Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Conference Economic Policy Dialogue among Asian Transition Countries Urbanisation and Inclusive Growth
Imprint
Published by the Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn, Germany Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration in Asia China Office TaYuan Diplomatic Office 14 Liangmahe South Street, Chaoyang District 10600 Beijing, PR China T +86-10-8532-5344 F +86-10-8532-5744 Office Mongolia Naiman Zovkhi Building Seoul Street 21 Ulaanbaatar 14251, Mongolia Office Thailand 193/63 Lake Rajada Office Complex New Ratchadapisek Road, Klongtoey Bangkok 10110, Thailand rci-asia@giz.de www.giz.de As at June 2013
Photo credits Copyrights for all pictures: GIZ RCI Text Eric Herbstreit and Torben Niemeier GIZ is responsible for the content of this publication. The findings and conclusions expressed in this documentation are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the view of the Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). The information provided is without warranty of any kind. On behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)
Contents
List of Abbreviations 3
1. Introduction
2. Welcoming Remarks
4. Fiscal Constraints and Political Challenges 4.1 Citizenisation of migrant workers from the perspective of Inclusive Growth 4.2 New-type urbanisation and reform of public finance systems 4.3 Urban Development and SEZ in Lao PDR Comment by Gerhart Maier
11 11 12 13 13
5. Rural Population and Administrative Reform 5.1 Urbanisation should be advanced actively and steadily 5.2 New-type urbanisation and support of public finance 5.3 Rural-Urban Integration and Economic Growth 5.4 Urbanization development and inclusive growth. The case of Lao PDR Comment by Dr. Robert Haas Comment by Farhodhon Jurahonov
14 14 15 16 17 19 19
6. Sustainable Urban Population Development 6.1 Urban Population Development in Mongolia 6.2 The Specific Character of Urbanisation in Kyrgyzstan 6.3 Mongolia: Urban Population Development 6.4 Urbanisation in two core cities (Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City): highlights, challenges and policy orientations for inclusive growth Comment by Fuad Jafarly
20 20 21 22 23 25
7. Conclusion
26
List of Abbreviations
ADB CIEM CIRD EU GDP GIZ GNI GTI ODA RCI RMB SEZ UN UNDP UN HABITAT Asian Development Bank Central Institute for Economic Management China Institute for Reform and Development European Union Gross Domestic Product Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Gross National Income Greater Tumen Initiative Official Development Assistance Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration in Asia Programme Renminbi Special Economic Zone United Nations United Nations Development Programme United Nations Human Settlements Programme
Introduction
From 27 to 28 of April 2013, the China Institute for Reform and Development (CIRD) and the Central Institute for Economic Management (CIEM) of Viet Nam in cooperation with Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH convened an Economic Policy Dialogue among Asian Transition Countries on Urbanisation Development and Inclusive Growth in Haikou, People's Republic of China. The following pages summarise the themes and results of this event. Detailed information including the content of lectures and discussions can be retrieved from the respective summaries. The conference handbook provided during the conference holds additional information
th th
Purpose
The annual conference, which was initially started in 2004 as Sino-Vietnamese Economic Reform Dialogue by CIRD and CIEM, over time has expanded to become an established forum with other Asian transition countries. It is based on the recognition of similarities in economic reform needs and approaches in Asian transitional economies and aims at hastening the pace of respective reform processes while at the same time enhancing their sustainability through mutual learning and the exchange of lessons learnt. This years' forum was attended by more than 200 delegates, including officials, senior policy experts and researchers from Azerbaijan, Cambodia, China, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Mongolia, Viet Nam and Uzbekistan, as well as representatives from the Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI) and from the organising bodies CIRD, CIEM and GIZ.
