TOPIC: Should the government pay the tuition fees for students?

ANSWER: In recent years, education is becoming an issue of great concern in many countries, because it plays an important role for the development of each country. The question of whether or not the tuition fee should be covered by the government remains controversial. Personally, I strongly believe that students should pay their own university education because of three following reasons. The first reason for my belief is the limitation of governments budget. To be more specific, they have to pay for many other essential aspects, such as health care, environment, national security, science, and so on. Furthermore, the government has already invested in building schools, libraries, and supported for equipment, books, and the like. Students nowadays just pay tuition fees for salary of teaching staff and for improving of learning facilities. Secondly, paying their own education fees may lead to better studying. Indeed, almost all people are often more responsible when they have to give out something. Students will be more likely to attend classes and try hard for studying. Therefore, they will have better academic results. In addition, universities usually have scholarships for good students, hence, if they want to get money back, they have to study much more in order to get best marks to achieve the scholarship. Finally, students tend to find a part-time job when the government does not cover tuition fees. Because some students cannot afford their education fees, they have to earn money to pay for study materials. When they do part-time jobs, they will gain more experience which helps their future career.

In conclusion, its my opinion that the educational authority should not cover the tuition fees for students. Money that students and their family have to pay brings many benefits not only for their countrys development, but also for themselves.

Bi vit hay qu! :) TOPIC: Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. ANSWER: It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines. On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research. On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs

and medical procedures are concerned. In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.
(270 words, band 9 - by IELTS Simon)

TOPIC: Some people think that families have the most powerful influence on a child's development, while others think other factors such as television, friend, music, etc have biggest effects. Discuss both views and give your opinion. ANSWER: In the modern society, children approach the exciting world around by interacting with not only their parents but also their friends and through multiple channels. Although families have a tremendous effect on childrens development, I believe that they are more affected by other factors such as television, music and friends. It is undeniable that families are in the closest proximity to their offspring. There is no doubt that children tend to intimate the manners of elder family members. For example, children have respect for adults when witnessing that parents are respectful of the elder like grandparents. Bad habits of parents, also, exert adverse impacts on children, for instance, parents who are spendthrifts cannot educate their children to adopt a saving lifestyles. Moreover, children are likely to be oriented by parents as they are too young to realize what is right or wrong and what is good for them, which is the reason why families play a significant role in childrens maturity. However, I would contend that social relationship with friends and other channels such as television and music make more profound effects on childrens development. When getting older, children socialize with friends and spend most of time at schools and on other activities outside the scope

of families. By interacting with their peers, their communication and team work skills that is important for their later life can be improved. Additionally, children can enrich their knowledge through educating TV programs with interesting image of the universal around, which their families in many cases are not capable of showing them. Finally, listening to music, which is proven good for brain, nourishes children soul, contributing to the overall development of children. In conclusion, I hold the firm belief that other factors such as television, music and friends have the most momentous influence on children development over their families. (304 words) Some people think that families have the most powerful influence on a child's development, while others think other factors such as television, friend, music, etc have biggest effects. Discuss both views and give your opinion. TOPIC: Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. ANSWER: As a result of constant media attention, sports professionals in my country have become stars and celebrities, and those at the top are paid huge salaries. Just like movie stars, they live extravagant lifestyles with huge houses and cars. Many people find their rewards unfair, especially when comparing these super salaries with those of top surgeons or research scientists, or even

leading politicians who have the responsibility of governing the country. However, sports salaries are not determined by considering the contribution to society a person makes, or the level of responsibility he or she holds. Instead, they reflect the public popularity of sport in general and the level of public support that successful stars can generate. So the notion of fairness is not the issue. Those who feel that sports stars salaries are justified might argue that the number of professionals with real talent is very few, and the money is recognition of the skills and dedication a person needs to be successful. Competition is constant and a player is tested every time they perform in their relatively short career. The pressure from the media is intense and there is little privacy out of the spotlight. Therefore, all of these factors may justify the huge earnings. Personally, I think that the amount of money such sports stars make is more justified than the huge earnings of movie stars, but at the same time, it indicates that our society places more value on sport than on more essential professions and achievements. (250 words band 9)

