Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
McGraw -Hill/Irwin
7-2
Learning Objective 1
Explain how variable costing differs from absorption costing and compute unit product costs under each method.
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
7-3
Absorption Costing
Product Costs
Product Costs
Period Costs
Variable Selling and Administrati ve Expenses Fixed Selling and Administrati ve Expenses
Period Costs
7-4
Quick Check
Which method will produce the highest values for work in process and finished goods inventories? a. Absorption costing. b. Variable costing. c. They produce the same values for these inventories. d. It depends. . .
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
7-5
Quick Check
Which method will produce the highest values for work in process and finished goods inventories? a. Absorption costing. b. Variable costing. c. They produce the same values for these inventories. d. It depends. . .
7-6
25,000 25,000
$ $ $ $
10 10 3 3
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
7-7
$ $
$ $
Under absorption costing, selling and administrative expenses are always treated as period expenses and deducted from revenue as incurred.
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
7-8
Learning Objective 2
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
7-9
Now, lets compute net operating income using both absorption and variable costing.
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
7-10
Absorption Costing
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
7-11
Variable Costing
Variable manufacturing Variable Costing costs only.
Sales (20,000 $30) Less variable expenses: Beginning inven tory $ Add COGM (25,000 $10) 250,000 Goods available for sale 250,000 Less ending inventory (5,000 $10) 50,000 Variable cost of goods sold 200,000 Variable se lling & administrative ex penses (20,000 $3) 60,000 Contribution margin Less fixed ex penses: Manufacturing overhead $ 150,000 Selling & administrative expenses 100,000 Net operating income
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
$ 600,000
250,000 $ 90,000
I Made R. Natawidnyana, Ak., CPMA
7-12
Learning Objective 3
Reconcile variable costing and absorption costing net operating incomes and explain why the two amounts differ.
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
7-13
Cost Costof of Goods Goods Sold Sold Absorption Absorption costing costing Variable 200,000 Variable mfg. mfg. costs costs $ $ 200,000 Fixed mfg. costs 120,000 Fixed mfg. costs 120,000 $ 320,000 $ 320,000 Variable Variable costing costing Variable 200,000 Variable mfg. mfg. costs costs $ $ 200,000 Fixed mfg. costs -Fixed mfg. costs $ 200,000 $ 200,000
Ending Ending Inventory Inventory $ $ 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 $ $ 80,000 80,000
7-14
Fixed mfg. Overhead $150,000 = = $6.00 per unit Units produced 25,000 units
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
7-15
$ $ $ $
10 10 3 3
7-16
Absorption Absorption Costing Costing Direct Directmaterials, materials,direct directlabor, labor, and va riable mfg. and va riable mfg.overhead overhead Fixed Fixedm mfg. fg. overhead overhead ($150,000 ($150,000 25,000 25,000units) units) Unit product cost Unit product cost $ $ 10 10 6 6 16 16
$ $
$ $
Since there was no change in the variable costs per unit, total fixed costs, or the number of units produced, the unit costs remain unchanged.
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
7-17
Absorption Costing
Absorption AbsorptionCosting Costing
Sales Sales(30,000 (30,000 $30) $30) Less cost of goods Less cost of goodssold: sold: Beg. Beg. inventory inventory(5,000 (5,000 $16) $16) Add Add COGM COGM(25,000 (25,000 $16) $16) Goods Goodsavaila available ble for for sale sale Less ending inventory Less ending inventory Gross Grossmargin margin Less Lessselling selling & &admin. admin.e exp. xp. Variable (30,000 $3) Variable (30,000 $3) Fixe Fixed d Net Netope operating rating income income $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ $ 80,000 80,000 400,000 400,000 480,000 480,000 --
7-18
Variable Costing
Variable manufacturing costs only. Variable Variable Costing Costing Sa les (30,000 $30) $ Sa les (30,000 $30) $900,000 900,000 Le Less ssvariable variable expenses: expenses: Beg. $ Beg.inventory inventory(5,000 (5,000 $10) $10) $ 50,000 50,000 Add COGM (25,000 $10) 250,000 Add COGM (25,000 $10) 250,000 All fixed Goods e 300,000 Goodsavai available lable for forsal sal e 300,000 manufacturing Less -Lessending ending inventory inventory overhead is Variable cost of goods sold 300,000 Variable cost of goods sold 300,000 expensed. Variable Variable se selling lling& &administrative administrative expenses 90,000 390,000 expenses(30,000 (30,000 $3) $3) 90,000 390,000 Contribution m argin 510,000 Contribution m argin 510,000 Le Less ssfixed fixedex expenses: penses: Manufacturing $ Manufacturingoverhea overhead d $150,000 150,000 Selling & administrative expenses 250,000 Selling & administrative expenses 100,000 100,000 250,000 Ne t operating income $ Ne t operating income $260,000 260,000
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
7-19
Fixed mfg. Overhead $150,000 = = $6.00 per unit Units produced 25,000 units
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
7-20
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
10
7-21
Production = Sale s
No change
Rela tion between va riable and a bsorption income Absorption > Varia ble Absorption < Varia ble Absorption = Varia ble
I Made R. Natawidnyana, Ak., CPMA
7-22
In the previous example, 25,000 units were produced each year, but sales increased from 20,000 units in year one to 30,000 units in year two.
In this revised example, production will differ each year while sales will remain constant.
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
11
7-23
$ $ $ $
10 10 3 3
7-24
$ $
$ $
Since the number of units produced increased in this example, while the fixed manufacturing overhead remained the same, the absorption unit cost is less.
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
12
7-25
7-26
Sales (25,000 $30) Less varia ble e xpenses: Beginning inven tory $ Add COGM (30,000 $10) 300,000 Goods a vai la ble for sale 300,000 Less ending inventory (5,000 $10) 50,000 Variable cost of goods sold 250,000 Variable se lli ng & administrative ex penses (25,000 $3) 75,000 Contribution margin Less fixed ex penses: Manufacturing overhead $ 150,000 Sel ling & administrative e xpenses 100,000 Net operating income
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
$ 750,000
250,000 $ 175,000
I Made R. Natawidnyana, Ak., CPMA
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
13
7-27
$ $ $ $
10 10 3 3
7-28
$ $
$ $
Since the number of units produced decreased in the second year, while the fixed manufacturing overhead remained the same, the absorption unit cost is now higher.
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
14
7-29
These are the 20,000 units produced in the current period at the higher unit cost of $17.50 each.
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
7-30
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
15
7-31
Conclusions
Net operating income is not affected by changes in production using variable costing. Net operating income is affected by changes in production using absorption costing even though the number of units sold is the same each year.
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
7-32
Learning Objective 4
Understand the advantages and disadvantages of both variable and absorption costing.
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
16
7-33
7-34
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
17
7-35
Since top executives are usually evaluated based on external reports to shareholders, they may feel that decisions should be based on absorption cost income.
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, absorption costing must be used when filing income tax returns.
7-36
Advantages
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
18
7-37
Fixed manufacturing costs are capacity costs and will be incurred even if nothing is produced.
Absorption Costing
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
Variable Costing
I Made R. Natawidnyana, Ak., CPMA
7-38
workers a minimum number of paid hours. Direct labor is usually not the constraint. TOC emphasizes the role direct laborers play in driving continuous improvement. Since layoffs often devastate morale, managers involved in TOC are extremely reluctant to lay off employees.
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
19
7-39
So, the difference between variable and absorption income tends to disappear.
Managerial Accounting Variab le Costing
7-40
End of Chapter 7
http://natawidnyana.wordpress.com
20