Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Summary Report
Submitted by Junaid Iqbal Ansari BS 4th Semester Department Of Commerce, University Of Karachi. Submitted to Sir Sarfaraz Nehal
11/29/2011
Our Lord! Give us the best in this world and give us the best in the hereafter and save us from the fire of Hell. The Quran.
Islam is not an ascetic religion; it candidly encourages economic development. But it has many departures from the mainstream positions. The main ones are as under: Islam regards man as bi-polar. His wants are both mundane and spiritual. In any scheme of development both sorts of human wants are to be met. For this reason, in Islam development means the development of human personality. He has to follow worldly pursuits not in isolation or violation of his spiritual urges and responsibilities.
The Quran instructs him But buy with the wealth that Allah has given thee the home of the hereafter but forget not thy portion of this world. This reminds him his trusteeship obligations.
On the mundane side,
Islam gives the first claim to the fulfillment of basic needs and advocates moderation in consumption. And those who indulge in KUFR eat like animal; their abode is Hell. (Quran).
On the spiritual side, creation
of beauty in its widest sense and commitment to a noble cause are inalienable elements in the comprehensive development of human beings.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction 2. Content and Structure 3. Summary Chapter One 4. Summary Chapter Two 5. Summary Chapter Three 6. Summary Chapter Four 7. Summary Chapter Five 8. Summary Chapter Six - Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
All Muslim countries fall within the category of developing countries even though some of them are relatively rich while others are extremely poor. Most of these countries, particularly the poorer ones, like other developing countries, are also beset with a number of extremely difficult problems. One of these problems is their macroeconomic imbalance reflected in high rates of unemployment and inflation, excessive balance of payments deficits, continued exchange rate depreciation and heavy debt burden. The other problem is the extreme inequality of income and wealth among the different classes of each country, as well as between different Muslim countries. Consequently, while even the basic needs of a considerable portion of the population remain unsatisfied, the rich and the upper middle classes live in great affluence. This tends to corrode the fabric of social solidarity and serves as one of the prime causes of socio-political instability. Given this scenario, what is indispensable for the Muslim countries is not just a reasonably high rate of growth in aggregate output. They also need to substantially reduce their macroeconomic imbalances and socioeconomic inequalities. Without this reduction in imbalances and inequalities, even the continued growth of output and the socio-political health and stability of these countries will, in the ultimate, be seriously jeopardized. The Muslim countries like all other developing countries are, therefore, looking for a development strategy that would help them accelerate growth with justice and reduced instability. Since Islamic resurgence is gaining momentum in almost all Muslim countries, five basic questions arise in the mind.
The first question is about the kind of development that Islam envisages. The second and the third questions are whether this kind of development can be realized with the secular approach of those who believe either in the market system or socialism or with strategies formulated by development economists within the framework of these two systems. If not, then the fourth question is about the strategy that the Shariah (Islamic teachings) can help the Muslim countries formulate in order to actualize development of the kind that Islam envisages with substantially reduced macroeconomic imbalances. If a successful strategy can be formulated within the framework of the Shariah, then the fifth question is about why the Muslim countries have so far failed to formulate and implement such a strategy. Each of these five questions has been discussed in a separate chapter in this book. The concluding chapter wraps up the entire discussion so as to enable the reader to get a gist of the whole analysis.
SUMMARY
Chapter One (pp, 3-9)
Chapter one draws the contours of the kind of development that may resolve the problems developing countries are facing. It postulates that the goals to be achieved determine the proper strategy for development. But these goals, in turn, stem from the worldview of the system. Thus the choice of the goals and strategy together depends on the selection of an appropriate economic system. As the worldview of both capitalism and socialism is secular and thus devoid of a moral dimension, neither of them is considered conductive to a human economic development. On the other hand, the Islamic worldview, conditioned by three of the faiths basic tenets unity, vicegerency, and justice emphasizes both the mundane and spiritual aspects of human development. It makes the well-being (falah) of all human beings the principal goal of the Shariah. All this hardly disputable, but missing in Chapras exposition is the vital link Islam provides between the mundane and the spiritual goals of human development. The basic thesis of the book, says Chapra, is that even material development with justice is not possible without moral development (p. 7). The Muslim countries are advised to adopt the strategy based on the Islamic principles for achieving the missing dimension, among other things. In this connection the concepts of efficiency and equity, as they stand in mainstream economics, are revised to meet the Islamic requirements.
Five policy measures are indicated to put the above integrated approach into action. First is the needed to invigorate the human factor. This can be done through subjecting the pursuit of self-interest to moral discipline; promoting socioeconomic justice; initiating labor reforms; ensuring fair treatment of small income earners, producers, exporters, and consumers; expanding education and training facilities; and improving the weaker sections access to finance. Second, concentration in asset ownership is to be reduced. The measures suggested are land and tenancy reforms, including incentives for sharecropping in rural development schemes, integration of small and medium enterprises with agriculture, wider equity dispersal and control of corporations, the activation of zakah and the Islamic inheritance system, and financial reforms. Third is economic restructuring. Under this come changing consumer preferences by introducing a moral filter, distinguishing needs from luxuries, and liberalizing need fulfillment; reform of public finance, including priorities and principles of government spending; the issue of subsidies, public enterprises, defense, tax reforms, and deficit financing; restructuring of the investment climate by removing political uncertainties, exchange control, tariffs and import substitution, and encouraging foreign equity capital; need-based production; and a new deal for the unemployed. The fourth measure focuses on the urgency of financial restructuring especially for helping marginal farmers, small enterprises, and the self-employed poor who have more skills than they can use in the absence of adequate funds. Indeed, Chapra supports the view that the availability of finance should be recognized as one of the basic human rights, for it plays a critical role in the latters attainment (p. 109). The proposal has far-reaching implications, and deserves much more thought and space than IAED could provide. Fifth is the insistence on strategic policy planning. Although there is not much elaboration of the idea, the role of such planning would be to enable the state to take a realistic account of all the available physical and human resources and to establish a set of well-defined priorities. It would have a long-run perspective, and too-frequent policy changes have to be eschewed.