ITEM

CRITERIA

WT

Accuracy of Design of Spaces reflecting Site Analysis as per Archl Program (Site Development Plan)

15

Accuracy of Design of Spaces reflecting Activity analysis and Space Quantification as per Archl Program (Floor Plans)

15

Application of Architectural Theory, Planning Concepts and Design Principles (i.e. Balance, Symmetry, Harmony, Rhythm, etc.)

10

Cohesiveness of Architectural Conceptualization and Over-all Design Development

10

SCORING RUBRICS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 10 FINAL DEFENSE A B C Exceeds Expectation Satisfactory Met Criteria Work is above of Work is in range of acceptable standards acceptable standards with only few minor with more than half of comments and citation the requirements are satisfied. Complete and Solutions fullfill the More than half of the accurate. Solutions are parameters within program requirements outstanding, distinctive expected range of work are fulfilled and and novel. but some mistakes translated accurately. were made. (15 pts) (11 to 14 pts) (8 to 10 pts) Complete and Solutions fullfill the More than half of the accurate. Solutions are parameters within program requirements outstanding, distinctive expected range of work are fulfilled and and novel. but some mistakes translated accurately. were made. (15 pts) (11 to 14 pts) (8 to 10 pts) Student presents a Student present a solid Student present strong, clear application of concept concepts theory and application concepts, theory and principles principles, but the theory and principles supported by an array applications are very supported by wealth of of imaginative ideas. basic and limited exceptionally imaginative ideas. imaginative ideas. (10 pts) (7 to 9 pts) (4 to 6 pts) Over-all concepts, Better than average. More than half of the goals and objectives Strong resolution of concept s, goals and are exceptionally design investigatons objectives were translated into applied at appropriate substantially addressed architectural design scales to over-all design solution solution. (10 pts) (7 to 9 pts) (4 to 6 pts) Over-all Design Solution Complied with Provisions of the Building Law Solutions fullfill the parameters within expected range of work but some minor mistakes were made. (not more than five minor mistakes were cited) More than half of the program requirements are fulfilled and translated accurately. (minor mistakes that can be corrected with minor revisions)

D Less Satisfactory Basic knowledge and understanding yet translation and application did not met expectation Less than half of the program requirements are fullfilled and translated accurately. (1 to 7 pts) Less than half of the program requirements are fullfilled and translated accurately. (1 to 7 pts) Presented concepts theory and principles are not well communicated by supporting ideas of the project. (1 to 3 pts) Less than half of the concept s, goals and objectives were substantially addressed to over-all design solution. (1 to 3 pts) Less than half of the program requirements are fullfilled and translated accurately. (major mistakes that can only be corrected with major revisions)

E Did not meet Criteria (Work is below acceptable standard)

RATING

Unacceptable. Poor circulation movement and patterns, hierarchy and organization of spaces and the like. (0 pt) Unacceptable. Poor circulation movement and patterns, hierarchy and organization of spaces and the like. (0 pt) Concepts theory and principles presented are not clear. Suppotinng ideas are weak and confusing (0 pt) Poor, The work is lacking in many or most areas showing limited understanding of design logic or processes. (0 pt) Poor, The work is lacks complete understanding of building laws

Compliance on the pertinent provisions of Building Laws (NBC, BP 344, Fire Code, etc.)

15

(15 pts) 6 Application of Tropical Design Principles 10

(11 to 14 pts) There were many creative and innovative applications of Tropical Design Principles fulfilled and translated accurately (8 to 10 pts)

Presence and cohesiveness of Structural Framework to architectural plans.

Completeness of indication of building utilities, architectural details, building materials, finishes in major design application.

10

Completeness and Quality of Over-all Presentation Materials, Manner of Oral Presentation and Ability to defend

10

Presence of Structural Framework indicators are complete and translated accurately . (5 pts) Commendable, Student reflects exceptional knowledge and understanding of Building Technology and Building Utilities translated into building plans. (10 pts) Over-all presentation is flawless and commendable. A very professional output. (10 pts)

Work is above of acceptable standards with only few minor comments and citation

(8 to 10 pts) There are applications of Tropical Design Principles yet its very basic and some are not fulfilled and translated accurately. (7 to 5 pts) More than half of the indicators are complete and some were not translated accurately (3 to 4 pts) Work is in range of acceptable standards with more than half of the requirements are satisfied.

(1 to 7 pts) There are applications of Tropical Design Principles yet most are not fulfilled and translated accuartely. (1 to 4 pts) Less than half of the indicators are complete and most were not translated accurately. (1 to 2 pts) Basic knowledge and understanding yet translation and application did not met the expectation for a graduating student. (1 to 3 pts) An attempt but did not met the level of expectation for a senior student. (1 to 3 pts)

(0 pt) No application of Tropical Design Principles.

(0 pt) No indicator of structural framework (0 pt) The work is lacking in many or most areas showing limited understanding of Building Technology and Building Utilities (0pt) Output is sloppy and unprofessional (0 pts)

(7 to 9 pts) Over-all presentation is neat and organized. Meets the expectation of a Lasallian Graduate (7 to 9 pts)

(4 to 6 pts) Over-all presentation approaches the expectation of a Lasallian Graduate (4 to 6 pts)

TOTAL

100