Perry King Abuse in Court

"IN-CHAMBERS" Abuse are worse than unreported court hearings of the CDJ 2012 concerns
Abuse is contagious and corrupts everything it touches. Worse than that unchecked it encourages more abuse Perry R King engaged in the systematic abuse of his ex-spouse with financial oppression and a corrupt attorney Grainne Ward and her connections and relationships with Judges while running for Judgeship. Perry said she could never loose because of her friendship with judges. He was right as 3yrs of Dianne's life and her RN career were flushed down the toilet.
This empowered him to believe he has the right to abuse and threaten anyone.... He doesn't
5-25-99 - Judge Brown ordered Tax Debt Equalization of $13,307 and the responsibility of the I.R.S. bill of $ 9,272.66 & The Franchise Tax Boards bill of $ 3,699 paid EQUALLY by parties both parties. 100% was seized from Dianne. BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY - MANDATES 100% assignment to aggrieved party +Attorney Fees +10% yr interest $22K Debt 14 yrs @ $2.2K/yr = $30,800 Federally Non-Dismissible Interest or $52,800 Current Debt + $184/mo interest every month. The Court retains jurisdiction on all divorce issues including the ability to redistribute retirement investments and look at the egregious, illegal behavior that abused the petitioner out of LVN-RN school and reduced income by 1/2. This leaves many tort actions options available. A debt with a federally protected 10% Interest is a asset generating "Income" even if not collected. ajoinment
To: Jeff Stark 20355 Hawthorne Blvd. Torrance Ca. 90503 Fr: Dianne Romo & Kevin Powell Re: Letter Dated March 1 , 2002 Dear Jeff : I'm sorry there has been some misunderstanding or at least interpretations of our last letter. What was expressed was some concerns regarding the way thing happened at our last court date. Our intentions were not put you down or imply that you are not a good attorney. By your success you obviously are doing something right. If you took it that way, I personally apologize as we do really like you. The final outcome was at least acceptable and we had no major issues regarding this. What we were trying to do was address the future so that the grey areas could be dealt with. I do not want to be Dianne's lawyer my only issue is to protect her best interest to the best of my ability. I stayed out of her situation before and watched her get screwed. I am not implying that your intentions are to screw her. The lawyer's addressed in the letter were both of her previous lawyer's and the information was given not to "regurgitate" dead issues but to give you some understanding as to her history of blindly following attorneys and what the continual cost has been for her doing this. I had no intentions offending you and I hope that, as you have repeatedly asked for us to step away from the emotional aspects of this case, you too can close the emotions off and try to look at it from your client's side. What was stated was not intended as a personal attack. We thanked you before and will repeat our appreciation of the personal time spent with you and your family. I have never asked you to call Ms. Ward a "Fucking Bitch". You are the attorney and I would not want or expect you to. However if Ms. Ward caused your wife so much stress that it put her into the hospital with pre-term labor and almost caused you child to be born 3mo pre-mature, cost you $1800 in medical bills, came to court and lied to your attorney and the judge and stated that you threatened her, just because, she likes being a "Fucking Bitch", I believe you might have some strong feelings and believe as we do that that is a very kind statement of what she really is. If you are addressing the private communications between Perry and I or Dianne and Perry this was not personally addressed to Ms. Ward and were given to you only to clarify a motive that she would have to make up a such a malicious lie. We can prove that this has not happened if it comes to that as, all phone records can be subpoenaed by the courts as long as she pays for all cost of her apparent lies. As to the Income-tax thing, we had asked you about that in your office and you did not inform us at that time, that it would have to be addressed separately. So we would
understandably be a little disappointed that it was not addressed as we need the money to be released to cover her current expenses including attorney expenses. As far as my tactics...., I am confused as to what you mean. We have presented you with her Social Security information to what her income is. We have watched his lawyer play games time and time again and have presented you with this and warned you of what they would do, and then watch them do it anyway. His lawyer has lied to you and the judge. We have only asked for what the dissomaster really says and for him to pay the cost of what it has cost her to get what is fair. What lack of ethics have we requested from you or shown to you ? My strategy has been to hire a lawyer, prepare him with as much information as possible, let the judge see the truth of this situation by having the lawyer show him... true documentation, past history of tactics, lack of interest in the well being of the children, a history of avoiding responsibility, slanderous remarks, obsession with firearms he has been compensated for, lies to the court, refusal to provide her with the documentation that not only is she entitled to but he is court ordered to provide, history of not paying support, and an audio of the way he continues treats her years after their divorce. How ethical is it for a lawyer to refuse a continuance when she receives a doctors excuse or to come to court and lie about a threat that has never happened ? Do you really feel sorry for Perry or are you just upset at me ? Remember Dianne has been paying for the debt that Perry created while they were married and sent the IRS bills to a P.O. Box. Dianne has spent a fortune on attorney fees. Dianne takes shared responsibility as she allowed Perry to control their financials. This led to bankruptcy on her credit and years of financial burden. Perry lives in expensive Mission Viejo in a home. Dianne lives here in Torrance in a nice place only because I own my townhome. She drives a salvage title car with 90,000 miles on it because it's what she can afford with all of her expenses. Perry drives a 2 yr old fully loaded Camry. She can't get her $6000 in earned money back from the I.R.S. because he hasn't lived up to the agreement, yet he recently bought a 65 inch big screen T.V. and a Playstation2 and new furniture and goes golfing on courses with $100 green fees. She can't afford to finish school and advance her career as all her resources are getting eaten up by lawyers and Perry. Child support is given so that both children are to live in as close to same standard of living afforded if the parents were together. The only reason that is happening is because I provide it and that is not my responsibility. And the only reason they are in court is because he changed jobs and refused to give her court ordered information. I cannot understand how you can believe that he is being Tar and Feathered by being asked to live up to his responsibilities and pay for it when he doesn't. Is his lawyer that good that she has manipulated Dianne's own lawyer to feel sorry for him. What exactly is his suffering ?
Finally to address Dianne's financial. This is what I was trying to address in the letter about the attorney being on the same page with his client. It is important that you lawyer understands and listens to what you say so that they can protect you. You are Dianne's lawyer and you appear to believe what their lawyer says without verifying with your client what the facts are. You were given her Social Security statements which shows exactly what her income was for the last 5 years or so yet you didn't submit it to the court. You will see that she has made between 21,000 -24,000 /yr since her divorce. When she was married she worked a full time job however she worked nights. Nighttime is a $2/hr shift differential or $28/ day or $84/ wk or $4200/ yr. "For the umpteenth time...." we picked a paystub and inputted that amount from an average paystub and accept that error. That is a honest mistake not perjury. However she works at a temp agency. She gets cancelled occasionally, she gets scheduled for 2 days sometimes, and misses days of work due to going back and forth to court, and using math and calculator with her Final income for the last 3 years it averages about $2000/ mo. Neither you, me, Perry, Ms. Ward or even the judge can argue with this. As far as her work schedule you should have been clear on this as we had clearly discussed this in your office. She works FULL-TIME 3x 12hr shifts, like some Police and a large percentage of nurses and C.N.A.'s and other people.
Working Time Analysts - Publications - 45 FOUR TEAM, TWO (12HR) ...

