You are on page 1of 9

MUHAMMAD FAIS BIN ISMAIL

ISL

SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

Soalan ISL 1. Sediakan satu rubrik untuk menilai portfolio. 2. Buat refleksi tentang kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan. Cari makna istilah yg berikut: alfa cronbach, indeks kesukaran, indeks diskriminasi, indeks kebolehpercayaan, indeks kesahan, kesahan konstruk, kesahan

kandungan, kesahan kriteria, & kesahan muka.

*Bagi rubrik penilaian portfolio, contoh yang diberikan adalah dalam Bahasa Inggeris memandangkan kurang sumber rujukan di dalam bahasa Melayu.

Education

Teaching Portfolio Evaluation Rubric

DIRECTIONS: For each category assign a score (0-4) for completeness, relevance, and presentation. Calculate subtotals for each column and a total score. Cover Criteria letter/resum e Teaching philosophy Lesson plans/unit plan Concept or Evaluations/ reflections Resources

maps 207/307 graphic microteachin g evaluations to growth show

organizers Work samples-

yours/your students Assessment evaluation validity assignment and

[Type the company name] | SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

MUHAMMAD FAIS BIN ISMAIL

ISL

SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

related student assessment Completeness: includes rich

to

variety of items relevant teaching Relevance: items relate to current & effective to

materials, methods content Presentation: justification of &

items, creativity, organization, visual grammar spelling appeal, &

SUBTOTALS

TOTAL SCORE =

/48

Score of greater than 36 to pass anything less is a revise and resubmit Scoring key:
[Type the company name] | SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS 2

MUHAMMAD FAIS BIN ISMAIL

ISL

SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

0 = Not present. There is limited or no evidence in this category. 1 = Below expectations; unacceptable. Evidence presented is of low quality. Items are not completed in a thorough and professional manner (e.g., sloppy, not typed) or are of variable quality. Further work is required to adequately document the candidate's qualifications.

2 = Meets minimum expectations; fair Evidence presented indicates a minimally acceptable level of competence. Demonstrates some strength, but reveals inconsistent quality and/or clear weaknesses in the candidate's understandings, experiences, and/or abilities as a teacher. Demonstrates that the candidate has the potential to become a satisfactory teacher. 3 = Exceeds expectations; good. Evidence provided indicates that the candidate's competence clearly exceeds minimum expectations for professional practice. Documents work that is consistently of good quality. Documents some experience with, and a good understanding of, issues and practices in education. The portfolio demonstrates that this candidate has the potential to become a good teacher. 4 = Far exceeds expectation; exceptional. Evidence provided indicates that the candidate has the potential to be an exceptionally well qualified teacher. The items are neat, accurate, complete, and professionally presented. The portfolio indicates

substantial experience with, and excellent understanding of, issues in education, and a desire and ability to blend theory and practice in ones teaching. high quality.

[Type the company name] | SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

MUHAMMAD FAIS BIN ISMAIL

ISL

SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

CRITERIA

POOR (1)

GOOD (2) Navigation is clear; some links do not work; content includes audio/video, digital images, slide show, and/or PDF docs; few grammar errors in documents Organized; some evidence of personalization; is visual; good use of design, audio, and text elements Reflections are related to artifacts; some reflections missing/and or need of improvement and revisions; reflections overall are of good quality

EXCELLENT (3) Clear navigation; links work; content includes audio/video, digital images, slide show, and/or PDF docs; documents are errorfree; portfolio has been converted to CD or posted to a web site. Well organized; unique/imaginative approach to design; highly visual; excellent use of design, audio, and text elements Reflections are learly related to artifacts; reflections demonstrate growth over time; reflections are well written and reveal depth and breadth of experiences; reflections overall ar of excellent quality Artifacts are related to reflections; no artifacts missing; categories are complete; good variety of artifacts included; excellent quality digital and/or video images and sound

TECHNICAL Hard to navigate; many links do not work; all text docs with few images; audio/or video not included; documents have many grammatical errors DESIGN Not organized or presented well; lacks personalization; not visual; poor use of design, audio, text elements *REFLECTIONS Reflections not related to artifacts; many reflections missing and/or need substantial improvement and revisions; reflections overall are of poor quality ARTIFACTS Artifacts are not related to reflections; many artifacts missing; little variety of artifacts included; poor quality digital and/or video images and sound

Artifacts related to reflections; some artifacts missing; has a variety of artifacts included; good quality digital and/or video images & sound

[Type the company name] | SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

MUHAMMAD FAIS BIN ISMAIL

ISL

SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

Jawapan soalan kedua:

KEBOLEHPERCAYAAN DAN KESAHAN

Cara untuk mendapatkan kaedah yang terbaik ialah dengan cara kebolehpercayaan dan kesahan.Kebolehpercayaan itu terbatas dan ia merupakan ujian atau prosuder dan hasil keputusan yang sama di bawah keadaan yang tetap dalam semua keadaan.

Kesahan pula adalah lebih kompleks daripada kebolehpercayaan iaitu ia menjelaskan kepada kita keadaan instrumen pengumpulan data yang sebenarnya mengumpul atau mengukur maklumat yang telah dirancang.

[Type the company name] | SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

MUHAMMAD FAIS BIN ISMAIL

ISL

SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

[Type the company name] | SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

MUHAMMAD FAIS BIN ISMAIL

ISL

SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

[Type the company name] | SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

MUHAMMAD FAIS BIN ISMAIL

ISL

SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

Glossari: Cari makna istilah yg berikut: alfa cronbach, indeks kesukaran, indeks diskriminasi, indeks kebolehpercayaan, indeks kesahan, kesahan konstruk, kesahan kandungan, kesahan kriteria, & kesahan muka.

Istilah Alfa Cronbach

Makna Indeks untuk mengukur ketakalan dalaman / keseragaman item / soalan yang bukan berjawapan dikotomi.

Indeks kesukaran

Indeks untuk mengukur aras kesukaran sesuatu item, iaitu nisbah calon yang memberi jawapan betul kepada jumlah calon, atau markah purata dibahagikan dengan julat markah penuh.

Indeks Diskriminasi

Indeks yang dihasilkan oleh sesuatu item untuk mengukur perbezaan keupayaan

pelajar, iaitu nisbah pelajar pandai yang menjawab dengan betul ditolak nisbah pelajar lemah yang menjawab soalan

dengan betul. Indeks Kebolehpercayaan Indeks untuk mengukur ketakalan ukuranukuran yang dihasilkan oleh sesuatu alat ukuran yang boleh dikira menggunakan pekali Korelasi Pearson, Kuder-Richardson atau Alfa- Cronbach. Indeks Kesahan Indeks untuk mengukur sejauh mana

sesuatu alat dapat mengukur apa yang sepatutnya diukur oleh alat tersebut yang

[Type the company name] | SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

MUHAMMAD FAIS BIN ISMAIL

ISL

SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

boleh dikira menggunakan pekali Korelasi Pearson atau persamaan regresi. Kesahan Konstruk Kesahan dari segi sejauh mana sesuatu ujian dapat mengukur sesuatu konstruk tertentu. Kesahan Kandungan Kesahan dari segi sejauh mana sesuatu ujian mewakili kandungan / sukatan

pelajaran yang telah diajar. Kesahan Kriteria Kesahan dari segi sejauh mana sesuatu ujian mempunyai hubungan dengan ujian lain, sama ada yang ditadbirkan secara serentak atau kemudian. Kesahan Muka Kesahan dari segi sejauh mana sesuatu ujian dapat mengukur sesuatu konstruk tertentu seperti yang dipersepsikan oleh calon yang menduduki ujian.

[Type the company name] | SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS