Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 43

FinFET and other New Transistor Technologies

Chenming Hu
Univ. of California

Chenming Hu, July 2011

May 4 2011 NY Times Front Page


NY Times news article: Intel will use 3D FinFET for 22nm Most radical change in decades There is a competing SOI technology

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Other Background Info


TSMC, IBMnew transistors soon Since 2001 ITRS shows FinFET and ultra-thin-body UTB-SOI as the two successor MOSFETs SOITEC UTB-SOI recently available IBM 2009 5nm UTB SOI paper
3

Chenming Hu, July 2011

New MOSFET Structures

Cylindrical FET Ultra Thin Body SOI

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Good Old MOSFET Nearing Limits


Vt, S (swing) and Ioff are sensitive to Lg & dopant variations. high design cost high Vdd, hence high power usage

Finally painful enough for change.


Chenming Hu, July 2011 5

Power Consumption Problems


1.Not just a chip and package thermal issue. 2.ICs use a few % of worlds electricity today and Power per chip is growing. IC units in use also growing. 3.If power consumption is not reduced, industry future growth is at risk.

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Want Low Vt and Low Ioff Need smaller S and less variations of S and Vt

Chenming Hu, July 2011

How Vt Variation & S Got So Bad


MOSFET becomes resistor at very small L - Drain competes with Gate to control the channel barrier.
Drain Current, IDS (A/m)
10-3 10-5 10-7 10-9

L Gate Gate

Cg Smaller Size shrink size or larger Vd


0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9

Insulator Drain

Source

Cd

10-11

Gate Voltage, VGS (V)


Chenming Hu, July 2011

Reducing EOT is Not Enough


Gate Source Drain

Leakage Path

Gate cannot control the leakage current paths that are far from the gate.
Chenming Hu, July 2011

One of Two Ways to Better Vt and S


The gate controls a thin body from more than one side. Gate Length
Gate Source Gate Drain
Drain Source

FinFET body is a thin fin

Fin Height Fin Width


N. Lindert et al., DRC paper II.A.6, 2001

Chenming Hu, July 2011

FinFET- 1999
Undoped Body. 30nm etched thin fin. Vt set with gate work-function (SiGe).
0.6 0.4
Vt at 100 nA/m, Vd = 0.05 V

Vt [V]

0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 0

Fin width: 20 nm
10 20 30 40 50

Lg [nm]

X. Huang et al., IEDM, p. 67, 1999


Chenming Hu, July 2011

State-of-the-Art FinFET on Buk Si


Gate STI Si STI
20nm Hi Perf C.C. Wu et al., 2010 IEDM

28nm SoC C.C. Yeh et al., 2010 IEDM

Chenming Hu, July 2011

FinFET is Easy to Scale


10nm Lg AMD 2002 IEDM 5nm Lg TSMC 2004 VLSI Symp 3nm Lg KAIST 2006 VLSI Symp

Lg = 5 nm

because leakage is well suppressed if Fin thickness =or< Lg Thin fin can be made with the same Lg patterning/etching tools.
Chenming Hu, July 2011

Ultra-thin-body SOI (UTB-SOI) No leakage path far from the gate.


1.E-02

Second Way to Better Vt and S

Gate Source UTB Drain

Drain Current [A/um]

1.E-04 1.E-06 1.E-08 1.E-10 1.E-12 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

SiO2 Si
Y-K. Choi, IEEE EDL, p. 254, 2000

Tsi=8nm Tsi=6nm Tsi=4nm

Gate Voltage [V]


Chenming Hu, July 2011

Most Leakage Flows >5nm Below Surface

Y-K. Choi et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, p. 254, 2000


Chenming Hu, July 2011

Silicon Body Needs to be <Lg/3


For good swing and device variation

Y-K. Choi et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, p. 254, 2000


Chenming Hu, July 2011

3nm Silicon Body, Raised S/D

UTB-SOI

Y-K. Choi et al, VLSI Tech. Symposium, p. 19, 2001


Chenming Hu, July 2011

State-of-the-Art 5nm Thin-Body SOI

ETSOI, IBM
K. Cheng et al, IEDM, 2009

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Both Thin-Body Transistors Provide


Better swing. S & Vt less sensitive to Lg and Vd. No random dopant fluctuation. No impurity scattering. Less surface scattering (lower Eeff).

Higher on-current and lower leakage Lower Vdd and power consumption Further scaling and lower cost
Chenming Hu, July 2011

Back-Gate Bias Option


UTB-SOI
Gate 1 Si STI STI

FinFET

Gate 2

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Similarities 1996: UC Berkeley proposed to DARPA two 25nm Transistors. Both of them use body thickness as a new scaling parameter can use undoped body for high and no RDF 1999: demonstrated FinFET 2000: demonstrated UTB-SOI (Ultra-Thin Body) Since 2001: ITRS highlights FinFET and UTBSOI Now: Intel will use Trigate FinFET. Soitec readies +-0.5nm substrates for UTBSOI Both FinFET & UTBSOI better than planar bulk!
Chenming Hu, July 2011

Main Differences FinFET body thickness ~ Lg. Investment by fabs UTBSOI thickness ~1/3 Lg. Investment by Soitec FinFET has clear long term scalability. UTBSOI may be ready sooner depending on each firms readiness with FinFET. FinFET has larger Ion or can use lower Vdd. UTBSOI has a good back-gate bias option.
UTBSOI FinFET
Chenming Hu, July 2011

Gate 1 Si STI STI

Gate 2

What May Happen FinFET will be used at 22nm by Intel and later by more firms through and beyond 10nm. Some firms may use UTBSOI to gain/protect market at 20 or 18nm if FinFET is not option. If so, competition between FinFET and UTBSOI will bring out the best of both. If not----- back to first bullet.

