Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The motion of charged particles in assumed electric and magnetic eld can provide insight into many important physical properties of plasmas. While it does not provide the full plasma dynamics it can provide clues on the collective behavior.
In the absence of a magnetic eld the equation reduces to Assuming a constant and uniform magnetic eld, the scalar product with energy " $#&% ! 0 ')( 1
To solve the equations of motion let us consider a magnetic eld of 32547698 Denoting the direction perpendicular to @ with A the components of the equations of motion are # 6 0 CB 2 DBE 4&6
(4.2)
46
47
@ @
For # 6
(4.3)
0 the trajectories are circles in which the particles gyrate with a frequency of SVU 2 8
(4.4)
B
Figure 4.1: Helical ion trajectory in a uniform magnetic eld. lines with the same gyro-frequency. The location of With a nite velocity in @ the trajectories are helical the center of the particle gyro motion @ is called the guiding center of the particle motion. The gyro-radius for the particle motion is # B $# B U (4.5) SVU 8 2
The angle of the particle trajectory with the magnetic eld is called pitch angle # B a # e
(4.6)
"!
48
(4.8)
We can solve this equation either by explicit integration or nding a useful transformation in which the B perpendicular electric eld vanishes. Substituting with a time constant component the equation of motion becomes B
0 reduces the equation for Choosing the velocity such that electric force. Using the Lorentz transformation we obtain this velocity to be 2 %
(4.9)
Ion
Electron
drift.
drift does not feel the Thus a particle which drifts across the magnetic eld with this so-called perpendicular electric eld. The drift is independent of the particle charge because it represents the B transformation into the frame where the perpendicular electric eld 0 . The above result can be generalized by substituting with a general constant force term . The resulting particle drift exposed a this constant force is (4.10) 2 %
49
drift and the second is caused by a slow change of the electric B SVU (4.12) 2
Here slow means a change on a time scale much larger than the gyro period. Note that the time derivative in can be caused by a temporal change of the electric eld or by a spatial variation of the electric eld B ! over the gyro scale. In that case . The corresponding correction for the electric drift is second order and becomes U% % (4.13) 2 %
U Splitting the velocity into the gyro and a drift motion term and assuming that the drift velocity is much smaller than the gyro velocity U ! 7
where we have subtracted the gyro motion of the Lorentz equation and neglected in the last term of the equation. Averaging over a gyro period gets rid of the time derivative on the left side. Taking the 2 % yields cross product with
U 4&6 one can substitute and where denotes the average over the gyro period. Assuming with the solution for the simple gyro motion "! U 2 2 U one can substitute and with the solution for the simple gyro motion. Only the average along is nonzero and in it general form the drift becomes $#&B % % ' 2 (4.14) 2$#
% U
!
2
The gradient drift is perpendicular to the magnetic eld and perpendicular to the gradient of the eld.
50
Electron
where denotes the radius of curvature vector. With a local coordinate system 4 where s is the line element along the eld 4 2 and 4 % and noting that 4 % line we can rewrite the curvature term as " 2 (4.15) % 2 ( 2 2 %
B rc e2 e1
! We can neglect the last term because of the cross product with in the drift equation. With the curvature force is ! 7 $# %e % 2 ! 7 % ' Note also that 2 . In the absence of currents the curvature
force becomes
$# %e 2
$# %e 2
! 7
(4.16)
51
$# %e 2 #
(4.17)
YbH Y a P H
P
YbR Y Pa
#"
% 2 %
2
!
$
Y
a
(4.21) (4.22)
0) 21 Most drifts are associated with an electric current which is given by & %(' . ) 1` B 7@ @ 3547698 8 4 ' ' % C 2 ) #&) % 1 # 1 % e eED ' A5B # 8 B ! 7 % ) # )% B 2 1 # 1% B @ % F 8 ' %(' 2 ' 2 #
These drifts have been determined by model electric and magnetic elds. Thus they describe test particle motion if the electric and magnetic elds were in fact as assumed. However, it should be reminded that the currents due to the drifts alter the elds. If these changes are small compared to the background eld it is justied to apply the drift model. The derived particle drifts do not contain any collective behavior. For this reason it is a nontrivial aspect to compare particle and uid plasma drifts. We will return to this issue in a later chapter.
G)
&HPI
)c )
(4.26)
52
(4.27)
$#&B % ' 2
2
2
B 8
(4.28)
Conservation of energy
e
B 0 2
2 2
Which demonstrates that the magnetic moment is an invariant of the particle motion. In the presence of an electric eld and of a corresponding change the magnetic moment is still conserved as long as the changes of the magnetic eld are slow compared to the gyro U% 2 is motion. Note that the ux encircled by the gyro motion ' $% # B % (4.29) % 2 % 2 %
and therefore also conserved. Magnetic Mirror With the pitch angle moment becomes
for the particle trajectory relative to the magnetic eld orientation the magnetic $#&% R`Y a % (4.30) ' 2
and in the absence of parallel electric elds (such that the energy is conserved) the pitch angle at two different location in the magnetic eld must satisfy R Ya % 2 % % (4.31) R Ya % 2
This provides the information of the change of the pitch angle along the entire eld line if it is known in one location. In particular we ca compute the condition for which the pitch angle becomes 0 , i.e., the
53
Mirror point
Figure 4.5: Illustration of magnetic mirror motion. condition for which a particle is reected in the magnetic eld. Assuming the eld strength 2 point where a particle is mirrored we obtain anywhere on the eld line
R Ya
at the
2 2
(4.32)
In other words at a given location particle with a pitch angle smaller than particle with a larger pitch angle are mirrored.
The is important for many laboratory and space plasmas. Particles are conned in a magnetic mirror by this mirror force. particle with a smaller pitch angle are lost from the magnetic eld such that the distribution function miss this portion of phase space which is called the loss cone. The same principle governs the magnetosphere. Ions and electrons which penetrate into the lower ionosphere can undergo collisions with the neutrals and thereby are lost from the magnetospheric population. Adiabatic Heating Drift motion can bring particles into regions of the magnetosphere with a larger magnetic eld strength. The conservation of the magnetic moment implies
% 2
2 %
B
(4.33)
Thus particles can gain perpendicular energy (without a change of the parallel energy) by adiabatic motion. The process is similar to so-called betatron acceleration.
$# e
(4.34)
54
e the invariant is G ' 6 #& e with 6 being the length of the In terms of an average parallel velocity # entire eld line between the mirror points. The square of this invariant implies for the parallel energy
% e
6%
%
6%
(4.35)
Therefore as the length of the eld line between mirror points changes, so does the parallel energy which is basic for so-called Fermi acceleration. Exercise: Demonstrate that the momentum of an ideally reecting ball which bounces between two 4 where is the distance walls which approach each other with a velocity u, satises I e ' between the walls and I e is the momentum normal to the wall surface. Thus the Adiabatic invariants provide insight into the change of anisotropy distribution function. 6 % 2 % %% 6% 2
e for a
(4.36)
H
#
Similar to the other invariants it requires slow congurational changes quency of the drift motion.
S
where
S
(4.37)
the fre-
The same line of arguments can be made for spatial gradients because the particle motion is subject to the electromagnetic elds and spatial gradients can act similarly to temporal changes for the particle motion. There is also a hierarchy of spatial scales which limit the inhomogeneity of the eld, for instance, gradients on the scale of the gyro radius will destroy the rst adiabatic invariant.