..

.. Type Address Here

..
..
..

Hands of Love GS
June 2009

Inappropriate Intra-Household Care

Practices 10 Years Later
Fact Finding
. . . . . . . . . .

The Back To the Basics Series

June 2009, HOL GS
FilmWatch Division Marketing Plan 2
 ..
..
..
..
..
Inappropriate Intra-Household Care
Practices 10 Years Later
Fact Finding

The Back To The Basics Series

Results indicate that female income more often has a greater impact
than male income on infant and child survival probabilities, preschooler nutrition,
and child education. Doss (1997)

The Following Three Quotes Are Taken Directly From Two Reports
Results indicate that female income more often has a greater impact than
. . . . . . . .
male income on infant and child survival probabilities, preschooler
nutrition, and child education. Doss (1997), for example, finds a larger
. .
share of assets controlled by women correlates with improved child
education outcomes in rural Ghana. Thomas (1994) shows that the effect
of women's unearned income on child survival probabilities is almost 20
times higher than that of men's unearned income in urban Brazil. [1]Page 2
Many of these studies have examined the effect of women’s income on
household expenditure patterns and found that women typically spend a
higher proportion of their income on food and health care, for children, as
well as other goods for general household consumption than do men.[1]
Page3

In Zambia, mother’s income increases infant girls' weight-for-age more

than it does for infant boys, while father's income increases boys’ weight-
and height-for-age more than girls' (Wang 1996).[1] Page 4

Inappropriate Intra-Household Care Practices 2000

 ..
..
..
..
..
Inappropriate Intra-Household Care Practices 2000
Reference and Resource Papers Of Discussion

[1]
FCND DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 93
MOTHER-FATHER RESOURCE CONTROL, MARRIAGE
PAYMENTS, AND GIRL-BOY HEALTH IN RURAL
BANGLADESH, Kelly K. Hallman, Food Consumption and
Nutrition Division
International Food Policy Research Institute
September 2000
PDF:http://www.ifpri.org/divs/fcnd/dp/papers/fcndp93.pdf

[2]
The Intra-household Disadvantages Framework:
A Framework for the Analysis of Intra-household
Difference and Inequality.
Vincent J. Bolt and Kate Bird
Overseas Development Institute
CPRC Working Paper No 32
July 2003
PDF:
http://www.undp.org/povertycentre/publications/poverty/Intrahous
eholdInequalityCPRC.pdf

Inappropriate Intra-Household Care Practices 10

Years Later Fact Finding
HOL GS June 2009

Contact Hands of Love GS:

Email: handoflove@inbox.com

2
 Inappropriate Intra-Household Care
Practices 10 Years Later
Fact Finding

Abstract
The purpose of this summary of facts based on the previous inputs that are
noted in the cover is to: Develop an explanation of some of the changes that
have become more wide spread in world aid and donor relations.
The reasoning is in an abstract relative of some of the less known or talked
about facts of on going poverty. But the provisions of how aid is managed as
well as information contrived and put forth to the decision making process
has now seemed to have changed and the related out come is less funding.
The message as well as the final conclusion in this paper is a clear relative
to the issue and can in no way be misunderstood..
The commitment to the poor as well as an earnest attempt to change must be
taken at the highest level of integrity not only in the individual but in the
work and explanations that are put forth so an understanding can be
developed of all the facts.
It is suggested that both papers be accessed to get a better understanding of
what is being explained here.

Inappropriate Intra-Household Care Practices 10

Years Later Fact Finding
HOL GS June 2009

Contact Hands of Love GS:

Email: handoflove@inbox.com

7
 ..
..
..
..
..
Inappropriate Intra-Household Care
Practices 10 Years Later
Fact Finding
The Theoretical Model Explained 10 Years Later
Found on Page 5 [1] http://www.ifpri.org/divs/fcnd/dp/papers/fcndp93.pdf

W =Welfare of house hold

Formula
1 by M \ M depends on the commodity consumption of each house
hold member

M= Each household member

U= Utility function of each member M by X= Number and action

based

I= G Goods and L Leisure activities of M

M+U+I= X
Utility is affected by a vector of home-produced goods
How This Theoretical Model has Changed
In 2000 when the original model was produced there were other
variables with in the social ramifications of the over all condition of
the third world at that time.
It has to be fair to conceive that this Model as well as the Haddad
inputs were at that time highly recognized facts and models that were
taken in to consideration in 2000. By all accounts there can be a very
unique but stringent correlation to what the out come of today is, in
how the planning aspect of today’s results are recognized and
delivered in working program models.

