Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
P. Morales, H. Elgueta, C. Torres Codelco-Chile, Divisin el Teniente J. Yianatos, L. Vinnett CASIM, Universidad Tcnica Federico Santa Mara F. Daz Comisin Chilena de Energa Nuclear
CONTENT
INTRODUCTION HYDRODYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION
NON-CONVENTIONAL MEASUREMENTS
MASS BALANCE AND FLOTATION RATES
CONCLUSIONS
INTRODUCTION
Characterization of the selective molybdenite flotation plant at Divisin El Teniente
bubble load,
axial solids and grade profiles RTD and Mixing: Radioactive tracers, liquid and solids Analysis : hydrodynamic and flotation rate models
HYDRODYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION
Transport and mixing
Pulp distribution: rougher lines (Collective and Selective)
RTD: Liquid
Non-floatable solid (3 size classes) Floatable solid
0,0005 0,0004 Normalized RTD 0,0003 0,0002 0,0001 0,0000 0 2000 4000 Time, s 6000 8000
Data Model
HYDRODYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION
Axial grade profiles: Cu, Mo, Fe and Insoluble, per size class
0 40 Cell Depth, cm 80 120 160 200
Cu Mo Fe Insoluble
Interface
DIAGNOSTIC MEASUREMENTS
BUBBLE SIZE (MBSA sensor , McGill) LOCAL AIR OR NITROGEN (Jg, Sb) BUBBLE LOAD (UTFSM sensor )
1,0 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0,0 0,2 1,4 2,6 3,8 5 6,2
Relative Frequency
Data Lognormal
Bubble diameter, mm
BUBBLE SIZE
COLLECTIVE ROUGHER
SELECTIVE ROUGHER
BUBBLE SIZE
SAUTER MEAN DIAMETER
Stage
D32, mm
D, mm
Collective rougher 1 Collective rougher 2 Selective rougher First Cleaner Fourth Cleaner
Stage
Gas
JG, cm/s
D32, mm
SB, m2/s/m2
G, %
60 17.7 11.7
14
12 10 8 6 4 2
Collective Rougher - Exp 1 Selective Rougher - Exp 2 First Cleaner Column 5 - 3L Column 6 - 4L
0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
MASS BALANCE
OVERALL BALANCE : Adjustment Criteria
Feed and final concentrate : reliable Residence time measurement to estimate flowrates Single adjustments Zones adjustments Overall adjustment
MASS BALANCE
SELECTIVE FLOTATION PLANT
90
80 Moly Recovery, % 70 60 50 40 30
Data M1 Data M2 Data M3 Model
20
10 0 0 2 4 N of Cells
Model
0
0 2 4 N of Cells 6 8
SCALE UP
SELECTIVE ROUGHER PARAMETERS
Batch
Plant
kb/kp Ratio
5.9
kb/kp Ratio
1.20 100
0.177 100
6.8
CONCLUSIONS
FLOTATION HYDRODYNAMICS
Mechanical Cells : Flowrate differences in parallel lines (20-30%) Normal bubble size distributions Low gas flowrate in selective flotation Selective rougher lines showed by-pass flow Columns: Presence of shortcircuit
CONCLUSIONS
MASS BALANCE
END