International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research

Volume 2 Issue 4, 415 - 421, 2013

www.ijcat.com 415
Stability behavior of second order neutral impulsive
stochastic differential equations with delay

S. Karunanithi R .Maheswari
Department of Mathematics, Department of Mathematics,
Kongunadu Arts and Science College (Autonomous), Sri Eshwar College of Engineering,
Coimbatore 641 029, Tamilnadu, India Coimbatore 642 109, Tamilnadu, India

Abstract: In this article, we study the existence and asymptotic stability in pth moment of mild solutions to second order neutral
stochastic partial differential equations with delay. Our method of investigating the stability of solutions is based on fixed point
theorem and Lipchitz conditions being imposed.
Keywords: Stochastic, neutral, impulse, asymptotic stability, mild solution

1. INTRODUCTION
Stochastic partial differential equations have
received much attention in many areas of science including
physics, biology, medicine and engineering. The existence,
uniqueness and asymptotic behavior of solutions of the first
order stochastic partial differential equations have been
considered by several authors [3, 4, 11, 12, 15, 26]. Moreover
many dynamical systems not only depend on present and past
states but also involve derivatives with delays. Deterministic
neutral functional differential equations, which was originally
introduced by Hale and Lunel [9], are of great interest in
theoretical and practical applications. Kolmanovskii and
Myshkis [13] introduced neutral stochastic functional
differential equations and gave its applications in chemical
engineering and aero elasticity considering environmental
disturbances into account.
Caraballo et al. [5] have considered the exponential
stability of neutral stochastic delay partial differential
equations by the Lyapunov functional approach. In [7], Dauer
and Mahmudov have analyzed the existence of mild solutions
to semilinear neutral evolutions with nonlocal conditions by
using the fractional power of operators and Kransnoselski-
Schaefer type fixed point theorem. In [10], Hu and Ren have
established the existence results for impulsive neutral
stochastic functional integrodifferential equations with infinite
delays. It is well known that classical technique applied in the
study of stability is based on a stochastic version of the
Lyapunov direct method. However the Lyapunov direct
method has some difficulty with the theory and application to
specific problems when discussing the asymptotic behaviour
of solutions in stochastic differential equations [16]. It seems
that new methods are required to address those difficulties.
Appleby [1] studied the almost sure stability of
stochastic differential equations with fixed point approach.
Luo [18, 17] have successfully applied fixed point principle to
investigate the stability of mild solution of various stochastic
equations. Luo and Taniguchi [19], have studied the
asymptotic stability of neutral stochastic partial differential
equations with infinite delay by using the fixed point theorem.
The impulsive effects exists widely in many evolution
processes in which states are changed abruptly of certain
moments of time, involving such fields as finance, economics,
mechanics, electronics and telecommunications, etc [25]. The
theory of impulsive differential equations have been studied
extensively in [21, 22]. However in addition to impulsive
effects, stochastic effects likewise exist in real systems. It is
well known that a lot of dynamical systems have variable
structures subjects to stochastic abrupt changes, which may
result from abrupt phenomena such as stochastic failures and
repairs of the components, changes in the interconnections of
subsystems, sudden environment changes, etc.
Even though there are many valuable results about
neutral stochastic partial differential equations, they are
mainly concerned with first-order case. In many cases it is
advantageous to treat the second order stochastic differential
equations rather than to convert them to first-order systems.
The second-order stochastic differential equations are the
right model in continuous time to account for integrated
processes than can be made stationary. For instance, it is
useful for engineers to model mechanical vibrations or charge
on a capacitor or condenser subjected to white noise
excitation through a second-order stochastic differential
equations. The studies of the qualitative properties about
abstract deterministic second order evolution equation
governed by the generator of a strongly continuous cosine
family was proposed in [8,27]. Mahmudov and McKibben
[20] established results concerning the global existence and
approximate controllability of mild solutions for a class of
second order stochastic evolution equations. Moreover, Ren
and Sun [23] established the existence, uniqueness and
stability of the second-order neutral impulsive stochastic
evolution equations with delay with some non-Lipschitz
conditions. Balasubramaniam and Muthukumar [2] also
discussed the approximate controllability of second-order
neutral stochastic distributed implicit functional differential
equations with infinite delay. Sakthivel et al. [24] have
studied the asymptotic stability of second-order neutral
stochastic differential equations by a fixed point theorem. Lei
Zhang et al. [14] have studied the controllability of second-
order semilinear impulsive stochastic neutral functional
evolution equations. Inspired by this consideration, the main
objective of this paper is to study the asymptotic stability of
the second-order neutral impulsive stochastic delay
differential equations.
2. PRELIMINARIES
In this section, we briefly give some basic
definitions and results for stochastic equations in infinite
dimensions and cosine families of operators. We refer to Prato
and Zabczyk [6] and Fattorini [8] for more details. Let X
and E be two real separable Hilbert spaces and ) , ( X E L