<http://srd.yahoo.com/goo/12hr+shifts/3/T=1015706397/F=dfaa29575e57693fb47518b6969930a5/*http://www.rot as.co.uk/publications/45-four-team-summary.shtml>
... Publications. 45 FOUR TEAM, TWO (12HR) SHIFTS A DAY, SEVEN DAY ROTATIONS. ... http://www.rotas.co.uk/publications/45-four-team-summary.shtml
Employment @ Carle
www.carle.com/Employment/Foundation/HospJobOpp.asp> "... Technologist,
AS NEEDED, VARIABLE, to fill in as needed. OB SERVICES, Surgical Technologist, FULL TIME, DAY/NIGHT, 3 12hr shifts, eve or wknd, on-call, holidays.
http://www.carle.com/Employment/Foundation/HospJobOpp.asp
Lifespan (Rhode Island) Job Openings

www.lifespan.org/services/HR/display.asp?category=manage> "... 24 Department: Patient Services Unit: Shift: Rotating Work Hours/Schedule: 12hr
shifts,evenings/nights Requirements: Current RI license. Masters in Nursing or ...

http://www.lifespan.org/services/HR/display.asp?category=manage 5-25-99 - Judge Brown ordered Tax Debt Equalization of $13,307 and the responsibility of the I.R.S. bill of $ 9,272.66 & The Franchise Tax Boards bill of $ 3,699 paid EQUALLY by parties both parties. 100% was seized from Dianne. BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY - MANDATES 100% assignment to aggrieved party +Attorney Fees +10% yr interest $22K Debt 14 yrs @ $2.2K/yr = $30,800 Federally Non-Dismissible Interest or $52,800 Current Debt + $184/mo interest every month. The Court retains jurisdiction on all divorce issues including the ability to redistribute retirement investments and look at the egregious, illegal behavior that abused the petitioner out of LVN-RN school and reduced income by 1/2. This leaves many tort actions options available. A debt with a federally protected 10% Interest is a asset generating "Income" even if not collected. ajoinment
More Results From: www.lifespan.org </bin/query1?p=12hr+shifts&hq=site:www.lifespan.org>
VTFire, Messages
http://members.aol.com/vtfire/feature/guestbook.html>
"... from the BBQ pit. While local law enforcement officers WORK their 8 or 12hr shifts and go home; firefighters are perating 2nd business ventures out of the ...HTTP://members.aol.com/vtfire/feature/guestbook.html The first 8 hrs are regular pay and next 4 are 1.5X her reg pay. This means she works 36 hrs and gets paid for 42hrs. This allows her to be home with the kids for 2 more full days than working 5 x 8 hr days and she receives 2 more hrs of pay than a 40 hr work week. If the judge was explained this.... by the attorney we pay $300/hr to listen, understand, and represent us and not to listen to or care what Ms. Ward is saying about Dianne avoiding work to make Perry pay more, he would understand and would have nothing else to say about this accept maybe, as has been in the case in all the decisions Dianne has made, that this decision is in the best interest of the children and Dianne. As to the Worldwide Nursing Shortage... Dianne is a LVN as you were also told, not an RN. There is a worldwide shortage on RN's.
American Nurses Assoc. Addresses Nursing Shortage at Senate Subcommittee Hearing

