Human Rights Alert, NGO

Joseph Zernik, PhD

3144PO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313

"
91313 ,31440 "

123456xyz@gmail.com;

13-06-20 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court

Repeat notice of obstructionist conduct in the Court
Judge Alon continues to refuse to respond on evidence of
obstructionist conduct in the Court. After the May 22, 2013 Notice
was struck in the May 26, 2013 decision, a repeat Notice was filed
which attempted to use more appropriate language.
#

Caption and No

Page

1.

13-05-26 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 ) in the Haifa Magistrate

Court Judge Esperanza Alon's decision on Notice of
Obstructionist Conduct in the Court [English translation]

2.

13-05-26 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 ) in the Haifa Magistrate

Court Judge Esperanza Alon's decision on Notice of
Obstructionist Conduct in the Court [Hebrew original]

LINKS:
[1] 13-05-22 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court
Declaration of Joseph Zernik: Judge Esperanza Alon - master of the "mystical secrets of court
procedure", or "obstructionist with impunity"?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/147192877/
[2] 13-05-26 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court Judge Esperanza Alon's
decision on notice of obstructionist conduct in the Court.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/148957407/

1/6

In the Haifa Family Court

1829-06-10
In RE: Conservatee RSZ
Filer: The Conservatee's son, Joseph Zernik
Parties (to the best understanding of the Filer):
1. Conservator Robert Zernik, through his Counsel Attorney Amos Zadika
2. The State Attorney's Counsel Ministry of Justice
3. The State Attorney's Counsel Ministry of Welfare
Other Conservatee's children:
1. Dror Zernik Conservatee's son
2. Uri Zernik Consevatee's son
Declaration of the Conservatee's son regarding suspected obstruction
in court files pertaining to Conservatee Rivka Shami Zernik
The Court is asked to address instant Declaration within 14 days.

I, the undersigned, Joseph Zernik, ID no... , knowing that I must say the truth,
and that I may be punished pursuant to the law if I fail to do so, declare as
follows:
1. My name is Joseph Zernik and the Conservatee is my mother.
2. The evidence provided below indicate the issuance of simulated court
decisions and simulated service of simulated court decisions as part of
conduct simulated court process in files no 1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13. In
a civilized society, such conduct should be deemed criminal. Moreover,
such conduct is typically related to white collar organized crime by judges
and attorneys.
3. Therefore, failure of the Honorable Court to address instant Declaration in
general, and in particular regarding the different and contradictory March
17, 2013 decision records (a-d, below) is unreasonable.
a) Judge Alon so far failed to provide an explanation for the different and
contradictory March 17, 2013 decision records, which were issued in her
name in file 25607-03-13 [1]
4. Two different and contradictory decision records, dated March 17, 2013
were issued in court file 25607-03-13 in the name of Judge Esperanza Alon.
a. Regular Decision - which in part says: The Requester shall serve the
Request on the Responder and on Joseph Zernik for response within 60
days. This record was purportedly served on me by Attorney Amos Zadika
and by the Office of the Clerk.
113-03-17 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Three (3) falsified
decision records / simulated service of process, received by certified mail from the Clerk of
the Court and from Attorney Amos Sadika