be

the space of bounded linear operators from E

into X ,
equipped with the usual operator norm . Let ) , , ( P I O
be a complete probability space furnished with a normal
filtration
0
} {
>
I
t t
generated by the QWiener process w

International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Volume 2 Issue 4, 415 - 421, 2013
416
on ) , , ( P I O

with the linear bounded covariance operator

Q

such that < trQ . We assume that there exist a
complete orthonormal system
1
} {
> i i
e in E, a bounded
sequence of nonnegative real numbers } {
i
such that
i i i
e Qe = , ,..., 3 , 2 , 1 = i and a sequence } {
i
| of
independent Brownian motions such that
E e t e e e t w
i i
i
i
e =

=
), ( ), (
,
1
|

and
w
t t
I = I ,where
w
t
I is the sigma algebra generated by
0}. t {w(s); > Let ) ; (
2 / 1
2
0
2
X E Q L L = denote the
space of all Hilbert Schmidt operators from E Q
2 / 1

to X
with the inner product ] [ ,
0
2
-
= Q tr
L
. Let
) , , ( X L
t
p
I O is the Hilbert space of all

t
I -measurable
square integrable random variables with values in a Hilbert
space X .
In this paper, we consider the following second-order neutral
impulsive stochastic differential equations with delays of the
form
dt t t x t f t Ax t t x t f t x d )))] ( ( , ( ) ( [ )))] ( ( , ( ) ( [
1 0
o + = '
, 0 ), ( ))) ( ( , (
2
> + t t d t t x t f e o (1)
, ) 0 ( ; ) (
1 0
0
x x D x
b
= ' e =
I
(2)

)) ( (
~
) ( )) ( ( ) (
k k k k k k
t x I t x t x I t x = ' A = A ,
where , ,..., 2 , 1 m k = (3)
where
b
D
0
I
e

and
1
x is also an
0
I -measurable

X -
valued random variables independent of w.

X X A D A c ) ( : is the infinitesimal generator of a
strongly continuous cosine family on X ;
; ) 1 , 0 ( : =
+
i X X R f
i
0
2 2
: L X R f
+
are appropriate mappings

and X X I I
k k
:
~
, are
appropriate functions. Moreover, let

, ... 0
1 1 0
= < < < < =
+ m m
t t t t
, ) ( ) ( ) (
+
= A
k k k
t x t x t x
, ) ( ) ( ) (
+
' ' = ' A
k k k
t x t x t x ) (
+
k
t x and ) (

k
t x
denote the right and left limits of x at
k
t . Similarly ) (
+
'
k
t x
and ) (

'
k
t x denote the right and left limits of x' at .
k
t
Moreover ,
k
I
k
I
~
represents the size of the jump. Let
] , 0 [ : , , t o o
+
R ) 0 ( > t are continuous. The
space D is assumed to be equipped with the norm
X
t
D
t ) ( sup
0

t s s
= . Here ) ], 0 , ([
0
X D
b
t
I

denote the family of all almost surely bounded,
0
I -
measurable, continuous random variables from ] 0 , [ t to
X . Let us introduce the spaces

m k
X t t C x X J x X T H
k k
t t
k k
,..., 3 , 2 , 1
), ], , (( , : { ) ]; , 0 ([
1
, (
] 1
=
e =
+
+

and there exist ) (
+
k
t x for } ,..., 3 , 2 , 1 m k = and
m k X t t C
x X T H x X T H
k k
t t
k k
,..., 3 , 2 , 1 ), ], , ((
), ]; , 0 ([ { ) ; ] , 0 ([
1
, (
] 1
= '
e e = '
+
+

and there exist ) (
+
'
k
t x for } ,..., 3 , 2 , 1 m k = .
It is obvious that ) ]; , 0 ([ X T H and ) ; ] , 0 ([ X T H'
are Banach spaces endowed with the norm

p
X
T t
H
t x E x ) ( sup
] , 0 [ e
= .It is easy to see that H'
provided with the norm
H
H
H
x x x ' + =
'

.

