Updated to reflect the Burr amendment -If reconfigured per 6/12/2013 request from the Fiscal Research Division

of the General Assembly: Combine Districts 6A and 6B for Prosecutorial and District Court; Newly configured 16A contains Scotland, Hoke, Richmond, and Anson Counties for Superior and District Court; Newly created Prosecutorial District 16C contains Richmond and Anson Counties; Newly configured 20A contains Stanly County for Superior Court, District Court, and Prosecutorial District; SC 19D to 4th Division.. Affected districts highlighted

Superior Court Judges - Needed as of July 1, 2012, Based on Workload Formula

Based on Data through 6/30/2012
Division 1 District 1 2 3A 6A 6B 7A 7B Division Total Judge Need (FTE) 2.3 1.7 2.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 2.2 11.6 Resident Judges 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 10.0 = Special Judge Need (FTE) Division 2 District 3B 4A 4B 5 8A 8B Division Total Judge Need (FTE) 1.7 1.5 1.6 2.9 1.3 1.4 10.4 Resident Judges 3.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 10.0 = Special Judge Need (FTE)

0.4

1.6

Division 3 District 9 9A 10 14 15A 15B Division Total Judge Need (FTE) 2.3 0.9 7.7 3.1 1.5 1.2 16.7 Resident Judges 2.0 1.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 17.0 = Special Judge Need (FTE)

Division 4 District 11A 11B 12 13A 13B 16A 16B 19D Division Total Division 6 Judge Need (FTE) 1.0 1.2 6.6 1.5 2.4 1.1 13.8 Resident Judges 2.0 2.0 5.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 15.0 = Special Judge Need (FTE) District 19A 19C 20A 20B 22A 22B Division Total Judge Need (FTE) 1.9 1.5 0.9 2.0 1.9 1.7 9.9 Resident Judges 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 = Special Judge Need (FTE) Judge Need (FTE) 1.4 1.3 3.6 1.6 1.4 2.5 2.1 1.0 14.9 Resident Judges 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 13.0 = Special Judge Need (FTE)

No need

1.9

Division 5 District 17A 17B 18 19B 21 23 Division Total

No Need

0.9

Division 7 District 25A 25B 26 27A 27B Division Total

Judge Need (FTE) 1.7 1.5 10.9 2.8 2.1 19.0

Resident Judges 2.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 15.0

Special Judge Need (FTE)

Division 8 District 24 28 29A 29B 30A 30B Division Total

4.0

Judge Need (FTE) 1.3 2.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 7.8

Resident Judges 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 8.0

Special Judge Need (FTE)

No need

The North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts has provided this data in response to a specific request from the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly, and takes no position on the configuration of districts as proposed.

Superior Court Judges - Needed as of July 1, 2012, Based on Workload Formula

Based on Data through 6/30/2012

Business Court Business Court Judge Need (FTE) 1.0 1.0 1.0 BC Total 3.0 Resident Judges 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = Special Judge Need (FTE)

3.0

The North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts has provided this data in response to a specific request from the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly, and takes no position on the configuration of districts as proposed.

Updated to reflect Burr amendment FTE allocation --If reconfigured per 6/12/2013 request from the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly: Combine Districts 6A and 6B for Prosecutorial and District Court; Newly configured 16A contains Scotland, Hoke, Richmond, and Anson Counties for Superior and District Court; Newly created Prosecutorial District 16C contains Richmond and Anson Counties; Newly configured 20A contains Stanly County for Superior Court, District Court, and Prosecutorial District; SC 19D to 4th Division. Affected districts highlighted