4
The model used in 2000 probably was highly regarded as very
accurate with in what the over all social pictures was at that time.
Based on the pretext of a 2009/2010 model the accurate assumption
of what the final social answer was and will be is now based on a
longer out come that can reasonably be reflected in a new derivative
of the original model, that is now updated to reflect that continued
answer to the original problem.

So when we look at the original formula the pretext of ? now

becomes a sure well defined answer to what ? equaled which is up to
this point ?=? or ?= I don’t know?. The reasoning that defines this is
based on simply what the future outcome would be based on a year
2000 social condition that in all probability would be thought to still
exist at a later date.
It was stated that during the year 2000 time frame there were not a lot
of studies that dealt with the gender based factoring of Intra-
Household Care Practices into how this related to the morbidity of
certain social groups that existed in the frame of sustainable needs of
the poor.
Poor being based on the per capita reporting of nations and regional
access to services, personal security and prosperity overall.

This could also be looked at as, “Part of the original factoring of facts
that laid the ground work for what would become the Millennium
Development Goals of today.”

W =Welfare of house hold

Formula
1 by M \ M depends on the commodity consumption of each house
hold member

M= Each household member

U= Utility function of each member M by X= Number and action

based

7
 ..
..
..
..
..
I= G Goods and L Leisure activities of M

M+U+I= X
Utility is affected by a vector of home-produced goods

So Um (X, L, θ ; µω); ω Taken directly from Page 5[1] the

second to the last line on that page has now created a totally new
formula expression. This is also an absolute fact based on that
formula being cut and pasted directly that transferred in a vertical
line that when back spaced back to it horizontal position became
from:
U m(X,L ; ? ; cc; ?); ? that is now Um (X, L, θ ; µω); ω

So the Utility functions or actions U of each member M

interplayed by the Member, their Utility functions, goods and
leisure activities X could have or show un observed heterogeneity.
Heterogeneity meaning the diverse nature of something
The out come which was at that time still undefined as stated in
that part of the formula in some ways has been revealed and needs
only to be divulged to what the new formula is or a type of answer
to the first formula of expressions.
Because in the hand entered example of the original formula
recreated in 2009, 9 years later =| *on entry(Really) U m(X,L ;
? cc ? ?
; ; ); |
SO
 = |
U m(X,L ; ? ; cc; ?); ? = Um (X, L, θ ; µω); ω

*| is only the keyboard key below the Backspace that is the left
facing slash on shift that is a straight slash that made a sad face
independently on this document when entered as above,
automatically to this realigned formula and copy and pasted the
second time.

Why ?

6
?= the answer or ? = I don’t know?.
Because this has now become an interactive theater of sorts it
would be in the best interest of the reader to not re-enter the
original information and follow what ever format has been created
by simply realigning that characters to their original positions once
they are transferred to this document.
W = W[U1(x, L, θ; µ, ω), ....., UM (x, L, θ; µ, ω)]
The over all retrospect of this Intra-Household Care Practices
formula presented in this particular section leads to a very different
value content once the key is understood more clearly. With in the
greater relation ship that has developed between computers and
their users with in research modules and research it self. By the
simple above expression of what today can be the answer to
questions that were in theory a few years ago the above formula is
much more easily understood. W = W[U1(x, L, θ; µ, ω), ....., UM
(x, L, θ; µ, ω)] is also not the formula as it is a copy and paste
from the top of page 7 in this 1999 HTML version this report:
FCND DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 93
MOTHER-FATHER RESOURCE CONTROL, MARRIAGE
PAYMENTS, AND GIRL-BOY HEALTH IN RURAL
BANGLADESH.
The formula is now a new meaning
Θ* θ For Theta in Greek *A direct copy and paste yielded the
asterisked symbol and when attempted again yielded the correct
symbol that are all now highlighted in green.
µ For Mu in Greek
ω For Omega in Greek.
This * is also on to another subject more in tune with the hope
some may have had for programs like OLPC and other computers
for the third world programs that had some tremendous appeal a
few years ago but have faded for now. One interesting note would
be that the over all theme of this paper is: Inappropriate Intra-
Household Care Practices that was mentioned in the FIVIMS As
Part of UN System Reform Brochure about Food Insecurity and