http://www.scribd.com/doc/132872623/

2/6

b. Unreasonable Decision - which in part says: The Requester shall serve

the Request on the Responder and on Joseph Zernik for response within 45
days. Absent agreement, the matter shall be reviewed in conjunction with
Requests that were scheduled in court file 1829-06-10 for April 4, 2013, at
12:00 noon. This record was purportedly served on me by Attorney Amos
Zadika, but NOT by the Office of the Clerk.
5. Such matter, which appears as undermining of due process, was detailed in
the April 2, 2013 Notice and Declaration by the Requester to Inspect and to
Copy, Joseph Zernik.
6. To this date, no response was received on this matter by Judge Esperanza
Alon.
b) Chief Clerk Israel Hen continues to refuse to certify either one of the
different and contradictory decisions True Copy of the Original - and
therefore authenticity of both is at least dubious.
7. On March 24, 2013 and again on April 21, 2013, I sent letters to Chief
Clerk Israel Hen, informed him regarding the state of affairs, pertaining to
the above mentioned contradictory decisions, and asked that he certify under
his hand signature, pursuant to the Regulations of the Courts (Office of the
clerk) 2004, Regulation 6a, one or both of these records True Copy of the
Original, as he deems fit, pursuant to his duties and obligations as Chief
Clerk. [2]
8. To this date, I have not received a response from Chief Clerk Israel Hen
on the requests to certify such records True Copy of the Original.
9. Therefore, both records should be deemed court records, whose authenticity
is at least dubious.
c) An explanation on behalf of Chief Clerk Israel Hen for the March 17,
2013 different and contradictory decision records claims that the
Unreasonable Decision was issued first, and Regular Decision was
issued later as correction to the Nonsensical Decision.
10.
A letter on behalf of Mr Israel Hen, dated April 21, 2013, pertaining to
this matter, was issued by Area Administrator Ms Shulamit Gonen. [ 3]

2 13-03-24 RE: RSZ (25607-03-13 ) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Letter No 4 to Chief
Clerk Israel Hen, in RE - conflicting, unreasonable court orders dated March 17, 2013 by
Judge Esperanza Alon

http://www.scribd.com/doc/132063472/
13-04-21 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Letter No
5 to Chief Clerk Israel Hen, in RE inspection of court file, certification of court records,
appointment record of the Chief Clerk

http://www.scribd.com/doc/137166555/
313-04-21 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa Response letter on behalf of "Chief Clerk" Israel Hen
http://www.scribd.com/doc/142296449/

3/6

11.The April 21, 2013 letter by Ms Shulamit Gonen is void on its face as a
response by Chief Clerk Israel Hen, for lack of authority, as detailed in my
May 19, 2013 letter to Mr Israel Hen. [4]
12.
With it, Ms Gonen's letter addresses the above mentioned contradictory
decision records, and says, This decision was removed from the record by
the Honorable Judge Esperanza Alon and corrected, therefore, this decision
was not meant to be mailed [sic, not served - jz] by the Office of the Clerk
and was not mailed by the Office of the Clerk to the parties.
13.
Such statement does not explicitly state, which is the decision record
that was removed from the record and which is the corrected record.
However, one can conclude that the Unreasonable Decision was the first
of the two (and the one that was removed from the record), and the
Regular Decision was the second of the two (and the corrected one)
since the Regular Decision is the only one that came into my hands
through mailing by the Court as purported service.
c) Email messages by Attorney Amos Zadika, Counsel of the Conservator,
present the Regular Decision as the one that was issued first, and the
Unreasoneble Decision as the one that was issued second, as correction
of the Regular Decision.
14.
Email communications by Attorney Amos Zadika, Counsel of the
Conservator, pertaining to the decision records, entirely contradict Ms
Gonen's words:
a. On March 18, 2013, at 11:45am, Attorney Zadika forwarded to me by
email Judge Alon's Regular Decision (which was printed out from Net
HaMishpat system on March 17, 2013 and scanned on March 18, 2013, at
8:45am).
Appendix A is a copy of the first email that I received from Attorney
Zadika on March 18, 2013, and purported Judge Alon Decision that was
attached to it.
b. On March 18, 2013, at 3:16pm, Attorney Zadika forwarded to me by
email Judge Alon's Unreasonable Decision (which was scanned at
11:55am). Moreover, in the accompanying text, Attorney Zadika explicitly
says: Following a Decision, previously sent to you by email, I am
forwarding to you a corrected decision by the Honorable Court. Pursuant to
the corrected decision, response time was shortened to 45 days, and
regardless, proceeding was scheduled for April 4, 2013.
Appendix B is a copy of the second email that I received from Attorney
Zadika on March 18, 2013, and purported Judge Alon Decision that was
attached to it.
15.
Based on Attorney Zadika's correspondence the Regular Decision was
the first of the two contradictory decision records, and the Unreasonable
4 13-05-19 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13 ) in the Magistrate Court, Haifa - Letter
No 6 to Chief Clerk Israel Hen, in RE certification of court records, appointment record of
the Chief Clerk

