Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Many Europeans have been taken aback by the recent and rapid changes in countries around the
Pacific coast (the Pacific Rim). Japan's growth after the war was well known, but this economic
prosperity spread during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s to many other trading, financial and
manufacturing sites in the region. By the 1990s Europe and the rest of the world could not avoid
the impact of the 'Asia Tiger'.
Bangkok is the capital of the ancient kingdom of Thailand. Here, as in all the big cities in the Asia
Pacific region, development is happening very fat indeed. The cities are the hotspots of this
development, the nerve centres of one of the most economically unstable regions in the world.
All over Asia Pacific, billions of pounds of investment have poured in from the four corners of the
world, and they have made the region one of the fastest changing growth spots in the global
marketplace. Banks have built new branches, property companies have speculated, the tourist
industry has build new hotels, and companies have set up new manufacturing plants. In Bangkok, as
far as the eye can see, they have all got in on the act.
In 20 years the population has shot from 3 to 10 million. Compared to 20 years ago, the city skyline
is unrecognisable, as is everyday life itself.
In the second half of the twentieth century, millions of rural people in less economically developed
countries have headed for cities. Much the same happened in Western Europe in the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries.
The process is best understood by considering 'push and pull' factors and so-called 'intervening
obstacles'.
'Push factors' are those which make people want to leave the countryside, such as rural poverty,
lack of employment, and boredom amongst teenagers.
'Pull factors' are the attractions of urban life, such as a better range of job opportunities,
schooling, and health provision.
Obstacles which may intervene to stop an obvious move could be the sheer distance to the nearest
city or a psychological reason such as fear of distant, unknown places.
The standard of living in the rural areas of Thailand is higher than in many developing countries. Yet
Bangkok acts as a huge magnet: There is no other city in Thailand to rival its size. The rural-urban
rush to Bangkok has been unstoppable.
For example,Malee Pantawong and her husband Pitoon moved to Bangkok from the countryside 15
years ago.
Malee says:
'At that time I didn't really know which way to turn. I'd finished my education at the end
of primary school and any work in the local area wasn't enough to make a proper living. So I
thought Bangkok. Frankly, if you're talking about poor people, life isn't very comfortable no
matter where they live. But here in Bangkok it's easier to make a living. Take my husband
for instance: he's not a farmer but in the countryside there's nothing else to do to make a
living. But here there's the opportunity for a small taxi business, so we can survive.
'Also, it's better to live here if you have a problem - like falling sick. If you want to buy
something there's a lot of choice. And where we live we're near the schools. Our children
might have a slightly better future. My oldest boy graduated with a certificate in
mechanics. Now the young one is in his third year at commercial college.'
The advice Malee would give to anybody looking to move to Bangkok from the countryside now is:
'If they're making a go of it in the countryside, the way I see it, I'd tell them not to come
to Bangkok. But if they've got no work at all they should think about coming if it's really
necessary. But I wouldn't say straight out "Come, it's good." No. I wouldn't do that because
the more people come to Bangkok, the worse life gets for all of us.'