District Court Judges - Needed as of July 1, 2012, Based on Workload Formula

Ranked from best off to worst off Based on Data through 6/30/2012
Judges Unrounded Staff to Authorized Judges Workload 7/1/2012 Needed Ratio 4 3.59 111.55% 6 5.60 107.06% 5 4.70 106.41% 4 3.76 106.32% 6 5.88 102.04% 9 8.84 101.85% 11 11.03 99.70% 4 4.04 99.03% 6 6.06 98.99% 7 7.29 95.98% 6 6.28 95.59% 6 6.29 95.35% 7 7.36 95.10% 6 6.31 95.09% 4 4.23 94.55% 5 5.34 93.58% 7 7.71 90.76% 7 7.85 89.15% 21 23.71 88.59% 5 5.66 88.33% 2 2.27 88.11% 6 6.88 87.19% 19 21.79 87.18% 5 5.79 86.32% 3 3.49 85.85% 4 4.71 84.98% 6 7.10 84.50% 4 4.75 84.21% 4 4.81 83.18% 9 10.89 82.63% 4 4.89 81.85% 14 17.13 81.71% 7 8.92 78.48% 2 2.56 78.00% 3 3.94 76.19% 5 6.65 75.18% 8 10.66 75.02% 10 13.78 72.56% 10 13.99 71.46% 4 5.82 68.71% If the allocation of a new district court 5 7.29 68.59% judgeship were to be based on workload need, it would be created in District 22A 270 309.67 or District 19A instead of in District 27B.

District 2 27B 1 24 9/9B 5 11 17B 22B 27A 30 3B 7 16A 6A/B 15B 14 28 26 3A 20A 8 10 19C 17A 29B 13 15A 20B 25 23 18 19B 9A 29A 16B 4 12 21 19A 22A Total

The North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts has provided this data in response to a specific request from the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly, and takes no position on the configuration of districts as proposed.

Updated to reflect Burr amendment FTE allocation -If reconfigured per 6/12/2013 request from the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly: Combine Districts 6A and 6B for Prosecutorial and District Court; Newly configured 16A contains Scotland, Hoke, Richmond, and Anson Counties for Superior and District Court; Newly created Prosecutorial District 16C contains Richmond and Anson Counties; Newly configured 20A contains Stanly County for Superior Court, District Court, and Prosecutorial District; SC 19D to 4th Division.. Affected districts included.

District Attorney Office Staffing - Needed as of July 1, 2012, Based on Workload Formula
Updated with data through 6/30/2012 (D21 filings adjusted) Includes: ADA Supervision Adjustment; Mega/Large District Adjustment; First Degree Murder Adjustment Includes State Funded Positions Only

Burr Amendment Staff Distribution

ADAs + DA VWLAs

Other State-funded Staff Current Need* Total Authorized Staff - State Funded

6 16C 20A

Statefunded (FTE) 11 7 6

Staff Need (FTE) 12.4 8.9 4.6

Statefunded (FTE) 6.0 6.0 1.0

Staff Need (FTE) 7.8 5.5 2.6

Inv 1 1 1

AA 1 1 1

CDM

AA + Inv CDM 1 1.0 1 1 1.0 1.0

State Authorized Positions 19.0 15.0 9.0

Total Staff Need 19.0 22.19 16.38 9.13

Staff to Workload Ratio 85.6% 91.6% 98.6%

*Need for other positions is: For Investigators: Minimum of 1 per office; two when DA + ADA + VWLA need is greater than 80 For Admin Assnt + Criminal Document Manager: Minimum of 1 per office; (DA + ADA + VWLA + Inv) needed / 25 Notes: Attorneys include elected DAs. Resource implications include elected DA administrative adjustment of .5 FTE per district.

Workload Balanced Staff Distribution

ADAs + DA VWLAs Other State-funded Staff Current Need* Total Authorized Staff - State Total Staff Need Funded 19.0 22.19 15.0 9.0 16.38 9.13

16C 20A

The North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts has provided this data in response to a specific request from the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly, and takes no position on the configuration of districts as proposed.

District District 6

15.0 9.0

Statefunded (FTE) 11 8 5

Staff Need (FTE) 12.4 8.9 4.6

Statefunded (FTE) 6.0 5.0 2.0

Staff Need (FTE) 7.8 5.5 2.6

Inv 1 1 1

AA 1 1 1

CDM

AA + Inv CDM 1 1.0 1 1 1.0 1.0

State Authorized Positions 19.0 15.0 9.0

Staff to Workload Ratio 85.6% 91.6% 98.6%