Background
Urbanisation rates in Asia in the last three decades are unprecedented in history. According to Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2012 issued by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), more than a billion people have settled to cities in Asia between 1980 and 2010 which makes this a topic of utmost importance. While urbanisation bears great potential for economic development for Asian transition countries, problems have emerged which require a change of strategy and therefore a profound discussion on suitable policies. These are needed as it seems more evident than ever that scale-oriented urbanisation cannot be upheld by Asian countries in the near future because negative impacts have grown too large to cope with. These negative impacts can primarily be found in the social and environmental context: rising inequality, social tensions as well as steadily worsening air and water pollution to name just a few. On the other hand it is widely accepted that urbanisation itself constitutes an important component to achieve economic development. To be able to extract positive features of urbanisation, important policy changes were proposed at the conference, which include for instance a reform of the fiscal and the household registration (hukou) system in China to lay grounds for the countrys transformation towards a consumption-driven economy. Additionally, country-specific best practices and perspectives were shared, such as the provision of public accommodation in Viet Nam. Moreover, experiences with special economic zones from Laos were discussed in order to evaluate their contribution to economic development.
A wide consensus among participants of the conference was that urbanisation represents a potential driver of inclusive economic growth. However, the full potential can only be unleashed, if it is carried out in a thoughtful, sustainable way.
2. Welcoming remarks
2.1. Welcoming Remarks by Mr. Wang Lu, Vice Governor, Hainan Provincial Peoples Government, PR China
In his welcoming remark, Mr. Wang stressed the importance of a shift from mass urbanisation towards a socially more sustainable type of urbanisation. In this context, he underlined the importance of enhancing the quality of life of migrant workers who recently moved to urban areas. In his point of view, urbanisation processes nevertheless need to come hand in hand with an agglomeration of industry sectors in order to lift economic well-being and hereby create the prerequisite for a more prosperous life. In Hainan, industries that seem the most prone to be able to deliver this task are the service sector, particularly tourism, and primary industries.
2.2. Welcoming Remarks by Mr. Jrgen Steiger, Deputy Country Director, GIZ China
Dear Mr. Chairman, dear Governor Wang Lu, dear Prof. Chi Fulin, Excellencies, distinguished guests, dear friends, ladies and gentlemen:
I would like to welcome you on behalf of GIZ to our economic policy dialogue and roundtable among Asian countries in transition here in Haikou, Hainan. I am very happy and proud that we can celebrate the 10 anniversary of the Economic Policy Dialogue today that started in 2004 in Hanoi and was held in Haikou and Hanoi on rotation as well as one time in 2010 in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. I am very happy to see you all again here in Haikou. I am happy to see old friends and new faces, from Southeast, Central and North East Asian transition countries and from Tumen Secretariat as well as of course our host country China.
th
Let me express my heartfelt gratitude and recognition to the China Institute for Reform and Development, CIRD, for organising this conference. I am looking forward to our exchange of views and to draw on your collective knowledge and wisdom.
But when we talk about urbanisation, we have to be careful not to equate urbanisation with urban construction and expanding the size of cities. If urbanisation, like the title of our forum, is to contribute to inclusive growth, we have to consider the human side of urbanisation. We can call it population urbanisation, or a new term which has been coined here in China, Citizenisation of new urban dwellers. People who come to cities hope to find better jobs in the developing industries. The cities, on the other hand, have to cope with rapid population growth and increased demand for housing, access to water and energy, education and healthcare.
Concluding remarks
Let us, ladies and gentleman, be pragmatic in the next 2 days, when we will have the chance to listen to different practices and experiences from Asian transition economies, to exchange ideas, to learn with and from each other. I want to wish all of us a successful and interesting forum and fruitful discussions.
Advancing institutional innovations with reforming the household registration system as the focus
The urban-rural dualistic household registration system has been in place for more than 50 years now and has turned out as a major source of inequality between urban and rural residents. It therefore needs to be replaced by a residents registration system. This new system needs to ensure that benefits are allocated to migrant workers. In small and medium sized cities it would be possible to introduce such a system within 3-5 years. Nationwide, including all major cities, this system should be in place in no more than 5-8 years.
