3 views

Original Title: Fixed Points Theorem on a Pair of Random Generalized Non-Linear Contractions

Uploaded by Alexander Decker

Fixed Points Theorem on a Pair of Random Generalized Non-Linear Contractions

International peer-reviewed academic journals call for papers, http://www.iiste.org/Journals

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Probability Theory and Mathematical
- EE325 Probability and Random Processes
- Nora Roberts Stakleni Otok PDF
- Stochastic Process
- Literature Survey
- UG Chemical Syllabus
- FOX Mechanics
- Introduction to Probability - Charles Grin Stead, Laurie Snell
- mathgen-1079926766
- Compressed Sensing Using Generative Models
- Syllabus Master Mistress PGT
- Lecture Notes 15 Dec 2014
- journal mathematical
- 4-4
- cds exam
- Chapter 10 the Topology of R
- tmp8F3C.tmp
- vmls.pdf
- Mutually Unbiased Bases Are Complex Projective 2Designs Klappenecker Roetteler 2005
- Hans Havlicek and Metod Saniga- Projective Ring Line of an Arbitrary Single Qudit

You are on page 1of 8

6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications

R.N.Yadava Director, Patel Group Of Institutions Bhopal (M.P.), India (dryadava@gmail.com) Rajesh Shrivastava Department of Mathematics Govt Science & commerce college Benazir, Bhopal(M.P.), India (Rajeshraju0101@rediffmail.com) S.K.Pandey Department of Mathematics Millennium Group of Institutions Bhopal(M.P.), India (Sudeeppandey1976@gmail.com) ABSTRACT A fixed point theorem for a pair of random generalized non-linear contraction mappings involving four points of the space under consideration is proven. It is shown that this result includes the result of Lee and Padgett [1]. Also an application of the result is given. Key words : Complete probability measure space, -algebras, Borel subsets, random operator, separable Banach space, upper semi-continuous functions. Bochner integral, Mathematics Subject classification: Primary 60H99, 47H10, and Secondary 60H 20. 1. Introduction and preliminaries The idea of fixed points plays a very important role in solving deterministic operator equations. Recently the idea of random fixed point theorems which are the stochastic generalization of the classical fixed point theorems has become a very important part of the theory of some operator equations which can be regarded as random operator equations. Many interesting results have been established by various authors (see for example Bharucha Reid [2], Hans [3], Padgett [4], Tsokos [5], Tsokas and padgett [6], Lee and padgett [7] in this area. Recently, a fixed point theorem for a pair of generalized non-linear contraction mappings involving four points of the space under consideration, which includes many well known results as special cases has been established by Achari [8] (see also Achari [9], Pittanuer [10]). The object of this paper is to study a stochastic version of a pair of generalized non-linear contraction mappings of Achari [8]. Also it has been shown that this result generalizes the result of Lee and Padgett [1]. It is interesting to note that with suitable modification of the conditions of the theorem, we can easily obtain stochastic generalizations of the results of different classical fixed points. Finally, we apply theorem 2 to prove the existence of a solution in a Banach space of a random non-linear integral equation of the form x (t; w) = h (t; w) + s k (t, s; w) (s, x (s; w) d, (s) ...... (1.1) where s is a locally compact metric space with metric d defined on S X S, is a complete -finite measure defined on the collection of Borel subsets of S and the integral is a Bochner integral. In this section, we state some definitions as used by Lee and padgett [1]. Let (, S. P) be complete probability measure space, and Let (X, ) and (Y, C) be two measurable spaces, where X and Y are Banach spaces and B and C are -algebras of Borel subsets of X and Y, respectively. First, we state the usual definitions of a Banach space-valued random variable and of a random operator. Definition 1.1 : A function V : X is said to be an X valued random variable (Random element in X, or generalized random variable) if { : v (w) B} S for each B . Definition 1.2 : A mapping T (w) : x X Y is said to be a random operator if y (w) = T (w) x is a Y-valued random variable for every x X. Definition 1.3 : Any X-valued random variable x (w) which satisfies the condition. P ( { W : T (w) x (w) y (w) } ) = 1 is said to be a random solution of the random operator equation T (w) x = y (w). Definition 1.4 : Let yj (w), j = 1, 2, ........, n be second order real valued random variables on a probability space (, S, P), that is yj (w) L2 (, S, P). The collection of all n-component random vectors y' (w) = (y1 (w), ....., yn (w)) constitutes a linear vector space if all equivalent random vectors are identified. Define the norm of y by

