Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • Ang Bagong Bayani Vs COMELEC

    Загружено:

    Martin Cusi
    204 просмотров1 страница
    Bagong Bayani and Akbayan filed a petition against COMELEC's Resolution accrediting 154 parties for the 2001 elections, seeking to disqualify mainstream parties as the party-list system is intended to benefit the marginalized. The Supreme Court ruled that while political parties may participate, the party-list system is exclusive to marginalized and underrepresented groups consistent with its purpose of enabling them representation in Congress, as stated in the Constitution and implementing law.

    Исходное описание:

    Ang Bagong Bayani v. COMELEC Digest

    Оригинальное название

    Ang Bagong Bayani vs COMELEC

    Авторское право

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Доступные форматы

    DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    Bagong Bayani and Akbayan filed a petition against COMELEC's Resolution accrediting 154 parties for the 2001 elections, seeking to disqualify mainstream parties as the party-list system is intended to benefit the marginalized. The Supreme Court ruled that while political parties may participate, the party-list system is exclusive to marginalized and underrepresented groups consistent with its purpose of enabling them representation in Congress, as stated in the Constitution and implementing law.

    Авторское право:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    204 просмотров1 страница

    Ang Bagong Bayani Vs COMELEC

    Загружено:

    Martin Cusi
    Bagong Bayani and Akbayan filed a petition against COMELEC's Resolution accrediting 154 parties for the 2001 elections, seeking to disqualify mainstream parties as the party-list system is intended to benefit the marginalized. The Supreme Court ruled that while political parties may participate, the party-list system is exclusive to marginalized and underrepresented groups consistent with its purpose of enabling them representation in Congress, as stated in the Constitution and implementing law.

    Авторское право:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 1

    Ang Bagong Bayani vs.

    COMELEC Facts Bagong Bayani and Akbayan filed a petition for Certiorari against Resolution 3785, which Resolution accredited 154 parties and organizations for the 2001 elections; Petitioners seek to disqualify mainstream political parties as the party-list system is for the benefit of the marginalized and underrepresented. Issues 1. W/N political parties may participate in the party-list; 2. W/N the party-list system is exclusive to the marginalized and underrepresented. Held/Ratio Yes. 1. The mere fact of being a political party is not sufficient for disqualification. Article IX(C) of the Constitution allows for registered national, regional, and sectoral parties. Article VI similarly refers to such parties. 2. Not all political parties may participate, since they must be consistent with the party-lists purpose, which is to enable the marginalized and underrepresented to be members of Congress. 3. RA 7941 implementing the system states that they must represent labor, peasant, fisherfolk, urban poor, and other similar groups. They are those with no welldefined constituents and could contribute to legislation that would benefit the nation as a whole.

    Вам также может понравиться