Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SLIDES
COMBATTING FALSIFIED MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND SIMILAR CRIMES THROUGH LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICAL MEASURES
Outline
Falsified medical product situation Global Falsified medical product situation UK The Risks Legal frameworks to combat MHRA Falsified Medical Products Strategy Conclusion
North America
Vast majority of counterfeits discovered in the UK are supplied over the internet 10 instances of counterfeit medicines in the legitimate supply chain that reached pharmacies and led to recall since 2004 850 million+ prescriptions written annually Counterfeit medicines in the legitimate supply chain are rare Obtaining medicines from unregulated sources significantly exposes the risk of receiving counterfeit medicines
Wholesale - Anti- cholesterol, Anti- inflammatory, Anti-platelet, Alopecia, Erectile Dysfunction, Rheumatoid Arthritis, HIV. Pharmacy - Anti-cholesterol, Anti-platelet, Anti-psychotic, Erectile dysfunction, Prostate cancer, Appetite suppressants, Chronic asthma. Clinical Trial - Anti - platelet
The Risks
To public health:
The products are sub standard in terms of their method of
of confidence when obtaining their medical products especially with a prescription from a pharmacy
Counterfeit medical products undermine that level of trust,
To industry/trade:
public health as above reputational damage financial impact
Safety features
Internet sales
Active substances
and consumers
increase the risk to those
30 yrs 2 months imprisonment 5 yrs 9.5 months suspended 930 hours Community Service 1,300 fines
Total costs awarded 66,000 Total amount of proceeds of crime ordered to be confiscated from criminals - 15.3m
Conclusion
No supply chain is impenetrable No room for complacency Collaborative effort from all key stakeholders is the only way to successfully tackle this issue Legal frameworks and/or a national strategy can be very helpful to combat this issue and act as a deterrent
Protecting public health is the
overarching aim
Thank you
All Enforcement enquiries and potential referrals to: MHRA Case Referrals Centre casereferrals@mhra.gsi.gov.uk or tel +44 (0)20 3080 6330
Gerald Heddell
Director Inspection, Enforcement and Standards Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in the following slides are those of the presenter. They should not be understood or quoted as being made on behalf of the European Commission.
Legislation
New EU legislation on the prevention of the entry into the legal supply chain of falsified medicines
Directive 2011/62/EC amending Directive 2001/83/EC
Manufacturers of medicines
Distributors
Online pharmacies
1. Establishment of unique identifiers for medicinal products 2. Assessment of the equivalence of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) rules for the manufacturing of active substances in third countries 3.Principles of GMP for active substances
Characteristics of the unique identifier. Linear or 2D barcode ? Who checks the serialisation number. Wholesalers? Frequency of checks? Establishment, management and accessibility of the repositories system Lists of exceptions/inclusions Notification of products at risk
Consultation closed Analysis of responses Impact assessment in 2013 Delegated act in 2014 Application 3 years after its publication
10
2. assessment of the equivalence of GMP rules for the manufacturing of active substances in third countries
From July 2013, new requirements on import of API active substances into the EU: written confirmation from the competent authority of the third country demonstrating:
-
manufacturing site is in compliance with GMP equivalent to EU GMP is subject to controls including site inspections.
11
2. assessment of the equivalence of GMP rules for the manufacturing of active substances in third countries
Written confirmation: -Template published for public consultation http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/counterf_par_trade/2012_04_ 16_pc_en.pdf - contacts with third countries trade partners.
12
2. assessment of the equivalence of GMP rules for the manufacturing of active substances in third countries
From July 2013, new requirements on import of API active substances into the EU: -the country is listed in a EU list (upon request of the third country)
13
2. assessment of the equivalence of GMP rules for the manufacturing of active substances in third countries
Countries in the EU list have been assessed for:
GMP rules equivalent to EU rules Regularity of inspections Effectiveness of enforcement of GMP Rapid alert system for non-compliant producers
14
Proposal to expand the scope of the current Directive 2003/94/EC on GMP to API
15
Delegated act on the introduction of medicines in the EU Implementing act on a trust mark for online pharmacies 4 guidelines (excipients, GDPs for APIs, Rules for brokers, inspections) 1 awareness campaign (illegal online-offers of medicines)
16
17
18
Thank you!