Washington, DC -- "America is experiencing a crisis in nurse staffing," along with "an unprecedented nursing shortage," Kathy Hall, MS, RN, executive director of the Maryland Nurses Association, told participants at a packed Senate subcommittee hearing today. on behalf of the American Nurses Association before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Subcommittee on Aging, Hall noted,"Employers are having difficulty finding "experienced "RN's" who are willing to work in health care facilities" Areas hardest hit include emergency room, critical care, labor and delivery, and long-term care units. Testifying </gova/federal/legis/testimon/2001/shortage.htm> Dianne had started the LVN to RN program that Perry would not let her go to when they were married because he was afraid she would make more money than he did at the time and he was a control freak. However she has had to stop because she has run out of money because she has had to keep spending it on lawyers. She would have been done 1 yr ago and would be making between $29.00/ hr and $45.00 and Perry would have been already paying only $200-$300/mo for child support. Everyone would have more money if Perry stopped being an asshole or if Dianne can find a lawyer who will represent her properly by defending her actions as being intelligent, and Perry's as being as malicious as they are. There has never been an argument about her ability to secure employment and I don't even know where that statement comes from. We have never discussed that. Also if it was
brought up previously in court it would have to be because Dianne lost her job do to a personality conflict with her one of her supervisors and a Zero tolerance policy of her hospital. She misread her schedule and missed 1 day of work without calling in, and after 5 years with this hospital this supervisor had the ability and finally a reason and she was fired. This hospital is owned by TENENT the largest group in the U.S. and owns the majority of the hospitals in L.A. and Orange Counties. She cannot get hired by any hospital owned by Tenant. That is the only thing that has ever been said and that was before you were hired. Obviously Ms. Ward has put things in your head that you have not addressed or clarified with you client.
Please understand that my personality and my jobs in both security and in computers require me to analyze and verify all aspects of a situation so I can make the best decisions possible. I must find all holes in any plan of attack or defense and then analyze and do cost vs. risk management. If I have pointed things out it has not be to belittle you, or attack your professionalism, it has been because my knowledge in this case due to experience, personal knowledge and the 40 plus hrs reviewing her documents gives me a certain perspective that maybe you don't yet have in this case. I do not let my emotions cloud how I analyze a situation, however it may sometime seep through my words or tones. I did slip and tell Ms. Ward "She needs to stop lying." in the hallway and Maybe I shouldn't have, but she does need to stop lying to the court. Since you have chosen to step away from this case then we will be asking for at refund as she may be unable to acquire representation without it, and we have not done anything that gives you a proper reason for abandoning your client. There was nothing in the letter stating that Dianne wanted to remove you from council only that there were some valid concerns. If your ego was so bruised by questions posed and the concerns stated, that it has made you quit, then I have underestimated your resolve as an attorney and this has strengthened my opinion that you were, at least that day, outmatched by opposing council. She walked out of chambers with a "Shit Eating Grin" after your first "in-chambers" conference with the judge while you seem irritated .We believed at the time, that Dianne would take less than due to her as to keep the judge happy, and were going to regroup and be properly prepared for the next date with a different understanding about what Ms. Ward would do to win and correct everything then. I now agree that she needs different council as it appears that you cannot accept that Ms. Ward controlled the last session and have chosen to quit rather than face her again. Dianne will fill out the forms as you have asked to relieve you of your obligation for representation. Please take into consideration the following:
1) Dianne has paid $2500 for representation, under the belief that it would be of the highest quality possible 2) We were offered $513 by Perry's lawyer before we went to court. You returned with $467 and asked her to sign. We had to insist on seeing the dissomaster as you claimed it was right and we would anger the judge. On that dissomaster there was an incorrect figure on her income. 3) There was a claim of 4 dependents on her side and only 2 on his, yet she only currently has only two as we have not yet decided if she or I am going to claim Arika on the taxes. You didn't observe that or correct it either. 4) There is a claim of $250 /mo insurance without proof and it should not have been credited until he provided the documentation as he has a history of claiming $150 $780/ mo insurance and this history was provided to you. He should have been told that his credits will be applied when documented. 5) We brought you a copy of one of the dissomasters where the amount Dianne had requested and the dissomaster his attorney provided was within $10 with the amount being approximately $760/ mo. they then charged Dianne for 1/2 the child care for Blair while Dianne was already paying childcare for Elle and did not request Perry to pay for it. This then brought the amount to $513. We brought you a letter from Wendy Coffin verifying Dianne's childcare arrangements and cost so you would be prepared for this attempt to twist the fair figures. You allowed them to credit Perry and not Dianne with childcare cost. This constitutes improper representation. You did not tell us what happened regarding her spousal support and we don't even know if this was addressed as we were told it would be. You did get her $1000 /mo. in support for two months that are in arrears and are supposed to be paid over the next 15 mo.... However she has still not received all of her last arrears. We specifically told you Dianne needed this order to be assigned as Perry has had to be forced each and every time to pay support. With today being March 10th and the order stating that she will be paid on the 1st and the 15th of the month and she has not received anything and has no idea if or when she will. With the attorney that we paid $2500 to for representation quitting and her not receiving the support he was supposed to assign and how is she to get her support or obtain representation to do what her attorney should have done in the first place. This is what we told you would happen, this has been what has happened in the past... and this is what is happening now. We do not believe that you have accomplished what we believed you could, what
you have said you could, or what you should have. Dianne is still not receiving child support and you are quitting without doing your job. 6) You informed us that Perry would pay a contributive share of the attorney fees based on his income Dianne makes $24,000/yr and Perry makes $80,000/yr or 30% of the income. By this analysis and the statements made by you during consultation he should have been made responsible for $1750 and you only received $600. By this math Dianne should pay $750. She will agree to pay the $750 out of the $2500 paid and you can also keep the $600 paid to you by Perry when and if you can receive it. This means that Dianne should receive a $1750.00 refund so she can use it to obtain proper representation.
While you are a very nice person and we like you personally, we do not feel that you have not provided a high quality or even an acceptable level of representation as you have not listened or at least did not comprehend things that were explained to you. You did not represent and protect Dianne against attacks regarding her employment. You have not gotten her support delivered. Now you are choosing to quit after doing very little for your client. I hope we can resolve this in a pleasant manor and just accept that this just turned out not to be the match of Client/Attorney that we had hoped for. This situation is not ideal for either person and is detrimental for Dianne's case and financial situation to have to be attempt to obtain and be represented by another lawyer while still not receiving support. Please let her know when she can pick up a check and sign the form to relieve you of you obligation for representation and retrieve all of her paperwork.
Kevin Powell & Dianne King
Marital Breach of Fiduciary Duty - Marital Dissolution Judgements

