Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The energy density predicted using this equation is From this action we retrieve the spin-2 graviton, the
of order 1071 (GeV )4 , which conflicts with the observed spin-1 photon and discover a spin-0 scalar field. This in-
value of 10−48 (GeV )4 . Indeed, this is genererally viewed deed was a success in unifying gravity with electromag-
as, by far, the worst predication of theoretical physics- netism. However the unexpected existence of the scalar
being off by a factor of 10119 ! This failure of quantum field was an embarrassment at the time. This stimulated
theory has recently been reexamined using brane world later work on Brans-Dicke theories of gravity where the
scenarios born of string theory [10], [4], [13], [1], [9], [23]. scalar field has the physical effect of changing the effec-
One (partial) fix to the vacuum energy calculations is tive gravitational constant from place to place.
the introduction of supersymmetry (SUSY). The basic Kaluza’s idea suffered from a very obvious drawback.
idea is that all known particles have an associated su- If there is a fifth dimension, where is it? In 1926 Oskar
perparticle whose spin differs by exactly one half (in ~ Klein suggested that the fifth dimension compactifies so
units). In the case of unbroken SUSY, i.e., when particle as to have the geometry of a circle of extremely small
and supersymmetric partner have exactly equal masses, radius [17]. Thus, the space has topology R4 × S 1 . One
the superparticle additions to the vacuum energy per- way to envisage this spacetime is to imagine a hosepipe.
fectly cancel the particle contributions and the result- From a long distance it looks like a one dimensional line
ing vacuum energy is reduced to zero. However, when but a closer inspection reveals that evey point on the line
SUSY is broken and the difference of the particle mass is in fact a circle.
and the supersymmetric partner mass is on a scale of
MS ≈ 104 GeV , then the resulting vacuum energy is
on the order (MS )4 ≈ 1016 GeV and the discrepancy is IV. EXTRA DIMENSIONS AND THE CASIMIR
(only) off by a factor of 1060 ! In this paper we assume EFFECT
that even the SUSY-breaking contribution is somehow
cancelled and that all contributions to the vacuum en- The Casimir effect is one of the most salient manifes-
ergy density are higher dimensional. tations of the vacuum fluctuations. In its most elemen-
tary form, it is the interaction of a pair of neutral, paral-
lel conducting planes whose existence modify the ground
III. KALUZA KLEIN MODELS
state of the quantum vacuum in the interior portion of
the plates creating a force which attracts the plates to
Kaluza-Klein (KK) theory was an early attempt to each other. For the electromagnetic field, this force of
unify gravitation with electromagnetism. Kaluza initially attraction is:
postulated that a fifth spatial dimension could be intro-
duced into Einstein’s equations [15]. When the equations
were solved the additional dimension would generate not πA hc
F =− (6)
only the standard metric, but also a vector field Aµ that 480 a4
could be associated with the electromagnetic field and a
scalar field φ. Kaluza’s starting point was the metric:
where A is the area of the plates, h is Planck’s constant,
gµν − φAµ Aν −φAµ
g̃µ̃ν̃ = (3) c is the speed of light and a is the plate separation. For
−φAν −φ
a review on the Casimir effect see [20].
Where µ and ν run over 0,1,2,3 and the tilde quantites The Casimir effect can be extended to regions of non-
run over 0,1,2,3,5. Aµ and Aν are vector fields and φ is a trivial topology. For example, on S 1 , a circular manifold,
scalar field. Now start with a source free spacetime (pure- one can associate 0 and 2π with the location of the plates
gravity) in five dimensions. The corresponding action of and the Casimir energy can be calculated. This becomes
the system is relevant when we consider models with additional spatial
Z dimensions.