Furthermore, land property rights needs to be reformed in order to ease urbanisation processes. In case of expropriation, land needs to be compensated properly and farmers ought to be accepted as negotiator with certain rights. Hereby, land will become an asset and not a liability. Rural markets need to be developed.
Farmers need to be enabled to use their land as mortgage to have access to credit in the same way that enterprises can use theirs. Ways for farmers to sell their property and hereby raise money in order to move to urban areas need to be enhanced.
Lastly, Chinas welfare system needs to be reformed so that more citizens of the middle and lower class have access to public services. As of now, China not only spends a relatively low amount of its budget on welfare but faces the problem, that the upper class receives most of it and those in need are not granted access. If this can be reversed, equality could be minimised and the way to a more prosperous system was laid out. Urbanisation has tremendous potential, economically and socially, for China and other Asian countries. This is mainly due to a shift towards a more service-driven economy with rising domestic demand. Nevertheless, population urbanisation requires a set of institutional changes that need to be implemented in order for this potential to be fully released.
10
Background
The academy has conducted a considerable amount of research on how to turn migrant workers into full citizens. It is beyond doubt that this should be seen and carried out as a people -oriented process. Yet, one also has to acknowledge, that this process is expensive for the government and hence requires sound analysis. CAG has therefore built a model which calculates the cost of citizenisation of migrant workers in China and enables one to develop needed reforms of the funding process. The Academy has compared different schemes and recognises that its model is subject to controversial discussions.
Policy implications
Knowing the costs, it is then inevitable to think carefully about the division of this financial burden. Some areas see more migration than others and the costs need to be divided between local and federal governments. Moreover, middle-sized cities will most likely be home to the largest proportion of new working migrants and need to be financially supported.
11
The question whether China can afford urbanisation should not be up for debate however. Instead, urban-rural readjustment, interregional as well as fiscal transfers from central to local government agencies should be discussed. The federal government needs to incentivise local governments to fulfil their duty in this context and financial support is the most promising to persuade local governments and thereby achieve this goal. If the costs are shared between regions, cities and the local as well as the federal government, a people-oriented urbanisation is possible. The model developed by CAG can hereby function as a useful tool.
Background
It has to be acknowledged that the Chinese fiscal system in its current condition is deeply flawed. Despite the fact that government revenue has grown tremendously over the last years, local governments see themselves in dangerous financial situations. This is mainly due to the fact that the federal government receives a larger share of revenues and yet local governments have to pay most of the social benefits to their citizens. Consequently, alternative sources of funding had to be found for local governments. We need to ask ourselves whether we should continue with the traditional system and expand land based revenue or whether we should try to find alternative funding sources. The costs of the former are high. Local governments will not be able to sell unlimited areas of land to regain fiscal balance, without seriously hampering the regions welfare. The system of land based revenue is therefore doomed to lead to failure and therefore alternative financing models need to be constructed.
12
13
Background
Generally, one needs to bear in mind that urbanisation is not a process in which the government tries to push people to move to cities. On the contrary, it should be seen as an inevitable, natural process which has great potential for a society. Nevertheless, it should also be acknowledged, that severe mismanagement has taken place over the last decades which has led to unsustainable consequences. Slums, shantytowns, and rising pollution are just a few among many. Most of these problems which become obvious today are related to or a direct consequence of policy priorities in the 1980s and 1990s. During these times, urbanisation was seen as the main driver of economic growth and cities were created that in todays view do not deserve to be called cities but can merely be seen as places of industrial accumulation. Policies have retained people in the countryside and township enterprises were not encouraged to develop. Additionally social imbalances were starting to build up as migrant worker, having moved to urban areas, were not treated equally and were deprived from urban benefits. As development then only proceeded in the Chinese mega cities, they saw vast price increases for housing combined with stagnating prices in the rest of China. This at least partly was also due to misguided policies which did not pay attention to development in all parts of China but were restricted to creating and supporting industrial hubs located in mega cities.
Lastly, urbanisation and resource consumption cannot go hand in hand as they did in the 1980s and 90s. If these steps are being followed and policies are implemented accordingly, urbanisation will be more sustainable and will lead to a more balanced development of China.