In this section, we mention some basic concepts, notations,
and properties about cosine families of operators [8, 27].
Let ) ; ( X E L is the space of bounded linear operators from
E into X. The one parameter family
) ( } ); ( { X L R t t C c e satisfying
(i) I C = ) 0 ( ,
(ii) x t C ) ( is continuous in t on R for all X x e ,
(iii) ) ( ) ( 2 ) ( ) ( s C t C s t C s t C = +


for all R s t e , is called a strongly continuous cosine
family.
The corresponding strongly continuous sine family
) ( } ); ( { X L R t t S c e is define
. , , ) ( ) (
0
X x R t xds s C x t S
t
e e =
}

The generator X X A : of } ); ( { R t t C e is given by
0
2 2
) ( ) / (
=
=
t
x t C dt d Ax for all
)} ; ( ) ( : { ) (
2
X R C x C X x A D x e e = e

It is well known that the infinitesimal generator Ais
a closed, densely defined operator

on

X .

Such cosine and
sine families and their generators satisfy the following
properties.

Lemma 2.1: [8]
Suppose that Ais the infinitesimal generator of a
cosine family of operators }. ); ( { R t t C e Then

the
following terms hold.

International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Volume 2 Issue 4, 415 - 421, 2013
417
(i) There exists

1 >
-
M

and

0 > o such that


t
e M t C
o -
s ) ( and hence
t
e M t S
o -
s ) ( .
(ii)
}
=
r
s
x s C r C xdu u S A

)] ( ) ( [ ) (

for all


s s s r s 0 .

(iii) There exists

1 >
-
N

such that
ds e N r S s S
r
s
s
}
-
s

) ( ) (
o

for all s s s r s 0 .

Lemma 2.2: [6]. For any

1 > r and for arbitrary

0
2
L - valued predictable process ) ( | such that

( ) . ) ( )) 1 2 ( ( ) ( ) ( sup
0
1
2
2
0
] , 0 [
0
2
r
t
r
r
L
r
r
X
s
t s
ds s E r r u dw u E
|
|
.
|

\
|
s
} }
e
| |

Definition 2.3: A stochastic process

} ] , 0 [ ), ( { T t t x e
< s T 0 is called a mild solution of equations (1), (2)
and (3) if
(i) ) (t x is adapted to . 0 , > I t
t

(ii) X t x e ) ( had g la d ca ` ` paths on ] , 0 [ T t e a.s and
for each ] , 0 [ T t e , ) (t x satisfies the integral equation

( ) ))) 0 ( , 0 ( , 0 ( ) ( ) 0 ( ) ( ) (
0 1
o + = x f x t S t C t x
ds s s x s f s t C
t
}
+
0
0
))) ( ( , ( ) ( o
ds s s x s f s t S
t
))) ( ( , ( ) (
1
0
+
}

) ( ))) ( ( , ( ) (
2
0
s dw s s x s f s t S
t
o +
}

)) ( ( ) (
0
k
t t
k k
t x I t t C
k

< <
+
)) ( (
~
) (
0
k
t t
k k
t x I t t S
k

< <
+ (4)

Definition 2.4: Let

2 > p be an integer. Equation (3) is
said to be asymptotically stable in pth moment if it is

stable in
pth moment and for any

, ,
1
0
X x D
b
e e
I
we have


0 } ) ( {sup lim =

p
X
T
t x E


3. ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY OF
SECOND-ORDER NEUTRAL

STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL
EQUATIONS
Now let us present the main result of this paper. We
consider the asymptotic stability in the pth moment of mild
solutions

(1), (2), (3) by using the fixed point principle.
Moreover, for the purpose of asymptotic

stability, we shall
assume that in this work

) 1 , 0 ( 0 ) 0 , ( f
i
= = i t and
0 ) 0 , ( f
2
= t , , 0 ) 0 ( =
k
I 0 ) 0 (
~
=
k
I , m k ,..., 2 , 1 = .
Then equations (1), (2) and (3) have a trivial solution when
0 = and 0
1
= x .
To prove the following result, we impose the following
conditions.
(I) The cosine family of operators

