About

Advertise

Hall of Fame

Register

Contact

Store

Reviews

+10 Recommend this on Google

Duels

FactPilers

Group Combat

Mecha

Media

SwordFighters

What If

AT-RT Vs Warthog
Published on July 17, 2013, by admin - Posted in Mecha 50

FactPile Promotion Guide FactPile Forum FactPile Youtube Channel FactPile Wiki

Heads Up
Battle Requests Fact Pile Award Guidelines FactPile Award FactPile Debating Rules

Categories
Suggested by ZomB
Select Category

Here we have the AT-RT (Star Wars) going up against a Halo Warthog. The two vehicles start at opposite ends of Central Park. All of New York is their battleground, it is completely un-populated. The Warhogs passenger is carrying an MA5D. Who wins?
Forerunners Vs Galactic Empire 4,796 comments
You might like:

Popular Posts
Wheel of Time Vs Sword of Truth 5,322 comments Halo Vs Mass Effect 5,154 comments Star Trek Vs Star Wars 5,031 comments

Royal Baby Flashback: Princess Diana Was Induced, See Baby Prince William's Debut (E! Online) Borg Cube vs Star Wars Imperial Star Destroyer (this site ) Tony Stark Vs Lex Luthor (this site ) Imperium of Man Vs Galactic Empire (this site )
Recommended by

Cartoon Network Civil War 4,631 comments Warhammer 40K Vs Stargate 4,496 comments Goku Vs Itachi Uchiha 4,462 comments Rand alThor Vs Richard Rahl 4,195 comments FactPilers Vs Zombified City 4,073 comments Star Wars Vs Halo 3,386 comments

Share this:

Related Posts:
Gekko, Dwarf Spider Droid, Stalker & Tachikoma Vs Mantis LS209, AT-RT & E.P.A Ancient Humans & Forerunners Vs Galactic Empire & Pre-HH Imperium Elite Zealot Vs Jedi Knight Sci-Fi Soldiers King of the Hill The Flood Vs The Yuuzhan Vong

Recent Comments
Rookie on Gipsy Danger & Jet Jaguar Vs Dies Irae & King Joe Shgon Dunstan on SIEGE: Shadowspawn & Darkspawn Vs Ministry of Magic & Menzoberranzan Ty on Shikamaru Nara Vs Batman Namer on Gipsy Danger & Jet Jaguar Vs Dies Irae & King Joe Shgon Dunstan on Shikamaru Nara Vs Batman
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

SHARE THIS POST

Shgon Dunstan on Shikamaru Nara Vs Batman Xornell on Ancient Humans & Forerunners Vs Galactic Empire & Pre-HH Imperium

Author: admin

View all posts by admin

Dassadec on Shikamaru Nara Vs Batman Sauroposeidon on Gipsy Danger & Jet Jaguar Vs Dies Irae & King Joe Commander Cross on Halo Vs Mass Effect Ty on Shikamaru Nara Vs Batman

50 Comments on "AT-RT Vs Warthog"

FactPile YouTube Channel

#1

Shadow-Knight July 17, 2013 at 8:07 am -

I am going with the AT-RT for now; however, the worthog dose have a 78 mph speed advantage to the RTs 56mph .

Shadow-Knight July 17, 2013 at 8:14 am -

#2

The AT-RT is 3.2 meters tall and 2.9 meters long. Could leap distances thanks to its light construction and is equip with a nose-mounted repeating blaster cannon, mortar launcher, a motion detection scanner and sensor equipment capable of providing Forward Command Centers with updated situation reports from the battlefield. ===== I think that covers the basic technical details.

Shadow-Knight July 17, 2013 at 8:23 am -

#3

The Worthog is a Jeep (Light APC) that can hold a driver, a top gunner, and a passenger who can serve as a side gunner. The mounted top gun comes in two styles 50cal chain gun and Gauss Cannon. Both the 50cal and the Gauss have nearly 360degree rotation giving it an impressive field of fire. ==== starwars.wikia.com/wiki/All_Terrain_Recon_Transport halowiki.net/p/Warthog halowiki.net/p/Gauss_Warthog ==== All that being said, both vehicles leave the occupants exposed to fire so it all comes down to who gets shot out of the drivers seat first or in the RTs case taking out all three occupants.

