Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Manchester
Multi-Agency
Public
Protection
Arrangement
ANNUAL
REPORT
2003-04
National overview 2
Forewords 3
Who we are 4
Achievements in 2003/4 5
How MAPPA works 6
Managing MAPPA 8
Helping Victims 9
Sharing Information 10
Helping to Manage Offenders 12
Greater Manchester Police 12
Probation Service 13
Prison Service 14
Housing 14
Education 15
Social Services 15
Youth Offending Teams 16
Health 16
Lay Members 17
Crown Prosecution Service 18
Other Agencies 18
Case Studies 19
Facts and Figures 20
Further Information 21
NATIONAL OVERVIEW
Sexual and violent offences are established as good practice. The strengthens the sex offenders’
dreadful crimes that deeply affect statutory basis of the duty will register, which has proved a
the lives of victims and their help ensure a more consistent valuable means by which the
families and bring fear to local engagement of all these agencies police can monitor convicted sex
communities. Their impact can be across England and Wales. offenders within their area, and
profound and long lasting, leaving Secondly, the relevant Central introduces new civil orders to help
victims feeling unsafe even in Government Departments have prevent further offences from
their own homes. The Government been involved in developing the being committed.
regards tackling sexual and Guidance, which the Home
violent crimes as one of its highest Secretary issued on the duty to co- Victim focus
priorities. operate. The reform of the way in The victims of sexual offending
which child protection is are identified as a priority group
The national development of the organised, following the public within the National Victims and
MAPPA has concentrated on inquiry into the tragic death of Witnesses Strategy. This strategy
preparing to implement the Victoria Climbie, will reinforce the which was published in July 2003,
MAPPA provisions of the Criminal importance of effective joint aims to improve support and
Justice Act 2003. These provisions working between different protection for victims and
came into force on 5 April 2004 agencies, which the MAPPA has witnesses by:
and help strengthen the MAPPA itself promoted. • Reducing the adverse effects
by: of crime on victims and
• Making the Prison Service part Other legislation witnesses, and preventing
of the ‘responsible authority’ In addition to this work to secondary victimisation
with police and probation strengthen the MAPPA, the • Encouraging more victims and
• Formalising the involvement of Government has also begun to witnesses to come forward
other agencies which can strengthen other statutory • Offering more options to
make an important provisions, the most significant of victims and witnesses,
contribution to helping which are the Sexual Offences Act including alternatives to
offenders not to reoffend 2003 and the measures to attendance at court.
• The Act imposes a Duty to introduce new sentences for
Cooperate with the ‘dangerous’ offenders which will These initiatives will help toward
Responsible Authority MAPPA keep them in custody until they no another key Government target,
upon: local authority housing, longer pose a serious risk to the that of improving public
education and social services, public. confidence in the criminal justice
health service bodies, system.
Jobcentres Plus, Youth The Sexual Offences Act overhauls
Offending Teams, Registered the many antiquated sexual The Government is underpinning
Social Landlords which offences and plugs loopholes in this work in its Domestic Violence,
accommodate MAPPA the law. In updating sexual Crime and Victims Bill, which is
offenders and electronic offences, it strengthens the law on currently going through
monitoring providers. rape and on sex offences against Parliament. It will create a new
The appointment by the Home children. It introduces new independent post of
Secretary of two members of the offences of ‘sexual grooming’ and Commissioner for Victims and
public as ‘lay advisers’ in each extends the protection from Witnesses to be a champion or
Area is to assist in monitoring the exploitation in prostitution or voice for all victims of crime and a
effectiveness of the MAPPA. pornography to children up to the new statutory Victims’ Code of
age of 18. For the first time, it will Practice (to be implemented in
Work on the duty to co-operate be an offence to buy sexual April 2005) which will build on the
has been taken forward by two services from a child below this existing Victims’ Charter and set
separate and complementary age, targeting those who abuse out specific responsibilities that
initiatives. First, in many areas the children in this way. each criminal justice service
duty to co-operate formalises agency and Victim Support must
what has already begun to be The Sexual Offences Act also provide to victims.
