Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 14

MANILA TYTANA COLLEGES Pres. Diosdado Macapagal Blvd.

, Metropolitan Park, Pasay City


COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS 1st Semester AY 2013 2014

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICS Expected Output Portfolio 1 Part 1 Expected Date of Submission July 1 5, 2013

Portfolio 1 Part 2 July 1 5, 2013 Portfolio 2 July 8 12, 2013 Portfolio 3 July 8 12, 2013 Portfolio 4 July 15 19, 2013 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION Portfolio 5 August 5 9, 2013 Portfolio 6 August 12 16, 2013 Portfolio 7 August 19 23, 2013 MIDTERM EXAMINATION Portfolio 8 September 23 27, 2013 Portfolio 9 September 30 October 4, 2013 Portfolio 10 October 7 11, 2013 FINAL EXAMINATION Components of the Expected Output: Portfolio 1(Part 1): (Part 2): Portfolio 2: Portfolio 3: Portfolio 4: Questions Project Title and Background of the Problem/Project Theory of the Project Concept/Study Paradigm Sample Questionnaire Tabulation of Data Gathered from the Respondents Demographic Profile of the Respondents and Response to Other Portfolio 5: Frequency Distribution Data Presentation Data Interpretation Measures of Central Tendency Measures of Variability Interpretation

Statement of the Problem (not less than 3 statements) Determining the dependent variables Determining the independent variables Identifying the difference variables Identifying the relationship variables

Portfolio 6:

Scope and Delimitation/Manageability Number of Study Participants Inclusion Criteria Statistical Treatment Hypotheses Measures of Difference Measures of Correlation Measures of Differences Using t-test Using One-way ANOVA with post-hoc tests (Scheffe + Tukey HSD) Findings (There is or There is no) Conclusion (Accept or Reject) Interpretation PASW Printed Output Measures of Correlations Using Pearson Using Chi-Square (include the contingency table) Findings (There is. or There is no.) Conclusion (Accept or Reject) Matrix Summary of Conclusions (Measures of Differences) Matrix Summary of Conclusions (Measures of Correlations)

Portfolio 7:

Portfolio 8:

Portfolio 9:

Portfolio 10:

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC /BIOSTATISTICS PORTFOLIO 1 (PARTS 1 and 2) Portfolio 1(Part 1): Project Title and Background of the Problem/Project

PART 1. PROJECT TITLE: A PROFILE ON THE LEVEL OF SELF-ESTEEM AND SATISFACTION OF BS NURSING STUDENTS FROM AND BETWEEN COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY A AND COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY B*
*(The title must be originally conceptualized and prepared by the bearer of the study to be checked by their instructor)

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM/PROJECT: A study was conducted, gathered in equal proportion from the nursing students of two schools namely College/University A and College/University B, the first one with an ISO 9001;2008 Quality Management and CHED Deregulated Status, while the second one bearing the CHED Autonomous Status and the prestigious IQUAME mark. College/University A, a private Catholic sectarian university whose famous motto Education with a purpose has a very strong humanitarian message, was founded by an American Physicist on the year 1912. Originally a school for liberal arts, has expanded into a myriad of courses which includes Architecture, Sciences, Business, Law and the latest addition is healthcare (Nursing, Caregiver). It currently has a student population which is mostly from economic classes B, C and some from D and E. On the other hand, the College/University A was founded by a bar topnotcher in 1940. The school laid down its objectives: (1) to maintain high standard of instruction; (2) to bring within the reach of the masses the blessings of higher education; and (3) to cooperate with the Philippine government in the implementation of its amelioration programs. College/University A committed itself to educating and developing men and women who could turn the wheels of progress and industry. It offers courses such as Engineering, Architecture, Commerce, Liberal Arts, Nursing and is considered to offer one of the lowest tuition rates among the private universities and colleges in the National Capital Region, which is a strong reflection of one of its core values. Thus, majority of its student population comes from economic classes C to E.
*Personal experience, readings or general perspective should be included in the background. This may include relevant statistics and personal reason why the bearers of the study chose their topic of interest *Include the research locale, the respondents and especially the objectives of the study *May end the background with the topic by restating it

