IP Integration within commercial Buildings

Case Study on One New Change, London, UK

Running Order
David Gallagher : The Developers Vision
Land Securities

Rob Unwin
Dimension Data

: Total Building IP Integration : Operational Delivery Q ti Ti Question Time

Sydney Hogg
Schneider Electric

Project Statistics
Project Type: Retail & Office Building Size: 2.5 Acres t Retail: il 220 000 f B, Grd 220,000sqf G d & 1st Office : 340,000sqf 2nd 6th Completion Date: Oct 2010 Construction costs: 500 million

The Development

Typical Floor Plan 91,172 Sq Ft NIA

Why Deliver IP!

System are transferring from Analogue era to the Digital? i.e. BMS, CCTV, Access Control, gy & Power Management g Energy systems, Satellite TV Distribution, Elevator Management Systems, Data Networks, Wireless and many more.

Pre-construction delivery
Why do pre-construction delivery? Review & Challenge the clients scope

Clients Brief

This page has been i t ti intentionally ll left l ft blank!!! bl k!!!

Or Under / Over specified or not specific or just not relevant

Pre-construction delivery
Why do pre-construction delivery? Review & Challenge the clients scope Review the IT consultants p of the client interpretation scope

Buyer beware?

Market Testing
1 Service Partners 1. Dimension Data : Total Building IP Integration Schneider Electric : Operational y Delivery

Service Partner Consultation Period

17 Weeks of a Project Integration Forum

Deliverables
1. Market test the IT consultants specification and network diagrams. Result: a. Simplified the network design but more resilient. b. Removed unwanted over scope.

Deliverables cont:
Result cont: c. Agreed a schedule of all the active equipment and consumable equipment for the project project.

Deliverables cont:
Result cont: d. Met with all the IP Partners and agreed their deliverables for the IP i t integration ti and d th their i interfacing with the iBMS / BSI. BSI

Deliverables cont:
Result cont: e. Cost benefit identified over the 17 weeks proving the p was in the client scope region of 24% 400 000 00 Saving 400,000.00

IP Integration within Commercial Buildings

Case study: Part 2 Total Building IP Integration

Rob Unwin

Topics One New Change: Total Building IP Integration

1. 2. 3. 4 4. Challenges Design g Considerations Building IP Solution The Future

Challenges
1. Attitude of project stakeholders 1 2. Early pre-construction design of network infrastructure & IP systems 3. Traditional construction procurement strategy multiple l i l trade d contractors, markup-onk markup, integration & design risk factors, etc.

Design Considerations
Early cost planning & technical design Buy B in i from f IP systems t manufacturers f t and d specialist installers Lifecycle cost management - capital build and operational costs

Common Network System

Two independent assets: Office & Retail
Single - yet separable - resilient network infrastructure

Backbone:
10 km OM3 10GB Fibre Dual resilient core switches

Edge:
10 km Cat6 UTP copper 100 MB to devices

Wireless LAN 802.11 a/b/g 54MB

Passive CNS Network

Active CNS Network

Retail IP Partners
Security (CCTV (CCTV, Access Control Control, Video Intercom) BMS Lighting Control & Emergency Lighting Monitoring Lifts & Escalator Management System Power Monitoring System Utility & Tenants Billing and Energy Monitoring System Management Voice & Data Car Park Barrier System Retailer Intranet & Communication System Retail Information & Help Kiosks Pedestrian Counting System Retail Digital Displays Marketing IP Satellite TV & FM Distribution System

Office IP Partners
Security (CCTV, Access Control, Video Intercom) Utility & Tenants Billing and Energy g System y BMS Monitoring Lighting Control & Emergency LightingOffice Intranet & Communication Monitoring System Lifts & Escalator Management System IP Satellite TV & FM Distribution Power Monitoring System System

The Role of the Integrator

Transition Employers Requirements into detailed design: 1.) Clients building operation requirements 2.) IP partner requirements 3.) ) Passive & Active Network Robust Integration Methodology Compliance with RIO Reliability Reliability, Innovation & Optimisation.

The Future of Building IP Integration

1.) A more educated industry means more benefits and less risk 2.) Reduction in technology costs means solutions are more scalable and viable 3.) Technology innovations ) Lower cost p procurement 4.) strategy & Single source providers
Technology Innovation Curve

Operational Delivery

Delivering a Shared Stakeholder Vision

Project Stakeholders
Land Securities
Development Operations Finance Energy Team Next Hugo Boss Swatch Friends Provident K&L Gates Mitsui Bank

Contractor Design Consultant Quantity Surveyor Facilities Management g

Main

Tenants

The need to take a different approach New Build & Refurbishment

Building g Goals
Intelligent & Green
Fully Wired data highway for all building control systems Supports building automation ; management facilities ; business to business ; business to consumer comms Real l time d data f for optimum conditions d

An innovative approach pp
Utili Utilise ht html ld design i expertise ti Interview key stakeholders to identify pain points & desires Engage with stakeholders in evolution of solution Don Dont t get complicated

Right g Access for the Right g Need

An Intuitive Approach pp

Simple p Portal Access

Live Demo

Web Portal