Shadow-Knight July 17, 2013 at 8:27 am -

#4

Can some one tell me why it wont let my warthog stats through?

Shadow-Knight July 17, 2013 at 8:29 am -

#5

Lets set me try this again. The Worthog is a Jeep (Light APC) that can hold a driver, a top gunner, and a passenger who can serve as a side gunner. The mounted top gun comes in two styles 50cal chain gun and Gauss Cannon. Both the 50cal and the Gauss have nearly 360degree rotation giving it an impressive field of fire. ==== All that being said, both vehicles leave the occupants exposed to fire so it all comes down to who gets shot out of the drivers seat first or in the RTs case taking out all three occupants.

Shadow-Knight July 17, 2013 at 8:31 am -

#6

Sorry for the quintuple post, Just wanted to say where all that came from. starwars.wikia.com/wiki/All_Terrain_Recon_Transport halowiki.net/p/Warthog

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

halowiki.net/p/Gauss_Warthog

Watchdog Lowk July 17, 2013 at 9:18 am -

#7

How good is the at rt at turning. It looks like if the warthog could manuver around or behind it the rider would be pretty much defenseless. Where as the Warthog has the whole 360 thing.

Mike July 17, 2013 at 9:24 am -

#8

a tank type match and its not from saurozomb must be sauros other account, only logical answer. going with the warthog though, ability to fire at angles quicker while having a speed advantage would be like a classic game of Perfect dark strafe circling when one guys n64 analog is 80% wore out and the other is brand new. if you get that reference, you are awesome.

Shadow-Knight July 17, 2013 at 9:38 am -

#9

@Mike I get it, had a Pokemon Colosseum n64 my self, had the clear plastic in fire orange color. On topic, Im switching my initial bid, at the time my inner star wars fan won out over the halo fan; however, I feel that in a one on one the warthog will win 9/10.

Eric Gigliotti July 17, 2013 at 9:59 am -

#10

I dont know any feats for the AT-RTs cannon; but considering the superiority of Star Wars over Halo, Id say it will one-shot the Warthog. Even so, Im going with the Warthog. The driver of the AT-RT is completely exposed and we know bullets will puncture Clone armor (Republic Commando). The Warthog is faster and more maneuverable. It can rain rounds and disappear down a street.

BC July 17, 2013 at 10:33 am -

#11

Since it is central park there are actually places where the narrow and rough terrain capable AT-RT would have the advantage, like the more heavily wooded or pedestrian only areas for instance. Anywhere it is fairly clear and the ground is firm enough the Warthog would have the advantage with its wide angle guns and crew of three. Raw firepower wise the AT-RT has it over the Warthog but either one would kill on the first good hit with the crews exposed the way they are.

OriginalA July 17, 2013 at 10:34 am -

#12

and we know bullets will puncture Clone armor (Republic Commando). Wuh? Context please.

Shgon Dunstan July 17, 2013 at 10:36 am -

#13

Im not sure about fire power, but I seem to remember the AT-RTs doing some decent acrobatics in SW:TCW.. For a SW walker anyway(not that just not blowing up when it hits a speed bump would count as decent acrobatics for a SW walker ).

Shgon Dunstan July 17, 2013 at 10:37 am Wouldnt count^

#14

Shadow-Knight July 17, 2013 at 10:45 am -

#15

Try as I might I just cant find any clips of AT-RTs in action, all youtube has are kids playing with lego versions/ stop motion shorts with toys. The episodes from the clone wars cartoon that take place on Ryloth are the episodes that have the best feats on the AT-RT.

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Shadow-Knight July 17, 2013 at 10:54 am -

#16

@OriginalA and we know bullets will puncture Clone armor (Republic Commando). Wuh? Context please. He was referring to the game Republic Commando, one of the enemy types you face are Trandosions(slavers have shot guns/Mercs have smgs/Heavy assault mercs have apc repeaters[chain guns]) the ammo type they use is almost identical to modern ballistic weapons, so it is logical to assume that if those weapons tare through the superior COMMANDO armor[which they do] than the modern-ish bullets of halo should encounter little difficulty on standard clone armor.