PART 2. THEORY OF THE PROJECT: Satisfaction and self-esteem has been a subject of study by various disciplines such as sociologists, academicians, psychologists and even capitalists. The last group believes that there is a direct relationship between satisfaction and selfesteem, whose ultimate end is for a more improved productivity on the part of the workforce. From a human interests point of view, instead of the productivity aspect, the importance of the relationship is to learn whether happiness with ones activity is related to ones self-esteem. Thus, regardless of whatever status, the existence of a strong satisfaction and selfesteem relationship is very evident in almost all studies that were conducted. The Rutherfords Model/Theory is based on the understanding that a person will take a specific action if that person experiences low self-esteem if he is not satisfied in a particular task or work given to him and on the other hand, he assigns to another person. The Rutherfords Model/Theory is used in the study to validate the relationship between self -esteem and satisfaction as well as to provide additional knowledge about the importance of its relationship to its respondents to increase their awareness. PROJECT CONCEPT/STUDY PARADIGM In this study, the researchers will aim to determine the answers to the following specific problems: first, the researchers will gather the demographic profile of the respondents which will include the age, gender, classification of college/university, parents occupation, educational level, family monthly income and religion; secondly, the researchers wil l determine the level of self-esteem and satisfaction of the students. Lastly, the respondents will determine if there is a significant difference between the demographic profile of the respondents and their levels of self-esteem and satisfaction as well as if there is a significant correlation between the respondents level of self-esteem and satisfaction.
*The theory of the project must include the theory, concept or model which can be used as a foundation of the study. The theory must be
presented in narrative form. * Discuss the theory or the source of concept where the concept of the study is anchored * Provide discussions on the contribution of the theory to the field of specialization being undertaken. Discuss also the use relative to the proposed study. Focus on the discussion of the theory itself.

MANILA TYTANA COLLEGES Pres. Diosdado Macapagal Blvd., Metropolitan Park, Pasay City COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS 1st Semester AY 2013 2014 RUBRIC IN RATING THE STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BIOSTATISTICS/BASIC STATISTICS

Task Objective: Each student has to identify a research topic related to their field of specialization as indicated in the course syllabus. The student should be able to analyze the gathered data related to the topic chosen and appropriate i n ones field of specialization. The preparation of the work should satisfy the criteria specified in this scoring rubric. Levels of Performance Score/Percentage 4 3 2 1 Dimensions/Criteria/Indicators
A. B. C. Time Management (10%) Completeness of Required Information (30%) Information required in the portfolio based on the specified criteria cited in the guidelines Accuracy of Data and Acceptability of Results (45%) The paper report submitted will gauge its accuracy. Accuracy refers to the correctness of the information cited in the paper report. 1. The researcher/s made use the correct/appropriate statistical test applicable to the respective research question/data 2. The given findings in the paper report are correct based on the PASW results. 3. The conclusions in the paper report are strongly based on the findings Mechanics (10%) 1. Work is free from grammatical errors 2. Work is free from errors in spelling/punctuations 3. Work is neat and presentable Packaging/Format (5%) 1. Short bond paper/Book Bound* (*at the end of the semester) 2. Cover page is made up of fluorescent paper 3. The specified format should be reflected on the cover page. 4. Pages are paginated and report is provided with table of contents* 5. Summary is in matrix form as specified in the format 6. Font is easy to read and size 12, 1 spaced and 1 inches margin in all sides 7. Scoring rubric is attached in the portfolio Excellent Submitted two (2) days before the date agreed upon for submission All of the required information were given Satisfies indicators the three (3) Very Good/Very Satisfactory Submitted one (1) day before the agreed date for submission Many of the required information was indicated (about 75% was indicated) Satisfies only two (2) of the given indicators Good/Satisfactory Submitted on the date agreed upon for submission Poor Submitted one (1) or more days after the agreed upon date for submission Few of the required information was indicated (about 25% was indicated) Satisfies none of the given indicators

Some of the required information was indicated (about 50% was indicated) Satisfies only one (1) of the given indicators

D.

Satisfies indicators Satisfies indicators

the

three

(3)

Satisfies only two (2) of the given indicators Satisfies only five (5) or six (6) of the given indicators

Satisfies only one (1) of the given indicators Satisfies only three (3) or four (4) of the given indicators

Satisfies none of the given indicators Satisfies only one (1) or two (2) of the given indicators

E.

the

seven

(7)

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC STATISTICS /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICS PORTFOLIO 2 SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE Respondent Code No. __________ SURVEY Good day! I would like to get your honest opinion related to your activity which will only take five minutes of your time. Rest be assured that everything stated here will be treated with utmost confidentiality. These will be used solely as inputs for the course requirement in statistics. (Name of the Researcher/s) PART A. Basic Personal Information A.1. Name (Optional, print name please) ____________________________________________________________________________ A.2. Gender (please tick one only) A.3. Religion (please tick one only) ( ( ) Roman Catholic ) Non-Catholic ( ) Male ( ) Female

A.4. Age (please tick one only where your age belongs) ( ( ( ) 20 30 years old ) 31 40 years old ) 41 50 years old ( ( ) 51 60 years old ) 61 years old and above

A.5. Educational Attainment ( ( ( ) Elementary Graduate ) High School Graduate ) Vocational Course ( ( ( ) College Degree ) Masters Degree ) Doctorate Degree

A.6. Net Monthly Income Range (take home pay/net profit, less of government taxes) ( ( ( ) below Php 10,000.00 ) Php 10,001 Php 20,000 ) Php 20,001 Php 30,000 ( ( ( ) Php 30,001 Php 40,000 ) Php 40,001 Php 50,000 ) Php 50,001 and above

PART B. Self-Esteem Scale. The following are various statements related to your activity in school. Please ENCIRCLE only one from 4 (Strongly Agree) to 1 (Strongly Disagree) on each of the statements, which you think are nearest to your point of view. There are no right nor wrong answers. Statements B.1. I feel good about my studies. Strongly Agree 4 Agree 3 Disagree 2 Strongly Disagree 1

Statements B.2. On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates in school. B.3. I am proud of my ability to cope with difficulties in school. B.4. When I feel uncomfortable in school, I know how to handle it. B.5. I can tell that my classmates in school are glad to have me there. B.6. I know Ill be able to cope with my studies for as long as I want. B.7. I am proud of my relationship with my professors in school. B.8. I am confident that I can handle my studies without constant assistance. B.9. I feel like I make a useful contribution at school. B.10. I can tell that my classmates respect me.

Strongly Agree 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Agree 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Disagree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Strongly Disagree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

PART C. Satisfaction Scale. The following are various statements related to your activity in school. Please ENCIRCLE only one from 4 (Strongly Agree) to 1 (Strongly Disagree) on each of the statements, which you think are nearest to your point of view. There are no right nor wrong answers. Statements C.1. What grades I earn in school is enough to pass all of my subjects. C.2. What grades I earn in school meets my shortterm expectations/ goals in life. C.3. The grades that I have right now reflects my educational experiences. C.4. I feel secure with the grades that I have earned so far. C.5. The grades I earn in school is fair enough. C.6. I feel that where I am now has improved compared to the previous year. C.7. I believe that I gained a wealth of knowledge from my present school, which I could use for my future plans. C.8. I feel that the school administration did its part in helping me improve my grades in school. Strongly Agree 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Agree 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Disagree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Strongly Disagree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

END OF THE SURVEY THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRECIOUS TIME.