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Chenming Hu, July 2011

FinFET BSIM Compact Model Verified


FinFET Fabricated at TSMC. Lg = 30 nm-10um
50

Drain Current (A)

Lg = 50nm

Id-Vg

1m 1

Lg = 50nm

Ibulk

Id-Vd
50 Lg = 50nm
Vg = 1.2 - 0.4V

Drain Current (A)

Bulk Current (A)

100p
Vd = 1.2V

25

Vd = 50mV Vd = 1.2V

Id-Vd
25

1n 1p 1.2

10p

0 0.0

0.4

0.8

Gate Voltage (V)

1p 0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

0 0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

Gate Voltage (V)

Drain Voltage (V)

M. Dunga, 2008 VLSI Tech Sym


Chenming Hu, July 2011

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Reduce C
f C Vdd
2

Reduce all capacitances.

Chenming Hu, July 2011

30

Vacuum-Sheath Interconnect
CTOTAL Delay, CM Crosstalk Noise

Dielectric Beam Etch Stop layer Metal

Load Capacitance : CO Mutual Capacitance : CM Total Capacitance : CTOTAL


J. Park, Electronics Letters, p. 1294, 2009
Chenming Hu, July 2011

Effective k of Vacuum-Sheath Interconnects


Beam Dielectric Constant 2.25 2.9 3.3 3.6 3.9
2.0 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3

2.1 2.3 2.2 2.4 No Solution 2.5 2.6

No Solution

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Air Percentage (%)


J. Park, Electronics Letters, p. 1294, 2009
Chenming Hu, July 2011

Vacuum Spacer to Reduce CGC

CGOX : Gate Oxide Capacitance

CGC : Gate-to-Contact Capacitance CGOX CGC


Gate

CGOX < CGC Contacts

Scale Down
Chenming Hu, July 2011

Vacuum Spacer Self-Aligned Contact


20nm MOSFET comparison

Oxide Spacer
Vacuum Oxide

Vacuum Spacer Selfaligned contact (SAC) 5.05 (0.82) 18.8 (0.78) 0.7

Inverter Delay, ps Inverter switching energy, fJ Relative Area

6.15 (1) 24.2 (1) 1

J. Park, IEEE EDL, p.1368, 2009


Chenming Hu, July 2011

Future Low Voltage Green Transistor

Log Drain Current Id

S<60mV/dec S>60mV/dec

Gate Voltage Vg
Chenming Hu, July 2011 35

How to reduce Vdd to 0.15V?


1.Reduce Vdd Vt to < 0.1V with highmobility-channel material, or subthreshold circuits.
2.

Reduce Vt to 50mV. Need a device that is free of the 60mV/decade turn-off limit.

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Origin of the 60mV/decade Limit


VG

A potential barrier controls the electron flow.

COX Ec Ev
Source Channel Drain

Leakage current is determined by Boltzmann distribution or 60 mV/decade, limiting MOSFET, bipolar, graphene MOSFET

So, let electrons go through, not over, the energy barrier semiconductor tunneling or MEMS
Chenming Hu, July 2011

Semiconductor Band-to-Band Tunneling:


EC EV
N+ PN+

generating electron/hole pairs

A known mechanism of leakage current since 1985. Called Gate Induce Drain Leakage (GIDL).
J. Chen, P. Ko, C. Hu, IEDM 1985

Chenming Hu, July 2011

Green Transistor --Simulation


P+ Pocket S N+ G
NC. Hu, 2008 VLSI-TSA, p.14, April, 2008

P+

Buried Oxide

P+ Pocket

Gate
Hole flow

Electron flow diagram Energy band N+ Source

P+ Drain

Simulated carrier generation rates

Abrupt turn-on due to over-lap of valence/conduction bands; adjustable turn-on voltage.


C. Hu, 2008 VLSI-TSA, p.14, April, 2008
Chenming Hu, July 2011

Reduce Vdd by Reducing Eg


Simulated impact of Eg scaling
1E-02 1E-03 1E-04 1E-05 1E-06 1E-07 1E-08 1E-09 1E-10 1E-11 0.0 0.2

Eg=0.36eV, Vdd=0.2V, EOT=5 , CV/I=0.42pS

IDS (/m)

Eg=0.69eV, Vdd=0.5V, EOT=7 , CV/I=2.2pS Eg=1.1eV, Vdd=1V, EOT=10 , CV/I=4.2pS


Eg=0.36eV Eg=0.69eV Eg=1.1eV Lg=40nm 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Gate Voltage, VGS (V)

Vdd scales down faster than Eg.


C. Hu, 2008 VLSI-TSA, p.14, April, 2008
Chenming Hu, July 2011

Simulated gFET Inverter VTC


Good voltage gain at 0.1V
200 VDD: 0.2 V 150 VDD: 0.15 V VDD: 0.1 V

Output Voltage, VOUT (mV)


.

100

50

0 0

Input Voltage, VIN (mV)

50

100

150

200

C. Hu, 2008 VLSI-TSA, p.14, April, 2008


Chenming Hu, July 2011

Hetero-junction gFET
Strained Si on Ge has 0.18eV effective tunneling Eg. III-V.
Gate P+ Source N+ Drain

~
Gate Oxide

EC EC offset EV

Si
Gate

Ge Substrate

Ge tFET

~
Si Ge

Si-Ge HtFET

A. Bowonder, Internl Workshop Junction Tech., 2008


Chenming Hu, July 2011

Summary
FinFET and UTB-SOI are viable new sub-22nm transistors. Different performances, investment costs, wafer costs, scaling barriers. Their BSIM SPICE models are available free Capacitance and tunnel gFET are potential opportunities.
Chenming Hu, July 2011 43

Вам также может понравиться