Top Job Interview Questions and Sample Answers: (Part 1) -Ti1. Tell me about yourself. (Hy k ti nghe v bn i) - Cu ny gn nh lun gp khi phng vn, rt quan trng nh cc bn. Be brief! Keep this answer to 30-45 seconds max or you will lose the

employers attention very quickly. Remember, tell me about yourself doesnt mean they want your life story. Summarize your skills and experience in a way that make you stand out and show why you are the best person for the job. (ng di dng! C gng tr li trong khong 30 - 45 giy thi nu ko s lm mt s ch ca ngi phng vn bn nhanh chng. Nh l "tell me about yourself" ko c ngha l h mun nghe chuyn v cuc sng ca bn. Hy tm tt nhng k nng, kinh nghim theo mt cch m lm cho bn vt tri hn nhng ngi khc) Sample Answer: Firstly I would like to thank you for giving me such a wonderful opportunity and it's my pleasure to introduce myself. I'm Raginee More. I'm 21 years old. I have completed graduation from Mumbai University in 2012. I live in Mumbra with my family. I'm currently working in sales tax as a clerk on contract basis since 1 year. I have basic computer knowledge. I have also done Ms-cit , tally, basic software diploma in computer application. I have done English Marathi and I can type 40 wpm. I'm a very simple, honest and loving person. I'm a good listener as well as good learner. I always try to learn new things when given the opportunity. I can work hard to achieve my target in time. I'm self confident and patience. I have ability to lead and manage people. My hobbies are to observe people, listen to music and net surfing. I like to talk, I like to watch tv, and whenever I'm alone I like to think. (Cu tr li mu: Trc tin ti xin cm n v cho ti c hi v vinh d t gii thiu mnh. Ti tn l Raginee More, 21 tui. Ti tt nghip i Hc Mumbai nm 2012. Ti sng Mumbra vi gia nh. Ti hin ang l nhn vin thu bn hng theo hp ng t 1 nm. Ti c kin thc c bn v my tnh. Ti cng hon thnh Ms-cit, kim ton, ng dng phn mm c bn trn my tnh. Ti cng hon thnh ting ANh Marathi v c th nh my

40 t mt pht. Ti l mt ngi rt n gin, thnh tht v thng ngi. Ti l mt ngi bit lng nghe v hc tp. Ti lun c gng hc nhng iu mi khi c c hi. Ti c th lm vic ct lc t mc tiu trong thi gian cho php. Ti kh t tin v kin nhn. Ti cng c kh nng lnh o v qun l nhn lc. S thch ca ti l quan st ngi khc, nghe nhc & lt internet. Ti thch ni v xem tv, v khi no mt mnh ti thng hay suy ngh. )

2. What about this job interests you? (Bn c hng th g i vi cng vic ny?/iu g khin bn chn cng vic ny?) The interviewer is listening for an answer that indicates youve given this some thought and are not sending out resumes just because there is an opening. Be clear about why you are interested in the job and the value you can bring to their organization. (Ngi phng vn ang lng nghe bn a ra mt cu tr li m ch ra rng bn thc s c mun lm vic ny ch ko phi ch np h s xin vic v c tuyn dng. Hy ni r rng l do ti sao bn c hng th vi cng vic ny v ch ra nhng gi tr m bn c th mang li cho h) Sample Answer: Ive applied to companies where I know I can get excited about what the company does. Your company is one of my top choices. This job is really attractive to me because it combines my interest and experience in logistics and security with work in a more global business environment. (Cu tr li mu: Ti xin vo nhng cng ty m ti c th cm thy hng th vi nhng g h lm. Cng ty ca ng l mt trong top nhng la chn ca ti. Cng vic ny thc s hp dn ti bi v n kt hp gia s hng th v kinh

nghim mt cch c khoa hc & m bo lm vic vi mi trng kinh doanh quc t)