326

Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications

max max || y || L n 2 = 1 < j < n || y j || L 2 = 1 < j < n

| y j | 2 dp

n

The space of all n-component random vectors y with second order components and norm given by || . ||L 2 above is separable Banach space and will be denoted by L2 (, s, p) or L2 . Let S be locally compact metric space with metric d defined on S X S and let be a complete -finite measure defined on the Borel subsets of S. Definition 1.5 : We define the space C (S,

n n

Ln 2

(, s, p) with the topology of uniform convergence on compacta. It may be noted that C (S, locally convex space whose topology is defined by a countable family of saminorms given by

Ln 2

Ln 2

(, s, p)) is

sup

|| x (t; w) ||j =

t c j

Definition 1.6 : Let B and D be Banach spaces. The pair (B, D) is said to be admissible with respect to a random operator U (w) if U (w) (B) D. Definition 1.7 : A random operator T (w) on a Banach space x with domain D (T(w)) is said to be a random generalized nonlinear contraction if there exists non-negative real-valued upper semi-continuous functions i (w), i=1, 2, ......, 7. Satisfying i (w) (r) < || T (w) x1 T (w) x2 ||

< 1 (||x1-x2||) + 2 (||x1 T(w)x1 ||) + 3 (||x2-T(w)x2||) + 4 (||x1-T (w)x2 ||) + 5 (||x2-T (w)x1||) + 6 [||x1-T (w) x1 ||) + (||x1-T(w)x2||)] 1+[x1-T(w)x1||) (||x1-T(w)x2||)] + 7 [||x2-T (w) x2 ||) + (||x2-T(w)x1||)] 1+[x2-T(w)x2||) (||x2-T(w)x1||)]

For all x1, x2 D (T (w) 2.Main results A fixed point theorem for a pair of random generalized non-linear contraction. Theorem 2.1 :- suppose A1 (w) and A2 (w) are a pair of random operators from a separable banach space x into itself such that ||A1(w) x1-A2 (w) x2 || < 1 (||x1-x2||) + 2 (||x1-A1 (w)x3||) +3 (||x2-A2 (w) x4|| + 4 (||x1-A2 (w)x4||) + 5 (||x2-A1 (w) x3||) + 6 + 7

............(2.1)

Where i (w), i = 1, 2, ........... 7, are non-negative real-valued upper semi-continuous functions satisfying i (w) (r) <

r , for r > 0, i = 0 (w) (o) and for all x1, x2, x3, x4 X. Then there exists an x valued 7

random variable (w) which is the unique common fixed point of A1 (w) and A2 (w). Proof : Let x, y x and we define. x1 = A2 (w)y, x2 = A1 (w) x, x3 = x, x4 = y Then (2.1) takes the form ||A1 (w) A2 (w) y A2 (w) A1 (w) x || < 1 A1 (w) x - A2 (w) y ||)+ 2 (|| A1 (w) x A2 (w) y ||) + 3 (||A1 (w) x A2 (w) y ||)+ 4 (||A2 (w) y A2 (w) y||) + 5 (||A1 (w) x A1 (w) x ||)

+ 6

327

Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications

+ 7

[(||A1 ( w)x A2 ( w)y ||) + (||A1 ( w)x A1 ( w)x ||)] 1 + [(||A1 ( w)x A2 ( w)y ||] [(||A1 ( w) x A1 ( w)x ||)]

..... (2.2)