S 5 = − d5 x g̃ R̃
p
(4) Two models with extra dimensions have become par-
ticularly popular in recent years. These are the Arkani-
Hamed-Dimopoulos-Dvali (ADD) [3] and the Randall-
Where g̃ is the five dimensional determinant of the metric
Sundrum (RS) models [22]. Both are attempts to ex-
and R̃ is the five dimensional Ricci Scalar. After integrat-
plain what has become known as a heirachy problem in
ing out the extra dimension and √ performing a conformal physics, which questions why the gravitational force is so
rescaling of the metric gµν → φgµν , it is trivial to show
much weaker than the other forces of nature. In the ADD
that the four dimensional action can be written as:
model it is proposed that the force carriers of the stan-
dard model (the photon, W + , W − , Z 0 and the gluons)
√ 1 1 √
Z
S= d4 x g(−R + ∂µ φ∂ ν − e− 3φ Fµν F µν ) (5) are constrained to exist on the usual four dimensional
2 4 spacetime, which we will call the bulk. Gravity however,
is free to move both in the bulk and in the extra dimen-
sions. These dimensions can be as large as µm [16]. //
3
Because only gravity can propagate in the extra dimen- Using the fact that ζ(−2m) = 0, for m and natural
sions, we cannot ‘see’ them as we see in the bulk through number, we obtain the vacuum energy:
the electromagnetic field (light), nor can we observe them
through weak or strong force interactions, which are also ∞
restricted to the bulk. It is the freedom of the graviton 1 X m2n
hEvac i4+2 = m4n log( ) (13)
to propagate off of the bulk that dilutes the field strength 32π 2 n1,n2=1
µ2
accounting for the apparent weakness of gravity. In the
RS models, it is the warping of the extra dimension that
∞
is the root cause of the weakness of gravity. π X
In both the ADD and RS models one can account for = (n21 + n22 )2 log(n21 + n22 ) (14)
2R4 n1,n2=1
the cosmological constant by calculating the contribution
of extra dimensional graviton fields to the Casimir energy
and then associating this energy with the cosmological π2
constant [10]. As an example we will demonstrate a cal- =− ζ(0)ζ ′ (4) (15)
R4
culation of the vacuum energy due to compactification in
the ADD scenario in which the spacetime orbifold will be This result can be generalized to 4+n dimensions
M 4 × T 2 . Matter fields will reside on the 3-brane (our
universe) and gravity is free to propagate in the bulk. π 2 (2 + n)(3 + n)
n−1 ′
The calculations closely follow [14]. hEvac i = − − 1 [ζ(0)] ζ (4)
R4 2
The four dimensional vacuum energy is given by:
(16)
∞
r where the graviton degrees of freedom is expressed in
1 d3 k 4π 2 (n21 + n22 )
X Z
hEvac i = k 2+ (7) the brackets. This vacuum energy due to the massive
n1,n2=1
2 (2π)3 R2 KK modes is associated with the cosmological constant.
108
2
Hc
M5 (5)
Z
≈ −18 = 1026
p
S (5) = d4 xdy −g (5) R (22) (26)
16π H 10
Where Hc is the ‘modified’ Hubble constant (subscript
Solving the vacuum Einstein equations c for speed of light). This results implies that H would
have to be increased by a factor of 1026 for space to ex-
Gµν = 0, (23) pand at the speed of light. Since we know that H ∝ R12 ,
we can naively form the relation
we obtain for the G11 component
Hc R2
3ȧ(bȧ + aḃ) = 2 = 1026 (27)
G11 = (24) H Rc
a2 b
or,
Rewriting ȧa = Ha and ḃb = Hb where Ha and Hb
corresponds to the Hubble constant in three space and
the Hubble constant in the extra dimension respectively, Rc = 10−13 R (28)
we find that solving for G11 = 0 yields
Where Rc is the modified radius of the extra dimen-
sion. This indicates that the extra dimensional radius
Ha = −Hb . (25) must be locally reduced by a factor of 1013 to stimulate
5
space to expand at the speed of light. In the ADD model extra-dimensional radius of 10−6 m which is the upper
the size of the extra dimension can be as large as 10−6 m. bound based on current experimental limits. Using these
If we use this number as a prototype extra-dimensional values and the known value of H in SI units we obtain
radius, this would have to be shrunk to 10−19 m for
lightspeed expansion.