14
Background
The ability of major cities, such as Beijing and Shanghai, to provide basic public services to migrant workers is lagging behind demand. This has led to socially unsustainable circumstances which are characterised by only 20% of migrant workers able to bring their spouse along with them to the city. Even more alarming is the fact that only 10% of children are being taken along, triggering an increasing number of left-behind-children in rural areas. These children hardly have a bright future and the government lacks capacity to effectively help them. In smaller cities the situation used to be superior as it was a lot easier to acquire citizenship. Thereby, access to public services for migrant workers was ensured. However, these cities could not afford the service in the long run and for political reason, citizenship has again been more difficult to attain since then and to this day.
15
Background
Cambodia is not yet highly urbanised. Almost 80 per cent of the population lives in rural areas and the share of urban dwellers in total population is much below the Asian average. But on the other hand, some numbers indicate that urbanisation is steadily increasing. Cambodia is experiencing rapid population growth, with urban population growing at about 2.5% per annum in the last five years, and rural population growing at about half that rate. Mr. Sok also pointed out that Cambodia is internationally competitive or at least potentially competitive referring to a wide range of agricultural products. Furthermore, the rural sector has considerable potential to prosper.
The sector grew by 5 per cent in the last five years, contributing 1.5% to overall economic growth. In general Cambodia is at the very early stages of industrialization. Recently manufacturing output consisted almost entirely of production of garments and footwear for export. Another important role in Cambodian economy play the nearly 200 special economic zones located in the rural area neighbouring Viet Nam and Thailand.
Cambodian experiences
The particular features of recent Cambodian development process affect the way that the urban and rural economies interact. There are several hundred garment & footwear factories (about 400 factories) located in the outskirt of Phnom Penh City and along the Growth Corridor from Phnom Penh Capital City to the main seaport of Cambodia. Garment & footwear workers (around 400,000) are mainly female migrating from the surrounding countryside. They remit a high proportion of their earnings back to their families in rural areas. Most of them, after working for several years, will return to their rural homes. This creates considerable income linkages between urban and rural areas. Manufactures other than garments are usually located in SEZs, which are spread around the country, especially near Cambodias borders. With the exception of one zone near Phnom Penh, these SEZs are not in or near urban areas. Thus, the rise of manufacturing in Cambodia has so far contributed only modestly to urbanisation. It follows that the pace of urbanisation has also been slowed by the rapid expansion of agricultural incomes.
16
Cambodias production of paddy rice has almost doubled during the past decade (2011-2012: 8.5 million tons of paddies produced), and other crops such as cassava, rubber, and palm oil have also expanded rapidly. In consequence The Royal Government developed a detailed strategy for increasing further paddy production and expanding sharply the export of milled rice (one million tons by 2015). It has also targeted a large increase in rubber plantings. At the political level, the Royal Government has pursued a policy of de-centralization designed to give provinces and their respective communities greater control over their development.
Conclusion
While urbanisation is clearly a feature of the current landscape, Cambodia has not yet experienced a head-long rush of population from rural to urban areas. Moreover is just at the very beginning of the process of assessing the issues of equity and inclusiveness associated with urbanisation.
5.4 Urbanization Development and Inclusive Growth:. The Case of Lao PDR
Expert Input by Mr. Pheuiphanh Ngaosrivathana, Senior Macroeconomic Specialist, GIZ Laos
Dr. Pheuiphanh Ngaosrivathana gave an introduction to urbanisation and inclusive growth in the case of Lao PDR. He explained that Laos has undergone some major transformations over the past decade, especially when it comes to structural changes of the economy. For example, urbanisation rate as estimated by UN Habitat amounts to the range of 4.9% per year.
