Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
January, 2012
For information call Loren (239) 267-1566
goldandrose@mac.com or goldandrose@me.com February 2012 Outings: 2/15/12 9 - Noon Bird Rookery Swamp Hike at Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (CREW) - with CREW Nature guide 2/21/12 9 -10:30 AM Clam Pass Park Nature Hike with Conservancy Nature guide. Optional add-on 2 hour kayak tour through Clam Pass mangrove creeks (fees apply to kayaking) 2/28/12 9 -10:30 AM Clam Pass Park Nature Hike with Conservancy Nature guide. Optional add-on 2 hour kayak tour through Clam Pass mangroves creeks (fees apply to kayaking) March 2012 Outings: 3/8/12 6:45-8:45 PM CREW Marsh Trail Full Moon Hike with CREW Nature guide (CREW requires a nominal fee for this special hike) 3/14/12 Paddle through Shell Creek 3/17/12 9 - Noon CREW Marsh Trail Hike with CREW Nature guide April 2012 Outings: 4/22/12 Join Sierra Calusa at Earth Day Event in Koreshan Historic Site State Park - includes many supporting partners and activities all day 4/25/12 Estero Bay Kayak tour with Florida Master Naturalist and GAIA certified Guide ( fees apply for guide and kayak rentals)
1
1. Stop the Buckeye pulp mill from building a pollution pipe to the Gulf. Now they plan to expand their pollution to the Gulf even more and still operate on 20 yearold expired permit. Heres what we are doing. 2. Defeat the state and federal Numeric nutrient criteria. Get a new nutrient rule that will actually help our waters. The next steps in a hugely wasteful and misleading process. 3. Push EPA to regulate dozens of health-based toxics in Floridas waters. 4. Stop Georgia-Pacific and their pollution pipe to the St. Johns River. 5. Expand our Florida Estuary Project. Keep fighting in court to have a real Impaired Waters clean-up program. Monitor TMDLs around the state.
ALSO BELOW: * Important meetings coming up that you may want to attend. * Our new website. And here are the details:
1. Buckeye pulp mill expands pollution to the Gulf and still operates on 20 yearold expired permit. Heres what we are doing. According to Buckeyes SEC filings, the 60-year-old, pulp mill in Perry, Florida is shifting its production to add a 42,000 ton increase in dissolving pulp products and to offset the same amount in fluff pulp. By keeping their total production numbers the same, they are hoping to avoid a permit modification. In case you have forgotten, Buckeye is operating on an expired permit that was issued some 20 years ago for a 60 million gpd discharge to an industrial river (class V). That means that the permit essentially has no pollution limits in it at all. The discharge has already caused a 10 square mile dead zone at the mouth of the Fenholloway River, which is right in the middle of the Big Bend Aquatic Seagrass Preserve.
What does this 8% increase in dissolving pulp products mean to the Fenholloway River, surrounding springs and tributaries, ground water and the Gulf of Mexico? It means a lot!!! Buckeyes daily discharge of tens of millions of gallons of industrial waste is highly contaminated with dioxin several orders of magnitude higher than allowed by law, according to studies done by the US EPA. It also contains a whole slew of other hydrogenated organochlorine chemicals that are extremely toxic to humans, marine life and land animals. It is high in nutrients which cause toxic algae to grow in the river and offshore in the Gulf and it has high levels of ammonium-nitrate which is very toxic to everything. Those are just a few of the problems.