} 0 ); ( { > t t C

on X and
the corresponding sine family } 0 ); ( { > t t S

satisfy the
conditions
bt
X
Me t C

s ) ( ,

at
X
Me t S

s ) ( , 0 > t

for some constants


1 > M

and
+
e < R b a, 0 .
(II) The functions ) 2 , 1 , 0 ( f
i
= i satisfy the Lipchitz
condition and there exist positive constants

3 2 1
, , K K K for every

0 > t and

X y x e ,

, such
that



1 , 0 ; ) , ( ) , ( = s i y x K y t f x t f
X
i
X
i i
.


2 ; ) , ( ) , (
3 2 2
= s i y x K y t f x t f
X X

(III) The function
k k
I I
~
,

and there are positive
constants q
k
, g
k
such that


p
k
p
k k
y x q y I x I s ) ( ) ( ,

p
k
p
k k
y x g y I x I s ) (
~
) (
~
,
for each

). ,..., 3 , 2 , 1 ( , m k X y x = e
(IV) , 0 ) 0 ( =
k
I 0 ) 0 (
~
=
k
I , m k ,..., 3 , 2 , 1 = .
Theorem 3.1:
Assume the conditions (I)-(IV) hold. Let 2 > p be
an integer and
2
2
) 1 (
p
p
p p
c |
.
|

\
|
= . If the inequality

1 )]

) 2 ( k + a k + b (k M 5 [
2
p
3
p - p
2
p - p
1
p 1 - p
< + +

D L a
p
is satisfied, then the second-order neutral stochastic
differential equations with delays (1), (2) and (3) is
asymptotically stable in pth moment.

Proof: Define an operator

H H + :

by

International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Volume 2 Issue 4, 415 - 421, 2013
418

( )
ds s s x s f s t C
x f x t S t C t x
t
}
+
+ = +
0
0
0 1
))) ( ( , ( ) (
))) 0 ( , 0 ( , 0 ( ) ( ) 0 ( ) ( ) )( (
o
o


ds s s x s f s t S
t
))) ( ( , ( ) (
1
0
+
}


) ( ))) ( ( , ( ) (
2
0
s dw s s x s f s t S
t
o +
}


)) ( (
~
) ( )) ( ( ) (
0 0
k
t t
k k k
t t
k k
t x I t t S t x I t t C
k k

< < < <
+ +

= ) (
7
1
t F
i
i
=

;

0 > t . (5)
In order to prove the asymptotic stability, it is enough to prove
that

the operator +

has a

fixed point H .To prove this
result, we use the contraction mapping principle. To apply the
contraction mapping principle, first we verify the mean square
continuity of

+

on ) , 0 [

.

Let H x e

,

0
1
> t

and


r is sufficiently small then


. ) ( ) ( 7
) )( ( ) )( (
7
1
1 1
1
1 1

+ s
+ +
i
p
X
i i
p
p
X
t F r t F E
t x r t x E

We can see that

. 0 7 , 6 , 4 , 3 , 2 , 1 , 0 ) ( ) (
1 1
= + r as i t F r t F E
p
X
i i

Moreover by using Holders inequality and lemma 2.2, we
obtain
p
X
t F r t F E ) ( ) (
1 5 1 5
+
) 2 / (
0
) / 2 (
2
1 1 1
1
))) ( ( , (
)) ( ) ( (
2
p
t
p
p
X
p
p
ds
s s x s f
s t S s r t S
E c
(
(

|
|
.
|

\
|

+
s
}

o


) 2 / (
) / 2 (
2 1
1
1
1
) ))) ( ( , ( ) ( ( 2
p
r t
t
p
p
X
p
p
ds s s x s f s r t S E c
(
(

+ +
}
+

o

, 0 0 r as (6)

Thus, + is continuous in pth moment on ) , 0 [ .
Next , we show that H H c + ) ( . From (5), we obtain

p
X
p
p
X
p
p
X
p
p
x
x f t S E x t S E
t C E t x E
))) 0 ( 0 ( , 0 ( ) ( 8 ) ( 8
) 0 ( ) ( 8 ) )( (
0
1
1
1
1
o