Family Code 721 (b)
Spouses fiduciary disclosure duties "including, but not limited, to the following: 1) Providing each spouse access at all times to any books kept regarding a transaction for the purposes of inspection and copying. 2) Rendering upon request, true and full information of all things affecting any transaction which concerns the community property. Nothing in this section is intended to impose a duty for either spouse to keep detailed books and records of community property transaction 3) Accounting to the spouse, and holding as a trustee, any benefit or profit derived from any transaction by one spouse without the consent of the other spouse which concern the community property." They are also obligated to provide the other spouse with: 1) Without demand, any information concerning the partnership's business and affairs reasonably required for the proper exercise of the partner's rights and duties under the partnership agreement or this chapter; and 2) On demand, any other information concerning the partnership's business and affairs, except to the extent the demand or the information demanded is unreasonable or otherwise improper under the circumstances."
Family Code 1100(e): The interspousal fiduciary duties set forth in Family Code 721(b) in the management and control of community assets continue "until such time as the assets and liabilities have been divided by the parties or by a court." Family Code 2100: This section sets forth what the intent was of the California Legislature in creating the fiduciary disclosure duties. This record of legislative intent helps us understand why the concept of the fiduciary duty owed between divorcing couples is taken as seriously as it is. In general, in creating these detailed rules, the Legislature intended to: To marshal, preserve and protect community property.
To ensure fair and sufficient child and spousal support awards. To achieve a division of community and quasi-community assets and liabilities on the dissolution or nullity of marriage or legal separation of the parties as provided under California law.
Family Code 2102(a):