7
 ..
..
..
..
..
Vulnerability Information and Mapping Systems that was acquired
by Hands of Love GS as part of our UN Global Compact
Women’s Day attendance. It was a brochure that was made
available by another UN System Group who had this available as
information but was not directly related to the event. It was also
not intended to place a computer related feedback right with in this
report but, to leave this out being that this section was the first
section created seemed as not being forth coming or fair since this
occurred. It also may seem as un believable that this happened but
you may attempt this and either get the same results, believe that
this was the results as stated in just for this for instance or this is
contrived information that was made up for a self serving reason
which would not be the fact at all. It may have meaning later but
this remains to be seen. By looking at Inappropriate Intra-
Household Care Practices as a phrase or a starting point the facts
grew to what ever this paper became in its completed entirety.

What is the original formula saying in as far as related data that created
the decisions that we are living in today?

The Topic and the Theme

8
Because this particular paper used as an example is only up to page
8[1] the topic theme thus far is based on the life and statistical out
comes of the marital Inappropriate Intra-Household Care Practices
that are practiced by families in Bangladesh with references made
to other nations and cultures having been based on the children and
using missed school days and health issues. It is also the first
subject that came up in the research on Inappropriate Intra-
Household Care Practices.
The formula has some very unique and ground breaking
suggestions based on it being created in 1999. The fact of where
we are today in issues of women, poverty and children in what has
been deemed as appropriate help and direction in many nations
seems to, in many ways making the ? answer exactly what is now
taking place.
As an NGO of course we have a direction and a hope in what it
would be hoped that was to be found out as the fact finding of the
subject continues.
But it is suggestive that “Leisure Activity” having a type of value
with in the formula created in 1999 in this paper [1].
Added to the fact that a little less then 10 years later was that, “If
the world wanted to fix its problems with poverty, cessation of
violence and childhood morbidity not only in missing days of
school but the actual life span of the child.”
The answer would be, “For women on a grand scale to take up jobs
and vocations to support their families that would be funded by
Billions of dollars paid by other nations and private interest and
citizens to help them achieve this.”
A higher interest in the fact that such a formula exists that as we
now follow that Haddad lead of offerings that was referenced in
this paper could be , “Is the over all social emotional structure of
the third world based on hidden practices in Inappropriate Intra-
Household Care Practices of communities as well as entire nations
the greater reason as to why unless addressed we may all bare
witness to long term failure to change any thing as it relates to
poverty and the advancement of all nations world wide?”

7
..
..
..
..
If .. in the frame of first world nations the active generality of, how
can we help those in need, would be to continually spend huge
sums of money to pay people to teach people how to take care of
themselves based on money in the form of philanthropy siphoned
off every year from a nations capital structure to other nations who
have far less.
There are so many ways that over time this can go wrong that if
what was found in this formula 10 years later, this fact now
becomes almost a matter of a nations national security if it could
be found as a pre planned method to take over a nation , her assets
and eventually her people in a slow moving but targeted pinpointed
way.
The receiving nation becomes dependent on a certain style of
funding that never actually pans out to fix the original intention of
the funds.
The supplying nation some how over looks its own needs in its
own population that may bare a stark contrast to what the money
could be used for in its own population in comparison to simply
keeping starving babies alive. Advancements in science and
technology, simple social conditions like; crime prevention and
moral convictions to ones own constitution might suffer
detrimental failure if over a longer period of time the problems
cannot be fixed and the apron strings cannot be cut based on
seeming cruel or uncaring.
If the case cannot be presented and if possible, proved that this is
part of the hidden Inappropriate Intra-Household Care Practices.
In addition to every thing else that has been presented as
information about different groups of people and nations that’s
main vocation is learning to care for themselves, may one day
comes to pass as being poor, un-prosperous and always in need to
only draw attention to it self as a way to achieve the act of control
based on greed, humanity as well as the ability to do just that.

If today as part of the greater facts that can be seen but not
pinpointed in inter personal relationships between people of some
third world cultures and their new friends in the first world.