TOPIC: Some people think that it is better for older schoolchildren to study a large number of subjects and develop a range of knowledge. Others argue that they should study a smaller number of subjects and focus in details. Discuss both views and give your opinion. (IELTS 27/04/2013) ANSWER: In recent years, the number of subjects at school has become an issue of widespread public concern. There are conflicting views toward this growing trend of whether it is necessary to offer a wide range of subjects for children. However, others argue that children should study a smaller number of subjects to specialize in intensive fields. Advocates for both sides are reasonable to some certain extent as now will be explained before a final conclusion is reached. On the one hand, those against this practice may argue that there are enormous benefits for older schoolchildren with studying a variety of subjects at school. This is especially true when it comes to eastern societies, where it has long been perceived that students are encouraged to study a large number of subjects such as math, history, geography and physics in order to have comprehensive developments rather than just study some courses and focus in details. Because of this, children can handle complicated problems in their life with extensive knowledge and essential skills from accessing different fields. It is understandable why the variety of chosen subjects at school is of significant importance to ensure the wholesome development as well as heighten their employability and success in later lives. On the other hand, there are no less convincing arguments to say that studying a limited number of subjects has considerable advantages. Firstly, learning smaller range of subjects help children to study more effective. It is true that focusing on fewer subjects lessens the pressure of studying for many exams and also reduces

the distraction since their brain does not have to handle multi-questions of different fields. Secondly, children can choose a set of subjects that they like or they are good at. In fact, once they are able to learn what they want, their higher motivation will surely enhance their academic results. With this support since children are young, they are likely to develop fully in their own fields, which leads to higher probability of success in the future. From what has been discussed, one can reach a conclusion that it is hard to choose a suitable number of subjects for children at school because the ability of individuality is different. However, I believe that it is better for children to study a limited number of subjects at school.
HOT HOT HOT! Di y l hai bi vit cho thi IELTS 27th April 2013. Bi vit u tin ca mt c gio dy IELTS, bi vit th hai l ca mnh. Bn hy c v cho mnh bit feeling ca bn v c hai bi vit, v bn thch cch vit no hn nh: TOPIC: Some people think that it is better for schoolchildren to study a large number of subjects and develop a range of knowledge. Others argue that they should study a smaller number of subjects and focus in details. Discuss both views and give ur opinion.

ESSAY 01: That older schoolchildren learn a larger or smaller number of subjects remains controversial. Some people think that the more subjects they learn, the more they become confident in work environment while others claim that they may grow stressed with too much to learn. Each idea has its own value. On one hand, the input of various subjects at school provides older schoolchildren numerous benefits. By accessing different fields of life, they can gain more knowledge, skills and handle complicated problems that they may encounter in later life. In addition, no sooner are they supplied with a bigger world of knowledge than they can widen their vision and discover their potentials. Meanwhile, those children who learn a limited number of subjects hardly realize their favorite field and often follow a certain subject of being imposed by schools. In addition, after graduation, if older schoolchildren enter work environment and desire to gain promotion and respect from colleagues, they should be adaptable,

versatile and knowledgeable. This, in fact, results from their absorption of various fields during school years. Equally important, in countries which supply older schoolchildren with an increasing quantity of subjects to choose and learn, their labor grows more high-skilled while their economy is more diverse. Even new fields are born thanks to this. Facts have shown that here in developed world, students are able to access strange but exhilarating subjects like paleontology, ornithology, astronomy, horticulture and others, giving birth to wonderful inventions and ensuring sustainable development. On the other hand, the introduction of a smaller range of subjects has its own advantages. As a consequence of cramming themselves with mountains of books and exercises, hardly do children have time to relax, let alone to work out to nurture their physical health. According to a study, there are a growing number of children suffering obesity and poor eye sights due to their sticking to computer screens to finish their assignments and thick books up to thousands of pages. The pressure of exams and overloaded schedules at school, in some worse cases, may deprive children of all ages of real student life, sleep, willingness to socialize with others and lead to a number of collective suicide cases among those of eighteen. In addition, seldom do parents expect to pay a huge amount of money, with an escalating amount of knowledge required. To some extent, is that necessary for older children to study while such savvy can prove slightly practical in work environment? Surveys have shown that companies still have to pour a large budget into re-training graduates , despite the latters absorption of various fields. It is better for these children to specialize in certain fields, instead of jacking of all trades, mastering of none, as there goes a saying. In brief, it is up to children to study a small or large number of subjects. As long as they are eager to learn, let them access more, but if they rather lead a life of harmonious combination between learning and entertainment, they will have their own choice of subjects. (508 words) ESSAY 02:

It is true that teaching a large number of subjects to children remains a controversial topic among people. Although reasons can be given to justify this, I believe that children should be taught fewer subjects. On the one hand, it is understandable why many people feel the need to teach children as many subjects as possible. Firstly, an exposure to different subjects would bring children opportunities to grow up socially and naturally. For example, while science lessons give children knowledge of how things are formed and evolved, arts subjects enrich students mind and soul. Secondly, children may discover their potentials when trained a variety of subjects. Sometimes we do not recognize what we do best until we have experience with it, and so do children. By studying various things, perhaps children find their interest in a particular field and pursue it as their later career path. On the other hand, those who believe that children should not be taught many subjects are also reasonable. The main arguments of this opinion base largely on reducing pressure for children and improving education quality. As fewer subjects mean fewer exams, children can ease some worries about the score at the end of every semester so that they can focus on details of the lectures. Additionally, when the subjects are limited in number, chidren have more time to ponder on the lessons that they are taught in the class. This will enable them to fully acquire the knowledge rather than just understanding general concept, and thus education quality will eventually be improved. In conclusion, although there are convincing arguments for teaching a great number of subjects at school, I would contend that fewer subjects prove to be better for the study of children.

Some people say that in our modern age it is unnecessary to teach children about the skills of handwriting. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (IELTS question 2011) Before the age of information, handwriting skills were so vital for human beings when they want to write something. However, things were changed since the

invention of computers and recorders because these devices can totally replace pens and papers. Thus, I personally believe that writing techniques will no longer need to be taught to children. To begin with, it can be obviously seen that computers are more convenient for people to note something. All what people can write on papers can easily be typed; using keyboard and software that sometimes to produce documents with a good view and ease to copy. For example, many high schools in Hanoi have changed their method of teaching from writing on the blackboard to presenting the lectures by computers and projectors. At the end of each lesson, the teaching materials are sent to students via e-mail to review at home. Secondly, many types of recording equipment have offered a great solution for people to save information instead of writing by hand. Sound recorders, for example, deal with troubles that journalists may encounter when they are incapable of noting what have been mentioned in a long speech, or in the situations that absent students want to recap knowledge provided by the professors. Similarly, a camera helps to record not only voice but also body language of the interviewees, which cannot be achieved by handwriting techniques. Having said that, some people still believe that handwriting skills are sometimes useful, especially when it comes to blackout and no electrical device works. However, this argument merely explains why more and more money are being invested in Research and Development sector. As a result, generators, batteries and other source of green power like solar power are being produced, providing energy for computers and recorders. Therefore, the argument for supporting handwriting should be stopped. All in all, although I do not mean to say that handwriting is some kind of bad, it can be replaced by modern technology. People in the future may not know how to write, but they are supported by much more convenient equipment.

TOPIC: Some people think that smoking should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

ANSWER: In many countries, people have become more concerned of a controversial issue that smoking should be prohibited. Although smokers have their own justifications for cigarette intake, I would argue that it is better to forbid the consuming of these sticks. Firstly, our health is put at risk by absorbing the smokes from cigarettes. When a cigarette is burnt, it releases cancer-causing chemicals, nicotine and other poisons into the air. In this way, chemicals in cigarette smoke are harmful to people, causing many diseases, including cancer, heart diseases and various lung diseases. This is the reason why we can easily see the warnings of these risks printed on cigarette packages. For the heavy smokers, they keep smoking as a part of their daily routine despite the alerted harm. As a result, doctors revealed that many patients are struggling with diseases related to their long-term smoking habits. Secondly, smoking costs health as well as your money. As smoking habits may lead to threatening diseases, in a particular situation when smokers are diagnosed with smoking-caused diseases, they have to take responsibilities for their medical bills. The costs varied on the different severe levels of their health status. They would not have to pay for that amount of money if they did not engage in smoking. In other words, they could spare those expenses for saving. Thus, its undeniable that smokers absorb the risks from smoking in terms of money and health. In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that cigarettes should not be allowed.By doing so, we can create a more healthy environment for our future lives.

Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion. ANSWER:

When they finish school, teenagers face the dilemma of whether to get a job or continue their education. While there are some benefits to getting a job straight after school, I would argue that it is better to go to college or university. The option to start work straight after school is attractive for several reasons. Many young people want to start earning money as soon as possible. In this way, they can become independent, and they will be able to afford their own house or start a family. In terms of their career, young people who decide to find work, rather than continue their studies, may progress more quickly. They will have the chance to gain real experience and learn practical skills related to their chosen profession. This may lead to promotions and a successful career. On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their studies. Firstly, academic qualifications are required in many professions. For example, it is impossible to become a doctor, teacher or lawyer without having the relevant degree. As a result, university graduates have access to more and better job opportunities, and they tend to earn higher salaries than those with fewer qualifications. Secondly, the job market is becoming increasingly competitive, and sometimes there are hundreds of applicants for one position in a company. Young people who do not have qualifications from a university or college will not be able to compete. For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their careers if they continue their studies beyond school level. (Mnh cha tin nu tc gi ca bi vit ny nh, cc bn c mnh dn on bi ny c khong my chm nh ^^) TOPIC: Some people think that the governments spent money on artists would be better than on more important things. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ANSWER: Art is crucial to the development of countries. Some people claim that

governments' support for art industry is of great value to social growth while others claim that this can put national economy in danger. I strongly agree with the former view for the following reasons. Admittedly, as a result of investing immense budget in this industry, other key fields are left abandoned. Particularly, in developing and underdeveloped world where millions of people are in abject poverty, it sounds irrational for this field to be heavily addressed. Besides, if people are obsessed with the artistic world, they may soon forget the real life and become unproductive. After all, a strong economy is the one in which people work hard to produce actual products while artistic items are believed to be of intangible value. On the other hand, there are numerous benefits of financially sponsoring arts. First, arts such as poem, music and pictures are to color the world. Listening to songs or writing poems, people grow more attached to emotional world and stay away from mundane worries of life. Their creativity is also nurtured through their imaginative minds in the production of artistic works. Second, with more budget poured, artists are increasingly motivated to give birth to wonderful works. Surveys have shown that due to being underpaid in this field, a great number of people leave for other more fertile pastures such as business, technology and the like, despite their years of pursuing and airing past strong passion for it. I still recalled the story of a man who died in rags while endeavoring endlessly to write this last work, which he believed as the only masterpiece of his life. Sometimes, the harsh materialistic life deprives these artists of the source of inspiration and love for going beyond the uncharted territories. Equally important, no sooner are artistic works highly received by the mass than national image of the entire country is promoted. Several countries like America where a significant amount of profit is allocated for the development of this field actually generate huge profit. The successive shows and exhibitions of artistic masterpieces around the world have financially benefited both artists and governments, undeniably.

In brief, there are more pains than gains in the decision to earmark more budget for arts, since writers, musicians and drawers are inspired to beautify the world and enrich national budget.

TOPIC: Human has made a great technological process in the last hundred years. However, this progress has negative effects on peoples lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ANSWER: Some people believe that the development of technology offered huge benefits for human being during the last ten decades, whereas others would contend that this progress causes adverse effects on human lives. As far as I am concerned, I am for the former group because of the following reasons. To begin with, there is no doubt that technology helps to improve living standard. Firstly, thanks to development of technology, an increasing number of vehicles such as cars, motorbikes help peoples lives become more convenient. Moving from this place to another place comfortably, people can save amount of time, and goods are delivered rapidly to customers. Secondly, technology stimulates the development of medical research , and this helps to cure people from fatal diseases such as cancer and heart attack. As such, many lives can be saved, and life expectancy is increasing as a result. At the same time, some people believe that the progress of technology leads to may negative effects on peoples lives. This view has a root in polluted environment caused by technology development. However, it will be soon flawed because scientists are endevouring to find various green energy such as solar and wind

energy to replace fossil fuel. In addition, technology applied in recycling process helps people reduce a huge number of rubbishes thrown into the environment. Most people hope that environmental standard will be improved in the near future by innovation of technology. In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against the development of technology, but I firmly hold the view that this progress offers many benefits for humans. (265 words)