The parties are subject to "the standards provided in Section 721, as to all activities that affect the assets and liabilities of the other party," including those stated in the section, "from the date of separation to the date of the distribution of the community or quasi-community property asset or liability in question." Family Code 2102(b): As to assets and liabilities, the fiduciary duties continue until the asset or liability has been divided between the parties. Thus, even if an asset is divided months or years after the end of the family law case, the parties continue to have the duty to fulfill their respective fiduciary duties with respect to that asset. Family Code 2102(c): The parties are "subject to the standards provided in Section 721 as to all issues relating to the support and fees, including immediate, full, and accurate disclosure of all material facts and information regarding the income or expenses of the party" "(f)rom the date of separation to the date of a valid, enforceable, and binding resolution of all issues relating child or spousal support and professional fees. Family Code 2103 - 2107: To implement the rules establishing the fiduciary duties between spouse, the law requires parties to family law cases to exchange their preliminary declarations of disclosure and final declarations of disclosure. These disclosures consist of the following: Detailed schedules of assets and debts Reporting of any important developments that might affect the marital assets and debts Completed income and expense declarations on court-mandated forms. The Court cannot file a judgment resolving the parties property rights until the declarations of disclosure have been exchanged. However, the final declarations of disclosure do not have to be exchanged if the parties have agreed in writing to dispense with that requirement. If a party has not complied with the requirements regarding preliminary and final declarations of disclosure, the aggrieved spouse can ask the judge to order the defaulting party to comply. In extreme cases the judge can impose the sanctions discussed below. CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH FIDUCIARY DUTIES
The consequences of not complying with the legally-imposed fiduciary duties can be severe. If a party to a family law case is found to have violated his/her fiduciary duties, the judge can do any or all of the following: Impose monetary sanctions. In Marriage of Feldman - a recent appellate court decision the husband was ordered to pay sanctions in the amount of $250,000 and attorney fees of $140,000 because of his failure to fulfill his fiduciary duties of disclosure. Make that party pay the other partys attorneys fees, court costs and other litigation expenses. Award all - not just one-half - of an asset a spouse has concealed to the other spouse. (In Marriage of Rossi, a noted case, the husband was awarded all - not just half - of the $3 million in California lottery winnings that the wife did not disclose to the husband. ) Prevent the offending spouse from presenting his or her case in court. Set-aside (void) a court order or judgment that was entered as the result of a partys failure to comply with the disclosure statutes. The Family Code further provides that, when deciding what sanctions are appropriate, the judge is to order sanctions that will effectuate compliance with the above statutes. This means that sanctions can be ordered even if the other spouse did not suffer any actual financial damage or loss.
Court History
Penal Code 166(a)
..every person guilty of any contempt of court, of any of the following kinds, is guilty of a misdemeanor: (4) Willful disobedience of the terms as written of any...court order... lawfully issued by any court, including orders pending trial." Previous 4-24-98 5-19-98 8-27-98 9-23-98
Dianne King files for divorce - Turns in 5 guns to S.A.P.D. - only 3 belong to Perry Wage Assignment - $1000 Custody 50/50 agreed ordered to turn over computer over to Dianne.- Contempt Of Court Perry files for reduction in family support stating under the penalty of perjury that he has the children for more than 50% of the time - False Statement Bob Glasser files responsive showing that in reality, using the calendar with all dates of the exchange of the children, Perry actually had the children only 42% of the time. Dianne completes the STEP program for effective parenting in lieu of the FACES program Perry refuses to participate in even though the court has made it a mandatory order. - Contempt Of Court
*10-31-98
11-17-98 Stipulation signed by both parties agreeing to support of $824/mo. and a 50/50 split custody. Attend FACES program before May 1999. Blair is to see Psychologist Paula Inge. Guns to be turned over to Dianne to sell and Perry is credited $500, which shall apply to his contributive share of attorney fees of Dianne regardless of what proceeds are. He was entitled to 50%-value $200
Dianne turned in 5 guns to Santa Ana PD but.... only 3 belonged to Perry

One was modified burst-fire Cobry assault rifle that police seized.
12-15-98 - Dissolution of Marriage