Background
From a more general perspective, the economy of Lao PDR looks to become the fastest growing in Southeast Asia. This years economic growth is on track to reach 8.3%. Main driving forces come from resource sectors such as hydropower and mining. These two combined accounted for about one third of the countrys economic growth between 2005 and 2010. Although external shocks like the recent global economic and financial crisis had some impact on less developed countries, GDP increased by 7.9% over the past 10 years and is expected to grow by 7.6% per year until 2015.Nevertheless, Lao PDR is still a very small economy with a population of 6 million and an annual average growth of 1.5%, Lao GDP was valued at just US$ 8 billion in 2011. Neighbouring Thailand, in comparison, had a GDP of US$ 345 billion.
17
18
Child malnutrition rates are still too high as 41% of children under the age of 5 suffer from chronic malnutrition.
Conclusion
The challenge ahead for the country will be to further shift the focus from absolute growth levels to improving the quality of growth. In this context it will be essential to ensure the country will follow an inclusive and sustainable growth path which will be based on the development of non-resource industries as well as on better urban planning. SEZs in remote areas of the country will prove to be of high significance for this process.
Comment by Mr. Farhodhon Jurahonov, Acting Deputy Director, Institute of Forecasting and Macroeconomic Research (IFMR) under the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan
In his comment, Mr. Jurahonov laid out how the government of the Republic of Uzbekistan plans to solve the problem of a lack of suitable accommodation for the rural population. In the following lines his major points will be summarised. Uzbekistan, neighbouring the states of Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Tajikistan is home to 30 Million inhabitants, 54% of them live in urban areas. A territory of 470.000 kmmakes Uzbekistan about 1.5 times as big as Germany. 2009 was declared as the year of Rural Development and Welfare by the government. More pr ecisely, a state program was adopted which built on the idea that the more the village advances, the higher the quality of our lives and prosperous the country. This program was then preceded by two presidential resolutions (in 2009 and 2010) which expanded construction of houses in standard design in rural areas. Through this funding close to 25.000 houses had been constructed between 2009 and 2012 and additional 10.000 were set to be built in 2013. The latter number reflects an increase in the programs budget by 54% relative to 2012. By 2015 around 40.000 houses will be constructed with the financial assistance of this program and will thereby contribute to further equalization of urban and rural population.
19
Background
Mongolia, with its 1,564,116 km, is the worlds 19th-largest country in the world. Its wide space of unused land is blessed with vast amounts of natural resources such as copper, zinc, gold, silver and coal etc. Neighbouring only with the Peoples Republic of China and the Russian Federation, leaves opportunity to trade via maritime transportation only through mentioned countries. Mongolian population has increased from 647,500 in 1918 to 2,647,500 in 2010. From 1990 until now population growth first slowed down caused by low fertility and high mortality, but as estimated by the National Statistics Office will increase to at least 3,750,000 in 2040. According to the new Mongolian constitution of 1992, people are guaranteed the right of free choice of residency. On this legal basis founds the ongoing internal migration process. Over the last 50 years rural migrants primarily moved to Ulaanbaatar. As a consequence, about 60% of urban population and 44.4% of all Mongolians live in the dominating capital nowadays. At the same time 88.2% of government bodies, banks, universities, hospitals, retail wholesales and theatres accumulate in the core city centre. A recent sustainable urban development plan for Ulaanbaatar provides policies such as migration control, reconstruction of existing buildings, decentralisation which includes the development of satellite cities, better economic and social infrastructure and stresses the need to elaborate and reform legislation. The focus lies on harnessing urbanisation to deliver equitable and inclusive growth as well as poverty alleviation. Policy discussions should start with the possible contributions by institutions, and specific instruments need to be identified which can promote economic density and manage social and environmental externalities. In order to foster inclusive growth, Mr. Sumkhuu suggested a wide range of key policies:
20
Target regional employment growth in strategic sectors of the economy, particularly in commodities, mining and oil industries. Financial investment & support for remote and poorly developed regions. This will include loans and grants for local residents.
