Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Fractures
Objectives of this Chapter: The characterization of fractures from electrical images. This includes the classification of fractures into open, mineral-filled, or vuggy and whether the fractures are: natural; polygonal; or mechanically includes. And the fracture strike/dip orientation.
Fractures
Fractures
Naturally occurring open fractures are very important to producibility in many carbonate and sandstone reservoirs. There are two methods of interpretation: fracture characterization (visual inspection of the electrical images) and fracture analysis (computer assisted evaluation). There are three factors which affect the electrical images and must be considered before an accurate interpretation is possible: Rm, resistivity of the mud at formation temperature; Rxo, resistivity of the flushed zone; Fracture geometry. Characterization of fracture systems from electrical images includes: the identification of the fracture type as to vertical, polygonal, or mechanically induced; the definition of the fracture morphology as to open, mineral-filled, or vuggy; and the dip/strike orientation.
Fracture Identification
Vertical fractures in a vertical borehole can be identified as a high amplitude feature which crosses other bedding planes. The feature is conductive if open and resistive if mineral-filled. Vertical fractures may be oriented by normal dip computation methods. Producibility and recovery efficiency in some reservoirs is influenced by the fracture angle. The angle most often used as criteria is 75. Fractures with dip angles of more than 75 are vertical fractures while those less than 75 are high angle fractures. Polygonal (syneresis) fractures are caused by the chemical or mechanical dewatering of a carbonate or by tectonic forces. The type of fractures often appears at changes in the lithology. Polygonal fractures have a braided appearance and are often referred to as chicken-wire fractures. These cannot be oriented. Mechanically induced fractures are created by the drilling process or by a hydraulic frac. These fractures are always open and may be oriented by conventional dip methods. The strike orientation of mechanically induced fractures reflects the present day least principle stress direction.
Fracture Morphology
Fractures may be open, mineral-filled, or vuggy. Open fractures are more conductive than the surrounding matrix. The degree of conductivity depends on the resistivities of the mud and the flushed-zone, and the fracture geometry. Visual inspection of the images may be used only as a guide to interpretation. A salt mud system will enhance the appearance of fracture while a fresh mud system will reduce the appearance. Mineral-filled fractures will appear less conductive than open fractures. Vuggy fractures exhibit irregular enlargements along the fracture plane.
4-2
Fractures
Fracture Identification
N W S E
Fractures
0 6'' Fe e t S p ec tras c opy Gamma Ray Ca liper 125 16'' 30% Ne utron/De ns i ty Poros ity 20% 10% 0% Me te rs X530 X300 00 X535
X540
X555
GR 0 150
Meters X545
Feet
30 60 90
Orientation: North
X350
X352
X356 X547
X358 1/15
X548 X360
4-4
Fractures
Fracture Orientation
Accurate orientation of fractures is required to properly locate offset development or injection wells. Often the orientation of mechanically induced fractures is used to decide the practicality of hydraulic fracs. A sine wave is fit through the fracture, in a BORMAP presentation, to compute the dip. If this is done manually, then the dip is apparent and not borehole compensated. Strike of the fracture is measured perpendicular to the fracture azimuth. The angle of the fracture from horizontal is used to classify the fracture as either vertical (greater than 75) or high angle (less than 75). The dip computation may be from overlays, geologic workstation, FMS Dip, or Fracview. Computer assisted interpretation programs allows statistical plots of the data. Straight line image plots from the two pad tools are more challenging to interpret. The fracture must be present on both pads or data from multiple passes must be used to determine the fracture orientation. The Pad No. 1 azimuth is determined from the borehole drift plot. The small arrow is the azimuth of Pad No. 1. Pads 3 and 4 are oriented clockwise from the Pad No. 1 azimuth. If the fracture is present on both pads, then the strike of the fracture can be plotted on an azimuth diagram and measured. Multiple passes may be handled in a similar manner.
