Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
This case shows how results measurement tools can be applied to a business environment advocacy programme. It presents the results chain for a collaboration with a radio station to enhance business programming.
We thank David Elliott, Justin van Rhyn and Gareth Davies for all of their assistance in preparing this case study. 2 Support functions (Springfield paper: The Operational Guide for the Making Markets Work for the Poor (M4P) Approach 2008) is a range of functions supporting the core exchange helping the market to develop, learn, adapt and grow including, for example, product development, skills enhancement, R&D, coordination and advocacy. 3 For more information about ENABLE, visit www.Enable-Nigeria.com.
parallel measurement system. ENABLE includes two universal impact indicators, additional jobs and additional income, in all of its results chains. The example on the next page is a results chain from ENABLEs media component. ENABLE views the media as an important channel for advocacy and dialogue in Nigeria. The programme works directly with mass media outlets, to improve their role in facilitating business environment reform. In the example on the next page, ENABLE helps Nigerias Federal Radio Corporation to launch and sustain a radio programme on SME-related issues. All of ENABLEs results chains chart not only show how each intervention will lead to highlevel impact but also illustrate how the intervention will contribute to sustainable and systemic change. In the case of media, this means that any new business programming should become a net revenue earner for the media outlet if it is to become sustainable (for commercial outlets at least). Systemic change also implies replication by other media outlets not directly supported by ENABLE.
Figure 1: Results chain (impact logic) for FRCN Kaduna media intervention
Enterprise level change
Media Relations s
10) BMOs and other PS representatives use new business media as an advocacy tool
11) Agenda setting: BMOs are influenced by new improved programmes to take up new/ increase advocacy activities
12) Direct advocacy influence by media: Media increases direct advocacy activities to government on behalf of its audience
ENABLE Government activities and media relations making Government more responsive to advocacy Specific issues and focus for partnership 7. Two 15 mins+ programmes in Hausa and English. Business programme networked on all FRCN stations (in the north/ nationwide) 6. FRCN Kaduna mgmt. support already secured. Build on this to gain wider FRCN network mgmt. support 9. A. Hausa programme replicated within the station; B. Business programme promoted as a replication within the wider FRCN network 5. Target to be defined with FRCN Kaduna. Sufficient level of advertising should convince the FRCN network to put on air 4. FDGs for the pilot productions & . for every production, before launch of pilot and Hausa progr. 2. Specific HR, skills and equipment challenge to be overcome. Need to analyse team incentives and motivation closely 3.Initital focus on selling within Kaduna to prove pilot and Hausa programmes. Network phase to involve FRCN marketing in Lagos
6) Increased and sustained management support for high quality business programming (investment, airtime, HR) without donor input
Enable BMO and research activities, enhancing sources of credible info. 3) Improved/ increased marketing of business programmes
2) Increased quality of business coverage in pilots - audience/demand led - more in-depth - balanced etc.
ACTIVITIES
Initial pilot programme phase: Support to pilot test new formats of business programming Initial focus on a 15 minute programme in English that will be more issue-based investigative, bottom-up and field based
Replication phase: Support to replicate successful; business programming (detailed inputs to be defined) 2-stage replication plan: 1) Developing a sister Hausa language programme, on FRCN Kaduna (with potential to expand length to 30 minutes for each programme?) 2) Promotion of the programme to be carried across the FRCN network (within the north or nationwide)
Results chains are part of ENABLEs regular monitoring. They are used in internal weekly meetings to discuss progress and pinpoint within the logic whether anticipated changes have in fact happened and to take action if necessary. The results chains also help in sharing of information between staff working on different components and in different regions. The results chains are also used to explain their work to donors and partners. A full-time Impact Assessment and Communications Manager supports the programme team, preparing initial drafts of the results chains and sharing them with the individual component managers to be finalised. Overall responsibility for finalising and updating the results chains lies with the individual component managers who own these results chains. These results chains are used extensively by the programme managers to keep an eye on what is being done. The results chains are updated in line with changes in circumstances (internal and external). Once the results chains are drawn, indicators are set for each of the different levels in the results chain. Each box in the results chain has at least one indicator set against it. In the measurement plan, the Means of Verification specifies how information on each of the indicators will be collected. ENABLE uses a range of methods to measure its results. The qualitative methods ENABLE employs include case studies and quality scorecards. These methods are particularly important for programmes such as ENABLE, where the quality of dialogue is a priority. Quantitative methods are used to assess profit margins, outreach, etc. ENABLE faces at least two major challenges in attributing change to its interventions. Firstly, partners are chosen on their merits, their demonstrated commitment and attitude. It would be difficult to establish a representative control group as there is a selection bias. Secondly, since ENABLE seeks to trigger systemic change, other companies of a similar nature may soon copy the target enterprises behaviour, making it even harder to identify a control group. To plausibly demonstrate attribution, ENABLE plans to make case studies and to triangulate information from various sources.