UK Largest Counterfeit Case in the legitimate supply chain 2007 Operation Singapore
Nimo Ahmed Head of Enforcement (Acting) Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency MEDICRIME CONFERENCE 16 MAY 2012 COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
Outline
Case overview Public Health v Investigation Case in detail Lessons learned Conclusion
Case overview
Most serious known case of Counterfeit Medicines
penetrated the UK supply chain between December 2006 and May 2007 (Retail value 2007 4.7m)
Medicines were for the treatment of Psychosis, Prostate
Case in detail
MHRA seized 1.3m doses before reaching pharmacies Further 7000 packs recovered following recalls 25,000 packs (700,000 doses) reached pharmacies and
patients
Products contained between 50% - 80% of Active
identification alone
UK
Belgium
UK
Luxembourg China
Mauritius
72,000 packs, 2.1 million doses 3 medicines, 7 separate batches 4 Class 1 recalls in May and June 2007 Retail value 4.7m 3 year investigation 13 countries involved 17,000 pages of evidence 4000 exhibits 40 Computers and phones forensically examined 93 witnesses gave evidence at trial from 6 countries 205 witnesses made written statements 4 month Crown Court Trial
UK
Lu (Kevin) XU (Chinese) 6 years imprisonment Trafficking counterfeit medicine MHRA investigators gave evidence
Peter Gillespie (British) 8 years imprisonment Conspiracy to defraud, TM, MA US officers gave evidence
Lessons learned
Priority is public health Act quickly, first 72 hours most important Develop investigation strategy:
computer forensics
Collaboration:
Conclusion
Public health always priority
First 72 hours vital for investigation International collaboration essential Legal frameworks ensure crucial and timely international cooperation
Thank you
All Enforcement enquiries and potential referrals to: MHRA Case Referrals Centre casereferrals@mhra.gsi.gov.uk or tel +44 (0)20 3080 6330
Nimo Ahmed
Acting Head of Enforcement Enforcement Group Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
Challenges for Croatian Medicines Agency as regards networking at both the national and international levels
COMBATING COUNTERFEITS
1) INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION
-Croatian Medicines Agency member of the OMCL network (sharing the latest counterfeit information) -representative in the Committee of Experts on Minimising the Public Health Risks Posed by Counterfeiting of Medical Products and Related Crimes -representative in the Ad hoc Committee on Counterfeiting of Medical products and Similar Crimes Involving Threats to Public Health -representative in HMA Working Group of Enforcement Officers (WGEO) -Co-operation with national medicines agencies in the EU
COMBATING COUNTERFEITS
2) CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RELEVANT INSTITUTIONS IN CROATIA (police, customs, pharmaceutical inspection, medicines agency) good cooperation and communication but SPOC model (Single Point of Contact) has not been established yet workshop in Zagreb in December 2012 for countries in region to facilitate establishment of SPOCs network in Croatia and surrounding countries 3) RAISING PUBLIC AWARENESS
Ukraine was one of the first who joined to the Council of Europe Convention on Counterfeiting of medicinal products and similar crimes involving threats to public health (MEDICRIME Convention), which complements EU Directive 2011/62 on falsified medicines. Moreover, falsification of medicines in Ukraine and related crimes became seriously punished according to the approved in 2011 amendments to the Criminal Law of Ukraine, which provides severe imprisonment and fines.
As for today MEDICRIME Convention is in process of ratification. The following Authorities have signed Ukrainian translation of Convention: Ministry of Health; Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Ministry of Internal Affairs (Police); Ministry of Finance; State Customs Service; State Tax Service; Security Service; The next step is to prepare list of regulations which need to be amended in accordance with the Convention. After that Convention will be signed in the Ministry of Justice and the Bill will be submitted to the Government for approval. Adopted Bill will be the final stage of ratification procedure.
In parallel, serious efforts were paid in order to develop modern laboratory network, using the OMCLs structure and experience. SAUMP Central Laboratory was successfully prequalified by the WHO. During the last two years number of scheduled and unscheduled inspections was significantly increased, as well as their quality. Medical devices have also been reviewed for protection against counterfeiting. The communication strategy is crucial for the State Administration of Ukraine on Medicinal Products. SAUMP supports continuous exchange of information with the EMEA, WHO, EDQM and interested European Agencies. SAUMP also supports constant cooperation with the representatives of Ukrainian law enforcement bodies and customs; a permanent working group was established and it works. Ukrainian authorities and pharmaceutical industry are now discussing the implementation of systems for protection against falsification, as well as implementation of Track & Trace System, and this point was highlighted by the respective Prime-Ministers Resolution two weeks ago.
The problems that remain: - Lack of effective cooperation with the law enforcement authorities and importance of control over the Internet; - Lack of informational exchange with the Customs Service in Ukraine in regard to medical products, need in legal binding instruments; - The complexity of purchasing procedure for equipment, need in modernization of laboratories and services; - Lack of preparedness of Ukrainian legislation to impose new requirements and standards; - Difficulties in cooperation with some regions and countries, lack of established network of single points of contacts.
