MGMT1001 Assignment 2 REPORT Feedback s1 2013 Weighting: 30% of total course assessment Student Name Date Received Student

No. Mark

Criteria O S U Report content and utilisation of course theory Overall quality of analysis in terms of the following areas; - Communication - Groups and Teams - Leadership Evidence of self reflective practice Research supporting the report Quality of academic research - Appropriate number of references sourced (min 6) from appropriate journals/ databases - Relevance of sources to your argument Structure and formatting Appropriate structure (introduction, body, conclusion) and inclusion of compulsory appendices Clarity of expression & grammar Correct in-text citations and bibliography format using ASB Harvard style Correct document formatting as per requirements in section 4.6 of the Course Outline and length (2500 words +/- 10%) Penalty(ies) applied: TOTAL NB: Marking criteria only applies to the students own original work. General Comments:

/20% /20% /20% /10%

/10% /5% /5% /5% /5%

O = Outstanding; S = Satisfactory; U = Unsatisfactory

Criteria

Outstanding Demonstrates critical application of appropriate Communication concepts and theories to individual/teams Everest experience Marks: 15-20 Demonstrates critical application of appropriate Groups and Teams concepts and theories to the individuals and teams Everest experience Marks: 15-20

Satisfactory Describes Communication within the context of individual/ group Everest experience. Some application of appropriate concepts or theory. Mark: 10-14.5 Describes Groups and Teams within the context of individual/ group Everest experience. Some application of appropriate concepts or theory. Mark: 10-14.5 Describes Leadership within the context of individual/ group Everest experience. Some application of appropriate concepts or theory. Mark: 10-14.5 Describes their own behaviour and feelings

Unsatisfactory Little to no discussion of Communication within the context of individual/ group Everest experience. Minimal application of appropriate concepts or theory Mark: 0 - 10 Little to no discussion of Groups and Teams within the context of individual/ group Everest experience. Minimal application of appropriate concepts or theory Mark: 0 - 10 Little to no discussion of Leadership within the context of individual/ group Everest experience. Minimal application of appropriate concepts or theory Mark: 0 - 10 Little to no description of their own behavior and feelings/describes events. May describe other team members Mark: 0 - 5 Demonstrated use of less than 6 academic sources or non academic sources Sources selected are largely irrelevant. Mark: 0 - 4.5 Report poorly structured; introduction and/or conclusion not clear or effective; body not clearly structured; paragraphs/sections not welldeveloped; ineffective transitions between paragraphs, use of lists/ bullet points. Mark: 0 - 2 Multiple spelling mistakes, extensive use of contractions, poor sentence construction, informal tone (word choice, spelling or slang) poor structure (e.g., 2 sentence paragraphs) Mark: 0 - 2 Referencing is absent or does not conform to Harvard style (as per ASB guide) Mark: 0 - 2 Report is outside the boundaries of the Word Limit and/or does not consistently conform to formatting requirements Mark: 0 - 2

Report content and utilisation of course theory

Overall quality of analysis in terms of Communication

Overall quality of analysis in terms of Groups and Teams

Overall quality of analysis in terms of Leadership

Demonstrates critical application of appropriate Leadership concepts and theories to the individuals and teams Everest experience Marks: 15-20 Evidence of self reflective practice Critically examines their own behaviour and feelings; a level of consistency in the portrayal of the Everest events among group members. Marks: 7.5 - 10 Research supporting the report - Quality of academic research - Appropriate number of references Demonstrated use of more than 6 academic sources (min 6) from appropriate sources journals/ databases Selection and use of sources highly - Relevance of sources to your appropriate to the analysis of the Everest argument experience. Mark: 7.5 - 10

Mark: 5 - 7 Demonstrated use of 6 academic sources Selection and use of sources broadly appropriate to analysis of Everest experience Mark: 5 -7

Structure and formatting

Appropriate structure (introduction, body, conclusion) and inclusion of compulsory appendices Report is well-structured and coherent, with a clear and effective introduction and conclusion; body is logically sequenced with clear transitions between parts; paragraphs are well-developed. Mark: 4 - 5 No spelling mistakes, absence of contractions, appropriate academic tone, well constructed paragraphs Mark: 4 - 5 Referencing is consistently accurate using Harvard style (as per ASB guide) Mark: 4 - 5 Report is within the Word Limit boundaries and confirms to all formatting requirements Mark: 4 - 5 Report is structured with an introduction and conclusion and body with clearly defined parts, although these could be developed more effectively / be more coherent. Transition between paragraphs could be improved. Mark: 2.5- 3.5 Some spelling mistakes and rare use of contractions, informal tone (word choice, spelling, or slang); appropriate paragraph structure Mark: 2.5- 3.5 Referencing is mainly accurate using Harvard style (as per ASB guide) Mark: 2.5- 3.5 Report is within the Word Limit boundaries but does not conform to all formatting requirements Mark: 2.5- 3.5

Clarity of expression and grammar

Correct in-text citations and bibliography format using ASB Harvard style Correct document formatting as per requirements in section 4.3.1 of the Course Outline and length (2500 words +/- 10%)

NB: Marking criteria only applies to the students own original work.