**March** After not being paid by Perry, his attorney Stephen Hosford relieves himself as council for Mr. King 3-25-99 Bob Glasser files Order to Show Cause because Perry fails to reply to the
documents and letter to divide property and is ordered to pay attorney fees and asks Equalization of $13,307 to be ordered and responsibility of the I.R.S. bill of $ 9,272.66 and The Franchise Tax Boards bill of $ 3,699 is to be paid equally by both parties. Bob asks the court to order a Performance Bond to force Perry to follow the existing order. Dianne is credited value of computer that Perry was ordered on 5-19-98 to turn over and again ignored court orders. - Contempt Of Court with 100%- Seized from Dianne 5-25-99 Judge Brown grants orders of 3-25-99 and orders $1600 in attorney fees to be paid after Perry fails to do as agreed.- Contempt of Court *6-08-99 Perry contacts Bob Glasser after already not meeting his obligation of the 50/50 agreement and he asks to have his custody agreement reduced to 70/30 as he cannot handle this much time with the children. I at first refuse, as I finally believed that I was almost done with court and I dont want any additional court cost. Bob convinces me that Perry is already not living up to his part of the agreement, and in his 25 years of experience he believes that if I attempt to force Perry to keep the children 50/50 then he will become resentful and he will become an absent parent. 07-6-99 Both parties agree and stipulate to custody based on 70/30 split with Perry having custody Friday 6:00 pm until Sunday 6:00 pm and every other Wednesday from 6:00 pm until 8:00 pm and on 24 hr notice an additional midweek from 6:00 pm until 8:00 pm. He took the children on only 1 of the Wednesdays and never the additional day. Support in the sum of $1,375 per month, payable $687.50 on the 1st and $687.50 on the 15th. Support terminates upon the remarriage of Petitioner or June 14 th 2002. Respondent shall be responsible for the payment of $450 of fees payable forthwith. To my knowledge the $450.00 fee has not been paid, as I have never been credited with that payment against my attorney fees.
10-06-99 After agreeing to pay support and made a court order Perry again fails to pay what is owed and the arrears are added to support in the amount of $77.65/month for 10 months. Contempt Of Court Current Case *5-21-2000 Spoke to Perry and asked for his new job information after receiving a partial support check. Perry refused to give any information. Contempt Of Court
*5-22-2000 After evaluating Perrys financial history and previous failure to pay ordered support and looking at the disparity between her income and expenses of supporting myself, Blair, Elle and my mother as the primary caregiver for the children I sought legal help. I Found Milo DeArmey as his retainer was as much as Bob Glasser. I retained him with most of my life savings and signed Application for Order and Supporting Declaration 6-30-2000 Milo DeArmey files above paperwork with proof of service of Wage Assignment served to Com 2001 in San Diego on 5-29-2000 7-01-2000 Milo DeArmey files order to show cause requesting a re-evaluation of support and a determination of arrears with Judge David Weinberg. Date to appear is 9-06-00 8-30-2000 Just 7 days before existing court date and with the children living with their mother all their life and Perry who once had 50/50 custody and then forced only 70/30 custody just 1 year earlier as he couldnt handle the children, Grainne Ward files for an emergency Ex-Parte hearing Perry stating: 1) That I dont live where I was living based on one of his friends spying on me that doesnt have the keys to my house and doesnt sleep with me and has no idea what my schedule is. 2) That he now has concerns about my mother who continually provided childcare for our children during the marriage, during the divorce she would occasionally watch them for him during his custody time, and who for the last year was the primary caregiver for the children during the time I work was now unfit to watch the children and needed monitored visits. This is the same person who Perry asked to watch Blair for the entire week he had custody in December 2001 after he started the his new job.
My mother now has Blair for two weeks starting 8/11/02