Control already performs SPOC determined functions in Ukrainian drug regulatory authority and reports to the interested parties about counterfeit cases in accordance with a set procedure, we propose: to include SAUMP details in the list of all SPOCs for each country; to develop the concept of a SPOC network; to emphasize cooperation on the national level and to establish SPOCs for Customs, Police and Justice.
INTERNET COMMUNICATION
Communication today
Information on the website, www.mpa.se product names responsible company (if known and action being taken) content found (identity and concentration) pictures of the products risk communication (medical information)
Information to healthcare professionals about
Sibutramin, 8 July
products that help them sleep Young people, healthcare professionals, general public
internet
Industry representative, quality failure of falsified medical products Economic crimes How do homepages look like selling falsified medical products
Result
Increased awareness of the risk of buying medicines over the internet
(from 0 to 50%).
Message needs to be repeated
Future projects
New website for information regarding regulations and
falsified medical products Update www.crimemedicine.com with Q&A? Blogs? /Twitter? New information campaign?
13/06/2012
OCLAESP Supports MediCrime Convention Interest for international cooperation Pharmaceutical crimes as an international tool in the field of criminal law Signature extended to non-Member States Harmonization of legislation Obligation to cooperate Possibility of seizure and confiscation
13/06/2012
Convention Medicrime : indispensable tool Specialised criminal investigation Including financial investigations Covert operations Controlled delivery Special investigative techniques Multidisciplinary and multisectoral approach
13/06/2012
PANGEA IV
FRENCH RESULTS - 171 Illegal websites identified - 12 established in France - 170 000 pills seized - 1 Illegal laboratory dismantled - 49 criminal investigations initiated
PANGEA IV
Global results Over 13 000 websites closed 606 auction sites removed Over 500 websites under investigation checks in postal hubs 66 505 packages inspected 8 695 packages seized 55 individuals arrested/ under investigation Over 2.5 million units seized Estimated value: 6.8 million USD
13/06/2012
Thank you
Customer
Fulfilment operation
Copyright PSI
networks
Identify the OCGs & the facilitators/enablers Remove their infrastructures Review & Monitor
Convention provides measures, tools & sanctions to assist, for example Articles 9, 10, 12 & 17.
A real commitment to cooperate & collaborate .
Speaker: XXXXX
Thank you.
Ashley HOW Director EMEA Pharmaceutical Security Institute, PSI Office: Mobile: Email: Website: +44 (0) 1903 779955 +44 (0) 7795 345600 ahow@psi-inc.org www.psi-inc.org
PRICE IS WHAT IS IMPORTANT NEVER USE THE : E WORD- THIS IS NOT THE MANDATE OF WHO criminalization and WHO no connection C WORD WHERE WAS THE CONCERN FOR THE
VICTIMS?
WHAT IS EFFCT OF PHARMACY LAW WITHOUT
PUNISHMENT CLAUSE?
PRE-MEDICRIME ISRAEL
PHARMACY LAW OF ISRAEL: 1. BASED UPON LAWS AND ORDINANCES OF BRITISH MANDATE 2. NO CONCEPT OF PHARMACEUTICAL CRIME 3. PUNISHMENT CLAUSE? 6 MONTHS PRISON (NOBODY EVER RECEIVED IT) $3000 FINE
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND MINISTRY OF JUSTICE :WHAT ARE LEGAL AND FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS? COMBINED LOBBY OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MOH (WITH OUR PRESSURE)
Speaker:mickeyarieli RPh
SSFI
OUR EMPHASIS IN ISRAELI COURTS OF
HARM
included the internet sale of medicines. Less falsified and counterfeit medicines on the market. Less fraud and other crimes conducted concerning prescriptions and medicines in general.
2
with rather short notice a convention which they were not too well familiar with. Ministries in Iceland were mostly concerned about possible legal and financial obligations as well as the time pressure for the signature. There were however no legal obstacles for signing the convention. There have also been concerns about the cost of pharmaceutical expertise needed for control on the border, should this cost be paid by the custom or the medicine agency?
3
convention in cooperation with other European countries, the European Union and the Council of Europe. Look for solution for financing inspection and border control of pharmaceuticals.