Of Buckeyes two production lines, the dissolving line is by far the most toxic and deadly. The fact that the Florida DEP and the US EPA are allowing Buckeye to increase their pollution load to the environment, when the mill doesnt even have a current permit is outrageous. For the past several years, the federal government has given paper mills billions of dollars to do something that they have been doing for decades: burning black liquor in their boilers. Black liquor is a byproduct of their process. By adding petroleum to their liquor fuel, they qualified for a federal tax credit that was intended for other purposes. Buckeye got $130 million in these tax credits for 2009. In 2010 they got $67.1 million in Alternative Fuel Mixture Credits (AFMC). Are they using this corporate welfare from the US government (thats our money by the way) to reduce their pollution to our air and water? No! They are using it to expand their production and their pollution. Buckeyes proposed solution to their lack of an operating permit is to build a 15 mile pollution pipeline to the Gulf of Mexico. By volume, their discharge equals about 20 of BPs Deepwater Horizon pipes that spewed into the Gulf for months. Buckeyes discharge will not be for a few months, it could be for another 60 years. Discharging pollution 24/7 at 45 to 70 million gallons per day. CWN-FL has been fighting Buckeyes pollution (the biggest, nastiest, deadliest polluter in Florida) for decades. We are continuing to fight for the protection of the Gulf of Mexico from this monster, rogue industry. Please contact the Congressional Representative from Taylor County with this message (or one of your choosing): Dear Congressman Southerland: https://southerland.house.gov/index.cfm/email-me Your congressional district has the dubious distinction of being the home of one of the most polluting industrial facilities in the country the Buckeye pulp mill in Perry. Did you know that this mill has a 45 to 70 million gallon per day discharge to the Fenholloway River and then on to the Gulf of Mexico? Did you know that it has no current permit for this discharge? Its last permit was written some 20 years ago for an industrial river and contains almost no pollution limits. Buckeyes discharge has caused a 10-square mile dead zone in the midst of the Big Bend Aquatic Seagrass Preserve. Its black dioxin-contaminated sludge landed on Wakulla beach a few years ago and killed a huge area of grassbeds there too. As shocking as this sounds, its only the tip of the iceberg. Now Buckeye is expanding its pollution even more. They are increasing by 8% their production of dissolved pulp which is their most toxic product and is the source of most of the dioxin in their waste stream. DEP has received no written request for permission to make this major change in their production and is demanding nothing from Buckeye since they cant possibly violate their expired permit that contains essentially no pollution limits. Your district also includes and is adjacent to counties that are largely dependent on coastal resources such as clam farming, scalloping, fishing and tourism for their economic health. These industries are in danger of collapse if Buckeyes pollution is not substantially reduced. I am writing you to ask DEP why Buckeye is being allowed to operate without an up -to-date permit? Why is this company allowed to increase its pollution loading without permission from the state? Buckeye has the technology available to clean up its pollution and protect the Gulf of Mexico. A pipe to the Gulf will only further threaten our valuable coastal
4
resources. In 2009 Buckeye took $130 million in tax-credits and in 2010 they took $67 million in tax-credits. They should use this money to clean up their mess and be a responsible part of the community. Please share your thoughts with me and let me know what you can do to help with this problem. Your name Address City, state, zip 2. Numeric nutrient criteria next steps in a hugely wasteful and misleading process. As previously reported the ERC approved the DEPs version of the Numeric Nutrient Criteria for Florida. DEPs nutrient rule essentially treats point-source polluters the same way that the Clean Water Act treats agriculture as a non-regulated entity. The federal nutrient rule does the same exact thing, so dont be mislead into thinking the federal rule will make a difference either because it wont. To explain further, point source discharges (NPDES discharges) will not be required to meet the nutrient criteria at their point of discharge like they do with other pollutants. Instead, the entire water body will be sampled over a one year span in different places. Only after those samples are averaged over the entire year, and are found to be too high for two out of three years will a red flag go up. This is where the state and federal rules take a different path. The federal rule then offers numerous ways to avoid making any polluters reduce their nutrient pollution. Those loopholes are easy to get and will usually be the end of the story once one or more are applied. The state rule requires that the chemically impaired water body be inspected for biological impairment. If DEP decides that the whole water body is not biologically impaired (basically dead), then life goes on and the pollution can continue unabated indefinitely. If