< 1 (||A1 (w) xA2 (w)y|| + 2 [||A1(w) x A2 (w) y ||) + 3 (|| A1 (w) x - A2 (w) y||)+ 6 (||A1 (w) x - A2 (w) y ||) + 7 (||A1 (w) x- A2 (w) y ||) Let x0 X be arbitrary and construct a sequence {xn) defined by A1(w) xn-1 = xn, A2 (w) xn = xn+1, A1 (w) xn+1 = xn+2, n=1,2.... Let us put x = xn-1 and y = xn in (2.2), then we have A1 (w) A2 (w) xn-A2(w) A1 (w) xn-1||< 1 (||A1 (w) xn-1-A2 (w) xn||) + 2 (||A1 (w) xn-1 - A2 (w) xn || + 3 (||A1 (w) xn-1 - A2 (w) xn||) + 6 (||A1 (w) xn-1 - A2 (w) xn || + 7 (||A1 (w) xn-1 - A2 (w) xn||) or ||xn+2 xn+1|| < 1 (||xn xn+1||) + 2 (||xn-xn+1||) + 3 (||xn-xn+1||) + 2 (||xn-xn+1||) + 7 (||xn xn+1 ||) We take n to be even and set n = ||xn-1 xn||. Then n+2 = || xn+1 xn+2|| < 1 (||xn-xn+1||) + 2 (||xn-xn+1)|| + 3 (||xn xn+1) || + 6 (|| xn-xn+1||)+ 7 (||xn xn+1||) < 1 (n+1) + 2 (n+1) + 3 (n+1) + 6 (n+1) + 7 (n+1) From (2.4) it is clear n decrease with n and hence n as n . Let > 0. Then since 1 is upper semi-continuous, we obtain in the limit as n < 1 () + 2 () + 3 () + 6 () + 7 () <

...... (2.3)

......... (2.4)

5 7

which is impossible unless = 0 Now, we shall show that {xn} is a cauchy sequence. If not, then there is an > 0 and for all positive integers K, there exist {m (k)} and {n (k)}with m (k) > n (k) > k, such that dk = ||xm(k) xn(k) || > , .......... (2.5) We may assume that - ||xm(k)-1 xn(k) || < by choosing m (k) to be the smallest number exceeding n (k) for which (2.5) holds. Then we have dk < || xm(k) xm(k)-1 || + ||xm(k)-1 xn(k) || < m(k) + < k + which implies that dk as k . Now the following cases are to be considered. (i) m is even and n is odd, (ii) m and n are both odd, (iii) m is odd and n is even, (iv) m and n are both even i.e. (i) : dk = ||xm-xn|| < ||xm xm+1||+||xm+1 xn+1|| + || xn-xn+1|| < n+1 + n+1 + ||A1 (w) xm A2 (w) xn|| By putting x1 = xn, x2 = xm, x3 = xn-1, x4 = xm-1 in (2.1), we have < m+1 + n+1 + 1 (||xm-xn||) + 2 (||xn-A1 (w) xn-1 ||) + 3 (||xm-A2(w) xm-1||) + 4 (|| xn-A2(w) xm-1||) + 5 (||xm-A1(w) xn-1||) + 6

[(||x n A1 ( w ) x n 1 ||)+ || x n A 2 ( w ) x m 1 ||) 1 + [(||x n A1 ( w ) x n 1 ||)][(||x n A 2 ( w ) x m 1 ||)] [(|| x m A2 ( w) x m1 ||)+ || ( xm A1 ( w) x n1 ||) + 7 1 + [(|| x m A 2 ( w) x m 1 ||)][(|| x m A1 ( w) xn1 ||)]

328

Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications

< m+1 + n+1 +1 (dk) +4 (dk) + 5 (dk) +6 (dk) + 7 (dk) letting k we have <

5 7

This is contradiction if > 0. In the case (ii), we have dk = || xm-xn|| < || xm - xm+1|| + ||xm+2 - xm+1||+||xm+2 - xn+1||+||xn-xn+1|| < m+2 + m+1 + n+1 + || A2 (w) xm+1 A1 (w) xn || By putting x1 = xn, x2 = xm+1, x3 = xn-1, x4 = xm in (3.1), we get < m+2 + m+1+n+1+1 (||xm+1 xn||) + 2 (||xn-A1 (w) xn-1|| ) + 3 (||xm+1-A2(w) xm||) + 4 (|| xn-A2(w) xm ||) + 5 (||xm-A1(w) xn-1||)