A: Are you ok, baby? You don't look well. - Em c sao ko? Nhn em ko c n lm. B: I'm ok. I'm just a little bit tired. Maybe I drank too much. - Em ko sao. Em thy hi mt thi. Hnh nh em ung hi nhiu. :3 A: Would you like something to eat? I know this place. They're famous for noodle soup. - Em mun n cht g ko? Anh bit ch ny. Ph y ni ting lm. B: I guess not. I just want to go home and take a rest now honey. - Chc ko u anh. Gi em ch mun v nh ri nm ngh thi. A: Yeah, It's quite late now. We better go home. That's enough for today. - Uhm, cng hi tr ri. Ti mnh nn v thi. Hm nay nh vy vui ri. B: Yeah, go get your motorbike, I'll wait here honey. - a, i ly xe i anh, em i. (On the way home...) - Trn ng v... :3 B: It's quite chilly today. Can you drive slower honey? - Hm nay lnh gh, chy chm cht c ko anh? A: You should hug me if you don't want to get cold. - m anh i cho lnh n em :) B: (Smile & pinch his hip) You just want to take advantage of me. - (Ci & nho eo anh ta) li dng... :3 A: You know what, you're so beautiful tonight! - Ti nay em p lm bit ko ^_^

B: Really? You must have told many girls that. - Thit ko? Chc gp c no anh cng ni vy ch g. A: No baby, you're the only one. (Hold her hand) - u c, c mnh em thui . (Nm tay c ta) ^_^ (After driving for a while...) - Sau mt lc li xe... B: I'm so tired honey. Can you find a place to rest. I'm not feeling well. - Em mt qu anh i. Tm ch no ngh cht i anh. Em thy kh chu qu... A: Are you ok? It's because of the wine, I guess. Hold on a second, there's a motel over there... We should take a short rest before going back home. Your mom's gonna get mad seeing you drunk. - Em c sao ko? Chc l do ru . i cht, c nh ngh ng kia. Mnh nn ngh mt cht ri v. M em m thy em say th cht. :3 B: I think so. Let's go honey... - Em cng ngh vy, i thi anh. :)

y l bi dch ca an vn bng ting Anh phn di. Xin hy c cng rt b ch cho sc khe ca chnh mnh. Ch cn thi 2-3 lt chanh mng v vo trong mt cc cha nc ung. Nc s tr nn nc kim. Ung c ngy, ch vic thm nhiu nc hn. Dng n nh l nc ung hng ngy. N tt cho sc khe. iu ny mi nht trong y hc, c hiu qu cho bnh ung th! Hy c k v t thm nh. Vin Khoa hc Y t, 819 N. L.L.C. Charles Street Baltimore, MD 1201. Chanh (Citrus) l mt sn phm k diu tiu dit cc t bo ung th. N mnh hn ha tr liu 10.000 ln. Ti sao chng ta khng bit v iu ? Bi v c cc phng th nghim quan tm trong vic a ra mt phin bn tng hp s mang li cho h li nhun khng l. By gi bn c th gip mt ngi bn c nhu cu bng cch cho anh ta / c y bit rng nc chanh c li trong vic ngn nga bnh. Hng v ca n d chu v n khng to ra nhng tc ng khng khip ca ha tr. C bao nhiu ngi s cht trong khi b quyt ny c gi cn mt khi phng hi n ngun li bc triu ca cc tp on khng l? Nh bn bit, cy chanh c bit n qua cc ging chanh (xanh) v chanh (vng). Bn c th n tri chanh bng nhng cch khc nhau: bn c th n mi chanh, nc p, lm thc ung, kem nc , bnh ngt, vv... N c cho l c rt nhiu dc tnh, nhng hiu qu th v nht l tc ng ca n trn cc u nang v khi u. Loi cy ny l mt phng thuc cha tr chng t chng li c tt c cc loi bnh ung th. Mt s ngi ni n rt hu dng trong tt c cc bin th ca bnh ung th. N cng c coi nh phng thuc chng li nhim trng do vi khun v nm, c hiu qu chng li k sinh trng ni tng v giun sn, iu ha huyt p qu cao v chng trm cm, chng cng thng v ri lon thn kinh. Ngun tin ny rt hp dn: do mt trong nhng nh sn xut thuc ln nht th gii, ni rng sau khi kim tra hn 20 phng th nghim t nm 1970, cc cht chit xut cho thy rng N ph hy cc t bo c tnh trong 12 bnh ung th bao gm c i trng, v, phi, tuyn tin lit v tuyn ty.