+ +
s

p
X
t
p
ds s s x s f s t C E
}
+

0
0
1
))) ( ( , ( ) ( 8 o

p
X
t
p
ds s s x s f s t S E ))) ( ( , ( ) ( 8
1
0
1
+
}

p
X
t
p
s dw s s x s f s t S E ) ( ))) ( ( , ( ) ( 8
2
0
1
o +
}

p
X
k k k
t t
p
t x I t t C E
k
)) ( ( ) ( 8
0
1
+

< <

. )) ( (
~
) ( 8
0
1
p
X
k k k
t t
p
t x I t t S E
k
+

< <

Now, we estimate the terms on the right hand side of (7) using
( I ), ( II ), ( III ) and (IV) we obtain

p
X
p
t C E ) 0 ( ) ( 8
1

0 8
1
s

p
D
bpt p p
e M as t , (8)

p
X
p
x t S E
1
1
) ( 8


0 8
1
1
s

p
X
apt p p
x e M as t , (9)
p
X
p
x f t S E ))) 0 ( , 0 ( , 0 ( ) ( 8
0
1
o

0 )) 0 ( ( 8
1
1
s

p
X
apt p p
x K e M o

as t ,(10)
p
X
k k k
t t
p
t x I t t C E
k
)) ( ( ) ( 8
0
1

< <

0 )) ( ( 8
1
s

p
X
k k
pbt p p
t x I e M
as t , (11)

p
X
k k k
t t
p
t x I t t S E
k
)) ( (
~
) ( 8
0
1

< <

0 )) ( (
~
8
1
s

p
X
k k
pat p p
t x I e M
as t , (12)
From

I, II, III, (IV) and Holders inequality, we have
p
X
t
p
ds s s x s f s t C E
}

0
0
1
))) ( ( , ( ) ( 8 o

ds s s x E e ds e K M
p
X
t
s t b
p
t
s t b p p p
)) ( ( 8
0
) (
1
0
) (
1
1
o
(

s
} }

ds s s x E e b K M
t
p
X
s t b p p p p
}
s

0
) ( 1
1
1
)) ( ( 8 o .
(13)
International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Volume 2 Issue 4, 415 - 421, 2013
419
For any H t x e ) (

and any 0 > c , there exist a 0
1
> t ,
such that c o <
p
X
s s x E )) ( ( for
1
t t > .

Thus from (13), we obtain



p
X
t
p
ds s s x s f s t C E
}

0
0
1
))) ( ( , ( ) ( 8 o
ds s s x E e e b K M
t
p
X
bs bt p p p p
}
s

1
0
1
1
1
)) ( ( 8 o

c
p p p p
b K M

+
1
1
8 . (14)

As 0
bt
e as t and by assumption on Theorem
3.1, there exists
1 2
t t > , such that for any ,
2
t t > we have

c c
o
p p p p
t
p
X
bs bt p p p p
b K M
ds s s x E e e b K M


s

}
1
1
0
1
1
1
8
)) ( ( 8
1
(15)

From (14) and (15), for any
2
t t > , we obtain

c o <
}

p
X
t
p
ds s s x s f s t C E
0
0
1
))) ( ( , ( ) ( 8 .

That is to say,
0 ))) ( ( , ( ) ( 8
0
0
1

}

p
X
t
p
ds s s x s f s t C E o


as t .

(16)


Similarly we can obtain

0 ))) ( ( , ( ) ( 8
0
1
1

}

p
X
t
p
ds s s x s f s t S E

as t . (17)
Now for any , ) ( S t x e | | e , t t , we have

) ( ))) ( ( , ( ) ( 8
2
0
1
p
X
t
p
s d s s x s f s t S E e o
}

( )
) 2 / (
0
) / 2 (
2
) ( 1
))) ( ( , ( 8
p
t
p
p
X
s t ap p
p
p
ds s s x s f E e M c
(

s
}

o


) 2 / (
0
) / 2 ( ) ( 2
3
1
) ))) ( ( ( 8
p
t
p
p
X
s t a p p
p
p
ds s s x E e k M c
(

s
}

o

s
}

1
0
) / 2 ( ) ( 2
3
1
) ))) ( ( ( 8
t
p
p
X
s t a p p
p
p
ds s s x E e k M c o


2 /
/ 2 ) ( 2
1
) ))) ( ( (
p
t
t
p
p
X
s t a
ds s s x E e
(
(

(
+
}

o
( ) ds s s x E e k M c
p
t
p
p
X
s t a p p
p
p
) 2 / (
0
) / 2 ( ) ( 2
3
1
1
) ))) ( ( ( 8
}
s

o


2 /
3
1
) 2 ( 8
p p p
p
p
a k M c

+ c
(18)