10
It could be derived even in scenarios that if every family in the
world found a way to make money and find a living to support
their family, over time based on first hand knowledge of
interpersonal relationships that first world people have developed
with third world people in their own first world nations. If certain
facts are not taken as possible and even serious then how can this
be miscounted as not being a fact?.
It is very possible based on the legal structure as well as the human
rights accountability that if world sustainability was achieved
hence, one group based on any reasoning including being paid off,
religious indoctrination or just a new wave trend could say, “Lets
not do business with certain people and not allow them to prosper
by cutting off their access to customers, any one who can listen as
well as a legal recourse to prove, change or have a defense that this
has happened can then be taken over by this type of ideal.
It is also a tactic that is so in tune with the words JUDE and
Juderent with what was written down and marked as a technique
and even a political platform to openly do this to others in societies
that were not in any way democracies but did use the voice and
will of the majority to destroy the life of others.
On a grand scale and on a not so grand scale, a present day
possible hidden fact that’s numbers have grown greater then any
other threat to man kind it self, if it could be shown that, extended
extreme poverty that is serviced as today’s poverty. Is serviced
through programs and initiatives to help change the present day,
excepted and explained reasons for it, has been the greatest
massacre of human life then all wars known to man kind put
together and ever will be.
The greater challenge today is the acceptance of this fact and then
creating ways to prevent this which is what social service programs
of many nations have up held over the longer time of successful
nations of prosperity, that if there was even just a chance by how
ever means even the unimaginable that some one or any one could
not find a monitory support for the simple access to shelter ,
clothing and food then one would be provided for you at little or
no cost based on the prosperity of the land it self.

7
..
..
..
..
This.. fact is one of the longer standing deterrents to a profile of
democracy that every one under its blanket of security had a right
to as well as access to the expectation of provisions of life
resources to survive.
There have been over the last 10 years various tests of such a
system it is also sad to say that in some cases there can be a
marked distinction made to the lessening of such a view point of
the rule of peaceful prosperity that has went in tune with a
lessoning of prosperity as it stands today.
If it is the will of a greater or more powerful group of people to
will hardships on another group by simply carrying the act out with
out the safety net of what has been from the beginning known as
social service programs, this can become the fact of how extreme
poverty can live on for so long in so many nations based on
Inappropriate Intra-Household Care Practices gone national.
.---
It can also be seen as Inappropriate Intra-Household Care Practices
in nations who for what ever reason do not have such safety net
programs as the reason why they fail.
No one can look at someone or in a true accurate sense say, “Who
is capable or not capable of carrying out this type of power ego
bolstering censorship of the life of another by looking at them.”
With out programs and the conviction on a national level to be
prosperous based on making a way for all the nations citizens in
times of prosperity and in times of need, then poverty will over
take those who may not be strong enough to tackle the social
reasons and hence just starve to death and die.
The United States in more recent years has been one of the better
known first world nations that had addressed the fact of social
welfare reforms over the last 15 to 20 years. The fact that a good
number of US recipients of these types of services were not US
citizens as well as wide scale misuse of the US social service
system such as millionaires receiving government poverty
assistance, recipients receiving assistance multiple times in

different states as a well as various other reasons that relates to

what US social service programs were intended to do and what

12
those who took advantage of such programs implied them to do in
their own situations.
Became the greater part of what the US changed and many
supported it.
Through the up grade in finding out more about the social needs of
US-SS clients many were able to find jobs who may have never
had such an opportunity before. As well as those who may have
had special needs and circumstances that might have needed
assistance to be able to receive the help that they may have needed
temporary or long term.
There is no structure that prevents a citizen in the US who may
have had access to such programs to be held as having less rights,
less opportunity if their individual situation changed or to be
discriminated against based on income or other related factors to
what is also private information that is not public information
made available only based on a legal need or the person making
this fact known voluntary.
This is also some of the greater factors that would make social
service programs in some nations as the answer to poverty a
greater fact to achieve based on the level of rights that the
individual nation may have in place for each of its citizens.
If social service programs were applied to nations whose main
national standing was to keep an on going ego bolstering
persecution of parts of its population what has the present-day
sustainability community done to look into this fact as well as
prevent this as part of what human rights represent in the over all
international communities medaling in the affairs of other nations
based on the want and stated need to see better human rights
achieved?
If these facts could be so easily seen is the international
community at large, some what discriminatory of who can be a
part of it and could this be based on not knowing what other people
are really capable of doing in absolute asurity that this fact is not
already going on for some time on a grander scale?