Cc hp cht ca cy ny cho thy, 10.000 ln tt hn thuc driamycin, mt loi thuc thng c s dng ha tr liu trn th gii, lm chm s tng trng ca t bo ung th. V iu cn ng ngc nhin hn: loi tr liu vi chit xut chanh ch ph hy cc t bo ung th c tnh v n khng nh hng n cc t bo khe mnh. Vin Khoa hc Y t, 819 N. L.L.C. Cause Street, Baltimore, MD1201 Hy nh chia s cho cc bn b. Just cut 2-3 thin slices of lemon and put it in a cup containing driking water. The water will become "alkaline water". Drink for the whole day, just by adding more water. Take it as drinking water everyday. It is good for health. This is the latest in medicine, effective for cancer! Read carefully & you be the judge. Lemon (Citrus) is a miraculous product to kill cancer cells. It is 10,000 times stronger than chemotherapy. Why do we not know about that? Because there are laboratories interested in making a synthetic version that will bring them huge profits. You can now help a friend in need by letting him/her know that lemon juice is beneficial in preventing the disease. Its taste is pleasant and it does not produce the horrific effects of chemotherapy. How many people will die while this closely guarded secret is kept, so as not to jeopardize the beneficial multimillionaires of large corporations? As you know, the lemon tree is known for its varieties of lemons and limes. You can eat the fruit in different ways: you can eat the pulp, juice press, prepare drinks, sorbets, pastries, etc... It is credited with many virtues, but the most interesting is the effect it produces on cysts and tumors. This plant is a proven remedy against cancers of all types. Some say it is very useful in all variants of cancer. It is considered also as an anti microbial spectrum against bacterial infections and fungi, effective against internal parasites and worms, it regulates blood pressure which is too high and an antidepressant, combats stress and nervous disorders. The source of this information is fascinating: it comes from one of the largest drug manufacturers in the world, says that after more than 20 laboratory tests since 1970, the extracts revealed that It destroys the malignant cells in 12 cancers including colon, breast, prostate, lung and pancreas. The compounds of this tree showed 10,000 times better than the product Adriamycin, a drug normally used chemotherapeutic in the world, slowing the growth of cancer cells. And what is even more astonishing: this type of therapy with lemon extract only destroys malignant cancer cells and it does not affect healthy cells. Institute of Health Sciences, 819 N. L.L.C. Cause Street, Baltimore , MD1201 Remember to share with your friends.
I. Khi mun ni xin li v mt vic lm sai: Thn mt Im sorry Im late. Xin li ti n tr.

Im so sorry I forgot your birthday. Xin li anh qun ngy sinh nht ca em. Trang trng I beg your pardon madam, I didnt see you were waiting to be served. Ti xin li b, ti khng nhn thy b ang ch c phc v. Im awfully sorry but those tickets are sold out now. Ti thnh tht xin li nhng nhng v c bn ht ri. I must apologise for my childrens rude behaviour. Ti phi xin li v hnh vi v l ca cc con ti. II. Khi mun ni xin li a ra l do Thng thng khi xin li, chng ta a ra l do cho hnh vi ca mnh: Im sorry Im late but my alarm clock didnt go off this morning. Ti xin li n tr v ng h bo thc ca ti khng reng vo bui sng ny. Im so sorry theres nothing here you can eat, I didnt realise you were a vegetarian. Ti tht xin li khng c g bn c th n c. Ti khng bit l bn l ngi n chay. III. Khi mun ni xin li v ngt ngang ai Excuse me, can you tell me where the Post Office is please? Xin li, ng c th ch cho ti Bu in u khng? Im sorry but can I get through? Ti xin li nhng ti c th i qua c khng? IV. Khi mun ni xin li khi vic bun xy ra vi ai : Im sorry to hear youve not been feeling well. Ti tht bun khi nghe bn khng c khe. Im so sorry to hear your dad died. Ti thnh tht chia bun khi cha anh qua i. I heard you failed your driving test. Im really sorry but Im sure youll pass next time. Ti nghe ni bn trt k thi li xe. Ti chia bun nhng ti chc bn s u vo ln sau. V. Khi mun ni xin li yu cu ai lp li vic g: Excuse me? Xin li?