by some miracle DEP decides there is a serious problem, then all of the same loopholes that EPA offers to polluters, are also available. The worst case scenario for the polluters is that the water will get listed on the 303(d) list (can take up to 5 years), then a TMDL will be developed (can take an indefinite length of time), then a BMAP will be developed (will take at least 5 years) and then NPDES permits can be adjusted to reduce nutrients. Point-source polluters can ask for other loopholes and can have up to 20 years to comply if ever. So, in short, neither the state or federal nutrient rules are worth the paper they are written on. DEP says that the Legislature received the state rule on January 9th. This will be the first time a DEP rule has gotten ratified by the Legislature so DEP says that they do not know the procedure. Even though there is no hope that the Legislature will be horrified by the lack of integrity in the nutrient rule, we should all contact our state legislators (house and senate) and let them know that we are not satisfied with this do-nothing rule and we want them to vote against it. You message can be as simple as this: Dear Legislator: Floridas springs, lakes, streams and estuaries are choking to death on nutrients. They need help immediately and every other government official who has had an opportunity so far to provide protection to them has failed. We are writing to you today with this urgent message. Please reject the Dept. of Environmental Protections nutrient rule. Just vote no! I would appreciate a reply with your position on this issue which is vital to Floridas economy, public health and our future. When I learn more about next steps, I will let you know. EPA is requesting an extension of
5
time from the federal courts to adopt their version of the nutrient rule. They would prefer to wait until Floridas rule is final and then the federal rule will be withdrawn. 3. Push EPA to regulate dozens of health-based toxics in Floridas waters. CWN-FL is still pushing EPA to set limits on dozens of health-based toxics for Florida at levels that will be protective of the most vulnerable populations. Florida has stalled on setting these regulations for 15 years, so we have petitioned EPA to take over the rule-making process. If we can avoid a lawsuit, that will be our preference but we will continue to push for better protection until either the state or EPA sets protective limits for these toxic chemicals in our environment. 4. Georgia-Pacific and their pollution pipe to the St. Johns River. We continue to work with our members and partners to stop Georgia-Pacific from building their pipeline to the St Johns River. The St Johns Riverkeeper is doing excellent work on this issue and we will continue to assist in anyway possible. 5. Expand our Florida Estuary Project. Over the next year or so, DEP and/or EPA will be setting nutrient criteria for most of Floridas estuaries. It is critically important that you are involved in this process. We will continue our efforts to keep you informed of workshops and pending decisions. If you would like to partner with CWN-FL on your estuary protection, please let us know and well be happy to work with you. 6. TMDLs around the state. We are still in litigation over the state Impaired Waters list and the methodology that DEP uses to list and delist impaired waters. We have sued over this issue and won several times in the past 10 years. DEP is relentless in its efforts to keep many impaired waters off of this clean-up list. They would prefer that we accept current pollution levels and problems as the norm and the best that we should ever expect in the future. This is contrary to the Clean Water Act and a terrible legacy to leave for future generations. This litigation is expensive and extremely difficult to undertake. We are incredibly grateful to our attorney David Ludder for his amazing work on this important issue.
EVERGLADES NEWS
Everglades Skyway Update. On December 23 the President signed the 2012 Appropriations Act, including authorization for the elevation of Tamiami Trail, to restore the flow of the River of Grass. See more at Everglades Skyway. The Greater Everglades joins 9 other ecosystems in the Sierra Club's renewed effort to protect these important areas and the species that live in them. To find out how you can volunteer for the new Greater Everglades Resilient Habitats Campaign Click Here You can see the national campaigns listed on the web at Ecosystems You can give the gift of sponsorship of Everglades National Park! Finally, Everglades is getting the attention at the national level that it6 deserves. You can help. See the information at Everglades Sponsorship
FAVORITE WEBSITES
Please Explore http://www.swfwmd.state.fl.us/projects/ surplus-lands/index.php http://m1e.net/c?76996594-D/ Oze0CYRLRsE%407155690hjuVUjD43cKDg Kids Outdoors Act (HKOA) (HR 3353/ S 1802) will support state, local and federal strategies with intentions of improving children's health and supporting future economic growth and conservation efforts. The HKOA would provide funding for state-level incentives to connect youth with the outdoors and ensure the next generation of conservation stewards. Please take a minute to contact your U.S. Representative and Senators today and urge them to support the Healthy Kids Outdoors Act!