Historical background
The former Soviet republic of Kyrgyzstan is neighbouring the Peoples Republic of China and has to deal with environmental limits. Kyrgyzstan is an extremely mountainous country with only 15% flat land. Its urbanisation rate was 33.9% as of 2012. The number reflects downward tendencies in urbanisation after the collapse of the Soviet Union and is in fact the lowest since the early 1960s. Historically, in the period between 1920 and 1990 urbanisation process in Kyrgyzstan had been a result of industrialisation. Urban policy in the Soviet period was centralised and directly linked to interests of a militarised economy, which led to industrial agglomerations to support export hydro-related resources and other raw materials. The next two decades were characterised by an even stronger continuous outflow of population from rural areas which fostered decent urbanisation rates mainly in the two biggest cities: capital city Bish-
21
kek, where nearly half of all urban dwellers in Kyrgyzstan live and so called southern capital Osh. During this time administrative reorganization of villages was not supported by a clear city-orientated development. Later Kyrgyzstan chose a model of decentralization in order to reform city government. Unfortunately it occurred that individual power between central, regional and local authorities missed a clear distribution of responsibilities and budgeting. In fact, some critics observed that executive authority bodies dominated local self-governments.
Problems of urbanisation
Urbanisation can create environmental hazards which affect the health and safety of the population and especially of the poorest dwellers. It could be observed that urban growth has led to a deterioration of air and water quality and land degradation. At the same time, it has also aggravated a solid waste management problem. On the other hand, the rising number of urban dwellers has led to insufficient land and housing supply and furthermore, a rapid demand for services such as water supply, sanitation, solid waste collection and transportation occurred due to the inability to provide basic environmental infrastructure.
22
The reasons for this primarily lie in the domination of governments monopoly and heavily regulated prices and subsidies as well as in a poorly functioning urban land and housing market. Additionally, air pollution is another important issue that needs to be tackled. The increased motorisation and as a consequence overcrowded roads have a strong negative impact on environmental well-being of the inhabitants of major cities in Mongolia. In addition, households often use fuels of low quality and release even more carbon dioxide or other climatically detrimental substances. Due to unsustainable extraction linked to uncontrolled industrial effluent, unclear property rights and confusing treatment as a free resource, ground water depletes and is in fact contaminated by waste.
Policy implications
Based on these observations Dr. Bolormaa defined four essential recommendations for future sustainable development: Development strategy for cities Environmental public awareness Public awareness and citizen pressure on governments and polluters are some of the most important factors in motivating environmental reform Private sector involvement is key to sustainable urban environmental improvements
6.4 Urbanisation in two Core Cities (Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City): Highlights, Challenges and Policy Orientations for Inclusive Growth
Expert Input by Mr. Tran Kim Chung, Vice President, CIEM
In his presentation Tran Kim Chung introduced urbanisation processes in Viet Nam, specifically in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, and elaborated on positive and negative aspects of these processes as well as possible policy recommendations. The following lines will summarise his main points.
23
growth in population in the last decade in which the total number of inhabitants grew by almost 4 Million from 2.67 to 6.5 Million in 2000 and 2009, respectively. Population will continue to grow and will pass 8.5 Million by 2020. While Hanoi accounts for nearly 14% of national GDP, Ho Chi Minh City has established itself as the largest economic centre in Viet Nam and contributes 47% of the states economic output.
24
Further construction of urban housing so that new people can move to urban areas. Reduction and gradual termination of the development of high-rise buildings, paired with requirements for construction standards for old apartments. Development of environmentally friendly city and eco-cities. Protection of green belts and raise awareness among the population.
Taken together, one can conclude, that Viet Nam is on a solid path towards sustainable urbanisation. Good efforts have been made with positive results in many areas. Yet, challenges remain and policies need to be pursued that take these into account. If this is done properly however, Viet Nam could witness more prosperous years as the potential of urbanisation has not yet been released, as measured by the relative low urbanisation rate.
