You are on page 1of 4

ARELLANO LAW FOUNDATION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Atty. VOLTAIRE G.

SAN PEDRO
Professional Lecturer Second Semester 2012-2013 TABLE CONTENTS DIGEST OF CASES IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

I.

GENERAL PRINCIPLE
A. B. C. D. E. F. Definition Distinguished from the law of Public Administration Distinguished from Politics Origin and Development Sources Administration 1. Institution 2. Function 3. Internal 4. External

II.

ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES
A. B. C. D. Definition Nature Creation and Abolition Advantages

III.

POWERS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY


A. The Quasi-Legislative Power 1. 2. 3. 4. Definition Distinguished from legislative powers Sources Test Delegation

a. Completeness Test United States v. Ang tang Ho (43 Phil.1) Velarde v. Social Justice Society (GR No. 159357, Apr. 28, 04) Beltran v. sec. of Health (GR No. 133640, Nov. 2505) The Soli-Gen v. The Metropolitan Manila Authority (GR No. 102782, Dec. 1191) b. Sufficient Standard Test Ynot v. IAC (148 SCRA 659) Pelaez v. Auditor General (15 SCRA 19) Abakada Guro Party List Officers v. Sec. Ermita (GR No. 168056, Sept. 105) Batangas CATV, Inc. v. CA (GR No. 138810, Sept. 2904) De Los Angeles v. Home Dev. Mutual Fund (GR No. 131082, June 19, 2000) Guingona, Jr. vs. Hon. Carague Tatad v. Sec. Dept. of Energy (GR No. 124360, Nov.597) Cruz v. Santon Youngberg (56 Phil234)

B. The Quasi- Judicial Power 1. Definition 2. Distinguished from Judicial Power 3. Source 4. Exercise of Powers C. Determinative Powers IV. QUASI- LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION

A. Nature Commissioner v. CA (240 SCRA 358) Eastern Shipping Lines v. CA (GR No. 116356; June 298, 1998) Ople v. Torres (293 SCRA 141) Sierra Madre Trust v. SEC. of Agriculture and Natural Resources (121 SCRA 384) Perlata v. CSC (212 SCRA 485) Shell Phils. Inc. v. Central Bank of the Phils. (152 SCRA 628) Grego v. COMELEC (247 SCRA 481) B. Kinds of Administrative Regulation Misamis Oriental Assoc. of Coco Traders v. DOF (238 SCRA 63) Phil. Assoc. of Services Exporters, Inc. v. Hon. Torres (GR no. 98472, Aug. 19, 1993) Boie- Takeda chemicals v. De la Serna (228 SCRA 329) C. Requisites 1. First Requisite 2. Second Requisite Cebu Oxygen Acetylene Co. v. Drilon (176 SCRa 24) Echegaray v. Sec. of Justice (G.R. no. 132601; Oct 12, 1998) 3. Third Requisite 4. Fourth Requisite Tanda v. Tuvera (146 SCRA 446) De Jesus v. COA (G.R. No. 109023, Aug. 12, 1998) Eslao v. Comm. On Audit (GR no. 108310, Sept. 1, 1994) Araneta v. Hon. Gatmaitan ( G. R. Nos. L-8895 and L-9191, April 30, 1957) D. Administrative Rule with Penal Sanctions People v. Macaren (79 Phi 450) Tayug Rural Bank v. Central Bank of the Phils. (GR No. L-46158, Nov. 28, 1986) Lorenzo v. Dir. Of Health (GR No. 27484, Sept. 187) Pesigan v. Judge Angeles (129 SCRA 174) 1. Requisites E. Necessity for Notice and Hearing Corona v. United Harbor Pilot assoc. of the Phils. (GR No. 111953, Dec. 12, 1997) Comm. Of Internal Revenue v. CA (261 SCRA 236) Maceda v. Energy Regulatory Board (192 SCRA 363) Warren Mfg. Workers Union v. Bureau of Labor Relations (159 SCRA 387)

Taxicab Operations of Metro manila, Inc. v. Board of Transp. (GR No. 59234; 9/30/82) Phil. Consumers Foundation, Inc. v. Sec. of Education, Culture and Sports (GR No. 78365) Lina, Jr. v. Carino (GR No. 100127, Apr. 2393) V. QUASI-JUDICIAL POWER