2
Chief Constable’s Foreword
Greater Manchester Police is focused on fighting crime, and protecting
people. The work carried out to manage the risks posed by violent,
sexual and dangerous offenders is key to protecting people in Greater
Manchester. These offenders are a small number but we recognise the
concern about them that exists within communities. It is for this reason
that we put resources into investigating and detecting these crimes.
We cannot do this alone and the partnership working that is at the heart
of MAPPA (Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements) is now being
seen in all aspects of tackling crime and disorder in the county. Sharing
information about offenders and crime between organisations is vital to
safeguarding communities.
We face challenges ahead as the number of sex offenders we deal with continues to rise over the next few
years. This does not show a rise in the number of people committing offences, but is caused by the fact that
the Sex Offenders Act 1997 did not apply to offenders convicted before it came into effect, unless they were in
custody or under supervision at the time. But people should be reassured that the good work of the Violent
and Sex Offender Registration (ViSOR) unit will continue to manage the risks.
GMP is an open and accountable organisation and fully supported the introduction of lay members into the
MAPPA Strategic Management Board. These dedicated individuals represent the interests of the community
and scrutinise developments on behalf of us all. This report is part of our continued determination to be both
open and accountable for the work in managing violent, sexual and dangerous offenders, and in fact, for all
aspects of how we tackle crime in the county. The information contained in this report should reassure that
we are making a difference to the quality of life in our communities.
Chief Constable
3
WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO
In Greater Manchester Multi-
Agency Risk Panels, a partnership
between the police and probation,
were established in 1997. The
panels were set up to provide a
forum for information sharing and
close working to assess and
manage registered sex offenders
and other offenders regarded as
potentially dangerous. It built on
the success of a pilot project in the
Rochdale area in 1995.
4
KEY ACHIEVEMENTS 2003/4
During the last year we have had some significant achievements,
including:
5
HOW MAPPA WORKS
There are many aspects to protecting the public and managing the risks from dangerous, violent and sexual
offenders. In Greater Manchester, multi-agency assessment procedures for the assessment and management
of these offenders have been developed. Assessment and management is at three levels:
This structure of risk management is intended to enable resources to be deployed to manage identified risk in
the most efficient and effective manner. The level at which a case is managed is dependent upon the nature of
the risk and how it can be managed. For example, not all high risk cases will need to be managed by the
MAPPP and other less risky cases might justify MAPPP referral because of their complexity.
Level 1: ordinary risk Level 2: Local Risk Level 3: Multi Agency Public
management Management Meetings Protection Panel
Level 1 risk management is used Level 2 risk management is used The MAPPP is responsible for the
in cases where the risks posed by where the active involvement of management of the ‘critical few’.
the offender can be managed by more than one agency is required The criteria for referring a case to
one agency without actively or but where either the level of risk the MAPPP are defined as:
significantly involving other or the complexity of managing the
agencies. Level 1 management risk is not so great as to require (i) risk assessed as being a high
primarily involves probation, referral to the Level 3, the MAPPP. or very high risk of causing
police, youth offending teams or serious harm; AND
the Prison Service as the lead Risk can and will change, so the
agency. Generally, offenders means of managing risk is (ii) presents risks that can only be
managed at Level 1 will be regularly reviewed and will be managed by a plan which
assessed as presenting a low or adjusted to meet the specific requires close co-operation at
medium risk. need. The MAPPA provides the a senior level due to the
framework within which those complexity of the case and/or
changes can be effectively and because of the unusual
consistently managed. resource commitments it
requires; OR
6
ASSESSING THE RISKS
Initial risk assessments on numbers of registered sex Register in 1997, did not apply to
serious violent and sexual offenders will continue to rise offenders convicted before that
offenders are normally every year for the next few years time, unless they were still under
undertaken at the point of because the legislation, which supervision or in custody.
sentence in a Pre-Sentence brought about the Sex Offender
Report. They are prepared by the
Probation Service, or by Youth
Offending Teams for those under
18. The reports help the court
determine a suitable sentence,
and are used by the Probation
Service if the offender is
subsequently given a community
sentence eg Community
Rehabilitation Order. The
Probation staff have extensive
experience in working with
offenders.