http://www.scribd.com/doc/142316802/

4/6

Decision was the second, and the Nonsensical Decision is purportedly

corrected decision by Judge Alon.
16.
Therefore, there is reasonable cause for suspicion of fraud, pertaining to
the issuance of these two contradictory decisions, and also a reasonable
cause for suspicion that the Court engaged, directly or indirectly, in ex parte
communications, and that denial of my access to records in court file
number 25607-03-13 is meant, at least in part, to prevent discovery of
conclusive evidence of such fraud.
d) Integrity of the foundation Books of Court was undermined Index of
All Cases and Calendar of the Court.
17.
A new court file was opened in this matter (25607-03-13) with no
foundation in the law, and with it integrity of the Index of All Cases was
undermined, the primary foundation Book of Court.
18.
A hearing in a motion, which was registered under the new court file
number (25607-03-13), was conducted, while the proceeding itself was
registered under the old file number (1829-06-10), and with it integrity of
the Calendar of the Court was undermined, the secondary foundation Book
of Court.
e) Judge Esperanza Alon refuses to correct a false and misleading April 4,
2013 Protocol in instant court file (1829-06-10)
19.
Judge Esperanza Alon issued a false protocol record for the April 4,
2013 proceeding, where even the names of those attending are false.
Moreover, such protocol record was received by me when each page is
watermarked in extra-large inscription Unsigned, making its authenticity
at least dubious. When such falsehoods were brought to Judge Alon's
attention, she responded in her May 6, 2013 decision in instant court file
(1829-06-10), which says: regarding scribe's errors, in a closed process I
see no need to delve into them at this stage. Therefore, Jude Alon decided
to leave uncorrected a false and misleading protocol that she herself issued.
f) Judge Esperanza Alon refuses to address false and misleading record
that were filed by the Conservator and others in these court filed (1829-0610 and 25607-03-13)
20.
Judge Alon failed to respond to this date on repeat notices, accompanied
by incontrovertible evidence of false and deliberately misleading records,
which were filed in these court files by the Conservator and his counsel,
and false and misleading facts in the Social Worker's report in instant court
file (1829-06-10).
f) My access to inspect and to copy the court files.
21.
On April 29, 2013, I filed Requests to Inspect and to Copy the two court
files (1829-06-10 and 25607-03-13).
22.
Regarding my Request to Inspect and to Copy court file 1829-06-10 , no
decision was received by me to this date.
23.
Regarding my Request to Inspect and to Copy court file 25607-03-13, I
received the May 2, 2013 Decision by Judge Alon, which says:
"In this court file the Requester is a Party to the process. Pursuant to the
principles of Transparency and Equality among the Parties, the Requester is
permitted to inspect and to copy motions, responses, and decisions in the
5/6

court file, and pursuant to Court Procedures. Request to produce screen

prints is out of compliance with Court Procedures and is denied.
24.
the May 2, 2013 Decision by Judge Alon in court file 25607-03-13 is
baseless in its parts and in its entirety:
a. "In this court file the Requester is a Party to the process - Judge Alon
failed to explain the legal foundation for such statement.
b. Pursuant to the principles of Transparency and Equality among the
Parties - such claim is false on its face Counsel for the Conservator may
create screen prints at any time through Net HaMishpat system. Had Judge
Alon indeed intended to establish Transparency and Equality among the
Parties, all she had to do was key in my ID number as party, or person of
interest, and thereby permit my equal access to the records, such as
permitted to the Conservator's Counsel.
c. Request to produce screen prints is out of compliance with Court
Procedures
- Judge Alon failed to provide a reference to such deluded statement.
- According to such deluded statement, pursuant to Israeli Court Procedures,
a person, who is a party to legal process, is prevented from court file data
pertaining to identity of the parties, counsel, and case calendar.
25.On June 20, 2013, I filed Notice of Inspection in instant court file. In
response, I was provided with copies of six (6) outo f eight (8) decisions,
which appear in the system. Verbally I was told that I was forbidden from
access to the additional two decision records.
26.I was denied access to the list of parties, list of decisions, list of reuesrts,
etc.
g) Chief Clerk Israel Hen continues to refuse to produce a copy of his
appointment record, and is most likely a simulated Chief Clerk.
27.
Mr Israel Hen signed his February 24, 2013 letter Chief Clerk and
District Administrator, Magistrate Courts, Haifa District, [5] and he also
appears as Chief Clerk in the online page of the Court.
28.
To this date Mr Hen refuses to produce a copy of his appointment record
as Chief Clerk of the Court, and such record was not found so far in the
State Registry either.
29.
Such state of affairs undermines the competency of the Haifa Magistrate
Court, since Mr Israel Hen should be deemed simulated Chief Clerk.
Today, June 20, 2013,
[signature]
_____
Joseph Zernik
Conservatee's Son
513-02-24 In re: RSZ (1829-06-10) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Response by Chief Clerk
Israel Hen on Letter No 1- Request for certificates of service of court decisions
http://www.scribd.com/doc/132828177/