3) Requested that I, and the people who have provided care for the children their whole life have supervised visits. And he, the parent who gave up the 50/50 custody he had because he lacked the patience to deal with the children for an extended period of time, is given full custody. 4) Requested that guns that he threatened to kill me with and has already been compensated $500 for, to be turned over to him. * (Filed Dec 15 th 1998 and signed by Commissioner David S. Weinberg ) * As this has been addressed many times, this obsession with firearms should be a concern and the waste of this courts time and attorneys fees to address this once again
should result in sanctions against the respondent. 9-05-2000 Court orders Expedited Investigation via Mediation and Investigation Services after Grainne Ward reiterates the lies and irrelevant history stated in their request in order to make me look like a bad person and a horrible mother. 9-06-2000 Continuance granted till 9-20-00 Attorney Ward
9-13-2000 Ex Parte Hearing MK Gustinella recommends no custody change as the children are in a safe environment and are well taken care of. Court date set for 9-20-00 *9-13-2000 Milo DeArmey yells at me and asks me why I havent turned the gunsover to Perry. I tell him Perry has already been paid and I will never give him guns. He says its not true as he has seen the paperwork. I tell him I have the paperwork and I paid him and he is not getting guns from me. I went to Milos office with the documentation and he is arrogant, rude and disrespectful. I bring the paperwork that proves that Perry has been compensated (Filed Dec 15 th 1998 and signed by Commissioner David S. Weinberg ). Milo yells Im an attorney with 20years experience and I read the paperwork and I know what it says and you need to turn those guns over to Perry. Milo refuses to look at the documentation. I tell him I dont want him for a lawyer as I pay $250/hr and he needs to read anything I give him on my time. I leave his office and plan to represent myself, as this case is clearly a sham and Milo is obviously a poor excuse for an attorney
*9-??-2000
The question that must be asked by the court is: " Why would someone all of a sudden state these fraudulent concerns and express this as an emergency just a few days before the other party has scheduled a hearing to address court ordered support payments in arrears, re-evaluation of support due to failure to live up to the 70/30 agreement and starting a better paying job, and the resulting attorney cost incurred to go through this process."
9-20-2000 10-12-2000 *11-?-2000 12-7-2000 12-21-2001 *2-??-2001
1-18-2001 2-22-2001 3-08-2001 3-29-2001 5-10-2001 6-21-2001 *7-10-2001
Continuance till 10-12-00 Grainne Ward Continuance till 12-07-00 Milo DeArmey Milo sends a substitution of attorney form and I sign it and return it in the mail. Continuance till 12-21-00 - Both Parties Continuance till 1-18-01 - Milo DeArmey Milo claims he never received the signed substitution of attorney form and sends another. I sign and this time return it to his office in Santa Ana and put it directly in his mail slot in his door. I discontinue all contact with Milo as he is arrogant and rude and has not represented me well at all. Continuance till 2-22-01 - Both Parties Continuance till 3-08-01 - Both Parties Continuance till 3-29-01 - Both Parties Continuance till 5-10-01 - Milo DeArmey Continuance till 6-21-01 - Grainne Ward Continuance till 7-26-01 - Grainne Ward After many conversations with Perry and seeing that the things Perry has been telling my son about that is causing my son to have major issues, I decide to allow Perry to have Blair on a trial bases and write a letter to such. Milo DeArmey files a Motion to Be Relieved as Council Continuance till 8-30-01 - Grainne Ward.
7-19-2001 7-26-2001
*8-20-2001
Week spent attempting to enroll Elle in school as we agreed to divide custody and would make a fair support payment plan as school starts in two weeks
*8-23-2001
After giving Perry the custody of Blair he requested and agreeing to end this case that is taking far to long and costing way too much money, Perry starts bullying me to take much less than guidelines - $400.00 and no payments of arrears and no spousal support. He yells and screams at me and threatens to take your fucking ass to court and take both kids from your ass and the numbers I gave you is for $400 per month, so its a $200 check every two weeks or I will tell my lawyer to go forward with all proceedings He then threatens to tell my son that Mommy is a money grubby BITCH who just wants Dad to take care of her . I am already having issues with Blair believing the lies his father tells to him when he doesnt pick him up. He was telling my son Mommy and Grand Mommy are keeping you away, from me. when he wasnt picking his Blair up on his weekends. This was causing my son to lash out against my mother and I. School starts in 2 weeks, I have made all living arrangements, and I am moving on the 1 st of next month. I was 23 weeks into my pregnancy and I am an emotional wreck after this intense verbal assault. I am completely stressed out and begin having vaginal bleeding and start of labor cramps. Kevin takes me to Torrance Memorial Hospital where I am diagnosed with Pre-Term Labor. I am released on 8-24-2001 and told that I must avoid high stress and take a week off work.
These Verbal Assault and Threats are Recorded