Shgon Dunstan July 17, 2013 at 11:39 am -

#17

@Shadow-Knight Try as I might I just cant find any clips of AT-RTs in action, all youtube has are kids playing with lego versions/ stop motion shorts with toys. The episodes from the clone wars cartoon that take place on Ryloth are the episodes that have the best feats on the AT-RT. The one where that colony of Togruta got taken as slaves has at *least* some pretty good jump feats for them. Sure Ani and Ahsoka had to extend the jump with the Force, but still, for a walker, the AT-RT still did a petty decent amount of it on its own. The AT-RT aint no slowly walking chicken.. More of a roadrunner of unknown speed, and poorly armored pilot seating.

Tarbel July 17, 2013 at 11:41 am -

#18

I googled at rt. I think the Atypical tertoid rhabdoid tumor wins in the long run. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atypical_teratoid_rhabdoid_tumor In seriousness though AT-RT may have much better maneuverability while the warthog is limited to streets and side walks which may or may not be obstructed by vehicles. Based on the wiki: starwars.wikia.com/wiki/All_Terrain_Recon_Transport : AT-RTs can leap, not sure how high/far, but surely enough to easily bypass obstacles like cars and trucks or whatnot. Perhaps even some smaller buildings considering it is 10 feet tall. The AT-RT was fitted with a motion detection scanner and sensor equipment Recons would probably utilize this well by hiding (around a corner maybe? perhaps it can crouch) and ambushing warthogs. The recon walker was equipped with a nose-mounted repeating blaster cannon and mortar launcher Feels like one hit weapons, although the repeating blaster cannon might take another few rounds to take out the gunner as well. But firing rate might handle that. Found a scene of them in action: www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=1X6NTMrELdQ#t=77s They are very bouncy and can crouch. They can also do some pretty quick side stepping and perhaps a zig zag pattern, which isnt very used though. Warthog wiki says it is 10 feet high also. If AT-RT charges at them head on(as seen in the scene), the clone troopers are very dead. I think this battle may depend on range and accuracy the weapons.

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Tarbel July 17, 2013 at 11:55 am -

#19

For the warthog, are we using this: halo.wikia.com/wiki/M41_Light_Anti-Aircraft_Gun or this: halo.wikia.com/wiki/M46_Light_Anti-Aircraft_Gun Current incarnation tells me M46 which has superior range to M41. Im guessing it fires at the ~900 rpm said in the M41 wiki, which is 15 rounds per second. But depending on whether we use Halo wars/reach or Halo 2, etc, the spin up time may take from a half second to several seconds to spin. Anyone know the fire rate for AT-RT repeating blaster cannon? And perhaps the mortar?

Shgon Dunstan July 17, 2013 at 12:02 pm -

#20

I know this episode has some AT-RT feats in it. www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLUxSIXD-Gk www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMKujm8Vwps But my internet is running to slow right now to load then and get the times of where the feats are in them. Sorry.

Eric Gigliotti July 17, 2013 at 1:36 pm -

#21

and we know bullets will puncture Clone armor (Republic Commando). -Wuh? Context please . The Trandosian Slavers in Republic Commando (game) used slugthrowers. They were just as dangerous to the clones as blasters.

itcheyness July 17, 2013 at 3:03 pm -

#22

I thought that they were supposed to be energy weapons designed to look like slug throwers? These are the Trandoshan weapons used in the game: starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Accelerated_Charged_Particle_Repeater_Gun starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Accelerated_Charged_Particle_Array_Gun starwars.wikia.com/wiki/LS-150_Heavy_Accelerated_Charged_Particle_Repeater_Gun Theyre all use accelerated charged particles or plasma charges

Jolttra July 17, 2013 at 6:41 pm -

#23

Most Mass-Drivers are described as being similar in power to standard Blasters. Blasters are much stronger then UNSC bullets so it is probably safe to assume the Mass Driver used to pierce the Clone armor is stronger then the Vulcan rounds.

OberHeresy July 17, 2013 at 8:32 pm -

#24

Could the Warthog be allowed the Gauss Cannon? Or maybe the rockets?

Hac148 July 17, 2013 at 9:23 pm -

#25

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

you mean the puma?

the_man_with The_Answers July 17, 2013 at 9:24 pm you mean the puma? Sure it isnt a Unicorn or Chupicabra?

#26

Kara Zor-El July 17, 2013 at 9:33 pm -

#27

Sure it isnt a Unicorn or Chupicabra? _ How did you mess that up? One of the best bits ever! (my actual favourite RvB episode too! _ 2Hey simmons, whats the name of that Mexican lizard that eats all the goats? _ Uh, that would be the Chupacabra Sir _ Hey Grif, Chupa-thingy? How bout that? I like it, got a ring to it!