As 0
pat
e as t and by assumption on Theorem
3.1, there exists a ,
1 2
t t > such that for any ,
2
t t > we have
( ) ds s s x E e k M c
p
t
p
p
X
s t a p p
p
p
) 2 / (
0
) / 2 ( ) ( 2
3
1
1
) ))) ( ( ( 8
}


o


2 /
3
1
) 2 ( 8
p p p
p
p
a k M c

s c c . (19)

From (18) and (19), for any ,
2
t t > we obtain

. ) ( ))) ( ( , ( ) ( 8
2
0
1
c o <
}

p
X
t
p
s dw s s x s f s t S E

(20)
That is to say

}

t as s dw s s x s f s t S E
p
X
t
p
0 ) ( ))) ( ( , ( ) ( 8
0
2
1
o
. (21)
Thus from (8)-(12) and (16), (17), (21), we can obtain
+ t as t x E
p
x
0 ) )( ( .Thus we conclude that
. ) ( H H c +
Next we prove that + is a contraction mapping .To see this,
Let H y x e ,

and for ], , 0 [ T s e we obtain
p
X
T s
t y t x E ) )( ( ) )( ( sup
] , 0 [
+ +
e



p
X
t
T s
p
ds
s s y s f
s s x s f
s t C E
} |
|
.
|

\
|


s
e

0 0
0
] , 0 [
1
))) ( ( , (
))) ( ( , (
) ( sup 5
o
o

p
X
t
T s
p
ds
s s y s f
s s x s f
s t S E
} |
|
.
|

\
|


+
e

0 1
1
] , 0 [
1
))) ( ( , (
))) ( ( , (
) ( sup 5

International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Volume 2 Issue 4, 415 - 421, 2013
420
p
X
t
T s
p
s d
s s y s f
s s x s f
s t S E
} |
|
.
|

\
|


+
e

0 2
2
] , 0 [
1
) (
))) ( ( , (
))) ( ( , (
) ( sup 5 e
o
o


( )
p
X
t t
k k k k k
T s
p
k
t y I t x I t t C E

< <
e

+
0
] , 0 [
1
)) ( ( )) ( ( ) ( sup 5


( )
p
X
t t
k k k k k
T s
p
k
t y I t x I t t S E

< <
e

+
0
] , 0 [
1
)) ( (
~
)) ( (
~
) ( sup 5

2 /
3 2 1
1
) 2 ( [ 5
p
p
p p p p p p p
a c k a k b k M

+ + s





=

+ +
m
k
p
X
k
paT
m
k
p
X
k
pbT
g E e q E e
1 1
)] ( ) (

p
X
T s
t y t x E ) ( ) ( sup
] , 0 [

e
.

Therefore, +is a contraction mapping and hence there exist
an unique fixed point ) ( x in H which is the solution of the
equations (1)-(3) with
1 0
) 0 ( , ) ( x x x = ' = and
0 ) (
p
X
t x E as

. t This completes the proof.
Corollary 3.2:
If the conditions (I) to (IV) hold, then the second- order
neutral impulsive stochastic differential system (1) to (3) is
mean square asymptotically stable if
1 )