4-5
Fractures
Fracture Example 1
Objective of this example: Fracture Characterization. Geological Background: Jurassic Carbonate. Available Data: Equalized and Enhanced Images, Litho-Density and Neutron Logs, Perforation as marked. Evaluation: 3 Identification: o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced 3 Morphology: o Open o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Orientation: Fracture Angle: 85/113 Fracture Strike: 23 - 203 Azimuth Diagram:
XX998
XX999
XX000
4-6
Fractures
Fracture Example 2
Objective of this example: Geological Background: Available Data: Evaluation: Identification: Morphology: Orientation: Characterization of a vertical fracture. Carbonate. Resistivity Calibrated Images, NGT, Natural Gamma Ray.
3 Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o 3 3 3 o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: Vertical Fracture Strike: 38 - 218
Meters
0 0 0 0
Carbonate
Orientation: North 0 30 60 90 120 150 180210 240 270300 330
Feet
XX35
300
X335 XX36
270
90
240
120
210
150 180
XX37
X340
XX40 X350 Equalized 1/30 (FMSCAL) THOR - Thorium URAN - Uranium POTA - Potasium
1/6
RSGR - Total Gamma Ray FVA - Mean Fracture Aperture PVPA - Total Fracture Porosity
4-7
Fractures
Fracture Exercise 1
Objective of this example: Geological Background: Available Data: Evaluation: Identification: Morphology: Orientation: Characterization of a vertical fracture. Cretaceous Reef. Equalized Images. o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: Fracture Strike:
North 0 330 30 300 60
270
90
Feet
45
240
120
210 180
150
XX456 X00.0
TD:84/179
XX457
X00.5
XX458
XX459
Equalized
4-8
Fractures
Fracture Exercise 2
Objective of this example: Geological Background: Available Data: Evaluation: Identification: Morphology: Orientation: Azimuth Diagram:
300
Characterization of a vertical fracture. Pennsylvanian Sand. Equalized Images. o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: North 0 Fracture Strike:
330 30 60
270
90
240
120
210 180
150
TD: 20/359 X03 X00.5 X020 X04 X031 TD: 17/353 X05 TD: 87/112 X025 TD: 17/344 TD: 18/358
TD: 17/340
X08
Meter s
Feet Equalized
4-9
Fractures
Fracture Exercise 3
Objective of this example: Geological Background: Available Data: Evaluation: Identification: Morphology: Orientation: Azimuth Diagram:
300
Characterization of a vertical fracture. Carbonate. Resistivity Calibrated Images. o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: North 0 Fracture Strike:
330 30 60
Carbonate
Display 1 ; scale 1/5
0 30 60 90 120 Orientation: North 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
270
90
240
120
210 180
150
60
61
62
63
Feet
4-10
Fractures
Fracture Exercise 4
Objective of this example: Geological Background: Available Data: Evaluation: Identification: Morphology: Orientation: Fracture Characterization. Carbonate. Resistivity Calibrated Images. o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: Fracture Strike:
Carbonate
Display 1; scale 1/5
0 30 60 90 120 Orientation: North 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
29.0 57
29.2
58 29.4
29.6 59
29.8
4-11
Fractures
30
60
Orientation: North 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
X431 X000.0
X000.2 X432
Stri
ke
X000.4
X000.8 X434
Meters
Feet
4-12
Fractures
70.5 18
19 71.0
20
71.5
21
22
72.0 23
24 72.5
Meters
Feet
Equalized 1/10::1/10
4-13
Fractures
Fracture Exercise 5
Objective of this example: Geological Background: Available Data: Evaluation: Identification: Morphology: Orientation: Fracture Characterization. Carbonate. Resistivity Calibrated Images. o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: Fracture Strike:
Carbonate
0 90 180 270 360
XX052
XX053
XX054
Feet
4-14
Fractures
Fracture Example
Objective of this example: Evaluation of unconformities. Geological Background: Available Data: Electrical Images.
