Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
mean. Without this you cant understand what the question is asking of you. Words in the 40mk essay are often taken directly from the specification. Whatever the command work is then include it in the introduction. This will focus the mind and refers you back to what is being asked. It is generally advised that you look back at the question after every paragraph. Chunk/highlight the key parts of the question. The examiner says only 5-10% of students do this, yet it is an excellent way of ensuring you dont misread the question or miss something out. Plan your answer. You dont have a lot of time so use short hand, outline the key ideas/key case studies. Case studies are vital but you dont need to learn everything. Applying 2 or 3 facts well will score more marks than listing tens of facts about a place. Be selective and use your concepts/theories carefully to hang your case studies on. Keep referring back to the question in your answer-it keeps you on track. Aim to RTBQ But most of all ATBQ
Aim to structure your essay as follows: 1. Introduction-define the terms, set out the content 2. Main body of the essay-here you will need to use paragraphs. Each paragraph should start with an introduction, then develop the point being made and finally conclude before moving onto the next paragraph. Within this section you will include your detailed knowledge and understanding. The aim is to link the key ideas together. If the question is a discuss or compare question then aim to do one paragraph on one view and the next paragraph on a contrasting view. In other words organise your thoughts. In this section you will need to use evidence, applying applicable case studies to the theory. 3. Conclusion-go back and refer to the words in the question. Dont repeat any points you have already made as this is wasting time. Aim to link the paragraphs together and sum up. In some cases give your own opinion/answer to the debate.
Some golden rules for success Range Give several examples, at least two. If the question allows for it, try to make the examples a bit different (contrasting), such as in terms of development, or scale. If you are discussing a topic or issues, give both sides of the argument, eg costs and benefits, advantages and disadvantages. Dont be one-sided. Include some hard facts. It is much better to say $3.5 billion than lots of money. Avoid writing in the first person. Instead, use the third person, eg A common view is or Overall the evidence suggests that. Geography is about places. An exam answer which does not refer to any places will be weak. When you use examples, name them, and say where they are. Rather than just writing and writing, try to write to a structure. When writing about impacts, commonly used examples are social, economic and environmental; or positives and negatives. There are some classic case studies and examples which we continue to use, such as Bhopal, Mount St Helens and Kobe. We use these because they are unusual they are one offs. Apart from these, examples and case studies should be recent. Be careful how you phrase things, especially under exam pressure. Here are some (common) simplistic statements which could make answers look less than convincing: the country of Africa in the developing world there is no education South Korea, an LEDC country None of these statements is true. Dont fall into the trap of making sweeping statements: they are likely to be wrong. You should try to provide an overview at the end of your answer. All you need is perhaps two sentences that summarise what you have said and round off your answer. Examiners are impressed by this.
Balance
Structure
Relevance
Realism
Overview
Describe and comment on This demands a higher level of response than just describe. Usually the description is straightforward, with judgements about the description getting most of the marks. Discuss Usually you are expected to build up an argument about an issue and to present more than one side of the evidence with supporting examples. This creates a written debate identifying both positive and negative points and then you must reach a conclusion from the debate. You should both describe and explain. Try to create a balanced answer. Discuss the extent to which requires a judgement about the validity of the evidence or outcome. Discuss varying attitudes to there is a variety of viewpoints (eg decision makers and others affected) and priorities to be included in the answer. Evaluate or assess This is similar to the idea of discuss. Assess requires a statement of the overall quality or value of the feature/issue being considered. Evaluate asks the candidate to give an overall statement of value. In both cases you need to state a viewpoint, after consideration of the evidence. In both cases your own judgement/opinion is wanted. Although an opinion cannot be marked incorrect, credit is given for the justification of the position youve taken up. It usually best not to adopt an extreme viewpoint (a balanced answer is best). Examine... Look closely. Explain Give reasons or causes. Description is not enough (and may not be needed at all). Show an understanding of why or how something has occurred. Justify Usually applies to decision-making questions. When you have made your decision you must justify why that course of action was better than the alternatives. Explain why your chosen course is better than the options that you rejected. Also explain how your choice meets the criteria set out for you in the question (or which you had to describe earlier in your answer). Outline... Note the main features. Suggest... Put forward an idea or reason. To what extent... Agree and disagree (for and against). There are a number of possible explanations - give these. Then say which you tend to favour.