*strictly follow the given format *questionnaire can be taken from the internet *items in the questionnaire should cover the four levels of measurement such as nominal, interval, ratio and interval *possible problem statements must be culled out and must be statistically analyzed covering the descriptive and inferential statistics *if in doubt about the questionnaire, please consult your respective professor

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC STATISTICS /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICS PORTFOLIO 3 TABULATION OF DATA GATHERED FROM THE RESPONDENTS*
Respondent Code No. Gender Religion Age EA NMIR SE1 SE2 SE3 SE4 SE5 SE6 SE7 SE8 SE9 SE10 SE_AVE SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8 SS_AVE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
LEGEND:

1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2

1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 2 4 3 5 2 3 5 1 2 1 5 5 5 3 4 1 2 5 2 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 1 1 2

1 1 2 4 4 5 2 3 4 1 2 1 5 5 5 5 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 2 2

2 3 5 6 6 3 3 4 5 1 1 1 2 5 4 3 3 5 6 5 2 3 4 5 6 1 1 2 1 4

1 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 4 2 2 3 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 3 4 1

1 1 2 2 2 4 4 3 3 4 1 1 1 2 3 4 4 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 1 3 4 4 1 2

1 1 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 1 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 1 1 1 3 4 4 2 3 4 1 1 2

1 1 1 2 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 4 1 2 4 4 2 3 4 4 4 2

1 1 3 3 4 4 2 3 4 4 1 1 2 4 4 1 1 2 4 4 1 2 4 4 4 1 3 3 4 4

1 1 2 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 4 1 1 1

1 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 4 2 3 1 4 1

1 1 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 1 2 2 3 1 3 3 4 1 2 3 1 4 4 1 1 2 3 3 4

1 2 2 2 3 3 4 2 3 4 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 1 1 1 4 4

1 4 4 2 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 1 2 2 2 4 4 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 4 1 1 4 1

1.00 1.40 2.30 2.80 3.30 3.50 3.50 3.00 3.00 3.10 1.90 2.60 2.60 3.00 3.00 2.20 2.60 2.80 1.90 2.10 1.50 2.10 3.00 3.10 2.50 2.60 2.80 2.20 3.00 2.20

3 3 3 4 1 1 2 2 2 2 4 4 3 3 4 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 `1 1 2 4 2

2 2 2 4 3 2 4 4 4 2 2 1 3 4 4 4 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 1 1 1 2 4 3 2

2 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 1 1 3 2 2 2 4 1 1 2 3 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 4 4 4 2

1 4 4 3 4 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 1 1 2 2 4 4 4 3 4 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 4

3 3 3 3 2 1 3 4 4 4 2 1 3 3 4 4 4 3 2 1 1 3 4 4 4 2 3 4 4 1

2 2 2 3 3 4 4 1 2 3 4 4 4 2 3 4 1 1 2 2 4 3 4 2 1 1 1 1 4 4

1 4 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 3 1 1 4 1 1 2 4 4 4 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 1

2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 1 3 3 3 4 1 1 2 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 1 1

2.00 2.75 2.63 3.25 3.00 2.63 3.38 2.88 2.38 2.75 2.88 2.50 3.00 2.13 2.88 2.88 2.50 2.50 2.75 2.13 2.75 2.75 2.88 2.38 2.25 1.86 2.63 3.13 3.38 2.13

*All entries must be entered in the Microsoft Excel.


Gender: 1 Male 2 Female Religion: 1 Roman Catholic Age: 1 20 to 30 4 51 to 60 EA: 1 Elementary 4 College 2 Non-Catholic 2 31 to 40 5 61 yrs. and above 2 High School 5 Masters NMIR: 1 below Php10000 3 Php 20001 to Php 30000 5 Php 40001 to Php 50000 SE and SS: 1 Strongly Agree 3 Disagree 2 Php10001 to Php 20000 4 Php 30001 to Php 40000 6 Php 50001 and above 2 Agree 4 Strongly Disagree

EA Educational Attainment NMIR Net Monthly Income Range SE Self-Esteem SE_AVE Self-Esteem Average SS Satisfaction Scale SS_AVE Satisfaction Average

3 41 to 50 3 Vocational 6 Doctorate

*All averages must be in two decimal places (i.e. SE_AVE and SS_AVE) *Do not forget to fill-in all rows and columns. All legends must be placed below the tabulated data for reference. *The sequence of the data to be tabulated in rows and columns should strictly follow the arrangement of information found in the questionnaire. *There must be at least 30 respondents in the survey to be conducted. *If in doubt about the tabulated data, please consult your respective professor.

