints about sanitation facilities not working, and bad food provided. These workers (Bangladeshis, Indians, Chinese) have been living there for some time now, 2 years or maybe more. 24 April: Chin Yen Eu asked for specific information, and for me to fill up a form. 24 April: My reply to Chin Yen Eu contained the following information: - 63 to 69, Kaki Bukit Industrial Terrace - MOM might also want to take a look at the other dormitories around that area/street as well. 26 April: Emailed Chin Yen Eu to ask if she had received my last email (on 24 April), as I had not heard from her since then. 8 May: Emailed Chin Yen Eu again to ask if she could provide updates. 8 May: Chin Yen Eu finally replied to say that MOM "have acted on the information provided". As you can see, it was MOM which failed to acknowledge or to reply to my email on 24 April, in which I provided the specific information Yen Eu had asked for - namely, the house numbers of the dormitories. I had not provided this earlier as I did not have this information with me. However, when asked for this, I took time to do a Google Earth search to retrieve the house numbers and I promptly provided this to MOM on the very same day. In short, in those 3 days between the 21 to 24 April, I had provided MOM with the following: - A video of the dorms - Pictures of the dorms - 2 articles detailing the conditions inside the dorms, including number of workers in each of them, their nationalities, their complaints, etc. - The road address of the dorms - The house numbers of the dorms In fact, I had provided all the information which MOM required - information which it apparently used eventually to visit the dorms to take the necessary actions. It is regrettable that MOM finds it fit to criticise me for not being prompt enough in providing the information it requires. And it is also unfortunate that despite the facts available to MOM with regards to the email exchanges, it continues to maintain that its blog posting is "accurate". If MOM maintains this, then so be it. Thank you. Regards, Andrew Loh ----------------------A follow-up email from me to Farah Abdul Rahim, on the same day: Dear Farah, By the way, you said: "You had also mocked our request for more specific information in your Facebook entry (as reproduced below, which has since been removed)." I am not sure which posting you're referring to because my posting on my Facebook page has never been removed: https://www.facebook.com/andrewlohhp/posts/601774623180824 Regards, Andrew Loh

Unlike Comment Share You, Lynn Lee and Callan Tham like this. SpeakSpoke WriteWrote Unbelievable about an hour ago via mobile Like Angela Faye Oon All this distraction aside, has MOM done anything about the condition of the dormitories?!

11

It seems to me that the onus is on MOM to begin investigations once a "public tip-off" is received, and when they are informed of the general area where the pro... See More about an hour ago via mobile Like 4 Simon Sim Fail epic. Internal organisation seems to be in disarray. about an hour ago Like

www.facebook.com/notes/andrew-loh/updates-mom-maintains-blog-post-accusation-is-accurate/10151662241720460

3/4

5/20/13

Updates: MOM maintains blog post accusation is "accurate"

Jann Goh Does MOM even inspect dormitories on a regular basis? Or is MOM dependent on, and simultaneously disparaging, members of the public for tip-offs? If anything, this episode illustrates the mean-spiritedness and incompetence MOM. about an hour ago via mobile Like Sam Ho image and public confidence are quite important. any way, the government needs full details before deploying resources for (reactive) action. the part in the blog entry that referenced the "blogger" is petty, very passive aggressive, and uncalled for. 59 minutes ago Like Andrew Loh Sam, the question is that the "full details" were provided to MOM - videos, pictures, street name, house numbers, number of workers, nationalities, living conditions. 49 minutes ago Like 1 Lynn Lee This is absolutely pathetic. MOM seems more interested in making you look bad than in helping the workers. Why the obsession over whether or not you filled out a form? You already took the initiative to investigate, video the workers' living conditions, write to MOM and track down the relevant addresses... and it's not even your job! Good on you for calling them out. 36 minutes ago Unlike 4 Andrew Loh I think they are unhappy either about me ranting about them, or that I didn't provide the info promptly enough. But so much info within 3 days is actually quite prompt liao. Ha! 13 minutes ago Like John Schmoe I'm wondering why MOM used a memefied screenshot as "evidence" of mockery, instead of a screenshot containing just the fb post (or a link to the post). Trying to exaggerate? 8 minutes ago Like Andrew Loh That meme is not even from my Facebook page. Haiz. She used a meme which I did not create, and accused me of removing that FB post which I did not in fact remove. 5 minutes ago Like 2 Write a comment...

About

Create Ad

Create Page

Developers

Careers

Privacy

Cookies

Terms

Help

Facebook 2013 English (US)

www.facebook.com/notes/andrew-loh/updates-mom-maintains-blog-post-accusation-is-accurate/10151662241720460

4/4

Вам также может понравиться