Speaker: XXXXX
Switzerland International collaboration with robust network of points of contact Better communication between industry and authorities
Experiences
Issues raised: Costs: estimation of additional costs after ratification Roles of the different stakeholders, differing priorities Positive experiences: Awareness amongst various authorities Good collaboration between Ministries, initial invitation done by medicines agency
Swissmedic (Drug Regulatory Agency) Identification of articles to modify in Swiss Law of Therapeutic Products and in other laws Consultation of federal authorities Submission for signature Decision for signature by Federal Council Switzerland signed 28th october 2011
Health Draft for a decision by Parliament 1st consultation of federal authorities (January 2012) > consolidation Consultation of public stakeholders > consolidation 2nd consultation of federal authorities > consolidation Submission to the Parliament Parlamentary debates and decision If positive > ratification
Speaker: HMF
Regulatory Framework
Art.282 Portuguese Penal Code (corruption of medical substances) Foresees crime of manufacture and commercialisation of medical substances punishable with 1-8 years imprisonment ONLY if evidence can sustain that the corruption of a medical substance has caused danger to the life of a person
Crime only if cause effect is proven in court Very wide scope of application Undefined concepts
Speaker: HMF
Benefits
Reinforcement/clarification of legislative framework Definition of pharmaceutical crime Criminalization of conducts Legal certainty Better prosecution of cases Legal basis for national and international cooperation Better coordination/communication Formal SPOC network Reference for portuguese speaking countries
Speaker: HMF
Ratification Procedure
Joint inter-ministerial taskforce to analyse legislation and
Speaker: HMF
State of Play
Political priorities focused on economic and financial
situation
Internal reorganisation of Foreign Affairs & public service
in general
Replacement of identified contact points Loss of information flow whole dossier to be resumed from the
start
Delay in setting up taskforce
Speaker: XXXXX
Conclusions
Expectation of quick ratification frustrated New regulatory framework awaited with anticipation by all
regulatory authorities
Political Support to move forward expected in the coming
months
Speaker: HMF
Speaker: XXXXX
Speaker: XXXXX
Defined the crime(s) Defined the necessary criminal terms Defined the necessary terms as far as sanctions and
Speaker: XXXXX
Speaker: XXXXX
Speaker: XXXXX
Getting there
Strategic changes in attitude
Strategic changes
Stakeholders must drive implementation together it is an opportunity, not a burden Involve police, customs and health authorities in designing practical implementation steps
Make Medicrime Convention a living approach driven by the need to protect public health
Strategic changes in attitude required not just another economic crime Holistic approach No one agency has all the resources to implement Medicrime No single focus will work All stakeholders have a role in protecting the public health (Art 17)
Communication
Mechanism
Objective
Task
National coordination, not control SPOCs Art 17, 22) International Know whom to contact
Develop a national committee by consensus Agree nationally, promote internationally Overcomes conflict many SPOC models Interagecy support facility Resolve competition opportunties increased support for coordinated action
Two-way process
Increase resource potential Networks Art 17, 22 Improve information flow and quality Better decision making
Share
Engage
Mutual reliances
Prepare strategic initiatives that facilitate implementation (Art 17) Interdepartmental discussions on sharing implementation Developing formal agreements (e.g. Memorandum of Undersanding)
Facilitate interagency joint actions (Art17, 18) Cooperative training share what each has to offer (Art 16) Decision making needs information share it now start building the trust Be prepared to support other agency agenda in support of Medicrime Convention
Speaker: XXXXX
specific)) danger or damage to the public Development in society new challenges/threats From tampering with foodstuffs and drinking water over interferences with electricity and trains and now. Medicrime ! Not a whole new issue, but due to growing demands for health care, the costs of health care and globalization a more and more pertinent problem on a local and global scale Motivation behind medicrime: to make money/org. crime
Speaker: XXXXX
laws Limited awareness in society and among law enforcement bodies and judiciary Are criminal law regulations really up to date ? Criminal law provisions in specific laws In the Criminal Code ? Can states really cope with new threats and challenges within existing rules and regulations ? The Medicrime Convention opens a window of opportunity
Speaker: XXXXX
provisions Wellprepared rules and structures to be implemented in national law (without having to start from almost zero in each individual state) An opportunity to raise awareness of problems and solutions during the whole implementing process among all relevant sectors and groups (general public, politicians and practitioners)
Speaker: XXXXX
Stakeholders in implementing
Start the implementing process early and do not forget
that the law or the ammendments to existing regulations do not necessarily produce results in themselves Do not forget the groups that should work with the specific violations of the rules ! Training issues, specialization, co-operation structures Making health care authorities and law enforcement work together in an efficient and trustful way The expertise from different partners joining forces provides the overall good results !
Speaker: XXXXX
Thank you.
Bart Wijnberg
bartwijnberg@gmail.com