The problems that have been under the view of HOL GS for
several years now, do not show a caring community that’s only aim

7
..
..
..
..
is .. to help others based on the time frame of how long this has been
going on a grander scale.
The fact of third world 80% unemployment rates but based not
actually on who earns a living as billions of other nations money is
being spent on programs that are supposed to be working at
helping people find lively hoods. But figures (80%) based on legal
tax paying jobs that in many nations even in the third world are
jobs with a level of benefits such as old age pensions as well as
disability if you are injured on the job.
The fact of a nation that has allowed its people to pick and choose
based on this weeks whim, who they can lock out of a right to life
based on the ability for so many to starve in the streets and no one
caring. Might make legal benefit bearing jobs a very scary prospect
if this same tactic is used in the venues of normal registered jobs
that seems to be going on for the poor of some nations.
If 80% unemployment of some populations are noted along with
video images of every one looking busy selling , shopping and
active at something in the back round.
Why has it taken so long for those who are paid to tell the story
based on in nations organizations to those who could use some of
the same billion dollars of interest in their own nations that their
own nations are giving away to this very flimsy facade of a story
about poverty and its root cause?
Why is there drought in a time of hydrofluoric technology unless it
has become so embedded by methods that crops are not just in
drought but poisoned by simply, people who live in your nation
and don’t like you, local farmers who see a profit of getting what
you own for payment when your crop fails as well as governments
that can use the over all social distress and hidden rumors to keep
their populations in check.
This is also not to be looked at as the studies incorporated reason
for poverty but at each point there is very little evidence in
existence to discredit these facts of scenarios of thought created out
of reasoning of what has been made available just as the 1999
paper had very little facts or similar information to conclude its

findings that could very well be the facts that we are all baring in
the fight against poverty today.

14
In defense of those who in good faith have put their own nations
needs and priorities on back burners to bail out the face of poverty
there needs to be another recourse or look at the matter as an act
of defense in why this may until up to now has not worked.
Too little information provided as well as in-accurate reporting
cannot be acceptable as an excuse when your own nation’s
population in starving and living in the streets as you have given
all your money away to the poor.
The correlation to what seems to be the understated statement as
well as the pressing events of the day back in 1999 may have been
that, “Certain behaviors were based in part from the habits and
traditions of in this case gender related principles that were
probably seen as sub conscious acceptances of the local gender
based traditions that could be seen in real time affects even in
young school age children then.”

It was stated the Mothers with more brothers reduced the rate of
sickness for boys and girls. Families with greater land holdings
saw only a reduction of health issues in boys. Page 6[1]
On Page 9[1] it then went on to state the data model of 47 rural
communities and a few had recently received modern farming
technologies.
From page 9 on to 24[1] their were various techniques used to
continue the model formula based on how much money had
transferred from Husband to Wife based on out side marriage
based contributions to the bride or the groom as well as the male
made up of the male to female ratio of the extended family that
could show a type of pattern in illness in the children.
Two striking notes were, “That at the age of 1 and 3 most of the
children got sick as well as on page 24[1] a limited mention of
sanitary conditions as having not to have been included in this
study.”
From the Wet to Dry season as the dry season producing less rice
there were also some noted differences in a boys health to a girls.
This was also based on the extended activity based on extra family
related jobs that the children might have to participate respectively
to their gender and the season.

7
..
..
..
..
The .. over all idea based on the assets of the gender of originations
of the assets with in the nuclear family as well as the extended
family continued on to be the higher focus with in the test subject
groups.

It was found with in some graph models that during the 1970’s
noting about 1973 to 1978 there was a very high rate of money
transfers with in the families under this gender based traditional
frame work that also included wife to wife money transfers.
This was not deemed as a noted lead or any type of expectation
made as to having a correlation to any facts. Also based on the
FCND Discussion Papers on page 75 there were also noted many
papers created during this 1997 to 1999 time period even though it
was stated early on that there was very little information in regards
to this type of study.
It was stated vaguely that there was a data source that was
available where the information was taken from. But in all realties
the Inappropriate Intra-Household Care Practices as a phrase of
note still remains elusive .

