Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Can't a property that is identified through a thing also be identified through any other thing?
S IVASHANMUGAM . P.,
Disclaimer: Nothing except the order in which I put the words is mine.
This writing may disappear from internet. Have a copy for your future reference.
You are supposed to say that ONE is changed only if ONE becomes NOT ONE. Study
this illustration in order to get rid of future confusions.
Let x = A B C
Let y = B A C
A B C > B A C
x y
One could identify that A remains as A, B remains as B, C remains as C and the order in
which A and B exist in x alone changes in the change from x to y.
One is supposed to say that ‘A is changed’ only if A becomes ‘NOT A’. It is inappro-
priate to say that ‘A changes’ when A remains as A. Does A become ‘NOT A’ in the
change from x to y?
.
One is supposed to say that ‘B is changed’ only if B becomes ‘NOT B’. It is inappropri-
ate to say that ‘B changes’ when B remains as B. Does B become ‘NOT B’ in the
change from x to y?
It is also inappropriate to say that everything changes in the change from x to y, be-
cause it will contradict with the facts: A remains as A, B remains as B, and C remains as
C. It is absurd to make statements like A changes to A or B changes to B. A changes A
to a means that A remains A as only.
The appropriate saying would be that ‘the order alone changes in the change from x to
y’ or ‘everything except the order in remains the same in the change from x to y’.
What is not common to x and y? The order in which A, B, and C exist in x does not
exist in y. The order in which A, B, and C exist in y does not exist in x. The order in
which A, B, and C exist in x and y is not common to x and y. x and y differ in the order
in which A, B, and C exist in them. The order in which A, B, and C exist in x and y alone
changes in the change from x to y.
‘Everything which changes’ ≠ ‘Everything changes’
‘Everything which do not change’ ≠ ‘Everything do not change’
‘Everything is subjected to change’ ≠ ‘Everything changes’; ‘Independent’ ≠ ‘Isolated’
‘A’ ≠ ‘order of A’ . There is a difference between A and order of A.
‘Constant change’ ≠ ‘Constants of change’; ‘Constant motion’ ≠ ‘Constants of motion’
‘Different things’ ≠ ‘Difference between things’; ‘Making different’ ≠ ‘Making a difference’
Can one identify and prove that x = x if the things by which everything is identified
do not remain the same? Can one identify and prove that x ≠ y if the things by which every-
thing is identified change? One could identify and prove that “every constant is a variable”
if the things by which everything is identified do not remain the same. One can never
identify things without the things to identify them. Why can’t one identify those which
change without those which do not change?
This writing is to refute the statement that everything changes. One who attempts
prove that “everything changes” can identify nothing and prove no thing through search
and research. You can never identify that which you search for if no thing re-
mains the same. No one can ever prove that which can never be the same.
The statement “everything changes” is set to impeach the first principle of science
that “the total energy of the universe remains the same.” No thing can be changed except
the order in which those which can neither be created nor be destroyed exist. Every thing
except the order remains the same. Everything except the order can never be disor-
dered. No thing can be conserved if everything changes.
All those who aspire to prove that "everything changes" must abolish the
universals, constants, logic, and other analytical principles of science and phi-
losophy. All those who aspire to prove that "those which change can be identified without
those which do not change" must abolish the ideas with which everyone searches, identi-
fies, classifies, relates, questions, studies, describes, comprehends and explains the differ-
ent things. The statement "everything changes" is expressed as a constant and cancels it-
self out if there are no constants. The statement that ‘everything changes’ is true until those
which do not change are identified.
Is no thing common to all? Can any two things be without similarity? No two
things can be without similarity. The similarities among all things can never be destroyed.
One who advocates that “everything changes” denies the similarities which are
common to all. One needs the theory of constants and invariantology in order to study
and explain why those which are common to all can never be changed.
Tiruchirappalli
7th day of June, 2009 Sivashanmugam. P.,
CONTENTS
.
Can't a property that is identified through
a thing also be identified through any other thing?
The ideas on a one and all the others correspond to the properties identified through them.
“Is it a divisible one? What are its parts, if it is a divisible one? Can it be divided into
equal parts? What are the differences and similarities among its parts? How are its
parts related? How are its parts interactive? Can its parts be reordered?Is it a
substitutable one? Is it fulfilling the requirements? What are its preferences?...”
THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED THROUGH A ONE IS NOT COMMON ONLY IF IT IS NOT IDENTIFIED
THROUGH ANY OTHER ONE
Nothing can be searched to find the property which
has not been identified through anyone.
One may tend to say that “a thing can be compared with itself as it
changes.” This statement is a fallacy.’ x’ becomes ‘not x’ when ‘x’ changes. Are
‘x’ and ‘not x’ the same thing? ‘x’ and ‘not x’ are different things.
The ideas with which one questions, studies, relates, comprehends, describes, and
explains each and every thing remain the same because no change can produce that
which cannot be:
1. as a part,
2. as a whole,
3. as an equivalence,
4. as a uniqueness,
5. as a limit,
6. as a link,
7. as a sensation,
8. as a influence,
9. as an origin,
10. as a derivative,
11. a determinant,
12. an expression,
13. as an intent, and
14. as a fulfillment.
Order is that which can be disordered. Invariant is that which can never be disor-
dered. Invariants can neither be created nor be destroyed. No order can be formed
without disorder. What would be formed if a thing disorders? A new order will be formed
with the deformation of the existing the order. Everything except the order will remain
the same.
~ What would be formed if one is in isolation?
~ What would be formed if A reacts with B?
~ What would be formed if organism A is crossed with organism B?
~ What would be formed if gene A is recombined with gene B?
~ What would be the outcome if individual A is made to go with individual B?
~ What would be the outcome if firm A is merged with firm B?
~ What would be formed if one alphabet is combined with other alphabets?
~ What would be formed if one sound combines another sound?
~ What would be formed if one ray of light combines with another ray of light?
~ What would be the outcome if photon combines with matter?
~ What would be formed if Sun collides with earth?
~ What would be the outcome if you sleep with a woman?
~ What would be the consequence if one premise combines with another premise?
~ What would be formed if earth is depleted of energy?
~ What would be formed if a pathogen invades your body?
~ What would be formed if a virus attacks you?
~ What would be the outcome if I kiss you?
~ What would be the outcome if I beat you?
~ What would be formed if there is a street fight?
~ What would be formed if there is atomic explosion?
~ What would be the outcome if countries go on war?
~ What would be formed if an elephant eats a rat?
~ What would be formed if a rat eats an elephant?
~ What would be formed if hydrogen reacts with iodine?
~ What would be formed if one quantity is combined with another quantity?
~ What would be formed if two or more forces combine?
~ What would be formed if two or more vectors combine?
~ What would be formed if a quantity is subtracted from another?
~ What would be formed if a quantity is divided?
~ What would be formed if cow hits a dog?
~ What would be formed if horse loves donkey?
~ What would be formed if you love me?
~ What would be formed if you marry me?
~ What would be the outcome if kill me?
~ What would be formed if you are irregular to classes?
~ What would be the outcome if fail in examinations?
~ What would be formed if one segment of DNA is transposed to another location?
~ What would be the outcome if you live with 99% error?
~ What would be the outcome if you cheat the people?
~ What would be the outcome if the political leaders are honest?
~ What would be consequences if you become rich?
~ What would be consequences if you become poor?
~ What would be formed if you do not have food?
~ What would be formed if you do not drink?
~ What would be formed if you do not eat?
~ What would be formed if you do not bath?
~ What would be formed if you smoke?
~ What would be formed if there is mutation in gene?
~ What would be formed if a catalyst is added to the reaction system?
152 Everything except the order remains the same
~ What would be formed if a catalyst is added to the reaction system?
~ What would be formed if an inhibitor is added to the reaction system?
~ What would be formed if there is no photosynthesis in this universe?
~ What would be formed if the entire earth explodes?
~ What would be formed if there is a flood?
~ What would be formed if everyone dies?
~ What would be the consequences if everyone lives forever?
~ What would be the outcome if no appearance disappears?
~ What would be formed if bleeding occurs?
~ What would be formed if no one reproduces?
~ What would be formed if everyone innovates?
~ What would be formed if everyone procreates?
~ What would be formed if everyone is intolerant?
~ What would be formed if thrown into a barrel of sulphuric acid?
~ What would be formed if you take more cholesterol?
~ What would be formed if take poison? Information tells what
~ What would be formed if you start thinking? is in formation!
~ What would be formed if you stop thinking?
~ What would be formed if you stop smoking?
~ What would be formed if you cannot move?
~ What would be formed if you cannot breathe?
~ What would be formed if you cannot digest?