ROCHDALE N
BURY
BOLTON
NORTH
MIDDLETON
NORTH
SWINTON MANCHESTER
CRESCENT ASHTON
LEIGH
ECCLES STALYBRIDGE
SOUTH
STRETFORD MANCHESTER
STOCKPORT
ALTRINCHAM
CHEADLE HULME
8
HELPING VICTIMS OF CRIME
Greater Manchester Victim can be substantial particularly Greater Manchester Probation
Support and Witness Service is an where the offender may be Area employs Probation Service
integral part of the MAPPP released back into the community. Officers to liaise with victims of
process. The charity provides local At MAPPPs they can pass on the serious violent or sexual offences.
support and assistance to victims concerns of victims and ensure Victim Liaison Officers provide
of crime and to vulnerable victims are kept fully informed, as victims with information about the
witnesses. Where Victim Support well as assisting other agencies. offender’s sentence, parole
involvement is requested at a eligibility and any plans for
MAPPP, a staff member will As part of the Street Crime release. They will ask the victim if
attend the meeting and then liaise Initiative in Greater Manchester, they have any views, which might
with the appropriate victim worker witnesses of violent crime have affect the offender’s license
in the case. been contacted and visited so conditions on release.
their concerns can be passed on.
Trained staff and volunteers at Some have been accompanied to
local branches offer information court to increase confidence in the • A network of GMP Family
and support to victims, witnesses, criminal justice system. The Support Units exists
their families and friends. Where service plans to extend to provide throughout the county
an offence is violent or sexual, the even greater support to victims supporting child victims and
needs of the victim are greatly and witnesses. their families through the
increased. The impact on a victim process of reporting,
investigation and prosecution
of a crime. They also provide
assistance to victims of
domestic violence and children
who have been subjected to
violent or sexual assaults.
9
SHARING INFORMATION
Public protection depends upon
the effectiveness of the plans
MAPPA agencies draw up to
manage an offender’s risks. These
plans are in turn dependent upon
the quality of the risk
identification and assessment
processes; and the quality of both
the risk assessment and the risk
management plan are heavily
determined by the effectiveness of
information sharing
arrangements. Unless all relevant
information is available, in good
time, to those making the
assessments and drawing up the
management plans, public
protection could be compromised.
10
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
There may be some cases where Disclosure rarely means providing In 2002, a media protocol between
the management of an offender’s information to the media, and is the police, probation and the local
risk in the community cannot be usually on a one-to-one basis and regional media was put in
carried out without the disclosure handled sensitively by place. This has helped to ensure
of some information to a third professionals involved. The media that the media are more informed
party outside the MAPPA may be involved to assist public about how agencies co-operate to
agencies. For example, where an protection by wide coverage of an manage offenders in the
employer, voluntary group individual case. They can play a community and how media
organiser or church leader has a major role in helping to alert the coverage can both help and hinder
position of responsibility/control public. For example, if an offender their supervision. The protocol
over the offender and other fails to comply with supervision also sets out what assistance
persons who may be at serious and his whereabouts become police and probation will give to
risk from the offender, the unknown, appeals for information the media. Almost 40 newspapers
disclosure to them of certain may be made through the media. and broadcasters are signed up to
information about the offender is This means the public can help the protocol and it has so far been
the only way to manage that risk. track down the offender and very successful in improving
protect other people. This has not relationships between the media,
If such a course of action is been required in Greater police and probation.
required, it must be part of a risk Manchester since the introduction
management plan. of MAPPA.