http://www.news-press.com/ article/20120120/ OPINION/301200030/ Editorial: Resume Cape utility expansion In another example of elections having consequences, the Cape Coral City Council has declared in strong terms that it wants the citys controversial utility expansion program restarted. Red Tide Current Status
Sponsored-by:
1000 Friends of Florida ... and the Future Is Now Foundation
MOSQUITOES
10
First International Conference on Mining Impacts to the Human and Natural Environments
Click here for Biographies of the Conference speakers
Schedule of Events
Morning Group Sessions Human and Wildlife Impacts 9:00-10:00 Central Florida
Inadequate Public Input on Offsite and Long-term Adverse Impacts of Phosphate Mining in the Peace River Basin: Lake Hancock to Charlotte Harbor Estuary Hardee County Dennis Mader, People for Protecting Peace River
Listen to Mr. Mader's presentation Phosphate Mining Impacts, Gyp Stacks and Gaps in Agency Regulation Manatee and Sarasota Counties Glenn Compton, ManaSota-88 website maintained by ManaSota-88 http://www.ourphosphaterisk.com Listen to Glenn's presentation 10:00-11:30 Southern and Coastal Florida Threats to Lives and Lifestyles from Industrial Mining in a Rural Southwest Florida Community Lee County Peggy Apgar-Schmidt & Kevin Hill, Corkscrew Road Rural Community oops! We don't appear to have the audio for this one- sorry! Maybe next conference. listen to the afternoon panel discussion
11
Brooks Concerned Citizens advocacy website - sign up for e-mail notices and e-action alerts Gulf Coast Impacts from Inland Mining Gulf Coast Joe Murphy, Gulf Restoration Network " If the earth came with an instruction manual, it would have said DONT TOUCH THE KNOBS!" listen to the presentation South Floridas Dredge & Fill Projects for Beach Dunes Ignore Impacts of Source Material from Inland Mines"- not yet available for release Southeast to Southwest Tom Warnke, Surfrider Foundation & the Eastern Surfing Association - look especially for their "Position Statement on Coastal Armoring". 11:30-12:00 Morning Session Speakers Panel Discussion Ron Armstrong, P.E. & Jack McCarthy, Withlacoochee Area Residents Rob Brinkman, the Suwanee-St. Johns Group of the Florida Chapter of the Sierra Club Glenn Compton, ManaSota-88 Peggy Apgar-Schmidt, Corkscrew Road Rural Community Dennis Mader, People for Protecting Peace River Joe Murphy, Gulf Restoration Network Tom Warnke, Surfrider Foundation & the Eastern Surfing Association Afternoon Technical Sessions Science, Technology and Alternatives Session Moderator Nora Demers, Ph. D., Florida Gulf Coast University 1:00-2:00 Monitoring Inadequacies and Alternatives Designing a Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Phosphate Mining: A Critique of the Horse Creek Stewardship Program Bill Dunson, Ph. D., Penn State University Listen to Dr. Dunson's presentation High Performance Wireless Networks: Realtime Data Access for Monitoring Mine Sites (see the video at the link) Hans-Werner Braun & Pablo Bryant, University of California San Diego Learn more about HPWREN Applications for Glass Cullet as an Alternative to Mined Sand for Construction Aggregate * Charles W. Finkl, Ph. D. & C. Makowski, Coastal Planning & Engineering sample of Florida projects 2:00-3:00 Air and Water Quality, Remote Sensing and Economic Impacts Spatial and Temporal Monitoring of Phytoplankton in Waters Affected by or within Open Pit Mining Operations Using Pigment-Based Chemotaxonomy * Bill Louda, Ph. D., Florida Atlantic University, and Councilman of Loxahatchee Groves see Dr. Louda's CV "The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." (Isaac Asimov) Monitoring Open Pit Mining Operations Using Aerial Photographs and Google Earth * Tommy Jordan, Ph. D. & Marguerite Madden, Ph. D., University of Georgia Center for Remote Sensing and Mapping Science Economic Analysis of Mining Impacts: Flaws and Inadequacies Richard Weisskoff, Ph. D., University of Miami technical difficulties - click here for Dr. Weiskoff's T/F test 3:00-4:00 Soils and Geology Comparative Analysis of Physical, Chemical and Hydrological Characteristics of Native and Reclaimed Phosphate Mine Soils in Hardee, Hillsborough and Polk Counties, Florida, USA Lew Carter, Polston Engineering listen to the presentation
12
The Use of Seismic Profiling To Identify Subsurface Fluid Migration Pathways at Proposed Mine Sites in Florida, USA James Flocks, USGS listen to the presentation Controls on the Depositional Balance Between Carbonates and Siliciclastics on the Southeastern Florida Platform: Applicability To Mine Site Evaluations* 4:00-5:30 Hydrology and Hydroperiod Understanding the Floridan Aquifer System: Dye Tracing Challenges Conventional Wisdoms of Mining Impacts Todd Kincaid, Ph. D., H2H Associates "Don't do the pink underwear test" listen to Dr. Kincaid's presentation Groundwater Modeling to Assess Impacts from Mining in Karst Aquifers Tim Hazlett, Ph. D. & Todd Kincaid, Ph. D., Hazlett-Kincaid listen to the presentation Field Assessments of Landscape-scale Mining Impacts Based on Spectroscopic Analyses Sydney Bacchus, Ph. D., Applied Environmental Services listen to Dr. Bacchus' presentation