~ What would be formed if you cannot swim?
~ What would be formed if there is no global warming?
~ What would be formed if every fish is killed in the ocean?
~ What would be formed if more amounts of algae grow?
~ What would be formed if you cut yourself?
~ What would be formed if you cheat yourself?
The possible orders which can be formed when a thing disorders can be found from the possible
ways the characteristic components segregate and recombine. What is the most probable order
which can be formed can be found from the degree of preference for every possible order. The
absence of preference for any order is the random condition. Under random condition, every
possible order is equally probable.
The science of genetics deals with the inheritance of characteristics, i.e., transfer
of characteristics from one generation to next generation. No transfer or recombi-
nation can occur without disorder of the existing order of the units of inheritance.
The science of genetics neither deals with the ab initio genesis of characteristics nor
deals with the genesis of units of inheritance.
The science of probability deals with the computation of the degree of prefer-
ence for every possible order which can be formed through disorders.
153 Everything except the order remains the same
Which one will remain forever? One would find two contradictory answers to this
question.
1. Anything which cannot be changed will remain forever. (thermodynamic version)
2. Anything which is flexible will remain forever. (evolutionary theory version)
In the thermodynamic version, stability is related to energy and probability. Lesser the
energy is more the stability. The stable one is the probable one. The probable one is the stable
one. In evolutionary theory version, one that adapts to every condition will be selected while the
other will be eliminated.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
disorders, one needs the knowledge of: 1. the rate of disorder, 2. the route of disorder, 3. the
extent of disorder, and 4. the direction (the order towards which a disorder progresses) of dis-
order.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
a change, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of change (number of changes per step of change),
2. route of change,
3. direction of change, and
4. extent of change.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
a chemical reaction, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of a chemical reaction,
2. route of a chemical reaction,
3. direction of a chemical reaction, and
4. extent of a chemical reaction.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
electron flow, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of electron flow,
2. route of electron flow,
3. direction of electron flow, and
4. extent of electron flow.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
energy flow, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of energy flow,
2. route of energy flow,
3. direction of energy flow, and
4. extent of energy flow.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
blood flow, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of blood flow,
2. route of blood flow,
3. direction of blood flow, and
4. extent of blood flow.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
growth, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of growth,
2. route of growth,
3. direction of growth, and
4. extent of growth.
154 Everything except the order remains the same
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through a
process, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of a process,
2. route of a process,
3. direction of a process, and
4. extent of a process.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
replication, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of replication,
2. route of replication,
3. direction of replication, and
4. extent of replication.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
transcription, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of transcription,
2. route of transcription,
3. direction of transcription, and
4. extent of transcription.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
translation, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of translation,
2. route of translation,
3. direction of translation, and
4. extent of translation.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through a
production, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of production,
2. route of production,
3. direction of production, and
4. extent of production.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through a
propagation, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of propagation,
2. route of propagation,
3. direction of propagation, and
4. extent of propagation.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
error, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of error,
2. route of error,
3. direction of error, and
4. extent of error.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
recombination, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of recombination,
2. route of recombination,
3. direction of recombination, and
4. extent of recombination.
155 Everything except the order remains the same
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through a
transfer, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of transfer,
2. route of transfer,
3. direction of transfer, and
4. extent of transfer.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
conservation, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of conservation,
2. route of conservation,
3. direction of conservation, and
4. extent of conservation.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
movement, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of movement,
2. route of movement,
3. direction of movement, and
4. extent of movement.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
displacement, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of displacement,
2. route of displacement,
3. direction of displacement, and
4. extent of displacement.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
reproduction, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of reproduction,
2. route of reproduction,
3. direction of reproduction, and
4. extent of reproduction.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through
evolution, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of evolution,
2. route of evolution,
3. direction of evolution, and
4. extent of evolution.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through a
progress, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of progress,
2. route of progress, The science of calculus
3. direction of progress, and deals with rates of disorder.
4. extent of progress.
In order to identify the preference for every possible order which would be formed through a
transition, one needs the knowledge of:
1. the rate of transition,
2. route of transition,
3. direction of transition, and
4. extent of transition.
156 Everything except the order remains the same
In every disorder, one could identify 1. a state of initiation, 2. the states of progression
and 3. a state of termination. The initial and final states are called as boundary states. The states
of progression are called as transition states.
For examples,
In the case of a chemical reaction, one could identify:
1. reaction initiation (initial state),
2. reaction progression(through transition states) and
3. reaction termination (final state).