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC STATISTICS /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICS PORTFOLIO 4 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS AND RESPONSE TO OTHER QUESTIONS Table 4.1 Respondents Profile Based on Gender Gender Male Female Total Frequency 14 16 30 Percentage 46.7 53.3 100.0

Table 4.1 presents the profile of the respondents based on gender. It is shown that 46.7% or fourteen (14) of the respondents are males while 53.3% or sixteen (16) of the respondents are females. Table 4.2 Respondents Profile Based on Religion* Table 4.3 Respondents Profile Based on Age* Table 4.4 Respondents Profile Based on Educational Attainment Educational Attainment Elementary High School Vocational College Masters Total Frequency 4 7 2 11 6 30 Percentage 13.3 23.3 6.7 36.7 20.0 100.0

Table 4.4 presents the profile of the respondents based on educational attainment. It is shown that 36.7% or eleven (11) of the respondents are College graduates while only 6.7% or two (2) of the respondents are graduates of vocational courses. Table 4.5 Respondents Profile Based on Net Monthly Income Range Net Monthly Income Range Below Php 10000 Php 10001 to Php 20000 Php 20001 to Php 30000 Php 30001 to Php 40000 Php 40001 to Php 50000 Php 50001 and above Total Frequency 6 4 6 4 6 4 30 Percentage 20.0 13.3 20.0 13.3 20.0 13.3 100.0

Table 4.5 presents the profile of the respondents based on net monthly income range. It is shown that three (3) of the net monthly income ranges such as those who are earning below Php 10000, between Php 20001 to Php 30000 and between Php 40001 to Php 50000 each are 20% or six (6) of the respondents while three (3) of the net monthly income ranges such as those who are earning between Php 10001 and Php 20000, between Php 30001 and Php 40000 and Php 50001 and above each are 13.3% or four (4) of the respondents.

Table 4.6 Self-Esteem of the Respondents Towards Their Activity in School Items On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates in school. I am proud of my ability to cope with difficulties in school. When I feel uncomfortable in school, I know how to handle it. I can tell that my classmates in school are glad to have me there. I know Ill be able to cope with my studies for as long as I want. I am proud of my relationship with my professors in school. I am confident that I can handle my studies without constant assistance. I feel like I make a useful contribution at school. I can tell that my classmates respect me. On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates in school. Composite Mean Mean 2.47 2.43 2.63 2.93 2.77 2.50 2.47 2.60 2.47 2.27 2.55 Standard Deviation 1.167 1.194 1.245 1.230 1.278 1.280 1.196 1.163 1.196 1.202 0.613 Interpretation Low Extent Low Extent High Extent High Extent High Extent Low Extent Low Extent High Extent Low Extent Low Extent High Extent

Legend: 1.00 1.50 Very Low Extent; 1.51 to 2.50 Low Extent; 2.51 to 3.50 High Extent; 3.51 to 4.00 Very High Extent

Table 4.6 shows the self-esteem of the respondents towards their activity in school. It is shown that the first item On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates in school has a mean of 2.47 and a standard deviation which is interpreted as low extent. The second item I am proud of my ability to cope with difficulties in school has a mean of 2.43 and a standard deviation of 1.194 which is interpreted as low extent. The third item When I feel uncomfortable in school, I know how to handle it Overall, the self-esteem of the respondents has a mean of 2.55 and a standard deviation of 0.613 which is interpreted as high extent. Table 4.7 Satisfaction of the Respondents Towards Their Activity in School*
*strictly follow the given format especially the tabular presentations *Tables 4.2 and 4.3 will follow the same format of discussion; for age, the focus of the discussion will be only on the highest and lowest frequencies among the group *for a four-point scale, use the given ranges in the legend; for a five-point scale, make use of 1.00 1.50, 1.51 2.50, 2.51 3.50, 3.51 4.50, 4.51 5.00 *Table 4.7 will have the same tabular presentation with Table 4.6 having three columns *Tables cannot be split into two or more pages. Make sure to construct the table in one page only. Adjust the first column containing the questions if necessary to present the table in just one page. *Make sure that the complete Predictive Analysis Software (PASW) results are attached in Portfolio 4 *If in doubt about the format and discussion, please consult your respective professor

