Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract
Internal conflicts have been a common focus for psychotherapies of a variety of orientations. All of them share the idea that internal conflicts (or personal dilemmas) are at the heart of human functioning. However, their almost opaque nature makes it difficult to identify and gauge. The notion of internal conflict can be formulated within the context of a broader psychological theory capable of contributing in more specific terms, as well as instruments for measuring it. Based on Personal Construct Theory, a constructivist theory that regards the significance attributed to events as being the basis of human functioning, research has been conducted on several clinical problems. Results suggests that internal conflicts can become a target for interventions promoting change. These personal dilemmas are identified in people who associate self-identity characteristics in which change is desirable (e.g., timid) to other, more central core identity constructs (e.g., modest). By implication, achieving change (e.g., becoming social) is linked in the subjects cognitive system to characteristics which are unacceptable for the persons sense of identity (e.g., arrogant). This workshop is designed to: (1) provide the clinician methods to identify internal conflicts, (2) use them for case formulation, and (3) offer the clinician specific guidelines for a dilemma-focused intervention. The presenter will describe and illustrate a protocol for working with internal conflicts, a mechanism that may be blockading change in a variety of clinical problems.
Social cognitive theorists (Festinger, Heider) where also focused on conflicts and efforts human do to balance them HOWEVER, little has been done in terms of defining conflicts in an operational way, and thus, little research has been done Even less is known about the role of conflicts for both physical and psychological health, development, and change (psychotherapy)
A person is obviously not guided by one only construct but by an entire network of meanings. This system consists of hierarchically arranged personal constructs. The most central or "core" constructs are those that define the person's identity. In addition, there are more peripheral constructs that, although subordinate to these core constructs, are actively involved in construing events and further actions.
In the core of the construct system lies the sense of identity, represented by a set of core constructs whose invalidation produces great distress, and is strongly resisted. This portion of the system is mainly non-verbal or implicit but governs decisions taken at lower, more peripheral levels. It also might produce plans and personal goals that in certain situations become incompatible. IT IS NOT A LOGICAL SYSTEM The person is not aware of all its components, neither of the conflicts created by the fragmentation of the system.
Teresas grid
Implicative dilemma
SELF, IDEAL SELF
Constructo Congruent Construct Congruente
Polo Congruente Congruent Pole
modest SELF
Constructo Discrepant r >20 Discrepante Construct
Polo Actual Present Pole
timid
social
Differences are significant using a chi-squared test A logistic regression analysis including sex and age yields presence of implicative dilemmas as the first variable to enter into the equation
Some Conclusions
The presence of dilemmas as captured by repertory grids is a usual, natural, situation in humans at least to some degree (34%). Subjects consulting for clinical problems are more likely (52%) to present implicative dilemmas than subjects who dont. Grids of subjects presenting with psychological symptoms yield a greater number of dilemmas (4,37 vs. 2,11 a significant difference).
of implicative dilemmas
NO
After therapy
NO
YES
TOTAL
35 (92%) 34 (69%) 69
3 (8%) 15 (31%) 18
38 (45%) 49 (55%) 87
Before therapy
YES
TOTAL
Therapy results in a significant (p < .001; McNemars test) decrease in the number of subjects presenting with implicative dilemmas. (Feixas & Sal, 2004)
Overview
Based on the proposal of Feixas & Sal (2000), a more general protocol, a set of guidelines Designed primarily for research protocols but also suitable for clinical practice and training Addressed to neurotic clients showing implicative dilemmas in their rep grids Limited to those cases in which the client agrees to work on his or her dilemma
Recommendations
Clinical training with a constructivist/TCP emphasis Training in the especific techniques included in the manual Supervision
Formal issues
Five phases:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Initial (admittance & assessment) Dilemma formulation Working with the dilemma Dilemma resolution (Fixed role) Termination
Initial Phase
1st. Session
Goals: Establishing a good therapeutic alliance Defining the complain in psychological terms Setting therapy goals Assessing selfconstruction Means: Clinical interview, empathic attitude Analysis of the complain
Self-characterization
2nd. Session
Goals: Assessing the clients construct system Identifying implicatgive dilemmas Means: Repertory Grid Technique
3rd. Session
Goals: Feedback on assessment Reframing the problem in terms of the dilemma Reaching an agreement for working with the dilemma Means: Presenting the dilemma to the client
4th. Session
Goals: Assessing the implications of the dilemma Specifying the advantages and disadvantages of change Means: Ladering Tschudis ABC
Implicative dilemma
SELF, IDEAL SELF
Constructo Congruent Construct Congruente
Polo Congruente Congruent Pole
mature SELF
Constructo Discrepant r >20 Discrepante Construct
Polo Actual Present Pole
timid
extraverted
Tschudis ABC
Timid Disadvantages: Not making friends Extraverted Advantages: Express my views, secure, authentic, sincere Disadvantages: Being criticized and left alone
5th. Session
Goals: Putting the dilemma in the clients life Means: Reconstruction of the clients immediate experience (controlled elaboration)
6th. Session
Goals: Specify the relational implications of the dilemma Means: Exploring the role other people play in situations related to the dilemma
9th. Sessions
Goals: Exploring the alternatives to the dilemma Integrating the therapy process Means: Working with the exceptions to the problem Writing the history of the dilemma
Sessions 10 to 14th.
Goals: Working with an alternative view Experimenting the alternative in real life Taking decissions about changes in the clients life Means: Fixed role in which the dilemma is solved Writing a letter to the character of the fixed role