For a look at what one of these projects actually looks like on the ground, this video was shot 2 weeks ago at mile marker 51 of Interstate 75. It shows the massive new parking lot being constructed in the heart of primary panther habitat in the Big Cypress National Preserve Addition Lands. A popular hiking trail now lies buried somewhere beneath it. When completed, the project will provide parking for some of the 650 recreational motor vehicles which FWS has also approved in this highly sensitive area. http://m1e.net/c?76996594-D/Oze0CYRLRsE% 407155690-hjuVUjD43cKDg 2. Move immediately to expand the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge. As mentioned above, Director Ashe will be making an announcement today to protect 150,000 acres of ranch lands in central Florida through a combination of land purchases and conservation easements. He will be requesting a 700 million dollar authorization from congress to accomplish that. While we appreciate the intent of the "Headwaters of the Everglades" project, South Florida Wildlands Association (SFWA) believes that, given the current plight of the panther, a re-prioritization is absolutely essential. At least a half dozen properties essential to the panther - and totaling approximately the same acreage as would be included in the Headwaters project - have been on the books for a decade as unfinished Florida Forever projects (the State of Floridas conservation land acquisition program). These include a property to the north of the Big Cypress Addition Lands (bought up by Florida Power and Light just this past June and now slated to become the biggest fossil fuel power plant in the country - the Hendry County Clean Energy Center - if we and our allies are unsuccessful in stopping the project). Another piece of privately owned land borders the Caloosahatchee River and has been identified as the last piece of undeveloped property which panthers (so far only males) use to leave the confines of south Florida. While SFWA and other environmental organizations are working hard to bring this key corridor under conservation protection, the for sale sign remains. Time is of the essence. These lands and others adjacent to them are on the Florida Growth Machines chopping block now. Allowing them to be developed will likely deal a fatal blow to the panthers chances of recovery. If protected they would form a completely contiguous corridor of conservation lands and habitat which would stretch from the Caloosahatchee River to the southern tip of Everglades National Park. They have been extensively studied for their conservation importance and, with the sole exception of the land recently purchased by Florida Power and Light, have owners willing to provide protection without added development (we are still hoping Florida Power and Light will come around on this as well). This is not an opportunity we want to miss. 14 Please send an email to Director Ashe now. Ask him to reconsider the decision of his agency and designate critical habitat for the panther immediately. And ask him to use the power of the federal government to acquire lands necessary to the survival of Floridas great cat by expanding the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge with already identified, essential acquisitions. Once again, Director Ashes email address is: dan_ashe@fws.gov The National Park Services own comments on the construction of the parking lot and motorized recreational access point described above are well worth a read. Written in 1994, they are a fitting summary of what we (and the panther) stand to lose: The odds for the long-term survival of the Florida panther in the wild are not good. The-human population in the region continues to increase, resulting in urban growth and expansion of the regional highway network into former panther habitat. The demand and use of panther habitat for outdoor recreation has also increased and will continue to do soAny action that decreases the wilderness qualities of the Everglades region impacts this species. The existing threats to the panther are interrelated and cannot be separated. The primary threat to the Florida panther has been human encroachment into panther habitat. Eloquent words. Now is the time to follow them and make true protection of Florida panther habitat - along with the hundreds of species of plants and animals