A. Definition B. Jurisdiction 1. Nature of the Proceedings 2. Necessity of Jurisdiction 3. Subpoena Power 4. Contempt Power C. Notice and Hearing 1. Administrative Due Process Ang Tibay v. CIR (69 Phil. 635, 40 O. G. 7 th Supp. 129) Police Comm.. v. Lood (127 SCRA 757) Bautista v. Boad of Energy (169 SCRA 167) Civil Service Comm. V. Hernandez (GR No. 151095; Aug. 3104) Montemayor v. CA (GR No. 149335, July 1, 2003) Cruz v. Civil Service Comm. (GR No. 144464, Nov. 2701) D. Rights against Self-Incrimination Cabal v. Kapunan (6 SCRA 1064) Pascual v. Boad of Medical Examiners (28 SCRA 345) Phil. Board of Communications v. Comm. of Internal Revenue (G.R. No. 112024; Jan. 28, 1999) E. Administrative Appeal and Review Araneta v. Gatmaitan (101 Phil. 328) Briones v. Aute (380 Phil. 414) Fortich v. Corona (289 SCRA 624) SGMC v. Office of the President (G.R. No. 126999, Aug. 30, 2000) Maxima Realty v. Parkway Realty Estate (G.R. No. 136492, Feb. 13,04) F. Doctrine of Res. Judicata Ysmael v. Deputy Exec. Secretary (190 SCRA 673) United Pepsi Cola Supervisory Union v. Laguesma (288 SCRA 15) Fortich v. Corona (289 SCRA 624) Montemayor v. Bundalian, (GR No. 149335, 7/12/03, 405 SCRA 264) VI. A. B. C. D. JUDICIAL REVIEW General Rules Sources of Judicial Review Methods of Judicial Review Question may be subject of Judicial Review Ortua v. Singson Encarnacion (GR No. L-17838; 8/3/66

E. Doctrine of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies

Union bank v. CA (290 SCRA 198) Lopez v. City of Manila (GR No. 127139; Feb. 19, 1999) Industrial Enterprise Inc. v. CA (184 SCRA 462) Commissioner of Custom v. Navarro (77 SCRA 264) Cristobal v. CA (291 SCRA 122) Paat v. CA (266 SCRA 167) Gonzales v. CA (GR No. 106028; May 9, 2001) Vicente v. COMELEC (GR No. 170255; Jan. 31, 2006) DAR v. APEX Investment (GR No. 149422, Apr. 10, 2003) Hon. Carale, et al., v. Abarintos & Pontejos (GR No. 120704, Mar. 3, 1997) Corsiga v. Hon. Quirico G. Defensor (GR No. 139302, Oct. 2802) F. Doctrine of Prior Resort Industrial Enterprises Inc. v. CA (184 SCRA 462) Commissioner of Custom v. Navarro (77 SCRA 264) Cristobal v. CA (291 SCRA 122) Paat v. CA (266 SCRA 167) Camid v. Office of the President (GR no. 161414, Jan. 1705) G. Doctrine of Finality of Administrative Action Sta. Rosa Mining v. Liedo (156 SCRA 1) SSS Employees Assoc. v. Bathan-Velasco (313 SCRA 250; G.R. No. 108765, Aug. 27, 1999) Almendra v. Judge Asis (A. M. No. RTJ-00-1550, April 6, 2000) Laguna CATV Network, Inc. vs. Maraan (392 SCRA 221) H. Effect of Non- Compliance Soto v. Jareno (144 SCRA 116) Landbank v. CA (G.R. no. 126332, Nov. 16, 1999) I. Exception to the Doctrine Kilusang Bayan v. Dominguez (205 SCRA 92) Vda. De Tan v. Veterans Backpay Commission (105 Phil. 377) Palma Fernandez vs. Dela Paz (160SCRA751) Samson v. NLRC (253 SCRA 112) Espina v. CA (294 SCRA 525) Bordallo v. PRC (G.R. No. 140920, Nov. 19, 2001) Enemico v. Office of the Ombudsman (G.R. no. 146731, Jan. 13, 2004) Appeal to the President Calo v. Fuentes (5 SCRA 397) Tan v. Director of Forestry (125 SCRA 302) Suyat, Jr., v. Hon. Ruben Torres (G.R. No. 133530, Oct. 25, 2004)

J.