) 2 ( ( 5
1 2
3
2 2
2
2 2
1
2
< + + + +

D L a k a k b k M


where |
.
|

\
|
=

=

m
k
X
k
bT
q E e L
1
2
2

,
|
.
|

\
|
=

=

m
k
X
k
bT
g E e D
1
2
2

.
4. REFERENCES

[1] Appleby, J. A. D., (2008), Fixed points, stability and
harmless stochastic perturbations, preprint.
[2] Balasubramaniam, P., and Muthukumar, P., Approximate
controllability of second-order stochastic distributed
implicit functional differential systems with infinite delay,
J. Optim. Theory Appl., 143 (2) (2009), 225-244.
[3] Caraballo, T., Asymptotic exponential stability of
stochastic partial differential equations with delay,
stochastics, 33 (1990), 27- 47.
[4] Caraballo, T., Real, J., Partial differential equations with
delayed random perturbations: existence, uniqueness and
stability of solutions, Stoch. Anal. Appl. 11 (1993), 497-
511.
[5] Caraballo, T., Real, J., Taniguchi, T. The exponential
stability of neutral stochastic delay partial differential
equations, Discrete and continuous Dynamical systems,
series A, 18 (2-3) (2007), 295-313.
[6] Da Prato, G., Zabczyk, J., 1992. Stochastic Equations in
infinite Dimensions (Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge).
[7] Dauer, J.P., Mahmudov, N. I., Integral inequalities and
mild solutions of semilinear neutral evolution equations,
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 300 (1) (2004), 189-202.
[8] Fattorini, H.O., 1985. Second order linear Differential
equations in Banach Spaces, North Holland Mathematics
Studies series No. 108 (Elsevier Science, North Holland).
[9] Hale, J. K., Lunel. S. M. V., 1991. Introduction to
Functional differential equations (Springer-Verlag,
Berlin).
[10] Hu, L., Ren, Y., Existence results for impulsive neutral
stochastic functional integro-differential equations with
infinite delays, Acta Appl. Math. 111 (3) (2010),
303-317.
[11] Ichikawa, A., Stability of semilinear stochastic evolution
equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 90 (1982), 12-24.
[12] Khasminskii, R., 1980. Stochastic stability of
differential equations, Sijthoff and noordhoff,
Netherlands.
[13] Kolmanovskii, V. B and., Myshkis, A., 1992. Applied
Theory of Functional Differential Equations (Kluwer
Academic, Norwell, MA).
[14] Lei Zhang, Yongsheng Ding, Tong Wang, Liangjian Hu,
and Kuangrong Hao, Controllability of second-order
semilinear impulsive stochastic neutral functional
evolution equations, Mathematical Problems in
Engineering 748091 (2012), 1-13.
[15] Liu, K., Truman, A., A note on almost exponential
stability for stochastic partial differential equations,
Statist. Probab. Lett. 50 (2000), 273-278.
[16] Luo, J., Fixed points and exponential stability of mild
solutions of stochastic partial differential equations with
delays, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 342 (2008), 753-760.
[17] Luo, J., Stability of stochastic partial differential
equations with infinite delays, J. Comput. Appl. Math.
222 (2008), 364-371.
[18] Luo, J., Exponential stability for stochastic neutral partial
functional differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl.
355 (1) (2009), 414425.
[19] Luo, J., Taniguchi, T., Fixed points and stability of
stochastic neutral partial differential equations with
International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Volume 2 Issue 4, 415 - 421, 2013
421
infinite delays, Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 27
(2) (2009), 1163-1173.
[20] Mahmudov, N. I., and Mckibben, M. A., Abstract
second-order damped Mckean-Vlasov stochastic
evolution equations, Stoch. Anal. Appl. 24 (2006),
303-328.
[21] Nieto, J.J., Rodriguez-Lopez, R., Boundary value
problems for a class of impulsive functional equations,
Comput. Math. Appl. 55 (2008), 2715-2731.
[22] Nieto, J.J., Rodriguez-Lopez, R., New comparison results
for impulsive integro-differential equations and
applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 328 (2007),
1343-1368.
[23] Ren, Y., Dandan, S., Second order neutral impulsive
stochastic evolution equations with delays, J. Math.
Phys. 50 (2009), 102709.
[24] Sakthivel, R., Ren, Y., Kim, H., Asymptotic stability of
second-order neutral stochastic differential equations,
J. Math. Phys. 51 (2010), 052701.
[25] Samoilenko, A.M., Perestyuk, N.A., 1995. Impulsive
Differential Equations, World Scientific, Singapore.
[26] Taniguchi, T., Liu, K., A., Truman, Existence and
uniqueness and asymptotic behavior of mild solution to
stochastic functional differential equations in Hilbert
spaces, J. Differential Equations 18 (2002), 72-91.
[27] Travis, C.C., Web, G.F., Cosine families and abstract
nonlinear second order differential equations, Acta Math.
Acad. Sci. Hung. 32 (1978), 75-96.