6/6

" . " - " :

45 . ,
" 1829-06-10 ,04.04.13 ".12:00
" , .
.5 , "
, , " 2-
.2013 ,
.6 .
" . "
" " "
.7 24- ,2013 , 21- ,2013 , " "
, ,
, )( ,2004 6 ,
" , " ,
[2] .
.8 " "
" " ".
.9 "
.
. " " 17-,
,2013 ,
, " .
.10 21- ,2013 , "
" ' [3] .
.11 ' " " ,
, 19-[4] .2013 ,
.12 , ' ",
: ' ,
" " ".
.13 "" "" .
' ," "
) ""( ," " )
13-03-24 2 " ) 1829-06-10 (25607-03-13 - " " .
http://www.scribd.com/doc/132063472/
13-04-21 " ) 1829-06-10 (25607-03-13 - " " .

http://www.scribd.com/doc/137166555/
13-04-21 3 " ) 1829-06-10 (25607-03-13 - "
" "

http://www.scribd.com/doc/142296449/
4

13-05-19 " ) 1829-06-10 (25607-03-13 - " " .

http://www.scribd.com/doc/142316802/

2/5

""( " " ,

.
. " " " "
" , " " ,
" "
.14 " ," ,
' :
. 18- ,2013 , ,11:45 " "
" " ) 17-
,2013 , 18- ,2013 , .(08:53
' " , " 18-,
,2013 .
. 18- ,2013 , ,15:16 " "
" " ) , .( 11:55 ,
:
, ' " .
45-
.04/04/13
' " , " 18-,2013 ,
.
.15 " " "
," " ," "
" " .
.16 , /
,
, 25607-03-13
.
. - -

.17 ) (25607-03-13 ,
)(
.
.18 ) (25607-03-13
) ,(1829-06-10
.
. 4- ,2013 , )
(1829-06-10
.19 4-
, 2013 , . ,
" " , .
, 6-,
2013 ) ,(1829-06-10:
, , " .
3/5

 , .
.
) 1829-06-10(25607-03-13 -
.20

,
).(1829-06-10
.
1829-06-10
.21 2012 .1829-06-10
. 2013 .
.22 29- ,2013 , .1829-06-10
.23 " ,1829-06-10 .
,
, .
.24 ,1829-06-10 22- .2013 ,
22-.2013 ,
.25 ,1829-06-10 ,
.
25607-03-13
.26 29- ,2013 , .25607-03-13
.27 25607-03-13 2-
,2013 ,:
. ,
,/ .
.

.28

2- 2013 , 25607-03-13 :
. "
. , 23-,2013 ,
25607-03-13 " "
) ( .2003
" . " ... -

.
" " " .
" ".
" . ":
.
,
, , .
)(3372/11 .

4/5

 , , " ". .15 " 2- ,2013 , 22-,2013 ,

.25607-03-13
.16 22- ,2013 ,
, " " ,25607-03-13
.
" . " ,
" "
5
.29 24-" [ ] ,2013 ,
, ,
.
.30
, .
.31 ,,
.
, ,
.
19 ,,2013 ,

_______________
,

13-02-24 5 " ) 1829-06-10 (25607-03-13 - "

"

http://www.scribd.com/doc/132828177/

5/5