PASW RESULTS: Frequencies


Statistics Net Monthly Income Range 30 0

Valid Missing

Gender 30 0

Religion 30 0

Age 30 0

Educational Attainment 30 0

Frequency Table
Gender Cumulative Percent 46.7 100.0

Valid

Male Female Total

Frequency 14 16 30

Percent 46.7 53.3 100.0

Valid Percent 46.7 53.3 100.0

Religion Cumulative Percent 60.0 100.0

Frequency Valid Roman Catholic Non-Catholic Total 18 12 30

Percent 60.0 40.0 100.0 Age

Valid Percent 60.0 40.0 100.0

Valid

20 to 30 yrs. old 31 to 40 yrs. old 41 to 50 yrs. old 51 to 60 yrs. old 61 yrs. old and above Total

Frequency 6 7 6 3 8 30

Percent 20.0 23.3 20.0 10.0 26.7 100.0

Valid Percent 20.0 23.3 20.0 10.0 26.7 100.0

Cumulative Percent 20.0 43.3 63.3 73.3 100.0

Educational Attainment Cumulative Percent 13.3 36.7 43.3 80.0 100.0

Frequency Valid Elementary High School Vocational College Masters Total 4 7 2 11 6 30

Percent 13.3 23.3 6.7 36.7 20.0 100.0

Valid Percent 13.3 23.3 6.7 36.7 20.0 100.0

Net Monthly Income Range Cumulative Percent 20.0 33.3 53.3 66.7 86.7 100.0

Valid

below Php 10000 Php 10001 to Php 20000 Php 20001 to Php 30000 Php 30001 to Php 40000 Php 40001 to Php 50000 Php 50001 and above Total

Frequency 6 4 6 4 6 4 30

Percent 20.0 13.3 20.0 13.3 20.0 13.3 100.0

Valid Percent 20.0 13.3 20.0 13.3 20.0 13.3 100.0

Descriptives
Descriptive Statistics N Self-Esteem Self-Esteem Self-Esteem Self-Esteem Self-Esteem Self-Esteem Self-Esteem Self-Esteem Self-Esteem Self-Esteem Ave_Self-Esteem Valid N (listwise) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Minimum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Maximum 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 2.47 2.43 2.63 2.93 2.77 2.50 2.47 2.60 2.47 2.27 2.55 Std. Deviation 1.167 1.194 1.245 1.230 1.278 1.280 1.196 1.163 1.196 1.202 .613

Descriptives
Descriptive Statistics N Satisfaction Scale Satisfaction Scale Satisfaction Scale Satisfaction Scale Satisfaction Scale Satisfaction Scale Satisfaction Scale Satisfaction Scale Ave_Satisfaction Scale Valid N (listwise) 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 Minimum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Maximum 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 Mean 2.45 2.60 2.60 2.70 2.90 2.60 2.70 2.77 2.66 Std. Deviation 1.121 1.133 1.221 1.149 1.094 1.192 1.208 1.135 .391

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC STATISTICS /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICS PORTFOLIO 5 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The main purpose of the study is to determine the self-esteem and satisfaction of the students towards their activity in school. In particular, it seeks to answer the following questions: 1. What is the demographic profile of the students in terms of: (Descriptive Statistics: Frequency and Percentage) a. Gender b. Religion c. Age d. Educational Attainment e. Net Monthly Income Range What is the level of self-esteem and satisfaction of the students? (Descriptive Statistics: Mean and Standard Deviation) Is there a significant correlation between work self-esteem and work satisfaction? (Inferential Statistics: Measures of Correlation) Is there a significant difference in the work self-esteem and work satisfaction of the respondents when they are grouped according to their demographic profile? (Inferential Statistics: Measures of Differences) Is there a significant difference between schools A and B in terms of level of self-esteem and satisfaction? (Inferential Statistics: Measures of Differences)

2. 3. 4. 5.