~ Scratch the gold & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ Feed yourself & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ Poison yourself & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ Hang yourself & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ Feed the organism & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ React the atom & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ React the molecule & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ Mutate the gene & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ Feed the organism & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ Kick the pot & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ Chase the dog & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ Love a girl & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ Cut the throat & identify those which change and those which do not change.
~ Cheat the people & identify those which change and those which do not change.
.
.
.
The Research Design:- Search, identify and list all the possibilities. Find the prob-
ability for every possibility. Re-search and identify the possibility which has the highest
probability. One which has the highest probability is the most probable outcome.
Is it difficult to comprehend?
Pressure develops when flow is blocked/resisted.
Water pressure develops when water flow is blocked.
Electric pressure develops when electron flow is resisted.
Osmotic pressure develops when osmotic flow is blocked.
Psychological pressure develops when psychological flow is blocked.
Social pressure develops when social flow is blocked.
...
The object and its properties can be identified from the image of the object.
[The principle of spectroscopy]
The things which move identically under all conditions can never be separated. Make the things
to move by the application of a driving force and separate them if there is a difference in their
moves! [The principle of all separation techniques]
Some say that everything is random. Randomness is the absence of preference. No plan or
experiment is significant if everything is randomness. Don’t you have any preference in your
life?
DON’T THESE IDEAS REMAIN THE SAME?
158 Analytical thinking
Thinking of thoughts as like little threads is one way of looking at things. But the idea
that people could hold "between 4 and 8" thoughts in mind at once has been fairly well debunked,
or at least abandoned. It's actually far simpler, more like 2 or 3, and the complexity of the rest of
it comes from the relevance of what your attention is on to what is in the rest of your mind.
I wouldn't say humans are like computers, but you only need to look at assembly language
to see how the most complex things can be accomplished by very simple methods, with only 2 or
3 things "in mind" at once.
For instance, assemblers aren't focused on variables and such like higher-level languages;
there are generally 2 or 3 "registers," usually called ax, bx and dx, that are each assigned numerical
values. There's often a special counting register, cx, also, but the main three do practically
everything. For instance suppose your language has an operation "mul" that multiplies bx and
dx, and stores the result in ax:
set bx,2
set dx,4
mul
At this point the ax register will have the value 8. Endless reams of assembly code can be written
using just basically those three "ideas."
Suppose you've got an output port, port 2, that takes the number given it and writes it on the
screen. Then you could write
set cx,100
set dx,2
set bx,2
:startloop
mul
out 2,ax
set bx,ax
loop startloop
It will run through that loop 100 times, and print out the first 100 powers of 2.
The human mind can do things just as simply. If you learned all the basic multiplication
and division tables in school, you can do long division in your head by just using three similar
"registers" and the imprinted memory of the process. (the "code.")
Hold the numerator and denominator in mind, calculate the dividend from memory of
multiplication tables, and say it so it sticks in your verbal memory. Then calculate the remainder
and discard the original numerator, replacing it in your mind with the remainder; add a zero on
the remainder, cause you're calculating the next decimal place, and repeat the process. Remember
the denominator stays the same; all you need to do is juggle numerator, dividend and remainder
with the same simple algorithm. Practice and you can do it real fast. It helps if you visualize
doing it on paper with the old-style method of the division box that looks similar to the square-
root symbol.
That's all analytical thinking is, really ... breaking down what is initially too complex to
fathom, and finding what is simple about it.
159 Thinking analytically is a capacity we all have
Thinking analytically is a capacity we all have. People who refuse this statement
either believe they are analytical thinkers and like to be special so they don't like the idea of
having other people be special so easily or they believe themselves to be inferior to other
people are not able to see their own potential on analytical thinking.
It is an obvious fact that the present day academic system completely failed in
promoting analytical thinking. The system which has no capacity to make students aware
of their analytical thinking capacity cannot be called as academic or educational system.
Such academic systems can never prepare students who can bring out public understanding
and social harmony. Public understanding and social harmony cannot be brought without
promoting analytical thinking.
If everything changes, then the idea that "everything changes" must also
change, and so everything doesn't change: otherwise the idea that everything
changes would also mean that everything doesn't change.
Students may find this writing useful in identifying the properties which correspond
to the ideas with which everyone searches, identifies, classifies, relates, questions, studies,
describes and explains the different things.
- End of document -