Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Reporting Meeting on the Feasibility Studies of Joint Crediting Mechanism(JCM) 2012 in Indonesia
Project Participants
142 unknown
PT MRT Jakarta
PT MRT Jakarta was incorporated in 2008 after the approval of DKI Jakarta Local Legislative Parliament through Local Act. PT MRT Jakarta will be responsible to all activities starting from the Engineering Service, Construction through Operations and Maintenance for MRT.
MRT operating company = Project Owner
3
* JICA also has provided grant to do feasibility study of extension MRT corridor from Bundaran HI Kampung Bandan (Kota).
Reference Emission
(tCO2)
Project Emission
(tCO2) Project Emission
CO2
CO2 emissions by transport modes which MRT passengers will have used if MRT is not introduced
4
Eligibility Criteria
1 A project intended to introduce a mass passenger transport system (e.g. MRT, BRT) 2 A project using or planning to use non-private foreign capital, in part or in whole, for introducing a mass passenger transport system
Reference Scenario
The existing transport modes continue to be used instead of MRT.
Emissions [tCO2]
Reference Scenario
Emissions by existing transport modes
Emission Reductions
Difference between two scenarios
Project Scenario
Emissions by MRT MRT starts operation year
5
Default
Question naire
Question naire
Question naire
High High
Note : Numbers (1), (2) and (3) corresponds to Calculation methods 1, 2, and 3 in following slides
Copyright (C) Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc.
Emission Reductions
(tCO2)
Reference Emission
(tCO2)
Project Emission
(tCO2)
Reference Emissions
Reference Emission
(tCO2) Project Emissions
Project Emission
(tCO2)
Reference Emissions
CO2 emissions by transport modes which MRT passengers will have used if MRT is not introduced.
Reference Emission =
(tCO2)
1+
Correction factor of travel distance for access/egress zone (-) Default Value (Constant)
CO2 emission factor for reference (tCO2/pkm) Default Value (Updated annually)
Monitored
Copyright (C) Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc.
Project Emissions
CO2 emissions by MRT and transport modes which MRT passengers use for access/egress trip.
Project Emission
(tCO2)
Correction factor of Distance CO2 emission Number of passengers travel distance for factor for project between each station between each (tCO2/pkm) access/egress zone station (km) (persons)
Monitored Default Value (Constant) Default Value (Constant) Default Value (Updated annually)
Monitoring
For Reference Emissions
Parameters Number of passengers between each station (persons) Organization MRT operating company Method 2 options as below Frequency continuously
Monitoring method 1: IC Card (simple method) Monitoring method 2: Estimated by fare revenue and number of passengers who get on and get off MRT at each station.
ODOrigin-Destination table between each MRT station
A st 100
B st 250
C st 300 500
Number of passengers between each station (persons)
A st B st C st
50 300
Default Values
R/P*
RE*
Item
CO2 emission factor for existing transport modes [tCO2/pkm]
* This value should be updated annually, by multiplying technology improvement factor. The factor is 1.0% per year which is from ACM0016.
Default Value
Distance between stations Less than 1 km 1km 5km 5km 10km 10km 15km Distance between stations Less than 1 km 1km 5km 5km 10km 10km 15km CO2 emission factor 6.0410-5 6.6910-5 6.9610-5 5.1210-5 Correction factor 1.33 0.43 0.37 0.31 CO2 emission factor 0.3210-5 0.6110-5 1.3710-5 1.4710-5 0.73 (year 2010) 0.094 (year 2010) 11
Note
[Source] Questionnaire surveys in Hanoi conducted 2012 [Remark] lower limit of 95% confidence interval
RE/ PE*
Correction factor which is the ratio travel distance for access/egress zone against travel distance between MRT stations [-]
[Source] Questionnaire surveys in Hanoi conducted 2012 [Remark] lower limit of 95% confidence interval
PE*
CO2 emission factor for existing transport modes which MRT passengers use for access/egress trip [tCO2/pkm]
* This
Distance between stations Less than 1 km 1km 5km 5km 10km 10km 15km
value should be updated annually, by multiplying technology improvement factor. The factor is 1.0% per year which is from ACM0016.