[(||x n A1 ( w ) x n 1 ||)+ || x n A 2 ( w ) x m ||) 1 + [(||x n A1 ( w ) x n 1||)][(||x n A 2 ( w ) x m ||)] [(||x m +1 A 2 ( w ) x m ||)+ || ( x m A1 ( w ) x n 1 ||) + 7 1 + [(||x m +1 A 2 ( w ) x m ||)][(||x m A1 ( w ) x n 1 ||)]

+ 6

< m+2 + m+1 + n+1 + 1 (dk+m+1) + 4 (dk + m+1) + 5 (dk+m+1) +6 (dk+m+1) + 7 (dk+m+1). Letting k in the above inequality we obtain <

[(||x n 1 A 1 ( w ) x n +1 ||)+ || ( x n 1 A 2 ( w ) x n ||) 1 + [(||x n 1 A1 ( w ) x n +1 ||)] [(||x n 1 A 2 ( w ) x n ||)] [(|| ( w ) A 2 ( w ) x n ||)+ || ( ( w ) A1 ( w ) x n +1 ||)] + 7 1 + [(|| ( w ) A 2 ( w ) x n ||) ( || ( ( w ) A1 ( w ) x n +1 ||)]

6

cases (iii) and (iv) may be disposed of. This Leads us to conclude that {xn} is a cachy sequence. Let (w) be the limit of the sequence. We shall now show that A1 (w) (w) = (w) = A2 (w) (w). Putting x1 = xn-1, x2 = (w), x3 = xn+1, x4 = xn, in (2.1), we get || A1 (w) xn-1 A2 (w) (w) || < 1 (||xn-1 - (w) ||) + 2 (||xn-1 A1 (w) xn+1||) + 3 (|| (w) A2(w) xn ||) + 4 (||xn-1 A2 (w) xn||) + 5 (|| (w)A1 (w) xn+1||) +

Letting n , we get || (w)- A2 (w) (w) || < 0 which is a contradiction and hence (w) = A2 (w) (w). In the same, way, it is possible to show that (w) = A1 (w) (w). Thus (w) is a common fixed point of A1 (w) and A2 (w). Suppose there is another fixed point (w) (w) of A1 (w) and A2 (w). Then putting x1 = x4 = (w) and x2 = x4 = (w) in (2.1), we have || (w) - (w)|| < 1 || (w) - (w) || + 2 (|| (w) - (w) || + 3 (||(w)- (w)|| + 6 (||(w)|| - (w)||) + 7 || (|| (w) - (w)||) <

5 || (w) - (w) || 7

which is contradiction. Hence (w) = (w). This completes the proof. If in theorem 2.1, we put A1 (w) = A2 (w) = A (w) and x1 = x3 = x, x2 = x4 = y then we have the following theorem which we only state without proof. Theorem 2.2 : If A (w) is a random generalized non-linear contraction from a separable Banach space x into itself, then there exists an x valued random variable which is the unique fixed point of A (w). We now have the following corollary of theorem 2.2 Corollary 2.3 : If Ab (w) is a random generalized contraction from x into itself for some positive integer b, then A (w) has a unique fixed point (w) which is an x valued random variable. Proof : Since Ab (w) is a random generalized non-linear contraction operator on X, by theorem 2.2, there exists a unique x valued random variable (w) such that Ab (w) (w) = (w) We claim that A (w) (w) = (w). If not, consider ||Ab+1 (w) (w) Ab (w) (w) || < 1 (||A (w) (w) - (w) ||)+ 2 (||A (w) (w) Ab+1 (w) (w) ||) + 3 (|| (w) Ab (w) (w)||)+ 4 (||A (w) (w) Ab (w) (w)||) 329

Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications

[(|| A( w )( w ) A b +1 ( w) ( w) ||) + (|| A ( w ) ( w ) A b ( w) ( w) ||] 1 + [(|| A( w )( w ) A b +1 ( w) ( w) ||] [|| A ( w ) ( w ) A b ( w) ( w) ||] [(|| ( w) A b ( w ) ( w ) ||) + (|| ( w) A b +1 ( w ) ( w ) ||] 1 + [(|| ( w ) A b ( w ) ( w ) ||] [|| ( w ) A b+1 ( w) ( w ) ||]

.....(2.31) Moreover, the left hand side of (2.31) is || Ab+1 (w) (w) Ab (w) (w)|| = ||A (w) (w) - (w)|| .... (2.32) From (2.31) and (2.32), we have ||A (w) (w) - (w) || < 1 (|| A (w) (w) - (w) || + 4 (||A (w) (w) - (w)|| + 5 (||A (w) (w) - (w)||) + 6 (||A (w) (w) - (w)||) + 7 (||A (w) (w) - (w) ||) which is, a contradiction and hence A (w) (w) = (w) we remark that under the conditions A1 (w) = A2 (w) = A (w) and x1 = x3 = x, x2 = x4 = y, i = , j (w) (r) = 0, j = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, the theorem 2.1 reduces to the following corollary. Corollary 2.4 : (Lee and padgett [1]) :- If A (w) is a random non-linear contraction operator from a separable Banach space x into itself, then there exists an x valued random variable (w) which is the unique random fixed point of A (w). 2.4 Application to a Random Non-linear integral Equation :In this section we give an application of a random non-linear integral equation. To do so we have followed the steps of Lee and padgett [1] with necessary modifications as required for the more general settings. We shall assume the following conditions concerning the random kernel k (t, s; w). The function k (., .; .) : S x S x R is such that (i) K (t, s; w) : S x S L (, S, P) such that || k (t, s; w) || . || x (s; w) || L2 is -integrable with respect to (, s, p) where for each (t, S) s x S ||| k (t, s; w) ||| = || k (t, s; w) || L (,S,P) is the norm in L (,S,P); For each s S, k (t, s; w) is continuous in t S from S into L (,S, P); for each t S, k (t, s; w) is continuous in s S from s into L (, S, P) and There exists a positive real-valued function H on S such that H (S) || x (s; w) || c (s,

n L2

Ln 2

(ii) (iii)

is -integrable for x

Ln 2

n L2

Thus, for each (t, s) S x S, we have K (t, s; w) x (s; w) operator T (w) on c (s,

(, S, P) by

[T (w) x ] (t; w) =

S

.......... (2.41)

where the integral is a Bochner Integral. Moreover, we have that for each t S, [T (w) x] (t; w) (, S, P) and that is a continuous linear operator from c (s,

following theorem. Theorem 2.5 : We consider the stochastic integral equation (1.1) subject to the following conditions : (a) B and D are Banach spaces stronger (cf. [1]) then C (s,

with respect to the integral operator defined by (4.1); (b) x ( t; w) f (t, x (t; w)) is an operator from the set Q () = { x (t; w) : x (t; w) D, || x (t; w) ||D < } into the space B satisfying. || f (t, x (t; w) f (t, y (t; w)) ||B < 1 (w) (|| x (t; w) y (t; w) ||D )+ 2 (w) (|| x (t; w) f(t, x (t; w))||D)

330

+ 3 (w) (||y (t; w) t (t, y (t; w))||D)+ 4 (w) (||x (t; w) f (t, y (t; w))||D) + 5 (w) (||y (t; w) f (t, x (t; w))||D) + 6

[(|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D ) + (|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, y( t; w )) ||D ] 1 + [(|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D ) (|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, y( t; w )) ||D ] [(|| y( t; w ) f ( t, y( t; w )) ||D ) + (|| y( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D ] + 7 1 + [(|| y( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D ) (|| y( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D ]

for x (t; w), y (t; w) Q (), where i (w), i = 1, 2, ......, 7 are non-negative real-valued upper semicontinuous functions satisfying i (w) (r) <

(c) h (t; w) D. Then there exists a unique random solution of (1.1) in Q (), provided c (w) < 1 and ||h (t; w) ||D + 2c (w) || f (t; o)||B < (1- c (w)) where c (w) is the norm of T (w). Proof : Define the operator U (w) from Q () into D by [U (w) x] (t; w) = h (t; w) +