In relation to statement of the problem number 3, the following are the dependent and independent variables with their statistical tests to be used which will be shown in Portfolios 8 and 9: a. Dependent Variables a.1. Satisfaction a.2. Self-Esteem Independent Variables (Demographic Aspects) b.1. Determining the Differences as shown in Portfolio 8 b.1.1. Comparison on the level of self-esteem based on the following: b.1.1.1. Gender using t-Test of Independent Samples b.1.1.2. Religion using t-Test of Independent Samples b.1.1.3. Age using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Tests b.1.1.4. Educational Attainment using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Tests b.1.1.5. Net Monthly Income Range using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Tests b.1.1.6. Comparison on the level of self esteem between schools A and B using t-Test of Independent Samples b.1.2. Comparison on the level of satisfaction based on the following: b.1.2.1. Gender using t-Test of Independent Samples b.1.2.2. Religion using t-Test of Independent Samples b.1.2.3. Age using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Tests b.1.2.4. Educational Attainment using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Tests b.1.2.5. Net Monthly Income Range using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Tests b.1.2.6. Comparison on the level of satisfaction between schools A and B using t-Test of Independent Samples b.2. Determining the Relationship as shown in Portfolio 9 b.2.1. Level of Self Esteem versus Level of Satisfaction using the Pearson r Test b.2.2. Correlation between self-esteem and the demographic profile of the respondents using the eta correlation b.2.3. Correlation between satisfaction and the demographic profile of the respondents using the eta correlation
* Strictly follow the given format * The type of statistical tests to be used must be highlighted. * For follow-up tests, you may use either the Tukey or the Scheffe Test * If in doubt about the format and discussion, please consult your respective professor.

b.

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC STATISTICS /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICS PORTFOLIO 6 SCOPE AND DELIMITATION/MANAGEABILITY The study focused on the level of self-esteem and satisfaction of the students in two different schools. The study is delimited to the students between two schools with regard to their level of self-esteem and satisfaction towards their activities. There were thirty (30) student respondents involved in the study. Only those who were currently and officially enrolled in schools A and B participated in the research. The researchers used the quantitative descriptive method to measure the difference of the students level of self esteem and satisfaction enrolled in schools A and B. Survey method was used to gather the demographic profile, selfesteem and satisfaction of the students in two schools. Non-probability sampling technique was used in selecting the students who served as respondents of the study. The researchers non-randomly chose the student respondents from two different schools on the basis of their gender, religion, age, educational attainment and net monthly income rate. The researchers adopted the questionnaire formulated by Hipolito, Fulgueras and Arcena (2013) entitled the selfesteem scale and the satisfaction scale having a reliability of 0.89. Statistical Treatment of Data For measures of differences, there will be a separate hypothesis testing (either t Test of independent samples or One Way Analysis of Variance) for the entire sample and another for each of the two schools (school A and school B). For measures of correlation, a hypothesis testing (Pearson r or eta correlation) was conducted for the entire sample (two schools combined). On this manner of treatment, fifteen (15) hypotheses were formulated covering both measures of differences and correlations.

* Discussion on the inclusion criteria must be included. The criteria for choosing the respondents must be clearly defined. * The number of respondents, research method and the data gathering technique must be clearly specified. * The survey instrument must be specified if this is adopted or researcher-made. It is important to take note of the reliability coefficient or the Cronbach Alpha of the research instrument. The accepted value is at least 0.85. * The number of research hypotheses should be aligned with the ones stated in portfolio 5 covering both measures of differences and correlation.

Вам также может понравиться