XX380
XX390
1:48 ft
Deg
10
C2.FBSTB.0 6 16
AHT60.HILTC FMI EID (C600926) 0.2 2000 Horizontal Scale: 1:11 (ohm.m) Orientation North AHT30.HILTC 0 120 240 360 0.2 2000 (ohm.m) FMI Image Resistive Conductive AHT20.HILTC 0.2 2000
FMI EID (C600914) Horizontal Scale: 1:11 Orientation North 0 120 240 360
Resistive
4-15
Fractures
Fracture Exercise 6
Objective of this example: Geological Background: Available Data: Evaluation: Identification: Morphology: Orientation: Fracture Characterization. Carbonate. Resistivity Calibrated Electrical Images. o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: Fracture Strike:
Carbonate
Display 1 ; scale 1/4
0 1292.2 30 60 90 120 Orientation: North 150 180 210 240 270 300 330
4240 1292.4
1292.6 4241
1292.8
4242 1293.0
4-16
Fractures
Fracture Exercise 7
Objective of this example: Geological Background: Available Data: Evaluation: Identification: Morphology: Orientation: Fracture Characterization. Carbonate. Resistivity Calibrated Images, Straight Borehole. o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: Fracture Strike:
Orientation: North 120 180 240 300
8200
2499.5
8201
8202 2500.0
8203
2500.5 8204
4-17
Fractures
Fracture Exercise 8
Objective of this example: Geological Background: Available Data: Evaluation: Identification: Morphology: Orientation: Azimuth Diagram:
300
Fracture Characterization. Carbonate. Resistivity Calibrated Images. o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: North 0 Fracture Strike:
330 30 60
270
90
240
120
Carbonate
210 180
150
4-18
Fractures
Fracture Exercise 9
Objective of this example: Geological Background: Available Data: Evaluation: Identification: Morphology: Orientation: Fracture Characterization. Carbonate. Resistivity Calibrated Images. o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: Fracture Strike:
Ordovician Carbonate
Display 1 ; scale 1/5
0 30 60 Orientation: North 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330
46 46.0
TD: 80/227
46.4
47.0
4-19
Fractures
3 o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced 3 3 Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o 3 Vuggy o Open o Fracture Angle: 84/179 Fracture Strike: 89 - 269 (E-W)
North 0 30
300
60
270
Strike
90
240
120
210 180
150
3 Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o 3 Open o 3 Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy o Fracture Angle: 87/112 Fracture Strike: 22 - 202
North 0 330 30
300
60
270
90
210 180
150
3 Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o 3 Mineral-Filled o Vuggy o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Fracture Angle: 50/140 Fracture Strike: N50E - S50W
4-20
Fractures
(continued)
3 o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced 3 Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy 3 Open o o Fracture Angle: NA Fracture Strike: NA
3 o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced 3 o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: Vertical Fracture Strike: 30 - 210
3 o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced 3 Vuggy 3 Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o o Fracture Angle: NA Fracture Strike: NA
3 Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced o 3 Mineral-Filled o Vuggy o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Fracture Angle: High > 80 Fracture Strike: ENE - WSW *Note: There is a fault at 2,500.4 meters
3 o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced 3 o Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Fracture Angle: Vertical Fracture Strike: NE - SW
4-21
Fractures
(continued)
Exercise 9 - Equalized Images 3 Identification: o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced 3 Open o Partially Mineral-Filled o Mineral-Filled o Vuggy Morphology: o Orientation: Upper Fracture: Fracture Angle: 80/227 Fracture Strike: 137 - 317 Lower Fracture: Fracture Angle: 69/215 Fracture Strike: 125 - 305 Exercise 9 - Resistivity Calibrated Identification: o Natural Vertical o Polygonal (Syneresis) o Mechanical Induced 3 Morphology: o Open (very low flow rate) Orientation: Fracture Angle: Vertical Fracture Strike: NW - SE Comments: The figure on the following page shows both the fraction image and the computed hydraulic aperture. Normally, a minimum of 0.05 mm in gas reservoirs is required to be commercially productive. The image of a fracture is affected by the surrounding rock resistivity and the mud resistivity. The large fracture appearance is a result of a very resistive formation with a very conductive mud system. This allows a low aperture fracture to have the appearance of an open fracture due to the resistivity contrast. Caution: The only positive method of fracture evaluation is to calculate the hydraulic fracture aperture through fracture analysis programs. This is discussed in a later chapter.
Display 1; scale 1/5
Orientation: North
0.001
10
46
46.2
47
47
46.4
48
46.6
48
46.8
49
47.0
49
Meters
Feet
4-22