Media interest:
examples of coverage
of incident s involving
sexual and violent
offences
11
HELPING TO MANAGE OFFENDERS
Protecting the public from sexual, violent and dangerous offenders is
best achieved by joint working between statutory and voluntary bodies.
Police and probation services are the lead agencies, but the
contributions made by other agencies are essential.
ViSOR is:
• Responsible for
maintaining the
Sex Offender
Register for
Greater
Manchester and
for ensuring the
compliance of
those on the
register.
• Staffed by more
than 20 police
personnel and
dedicated
Probation Service
co-ordinators
• A central point of
contact for liaison
with all agencies
involved in this
work across the
area
12
Probation Service
Other key areas of work include preparation of reports for the courts;
provision of accommodation in approved premises; supervision and
management of offenders servicing a community sentence; supervision
and management of offenders following their release from custody on
licence – this includes swiftly recalling to custody those offenders who
do not comply with the terms and conditions of their licence.
13
Prison Service
Her Majesty’s Prison Service contributes to the protection of the public
by keeping in custody those offenders committed by the courts and
working to reduce the risk they pose. It does this by:
From April 2004, the Prison Service will join the Police and Probation
Services in Greater Manchester as part of the Responsible Authority –
those agencies with a statutory duty for protection of the public. The
Prison Service is already engaged in the MAPPA process as a major part
in Greater Manchester.
Housing
Housing professionals contribute significant expertise
to MAPPP meetings and housing providers including
local authorities, Housing Associations and staff from
both statutory and voluntary hostels have attended
meetings.
15
Youth Offending Teams
Dangerous offenders are usually adults, however there are a few cases
each year where young offenders, aged under 18, are assessed as being
a danger to the public. Such cases may be under the supervision of
Youth Offending Teams (YOTs).
Teams consist of police, probation, education and social workers and are
well placed to co-ordinate arrangements to closely manage these
dangerous young offenders. YOTs have links to local Child and
Adolescent Mental Health Services.
Health
Health issues can be a significant factor in managing dangerous
offenders, and the health professionals attend MAPPPs on a case-by-
case basis. Some offenders have mental health problems, which need
assessment and treatment, and a local GP or specialist psychiatric staff
may be represented at MAPPPs.
16
Lay Members
Greater Manchester was among the first areas to have Lay Members
appointed, chosen as one of only eight areas in the country to pilot Lay
Member involvement. April 2004 sees the start of Lay Member involvement
rolled out to 42 areas of England and Wales following an evaluation of Lay
Member involvement undertaken to inform the MAPPA Lay Adviser
provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Home Office Minister Paul
Goggins said of the lay advisers: “We are committed to giving them not
only an insight into how this work is carried out but, more importantly, an
opportunity to question what is being done and why.”
“
“The transition from Lay Member to Lay Adviser clearly acknowledges
the importance and value of having members of the community
involved in the discussions and the decision making that takes place in
relation to Public Protection.
17
Crown Prosecution Service
Representatives from the CPS
attend the MAPPA SMB as
required and play a key part in
looking at disclosure related to
records where they become
relevant during the course of a
prosecution.
Other Agencies
MAPPPs may be attended by other
community agencies or
individuals where they can add to
the discussion. In Greater
Manchester, this has included
Housing Compliance Officers,
staff from Greater Manchester
Police’s Domestic Violence Unit,
Probation Service victim liaison
officers and offender’s family
members.