Comment by Mr. Fuad Jafarly, Urban Initiative-Azerbaijan, Urban Planning and Public Transportation Consultant
In his presentation Fuad Jafarly gave an overview of urbanisation processes in Azerbaijan with a specific focus on the greater Baku area. Azerbaijan had been the fastest growing economy between 2002 and 2010 and reached per capita income of 7000$ in 2011. The total population as of 2009 was 9 Million and is estimated to grow moderately in the future. 3.3 Million of these live in the Baku area which has a significantly higher population growth rate than the rest of the country. The Baku area itself makes up for roughly 90% of Azerbaijans GDP and nearly 85% of the states budget revenue is created within this region. The fact that Baku is the single most important economic centre of Azerbaijan can be demonstrated when one closer examines the nations emplo yment structure. In every important sector of economic activity, Baku accounts for more than 90% of the national output. The city is characterized by a distinct cluster system which scatters firms of similar industries in the same place. Despite the economic success of Baku, problems are existent that need to be addressed by politicians. Most prominently is a problem Mr. Jafarly calls the existence of two cities within one, a term which refers to rising social imbalances. The government of Azerbaijan has therefore launched a program is supposed to target these undesirable circumstances. The main locus hereby lies on equalisation of rural and urban population as well as boosting job quality within Baku.
25
7. Conclusion
Urbanisation bears great potential for Asian transition economies. This can mainly be attributed to rising income of migrant workers leaving rural areas and taking up employment in cities. The higher salary then leads to a more prosperous life of the individual worker and directly effects the national economy as domestic demand grows. Through this mechanism, urbanisation can lead to massive economic growth as can be seen in China and other Asian states. In recent years however, problems related to urbanisation processes have become apparent that demand the attention of policy makers in the region. Most prominent in the public debate are negative impacts in the environmental and social context. Cities are confronted with quickly increasing pollution of air and water and social tensions have started to arise in many areas. Inequality between migrant workers and residents as well as between the rural and urban population is rising. Slums, shantytowns and other undesirable living conditions have left a growing part of the cities migrant worker population in poverty instead of enabling them to become market participants. Additionally environmental degradation has continued as can for instance be measured by the rapidly decreasing number of lakes and forests. The main purpose of this conference was to bring together senior policy makers, researchers and practitioners from Asian transition countries to find and discuss answers to these pressing problems. The conference hereby provided a platform for mutual learning and transfer of professional experience. GIZ RCI Programme contributed to the productivity of the conference through its international network and its ability to mobilize renowned experts from across Asia. Many policy proposals were introduced by participants and discussed in formal and informal settings. Among them, a reform of the hukou system in China, a serious attempt to create equal opportunities for migrant workers, combined with an urgently needed change of the countrys fiscal system, seemed to be of general consensus. For Viet Nam and Lao PDR, the need for further housing opportunities was underlined and Mongolia stressed its need for more environmental friendly solutions. All of the participating countries still see vast potential for economic development through urbanisation processes. This potential is specifically high in countries that as of today do not have a very high urbanisation rate, as Lao PDR for instance. Scale-oriented urbanisation as carried out in the past will not be sustainable in the future. Peopleoriented urbanisation has to take its place to guarantee that more people are enabled to live a prosperous life in cities. To achieve this, reform needs to be undertaken in areas of public administration, public finance and environmental policy, to name just a few. Urbanisation will unleash its full potential only if this is done accurately.
26
Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration in Asia Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn, Germany T +49 228 44 60-0 (Bonn) T +49 61 96 79-0 (Eschborn) Dag-Hammarskjld-Weg 1-5 65760 Eschborn, Germany T +49 61 96 79-0 F +49 61 96 79-11 15 E info@giz.de I www.giz.de Office China Ta Yuan Diplomatic Office 14 Liangmahe South Street, Chaoyang District 100600 Beijing, PR China Office Mongolia Naiman Zovkhis Building Seoul Street 21, Ulaanbaatar 14251, Mongolia Office Thailand 193/63 Lake Rajada Office Complex New Ratchadapisek Road, Klongtoey Bangkok 10110, Thailand E rci-asia@giz.de