Now ||[U(w) x ] (t; w)||D < ||h (t; w) ||D + c (w)|| f (t, x (t; w) ||B < ||(t;w)||D + c (w) ||f (t; 0)||B + c (w)|| f (t, x (t; w) f (t; 0) ||B. Then from the conditions of the theorem. c (w) || f (t, x (t; w)) f (t, 0)||B < C (w) [1 (w) (||x (t; w)||D)]+ 2 (w) (||x(t;w) f (t, x (t; w)||D) + 3 (w) ||f (t; o)||D)+ 4 (w)(||x(t;w)||D) + 5 (w) (|| f (t, x (t; w))||D) + 6

[(|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w ) ||D ) + (|| x ( t; w ) ||D )] 1 + [(|| x ( t; w ) f ( t , x ( t; w ) ||D ] [(|| x ( t; w ) ||D )] [(|| f ( t; 0) ||D ) + (|| f ( t , x ( t; w ) ||D )] + 7 1 + [(|| f ( t; 0) ||D ) (|| f ( t, x ( t; w ) ||D )] 5 5 5 i.e. cw|| f(t, x (t; w))f (t; o)||B < c (w) + c (w)||f (t; 0)||B 7 7 7

Hence || [ U (w)x ] (t; w)||D < ||h (t; w)||D + 2 c (w)|| f (t; 0)||B + c (w) < (1- c(w)) + c (w) < Hence, [ U (w) x ] (t; w) Q () Now, for x (t; w), y (t; w) Q () We have by condition (b) || [U (w) x ] (t; w) [U (w)y] (t; w) ||D = ||

< c (w)|| f (t, x (t; w)) f (t, y (t;w))||B < c (w) [1 (|| x (t; w) y (t; w)||D]+ 2 (w) (|| x (t; w) f (t, x(t, w)||D) + 3 (w) (||y (t;w) f (t, y (t; w)) ||D)+ 4 (w) (||x (t; w) f (t, y (t;w))||D) + 5 (w) (||y (t; w) f (t, x (t; w))||D)

[(|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D ) + (|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, y ( t; w )) ||D ) 1 + [(|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D )] [(|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, y ( t; w )) ||D )] [(|| y( t; w ) f ( t, y ( t; w )) ||D ) + (|| y ( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D ) + 7 1 + [(|| y( t; w ) f ( t, y ( t; w )) ||D )] [(|| y ( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D )]

+ 6 < 1 (w) (||x (t; w) y (t; w))||D) + 2 (w) (||x (t; w)-f (t, x (t; w))||D) + 3 (w) (||y (t; w) f (t, y (t;w)||D) + 4 (w) (||x (t;w) f (t, y (t;w))||D) + 5 (w) (||y (t;w) f (t, x (t; w))||D)

331

[(|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D ) + (|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, y ( t; w )) ||D ) 1 + [(|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D )] [(|| x ( t; w ) f ( t, y ( t; w )) ||D )] [(|| y( t; w ) f ( t, y ( t; w )) ||D ) + (|| y ( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D ) + 7 1 + [(|| y( t; w ) f ( t, y ( t; w )) ||D )] [(|| y ( t; w ) f ( t, x ( t; w )) ||D )]

+ 6 Since c (w) < 1. Thus U (w) is a random non-linear contraction operator on Q (). Hence, by theorem 2.2 there exists a unique x valued random variable x* (t; w) Q () which is a fixed point of U (w), that is x * (t; w) is the unique random solution of the equation (1.1). REFERENCES 1. Lee, Arthur C.H., Padgett, W.J. On random non-linear contraction, math. systems theory 11 (1977), 77-84. 2. Bharucha Reid, A.T. Random Integral Equations, Academic Press, New York (1972). 3. Hans, O. Random fixed point-theorems, Trans. First prague conf. on information theory, statist. decision functions on random process, (1957), 105-125. 4. Padgett, W.J. On a non-linear stochastic integral equations of Hammerstein type, proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 38 (1973), 625-631. 5. Tsokos, C.P. On a stochastic integral equation of voltera type, math, systems theory 3 (1969), 222231. 6. Tsokos, C.P. , Padgett, W.J. Random Integral equations with applications in life science and engineering, Academic Press, New York (1974). 7. Lee, A.C.H. , Padgett, W.J. On heavily non-linear stochastic integral equations, utilitas mathematics 9 (1976), 128, 138. 8. Achari, J. A result on fixed points, kyungpook math. Journal 19 (1979), 245-248. 10. Achari, J. On a pair of Random generalized non-linear contractions, Internal J. Math. and math. sci. vol. 6 No. 3 (1983) 467-475. 11. Pittnaur, F. A fixed point theorem in complete metric spaces, to appear in periodica math. Hungarica.