8-24-2001 *8-27-2001
Relief of Council granted to Milo DeArmey I contact the court clerk at Dept L69 to get continuance based on my medical condition, which was dangerous to the health of my unborn child. I was told to call back the following day I called the clerk again and this time he said to contact the respondents attorney and she would be able to get a continuance for me. I contacted Grainne Ward and explained my situation. She said she didnt believe me but to have something faxed to her from the doctors office. I contacted the doctors office and asked them to fax it to Ms. Ward. It was late afternoon when they contacted me and said for some reason they couldnt get it faxed to her. I had it faxed to the hospital where I worked and had someone there then refax it to Ms. Ward. She received the fax and then said she would not give me a continuance as I was a nurse and she said Im lying and I made this up not to go to court. I told her she was given what she asked for and she refused to do the continuance. Still at high risk for returning into pre-term labor, and with the only person that I had for support and help, Kevin, being on a business trip after believing that I would be able to get the continuance, I again was an emotional wreck. I couldnt stop crying as I couldnt believe how cold and insensitive Ms. Ward was. She could have told me she wasnt going to do it before I went through everything and sent her what she asked for. I started vaginal bleeding and labor cramps again and returned to Torrance Memorial Hospital for the second time in 1 week Again in stress related pre-term labor, I was admitted. I knew that I had no representation and Grainne Ward would try to take advantage of the situation and lie to the court and do what ever she could. I knew that I have never been able to address these issues without an attorney and it would be even harder after Grainne Ward puts more of her twist on it. I checked out at 3:00 am was driven to Kevins house by his sister. Dr. Kwon ordered me on bed rest for a few days, and off of work for another 2 weeks. I was told I cannot drive and to avoid stress, as this is the common denominator of both hospitalizations. I gathered my court things to the best of my ability and drove to my house in Santa Ana. I was able to get 1 hour of sleep and had to get up to be on court on time.
*8-28-2001 *8-29-2001
*8-29-2001
*8-30-2001
8-30-2001 Continuance Denied Grainne Ward reiterate her conspired false statements to the court and Calls me a Liar about being in the Hospital in open court. Continued to 9-27-2001 9-27-2001 I am told by Attorney Robert Bergen not to show up to court as he has not had time to finish what he needs to do and he is going to continue the court date. While I am not there Grainne Ward is able to get a judgment abating all support without me being able to object, question his severance pay, or have an existing order re-instating support upon re-establishing employment.
10-16-2001 Grainne Ward gets extension to 11-15-2001- Grainne Ward 11-15-2001 Grainne Ward and Perry King, both do not show up for court. After missing work and being in court for over 2 hours we find out that somebody died in Ms. Wards family. However she has the common courtesy to contact her client so he doesnt waste his time. I am 8 months pregnant and receiving nothing in support and working past when I had plan for all the income I can get before maternity leave and she purposely does this to cost me $187 in income, further encumbering my financial situation. 12-6-2001 With Perry already talking with his new employers about his new position Grainne Ward files this time, for a two month continuance to further the time Perry would have income without paying support. This continuance is until 02-21-02 Grainne Ward
12-17-2001 On or About - Perry starts his new job 12-26-2001 Perry sends Blair to stay with my Un-fit Mother as Perry has stated in court documents when he wants to defame my family and I, for over one week. This is strange behavior for someone who requested the court to require that I have monitored visits, of my children but not in the presence of my mother. 2-01-2002 Feeling that I have continued to be abused of rights Kevin loans me $1,500 and then borrows an additional $1,000 from Jayson Won to pay for a lawyer to protect my interest and I hire Jeffery Stark a prominent lawyer in the South Bay. I explain to him my situation and how out of control it has become and he says: Its an easy case and I am making to much out of it
2-21-2002 We go to O/C Superior Court where we wait. Finally Judge Pro-Tem, Judge Candidate Grainne Ward (who Perry claimed could never lose due to being friends with most Judges in the court) and Jeffery Stark go into unreported chambers of Judge Daniel T. Brice. The "Embroiled and Corrupt" judge and Grainne Ward both violates their respective oaths as an attorneys and willfully lie. She claims to the judge and my attorney and that I have called and threatened her at her office. I am not sure what happened and exactly what was said but Jeffery Stark came out of chambers irritated and Grainne Ward intentional smirked at us. THIS WAS AN INTENTIONAL PRE-FABRICATED LIE told with the specific intent to destroy the integrity of this case by making the judge biased and prejudicial against me. My support is set below guidelines, my arrears are unfairly assessed, my spousal support is unfairly discontinued. Judge Brice made support orders on 2/21/02 that Perry has ignored, and now continued to violate at will. He is now and has always been during the course of this case: In Contempt Of Court Grainne Ward interactions with Kevin has been contentious after causing ER hospitalization & preterm labor risking the death of daughter Arika 2x and refusing a continuance with a doctors copy of bedrest orders and taken off work. When Granny Wards father died she had me miss work (1/3 of the weeks income) and drive 40miles to go to court, but was able to call her own client so he didn't go and neither called other attorney or me and she left to Ireland. Pregnant and not salaried and soon to be on maternity leave
Fraud, Corruption, Abuse and Title 18 241/242. Conspiracy to Defraud

Perry King Abuse in Court

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Perry King Abuse in Court

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

"IN-CHAMBERS" Abuse are worse than unreported court hearings of the CDJ 2012 concerns

Working Time Analysts - Publications - 45 FOUR TEAM, TWO (12HR) ...

Lifespan (Rhode Island) Job Openings

shifts,evenings/nights Requirements: Current RI license. Masters in Nursing or ...

American Nurses Assoc. Addresses Nursing Shortage at Senate Subcommittee Hearing

Kevin Powell & Dianne King

Marital Breach of Fiduciary Duty - Marital Dissolution Judgements

Family Code 2102(a):

Dianne turned in 5 guns to Santa Ana PD but.... only 3 belonged to Perry

12-15-98 - Dissolution of Marriage

My mother now has Blair for two weeks starting 8/11/02

9-20-2000 10-12-2000 11-?-2000 12-7-2000 12-21-2001 2-??-2001

1-18-2001 2-22-2001 3-08-2001 3-29-2001 5-10-2001 6-21-2001 *7-10-2001

These Verbal Assault and Threats are Recorded

Fraud, Corruption, Abuse and Title 18 241/242. Conspiracy to Defraud

Вам также может понравиться