Jolttra July 17, 2013 at 11:52 pm -

#28

Hey OberHeresy, settle a bet, would ya. Does that thing look kind of like a big cat to you?

OriginalA July 17, 2013 at 11:59 pm -

#29

www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TZ7h7Y0l88 3:05 Hmm, an energy weapon that looks like a slug-thrower. Didnt think Lizards were that nostalgic. Yeah, so I reiterate my wut? to bullets being effective against clone trooper armor. Since, you know, the previously presented proof doesnt support that at all.

Shadow-Knight July 18, 2013 at 2:22 am -

#30

@OriginalA sorry, its been a couple years since I last played Republic commando. I had for gotten that the line was energy weapon that looks like a slug-thrower. my mistake. ==== On another note, if we determine that bullets are less than effective, then does that mean we are using the Gauss Cannon in stead of the 50cal?

erickyboo July 18, 2013 at 3:34 am -

#31

www.break.com/video/ugc/take-out-the-taliban-in-the-hills-456710 This is a .50 cal sniper hitting humans if this video is to believed. Warthog chaingun uses .50 cal. Rocket hog is pretty powerful and gauss too but both would probably take out the at-rt easier than the chain gun. I played Star Wars galaxies, I believe I had Nyms Slugthrower at some point. It still damaged people. Tusken raiders used stormtroopers as targets. Neck/vulnerable areas and visor. Use halopedian.com not halo wikia please. Warthogs are indeed 3 meters tall. More information here: youtu.be/a-li4UHdBa0

Shgon Dunstan July 19, 2013 at 5:06 pm -

#32

By the way. Is it just me who thinks of one of the Hercs from Earth every time they look at that picture of the AT-RT? Roadrunner I think its name was. converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

.(goes to look if theirs any Metaltech-Earth/Starsiege-Tribes Vs on the site)

Shgon Dunstan July 19, 2013 at 5:10 pm -

#33

(gets back after finding nothing) OK, so. This site needs some Tribes Vs, any ideas?

Knukails July 19, 2013 at 6:06 pm -

#34

Given that all of NYC (i hope thats what he meant) is the battlefield, the Warthog has a great advantage. As far as i know the AT-RT doesnt have the maneuverability the Warthog has. Its like Eric Gigliotti said; It can rain rounds and disappear down a street.

ZomBirthday July 19, 2013 at 9:46 pm -

#35

Given that all of NYC (i hope thats what he meant) is the battlefield, the Warthog has a great advantage. As far as i know the AT-RT doesnt have the maneuverability the Warthog has. Its like Eric Gigliotti said; It can rain rounds and disappear down a street. Wut? How on Earth would you come to the conclusion that the AT-RT, a scout WALKER would have less manueverability than the Warthog, a WHEELED thing. Also, theyre starting at Central Park, so while the rest of New York is accessible, that is assuming that they both make it out of the park.

erickyboo July 19, 2013 at 10:30 pm -

#36

I think the warthog has a big motion/radar tracker as well. Did you guys check out the video? I have a windows surfaceRT now!!!! I wonder what happens if both vehicles run into eachother.

Shadow-Knight July 20, 2013 at 3:35 am -

#37

@erickyboo I wonder what happens if both vehicles run into eachother Well if they were charging head on then either the AT-RT would jump over the Warthog(assuming they are not firing at each other) or the Warthog would knock its lets back causing the AT-RTs saddle area to fall onto the driver and passenger, crushing them. If the Warthog rammed the legs from nearly any angle the result would probably be the same, a crushed driver and passenger.

Xornell July 21, 2013 at 5:03 am -

#38

I say Warthog. It looks faster, and can hold more crew. The pilots of the ATRT are wide open and completely exposed, and Im willing to bet the Warthogs guns are able to kill them. Also, bipedal walkers are stupid and impractical in any universe. All-Terrain my ass lol lets see that walker climb some stairs. -

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

ZomBirthday July 21, 2013 at 7:14 am That was enlightening

#39

erickyboo July 21, 2013 at 6:10 pm -

#40

Thats amusing. Some people complain about the warthogs lack of doors. It still is big enough to protect occupants but it provides advantages as well. Ill take an example from one of my matches. I was playing CTF on ragnarok and I took the flag. I went on the man cannon and there was a warthog right there that parked. I got in so quickly I was basically man cannoned into the passenger seat.