332

This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing. More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTEs homepage: http://www.iiste.org CALL FOR PAPERS The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and collaborating with academic institutions around the world. Theres no deadline for submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/ The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the journals is also available upon request of readers and authors. IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

- Probability Theory and MathematicalUploaded bymariobmac
- EE325 Probability and Random ProcessesUploaded byankit bansal
- Nora Roberts Stakleni Otok PDFUploaded byMaja
- Stochastic ProcessUploaded bymeetwithsanjay
- Literature SurveyUploaded bykuldipkatiyar198570
- UG Chemical SyllabusUploaded byDeo Karan Ram
- FOX MechanicsUploaded byrheavy2
- Introduction to Probability - Charles Grin Stead, Laurie SnellUploaded byAbdulRehmanKhilji
- mathgen-1079926766Uploaded bymdp anon
- Compressed Sensing Using Generative ModelsUploaded byJan Hula
- Syllabus Master Mistress PGTUploaded bySaikat Dutta
- Lecture Notes 15 Dec 2014Uploaded byClaudiu Harton
- journal mathematicalUploaded byhungkg
- 4-4Uploaded byAbeer Ewaineh
- cds examUploaded byCyrus Sandy
- Chapter 10 the Topology of RUploaded bySusilo Wati
- tmp8F3C.tmpUploaded byFrontiers
- vmls.pdfUploaded bykskrishnasangeeth
- Mutually Unbiased Bases Are Complex Projective 2Designs Klappenecker Roetteler 2005Uploaded bymartstonmorse
- Hans Havlicek and Metod Saniga- Projective Ring Line of an Arbitrary Single QuditUploaded byJupwe
- ps1_2014Uploaded bySanjay Kumar
- On ranges and null spaces of a special type of operator named ?−???????. – Part IIUploaded byIJMER
- wang2004.pdfUploaded byprakhar
- Class2 ChartsUploaded byjbrunomaciel1957
- 2Uploaded byLuis Alberto Fuentes
- yyyyyyyyUploaded bythinhle
- WEEK 1Uploaded byKimberly Gayosa
- Sparse Tracking Icip12Uploaded bySai Manoj
- 21 Medioni_tensor_voting.pdfUploaded byM Rameez Ur Rehman
- Probability 4Uploaded byali