Hmax = 1058 H ≈ 1040 (m/s)/m (33)
An interesting calculation is the energy required to A quick conversion into multiples of the speed of light
create the necessary warp bubble. The accepted value of reveals
the cosmological constant is Λ ≈ 10−47 (GeV )4 . Convert-
ing again into SI units gives Λ ≈ 10−10 J/m3 . Now, for
Vmax = 1032 c, (34)
a warp bubble expanding at the speed of light we would
to increase this again by a factor of 1052 as we have
need √ which would require on the order of 1099 Kg of anti-
H ∝ Λ . We can say matter, more mass energy than is contained within the
universe. At this velocity it would be possible to cross
the known universe in a little over 10−15 seconds.
Λc = 1052 Λ = 1042 J/m3 (29) The authors wish to reiterate that the calculations in
the previous two sections are extremely ‘back of the en-
where Λc is the local value of the cosmological con- velope’ and merely serve as interesting figures to contem-
stant when space is expanding at c. Let us consider a plate, based on the formula
spacecraft of dimensions
1
hEvac i = Λ ∝ . (35)
Vcraf t = 10m × 10m × 10m = 1000m3. (30) R4
Note that it is not really possible to travel faster than
If we postulate that the warp bubble must, at least, light in a local sense. One can however, make a round
encompass the volume of the craft, the total amount of trip between two points in an arbitrarily short time as
energy ‘injected’ locally would equal measured by an observer who remained at rest at the
starting point. See [24] for details on violations of the
null energy conditions and causality.
Ec = Λc × Vcraf t = 1045 J. (31)
[5] Brandenberger, R., and Vafa, C., “Superstrings in [17] Klein, O., Z. F. Physik 37 895 (1926); Klein,
the Early Universe,” Nucl. Phys. B136, 391 (1989) O.,Nature 118 516 (1926)
[6] Chen, P., and Gu, J., “Casimir Effect in a [18] Levin, J., “Inflation from Extra Dimensions,”
Supersymmetry-breaking Brane World as Dark Energy”, Phys.Lett. B343 69-75, (1995).
SLAC- PUB-10772, 2004.
[19] Lobo, S., Visser M., “Fundamental limitations
[7] Cherednikov, I., “On Casimir Energy Contribution on ’warp drive’ spacetimes,” Class.Quant.Grav.21:5871-
to Observable Value of the Cosmological Constant,” 5892,2004.
Acta Phys. Polon. B33:1973-1977, (2002).
[20] Milton, K., “The Casimir effect: Recent contro-
[8] Cleaver, G and Rosenthal P., “String Cosmology versies and progress,” J.Phys.A37:R209,2004
and the Dimension of Space-time,” Nucl.Phys. B457,
621-642, (1995). [21] Morris, M., and Thorne, K,. and Yurtsever, U.,
“Worm-holes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy
[9] de Alwis, S., “Brane World Scenarios and the Cos- Conditions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 1446-1449, (1988).
mological Constant,” Nucl. Phys. B597, 263-278, (2001).
[22] Randall, L., and Sundrum, R., “An Alternative
[10] Ellwanger, U., “Brane Universes and the Cos- to Compactification,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999);
mological Constant,” Mod.Phys.Lett. A20, 2521-2532,
(2005). [23] Tseytlin, A., and Vafa, C., “Elements of String
Cosmology,” Nucl. Phys. B372, 443-466, (1992).
[11] Garriga, J., Pujolas, O., Tanaka, T., “Radion
Effective Potential in the Brane World,” Nucl.Phys. [24] Visser, M., and Bassett, B., and Liberati, S., “Per-
B605, 192-214, (2001). turbative superluminal censorship and the null energy
condition,” arXiv:gr-qc/9908023v1 (1999).