Excuse me, what did you say? Xin li, bn ni g? Im sorry? Xin li? Im sorry, can you say that again? Xin li, bn c th lp li khng? Pardon? Xin li? VI. Khi mun chp nhn li xin li chp nhn li xin li, chng ta c th ni cm n hoc c gng lm cho ngi i phng d chu bng cch no . 1. V d 1 Im so sorry I forgot your birthday. Anh tht xin li qun ngy sinh nht ca em! Oh dont worry, theres always next year! khng sao, mnh ch nm sau! 2. V d 2 Im sorry to hear youve not been feeling well. Ti tht bun khi nghe bn khng c khe. Thanks. I think Ive just picked up a bug at the office. Its nothing too serious. Cm n. Ti ngh ti b ly bnh trong vn phng. Khng c g nghim trng. 3. V d 3 Im sorry Im late but my alarm clock didnt go o ff this morning. Ti xin li n tr v ng h bo thc khng reng vo bui sng ny. Thats OK. Weve only just started the meeting. Khng sao. Chng ti ch mi bt u bui hp. To begin with, I would claim that ________________. One reason is that ________________. ___[Example/Argument]____. Another justification is that ___________________________. [Example/Argument] _______________________. It is thus arguable/understandable why/that _________________. Chng ta hy th nhn v d p dng ca dng paragraph ny nh: To begin with, I would claim that sports players deserve high incomes. One reason is that

they often have a shorter career path than other occupations. For example, those footballers who are over 40 seem to be unskillful and not strong enough to continue playing the games. Another justification is that sports professionals are likely to be under threat of injury, which may seriously damage their health. This can be obviously seen in boxing matches where a head accident can lead to brain damage or even death. It is thus understandable why athletes receive large sums of money. [written by vinh@eclass.com.vn]

II.

TOPIC: Home schooling belongs to the past and is unacceptable in the modern society. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement? ANSWER: It is true that parents in the past preferred to teach their children at home. However, in the modern society, I believe that this approach of education is no longer an effective method. Firstly, there are many reasons why teaching children should be conducted by professionals. Many qualified teachers in different fields are working in education, and this is the reason why I believe that children are taught at schools better than at home. As these staffs at the school often have many years of experience teaching, they consider carefully what are good to be taught. Another reason is that a good education system is planned deliberately by professionals before teaching children. As such, knowledge that children obtain from schools is organized to be suitable for each childrens period. Secondly, not all parents are qualified to teach their children. As a saying goes the blind cannot lead the blind, many fathers and mothers do not know enough to educate their children. For example, a father who is good at literature can find mathematics or physics hard, and this leads to his failure of teaching these subjects to his children. As no one is perfect for all fields, parents cannot have enough abilities to educate all subjects to their children as well as professionals at schools do. Additionally, even if those parents succeeded at schools, they might forget the knowledge that they leant; that is, teaching their children becomes a hard work, if not impossible task. In conclusion, although homeschooling might be a choice in the past, I firmly believe that this practice is unsuitable in todays world.

III.

Life is tough! - Cuc sng tht kh khn/phc tp 2. Please help yourself! - Bn c t nhin! 3. No means no! - bo ko l ko! 4. I was just daydreaming - Ti ch ng tr cht thi 5. It's none of your business - Khng phi vic ca bn 6. Absolutely! - Chc chn ri 7. You better believe it! - Chc chn m! 8. There's no way to know. - Lm sao m bit c 9. I can't say for sure. - Ti ko th ni chc. 10. This is too good to be true. - Chuyn ny kh tin qu.