- Assessment and Characterization of Rhizo-Bacteria in Petroleum–Polluted Soil in South–East, NigeriaUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Asymptotic Properties of Bayes Factor in One- Way Repeated Measurements ModelUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Availability, Accessibility and Use of Information Resources and Services Among Information Seekers of Lafia Public Library in Nasarawa StateUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment of the Skills Possessed by the Teachers of Metalwork in the Use of Computer Numerically Controlled Machine Tools in Technical Colleges in Oyo StateUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Applying Multiple Streams Theoretical Framework to College Matriculation Policy Reform for Children of Migrant Workers in ChinaUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment of Factors Responsible for Organizational PoliticsUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment of Teachers’ and Principals’ Opinion on Causes of LowUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment of Some Micronutrient (Zn and Cu) Status of Fadama Soils Under Cultivation in Bauchi, NigeriaUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Barriers to Meeting the Primary Health Care Information NeedsUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Attitude of Muslim Female Students Towards Entrepreneurship - A Study on University Students in BangladeshUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment of the Practicum Training Program of B.S. Tourism in Selected UniversitiesUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment of Housing Conditions for a Developing Urban Slum Using Geospatial AnalysisUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment of Survivors’ Perceptions of Crises and Retrenchments in the Nigeria Banking SectorUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Availability and Use of Instructional Materials and FacilitiesUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Concerning Food Safety Among Restaurant Workers in Putrajaya, MalaysiaUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment of Relationships Between Students’ Counselling Needs,Uploaded byAlexander Decker
- Application of the Diagnostic Capability of SERVQUAL Model to an Estimation of Service Quality Gaps in Nigeria GSM IndustryUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Antibiotic Resistance and Molecular CharacterizationUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment in Primary School Mathematics Classrooms in NigeriaUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Extracts of African Mistletoes (Loranthus Begwensis L.) From Kolanut and Breadfruit TreesUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Application of Panel Data to the Effect of Five (5) World Development Indicators (WDI) on GDP Per Capita of Twenty (20) African Union (AU) Countries (1981-2011)Uploaded byAlexander Decker
- Are Graduates From the Public Authority for Applied Education and Training in Kuwaiti Meeting Industrial RequirementsUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessing the Effect of Liquidity on Profitability of Commercial Banks in KenyaUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment of Productive and Reproductive Performances of CrossUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Assessment for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning of Christian Religious Knowledge in Secondary Schools in Awgu Education Zone, Enugu State, NigeriaUploaded byAlexander Decker
- An Overview of the Environmental Policies to Ensure SafeUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Analysis of Frauds in Banks Nigeria’s ExperienceUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Antinutrient Profile of Three Mushroom Varieties Consumed in Amaifeke, Orlu, Imo StateUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Analysis of Blast Loading Effect on High Rise BuildingsUploaded byAlexander Decker
- An Overview of Climate Change and Food SecurityUploaded byAlexander Decker

- Lg 37lc2d Lcd Tv Service Manual[1]Uploaded byKJINTF
- Alex Flores CV - March 2018Uploaded byAlexandra Flores
- nutrients-09-00448-v4Uploaded bysyifa
- Board Exams Ob Gyn 2009Uploaded byfilchibuff
- Structural Design Brief.docUploaded bytaz_taz3
- Jabra GN9120 User GuideUploaded byFelipe Arango
- Perfect Herbals & Oils Chhattisgarh IndiaUploaded byExportersindia.com
- TWO-STROKE POPPET-VALVED DIESEL ENGINEUploaded bySrikanth Sridharan
- Data Speed Technology v. Cincom SystemsUploaded byPatentBlast
- How Can You Locate the the Software LocationUploaded byranji.vnv
- 98a7aa_541c045a2e6d4268bd4b4031287ed30eUploaded byKarlos Daniel Barros
- Dynamic ProgrammingUploaded byTalha Habib
- Core Banking Selection CriteriaUploaded byMussadaq Javed
- Stores ManagementUploaded byHarish Padmanaban
- Subcontractor Plan Notes.docxUploaded byjoflogeorg
- Classics-AJE-2000Uploaded byArthur Soares
- Development Kit for the PIC MCU - Exercise Book. DSP Analog DsPIC33FJ128GP706Uploaded byJaime Barragan
- Black PantherUploaded byPrussianCommand
- HVDC THESIS MTECH IIT HYD.pdfUploaded byN R SHEKAR
- Michael a. Uzendoski - Beyond OralityUploaded byAlejandra
- ansys tutoUploaded byசெல்வ குமார்
- GEM311E-0Uploaded byIgbalMammadli
- HackingUploaded byVijay Pradhan
- barzman1994.pdfUploaded bysuryanandini
- 2003 - Clinical Procedures for Predictable ResultsUploaded byMargot Rodriguez
- Financial Management Introduction Lecture#1Uploaded byRameez Ramzan Ali
- WCECS2011_pp673-678Uploaded by2340sergio
- MathematicsUploaded byGamini Hettiarachchi
- Expt[7]2006Uploaded bymnh_123
- Us 5890441Uploaded bykats2404