Xornell July 21, 2013 at 6:23 pm -

#41

I just hate bipedal vehicles. Its the stupidest idea anyones ever had lol. Lack of doors? The AT-RT has lack of everything. It looks like a dirtbike with legs lol. If they change it to Warthog vs AT-ST, thats a different story. But this flimsy thing aint cutting it. +1 Warthog.

lazysam99 July 21, 2013 at 10:24 pm -

#42

The Warthog has a speed advantage while the AT-RT has a fire power advantage but due to the wide open back that exposes the driver that is the AT-RT. The Warthog can easily go behind it and kill the driver but thats what I think.

BC July 22, 2013 at 12:04 am -

#43

The droid tech of Star Wars is a lot better than the Robocop tech, the walkers are a lot more stable than those robots were. Bipedal walkers have a lot of terrain advantages if they are strong enough to hop around, which the AT-RT is. Anywhere a small dinosaur could go the walker can, which is much better terrain handling that the Warthog (though it is good for a wheeled vehicle). Biped walkers are also intrinsically faster than a rigid backed quadruped and it would be almost impossible to ride a flexible backed quadruped and they do not tip that much if any easier than a quad. The lack of armor to protect the rider is a bit of a problem, logically there should be at least some kind of forcefield but I saw no sign of one in the source. The open saddle arrangement is typical of SW though, and no more dangerous than riding a biological mount would be (which really is not saying much, but it is a typical Star Wars thing anyway). With the larger crew and wider angle of fire, not to mention speed advantage, the Warthog
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

With the larger crew and wider angle of fire, not to mention speed advantage, the Warthog would probably take the match, though it is still up to chance as to who spots who first and if it is the AT-RT that gets off the first shot it would win most likely. Both are eggshells armed with hammers.

Shadow-Knight July 22, 2013 at 12:10 am -

#44

@Xornell Mostly, at least in the case of the empire, the walkers were used to instill fear into enemies, who in the early days were loosely organized and ill-equip planetary militias. I think the fear came from the concept of the large, lumbering monster that is always drawing closer for the kill; however, these fear based machines have many weaknesses that can be exploited in war as has been shown in the movies.

ZomBirthday July 22, 2013 at 12:10 am -

#45

I just hate bipedal vehicles. Its the stupidest idea anyones ever had Why? It isnt that impractical at all really. As long as it works. It allows a greater range of movement than any wheeled vehicle. It can jump under its own power to great heights, it can turn on a dime, it can traverse any terrain. As a matter of fact, it is funny you used stairs as an example, as when it comes to wheels vs legs. Legs are going to win every single time. Also, this is Sci-Fi, typically speaking, that means that the tech works perfectly no matter how poorly designed. It looks like a dirtbike with legs lol Its a recon vehicle Historically what have been the best land based light recon transports? Horses, and Motorcycles, the AT-RT is a natural evolution, combining the speed, and mechanical effeciency of a bike with the agility of a legged animal On the other hand, the Warthog is a Recon Vehicle as well, however, it is twenty feet long, ten feet tall, and ten feet wide. When it comes to which is a poorer design for its intended role, yeah, good luck doing recon with that parade float. The Warthog can easily go behind it and kill the driver but thats what I think. The AT-RT has legs, it can turn to face the Warthog, alot faster than the Warthog can manuever to its rear. Having legs is a huge advantage in this respect, you would need ludicrous amounts of speed to get behind something with legs.

Shadow-Knight July 22, 2013 at 1:04 am -

#46

you would need ludicrous amounts of speed to get behind something with legs. And I think the blaster cannon on the AT-RT has a 180 degree rotation so the RT does not need to be facing the Warthog in order to shoot it.

Xornell July 22, 2013 at 10:00 am -

#47

The droid tech of Star Wars is a lot better than the Robocop tech, the walkers are a lot more stable than those robots were. True but this is just too shitty a design to work. And the Robocop bit was just for shits and gigs, though the point does stand that All-Terrain was a piss-poor name for these things. Bipedal walkers have a lot of terrain advantages if they are strong enough to hop around, which the AT-RT is. Steep incline or decline- Walker falls down. Mud- Walker sinks like a stone in water. You get my point. This is also an era of SW that has repulsorlift tech! They can hover everywhere, why the hell would the do something like building a giant chicken robot to scout out areas?

