Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 2 ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................................... 3 FINDINGS .............................................................................................................................. 4 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 6 APPENDIX ............................................................................................................................. 7 Selected laboratory Photographs ........................................................................................... 7 Site-assessed equipment list from SPA ........................................................................... .. 13
Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Government of the Republic of Zambia implemented the Upgrading of the Chipata to Mfuwe Road Project in Eastern Province, under the recurring annual work plans. The road had initially not been engineered and consisted only of a thinly graveled wearing course throughout, and two surfaced sections each of less than 2km in length. The full-length-upgrade engineering design consisted of; widened carriageway to 10.2m (2 lanes), double bituminous surface dressing type on a geometrically designed alignment. The road route runs in the NorthWesterly direction from Chipata, via settlement areas of Kalichelo, Jumbe, Chisengu and Mambwe until the national park resort of Mfuwe, approximately 101km.
The Construction Contract was awarded by RDA to Sable Transport & Construction Limited with BCHOD Consulting Engineers being engaged as the Design/Supervision Engineer and Project Managers. During the 22nd Technical Meeting of the contracted parties held on 25th June 2012 at the Resident Engineers Office in Chipata, concerns were raised as to the appropriateness and adequacy of the provided laboratory for work quality control. The Laboratory, situated at the Contractors Chisengu Camp, was being currently utilized under a joint Engineer/Contractor arrangement as there was no exclusive laboratory for the Project Managers Staff.
The Project Manager at the above technical meeting issued an instruction to Project Managers staff to compile a report on the laboratory situation.
The report herein is a response to that instruction and was prepared by the Assistant Resident Engineer collaborating with the Engineers Laboratory Technician and the Contractors Laboratory Manager for consensus.
Page 2
2. ASSESMENT
The assessment of the laboratory was based on the Contract Specifications of Particular Application Clause B1402 Part (c) Laboratories and Clause B1402 Part (c) xvi Provision of laboratory equipment. The lists of equipment prescribed in the SPA were availed to the assessors, and an inspection of the facility carried out, with respect to availability and condition of each equipment piece, see Appendix.
Secondly the menu of the routine tests that were specifically being carried out on Works for the Project was identified and groups of pieces of laboratory equipment relevant only to each those particular procedures were also assessed in terms of availability and condition.
Page 3
3. FINDINGS The results of the investigation were summarized in two parts, the first one being a categorized table of the provided laboratory equipment compared against the prescribed levels in the SPA and the second, an outline of the routine tests that were being carried out on the works with an attached comment on the adequacy of the provided equipment as per investigation. TABLE 3.1: LABORATORY EQUIPMENT SITUATION AGAINST SPA
TEST CATEGORY QUANTITY IN SPA QUANTITY PROVIDED (No.) SIEVE ANALYSIS 239 63 QUANTITY PROVIDED PERCENTUM 26.4 %
ATTERBERG LIMIT
171
34
19.8 %
567
79
13.9 %
273
10
3.7 %
5.3 %
40.0 %
37
2.7 %
Page 4
MDD
SATISFACTORY
PI
SATISFACTORY
GRADING ON GRAVEL
CBR
UNRELIABLE
DUE
TO
MISSING
.0127MM
GAUGE
AND
UNAUTHENTICATED CALIBRATION
UCS
SATISFACTORY
FLAKINESS INDEX
AS SPECIFIED
ALD
AS SPECIFIED
Further on the provided building at Chisengu did not meet clause B1402 Part c (i) and (ii) of the SPA in terms of size and facilities prescribed therein.
Page 5
4. CONCLUSION
The provided laboratory did not meet the specification for the Contract in terms of quantities and standard. Therefore, there was need to equip the laboratory accordingly, at least to satisfactorily acceptable levels, so as to build and subsequently maintain confidence in all the parties and stakeholders that the quality function was being carried out objectively on the Project and to acceptable standards.
Page 6
APPENDIX
Laboratory building with office on the left and main lab room on right
Page 7
Reverse view of lab with main room on left and small lab room on right
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
CBR Machine
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13