18
CASE STUDIES
Mr A is 33 years old and has a history of sexual offences including Mr B is 40 years old with a
indecent assault and kidnapping young boys. In November 2003, a history of general criminality
Sex Offender Order was successfully obtained. It was ahead of his and serious violence. In the
release back into the community after a 45-month prison sentence past he has served prison
for a sexual offence. sentences for wounding,
assault, conspiracy to rob and
The Order prevented him approaching or communicating, directly causing grievous bodily harm.
or indirectly, with anyone under 16 and loitering around schools, He served seven years in
parks, play areas, bus stations and public toilets. prison for manslaughter and
has a history of drug and
MAPPPS were held both before and after his release with a alcohol problems.
rigorous risk management plan in place detailing how he should be
managed when released on licence. Mr A was required to live as For several years Mr B has
directed and subject to a curfew and reporting regime which were been the subject of MAPPPS
put in place to minimise the opportunities he had for reoffending. usually convened in the
period ahead of his release
Within a fortnight of his release Mr A breached the terms of both from prison back into the
his licence and Sex Offender Order when he approached a boy in a community and at times of
public place. He was immediately recalled to prison for the breach heightened risk. He has a
of his licence and received a further two-year prison sentence for history of domestic violence
breaching the Sex Offender Order. There was no harm or injury to towards a long-term partner
any member of the public caused by his actions. who had been informed of his
previous offences, and the
relationship is unstable and
volatile. Agencies have found
Mr X was convicted in 1990 of indecency with children. In 2003
it essential to communicate
enquiries established that he was allowing children to regularly
and liaise about any concerns
visit his home. Given the potential danger to those children he was
when Mr B is in the
made the subject of a MAPPP, which recommended an application
community but not subject to
for a Sex Offender Order.
any formal supervision.
Once on the Sex Offenders Register he was subject to various
In addition to the police and
restrictions on his movements, particularly if there were any
probation service other
changes in his name or address, he must notify police within 14
agencies in his case have
days. He was also required to have no contact with anyone under
included housing, education,
the age of 16.
social services and health
professionals. Care has been
In October 2003 he moved to a new part of Greater Manchester. His
taken to ensure the MAPPP
change of address and previous behaviour led to suspicions that he
and child protection systems
might be breaching the prohibitions placed on him by the Sex
work effectively with each
Offender Order. Surveillance was put in place and found Mr X was
other.
allowing children to visit his address. Two girls, both under 16
years old, were seen leaving his back yard with him.
Further enquiries found that one of the girls had been reported
missing from her home and Mr X had allowed her to stay at his flat
during that time. Mr X was arrested and when shown evidence
pleaded guilty at court. He spent three months in custody whilst on
remand and was sentenced to a Community Rehabilitation Order.
19
FACTS AND FIGURES
The number of Registered Sex Offenders (RSOs) in the community on 31 March 2004 1388
The number of Sex Offender Orders applied for and gained between
1 April 2003 and 31 March 2004 4
a) applied for 4
b) imposed by the courts 4
The number of violent offenders and other sexual offenders (as defined by
Section 68 (3) (4) & (5) CJ & CS Act 2000) living in the area during the year
1 April 2003 and 31 March 2004 1476
The number of ‘other offenders’ dealt with under MAPPA during the year
1 April 2003 and 31 March 2004 as being assessed by the Responsible Authority
as posing a risk of serious harm to the public (but who did not fall within either of
the other two categories, as defined by S67 (2b) 32
For each of the three categories of offenders covered by MAPPA (registered sex
offenders, violent and sex offenders, and other offenders) The number of offenders
that have been dealt with by
Of the cases managed by MAPPP during the reporting year the number of offenders:
who were returned to custody for breach of licence 30
who were returned to custody for breach of a Restraining Order of Sex Offender Order 1
charged with a serious sexual or violent offence 2
20
FURTHER INFORMATION
This report has been produced by Greater Manchester Police and
National Probation Service (Greater Manchester) in conjunction with
members of the Greater Manchester Multi Agency Public Protection
Arrangements Strategic Management Board.
21
This report has been produced by
Greater Manchester Police and
National Probation Service
(Greater Manchester) in
conjunction with members of the
Greater Manchester Multi Agency
Public Protection Arrangements
Strategic Management Board.