Xornell July 22, 2013 at 10:16 am Sorry for the double post. My bad. -

#48

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

The lack of armor to protect the rider is a bit of a problem, logically there should be at least some kind of forcefield but I saw no sign of one in the source. The open saddle arrangement is typical of SW though, and no more dangerous than riding a biological mount would be (which really is not saying much, but it is a typical Star Wars thing anyway). With the larger crew and wider angle of fire, not to mention speed advantage, the Warthog would probably take the match, though it is still up to chance as to who spots who first and if it is the AT-RT that gets off the first shot it would win most likely. Both are eggshells armed with hammers. Right but the Warthog may be able to survive a blaster bolt; that drivers getting knocked on his ass under sustained chaingun fire. Mostly, at least in the case of the empire, the walkers were used to instill fear into enemies, Im glad you brought that up. The AT-AT was designed to inspire fear. Its a giant robot. This is a slightly larger than human chicken. This is a scout vehicle, not a fear-inspiring death walker. Why? It isnt that impractical at all really. As long as it works. Because you waste more space and energy to carry around a bipedal walker than you would with something on wheels, that hovers, or even a 4-legged design. Its wildly inefficient and every single mechanism has to fit perfectly to not fall apart. Realistically, particles of dust lodged in the drive would probably make it so these things had an effective life of a weekend. It can jump under its own power to great heights, it can turn on a dime, it can traverse any terrain. 1 word: Repulsorlift. If you can hover, why would you be assed with any of this ^. As a matter of fact, it is funny you used stairs as an example, as when it comes to wheels vs legs. Legs are going to win every single time. Thats not true. Stairs, which are meant for smaller beings to negotiate, can be traversed with a larger wheeled vehicle, as the incline acts almost like a ramp. Like so www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8CZiqEjQDk When it comes to which is a poorer design for its intended role, yeah, good luck doing recon with that parade float. The warthog is intended to move quickly to scout out enemy locations. Wheels > legs in terms of speed. The AT-RT has legs, it can turn to face the Warthog, alot faster than the Warthog can manuever to its rear. Are you sure about that? Look at the legs on the AT-RT. They have joints that can move them forward, not ball & socket setup like humans would. That thing would have to turn and make a complete revolution by moving forward to turn around. This is true of all SW bipedal walkers, with the exception of droids. Even if it could turn the way youre mentioning, itd take a while to do so.

Shgon Dunstan July 22, 2013 at 10:19 am Sorry for the double post. My bad. Its not a problem on this site.

#49

ZomBirthday July 22, 2013 at 10:38 am -

#50

Ill just say it is a Star Wars vehicle, the energy requirements, and logical capabilities of things dont matter at all to Star Wars. 1 word: Repulsorlift. If you can hover, why would you be assed with any of this ^. Rule of cool, it is Sci-Fi after all, and walkers are pretty awesome. Hovertanks are pretty meh.
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Thats not true. Stairs, which are meant for smaller beings to negotiate, can be traversed with a larger wheeled vehicle, as the incline acts almost like a ramp. Like so Yes, this is common knowledge, however, sufficiently large stairs will be intraversable by wheels while legs are still climbing. The warthog is intended to move quickly to scout out enemy locations. Wheels > legs in terms of speed. That would make sense, if it was actually fast, and not huge. You know what could fulfill that exact role way better? It starts with D ends with E and has irtbik in the middle Are you sure about that? Look at the legs on the AT-RT. They have joints that can move them forward, not ball & socket setup like humans would. That thing would have to turn and make a complete revolution by moving forward to turn around. This is true of all SW bipedal walkers, with the exception of droids. Even if it could turn the way youre mentioning, itd take a while to do so. It is Sci-Fi Seriously bro, They turn all the time when they shouldnt be able to. Sci-Fi cares not for your damn dirty logic.

Leave A Response
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Wheel of Time Vs Sword of Truth Rebuttal

Home

Archives

Friends

DMCADisclaimer

Privacy Policy Statement

Ask the Admin

Back to top

Copyright 2006 - 2013 FactPile. All rights reserved. | Google+

Spawned from Pittsburgh, PA

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com