[Source] Questionnaire surveys in Hanoi conducted 2012 [Remark] lower limit of 95% confidence interval
CO2 emission factor for grid electricity [tCO2/MWh] Transmission and distribution loss of grid electricity [-]
* R/P; R = RE = For Reference Emissions, P = PE = For Project Emissions
Copyright (C) Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc.
[Source] National Committee on CDM Indonesian DNA [Remark] Updated annually [Source] World bank [Remark] Updated annually
Number of Fuel consumption accompanied CO2 emission people factor (tCO2/l) (km/l) (persons)
See below See below See below
CO2 emission factor for fuel [tCO2/l] 0 0 2.4010-3 2.4010-3 2.4010-3 2.7910-3
* These data are average data. In the actual calculation, the data for each person were used.
Emission Reduction Potential trial estimation For 1st phase and 2nd phase
Assumptions
Item Electricity consumption by MRT *1 Annual electricity consumption by MRT Number of passengers
*2
Estimated Emissions Reference Project Reductions 141,722 t-CO2/year 64,598 t-CO2/year 77,124 t-CO2/year
Estimated Emissions Reference Project Reductions 57,033 t-CO2/year 39,718 t-CO2/year 17,315 t-CO2/year
*1: JABODETABEK Urban Transportation Policy Integration Project in the Republic of Indonesia (JICA,2009) *2: PT. MRT Jakarta Website *3: Interview PT. MRT Jakarta
Copyright (C) Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc.
13
14
Appendix
15
16
General Information
Trip Information
Household Survey
Vehicle information
Type of vehicle / Model Engine Capacity Manufacture Year of purchase / manufacture
Fuel Efficiency
Fuel information
Frequency of refuel How to refuel Type of fuel Amount of fuel consumption and fuel fee for survey duration Travel distance for survey duration
17
Interview to bus operating companies The questionnaire would be sent to the companies in advance.
Taxi
Interview to taxi drivers driving along the Hanoi No. 1 and No. 2 Researchers will ask to the drivers directly, but would contact to taxi companies only when the number of drivers is not enough.
Copyright (C) Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc.
18
Interview Items
< Survey Period > Annual or monthly or daily actual figure (depending on the data sources)
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption Trip distance Frequency of refuel Whether to fill up their gas tank Fuel type
19
Operation
Taxi company / number The year that a driver started business Area of usual driving Frequency of operation
Total 1.7%
66.6%
Distance of a trip
Total0.5%
Motor(not drive yourself) E-motor (drive yourself)
73.3%
4.0%
14.6%
1.3% 2.4%
Motorcycle (drive yourself)
Over 15km0.1%
36.0%
1.3%
22.6%
18.0%
14.5% 0.7%
Over 15km0.0%
E-motor (not drive yourself)
62.4%
2.7%
28.7%
0.9% 4.5%
Bicycle
1015km0.4%
69.8%
1015km 1.0%
72.4%
3.7%
15.3%
0.8% 3.3%
Bus
Taxi
5km10km0.8%
76.7%
2.8% 7.2%1.6%7.2%1.6%
Rent-a-car Bus
5km10km0.0%
79.3%
4.7%
15km 1.5%
72.4%
5.0%
15km 4.3%
71.2%
Bicycle E-bicycle
Taxi
Under 1km 0%
0.0% 100%
Others
23.6% 70%
Others
2) Passenger Demands
Target : People along the Hanoi No. 1 and No. 2 Survey Items : Peoples daily travel behavior if MRT was introduced Under 1km 0.18% 0.03% 1~5km 7.94% 1.26%
20
Motorcycle
Average : 30.840.30[km/l]
Car
Average : 11.180.76[km/l]
120 100 80 60 40 20 0
50 45
Taxi
Bus
Average : 12.750.21[km/l]
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
5 6k m
2 3k m
3 4k m
4 5k m
9k m
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
2k m
7k m
8k m
km
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
7k m
km
km
km
km
km
km
km
km
km
Car 1.510.12
Taxi 2.300.09
Bus 40.184.47
Target : People along the Hanoi No. 1 and No. 2 Survey Items : Peoples daily travel behavior if MRT was introduced
Egress
77.9%
10.9%
Motor(not drive yourself) E-motor (not drive yourself) Car (drive yourself) Car (not drive yourself)
Access
78.6%
9.7%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Others