16
Finding and Understanding Inappropriate Intra-Household Care
Practices

A 2003 Study entitled, The Intra-household Disadvantages

Framework: A Framework for the Analysis of Intra-household
Difference and Inequality[2].
Creates a very distinct fabric that what ever was being
accomplished in the 1996 to 1999 period was not significantly
dubious enough to be left as mindless jabber of what could be seen
as cultural facts that had a relationship via the marriage relations of
the subjects to wealth, health and household care practices but
there was defiantly an underlying left out data that would have
made a more distinguished tie in to what the real fact was that was
being taken into account.
Because so much may have enveloped on this 4 or more years of
contrived research findings and hypotheses, there was to the donor
and the signatory aspect of this type of work seeming to be the
need to build more information in order for the next step to be
commenced. This also is stated with in the same frame work as the
sited papers statements being made simply in the same way based
on the review of reputable sources fact finding for a different type
of determination and out come model.
As was stated by the authors on page 2[2], “Collecting sub-
household level data has often been felt to be impractical as it
could generate huge volumes of information, which then has to
be analyzed, presented and used. Researchers and policy
makers have therefore often preferred to investigate only down
to the household level, feeling this to be ‘quite
micro enough.”
This direct statement was also not stated as the opinion of the
authors but subjected to fact by the author but not referenced to
any proof of the statement. In the authors opinion this has been
their experience and would have well worked better if stated as
such. This was also exactly stated again on Page 8[2] and followed
by a reference link to a comment of a colleague in the first draft of
the paper that goes on to note a work shop in 2002 that’s,

7
..
..
..
..
..
“Presentation highlighted the need to develop methods for
extending tools derived from gender analysis to enable them to
analyze other forms of social difference”
The next statement that directly followed the page 2 [2]opinionated
statement went on to say,
However, as we indicate in this paper, the household means
different things to different people, in different times and
places, and by using the household as a unit, researchers and
policy makers make a set of implicit assumptions about what
takes place within it. Individuals within a household are often
assumed to be equally wealthy or poor and to have equal access
to goods and services. Household models have presented the
household as a sharing, altruistic and co-operative body with a
unitary utility function.”
This is also a contrived artistic function almost as clearly stated
with in the statement. It is self based on the source of assumptions
as the cross references of researchers and only the derived opinion
in this paper to infer a statement and singularly confirm the
validity of not just an opinion but a clearly targeted follow up to a
main source that is not clearly absorbed in its message in any one
document, but may be found by its trail. This occurred on page
8[2]. It will also be discovered later on if the reference that was
made to the work shop held any vital clues if this was stated in
any way to support the claim of what policy makers are actually
looking for in research material. It did not.

The inference to the UN’s definition of the pragmatic approach to

household composition on page 10 [2] also holds a very direct
meaning in the same pragmatic way based on the over all event
based theory, of those who would be in a position to research
subject matter in certain research fields, should have a better
understanding of the over all event related reality of the day.
Based on education, experience as well as access to the facts that
the over all research community would want to present as
information that was more defined to what the issues of the day
were instead of presenting limited facts with limited planning

18
related outcomes. A pragmatic approach in a more broad based
field of vision that’s realties in this case, of those who cohabitate
and share food might would also point to the suggestion that a
wider field of vision needs to be developed as is being done here to
utilize the access to data collection as well as information already
in existence in a more realistic way using more common sense then
common idealisms.
The intra household model that goes on to page 14[2] then goes on
to do exactly that and broadens the intra household model to what
seems to be many households with in a community.
This is also a paper that notes itself as a type of frame work model
for future research patterns.
Because it[2] has still not been divulged what the relationship is to
the 2009 theory of play in poverty and cultural diversity and how
this relates to what could be seen as progress as well as if
understood. That could be building blocks of solutions to some of
the more pressing problems of certain segments of rural and urban
based poverty, that may be built on the re-conditioning of what is
not just a practice, but very serious social problems that are more
of the underlying factors of practices that actually are the reason
for certain practices in the first place.
In the scope of what people of the third world and poverty, weather
gender based or not, have to say as the real reasons that they(the
poor) may believe are the source of their own life misery and
unsure futures. May be much more realistic based on what has
been demonstrated to policy makers and every one else if a way
can be found to word for word state the reasoning and let those
who are in the position to make the decisions decide for them
selves what the correct course of action should be.

By Example.

This report holds as the reader now gets to the more meaty part of
the paper which is limited edited versions of real time testimonies
of people about their lives. The fact that now can come into play in
a more experimental frame work is how can what is being said be
reinforced in a more realistic way that can give insight to the next

7
..
..
..
..
..
person? The fact that the authors have provided their own direct
interviews changes the reality of the paper.
The purpose now becomes more solidified towards the work of
the author and not what their opinions are nor their expertise in
how to conduct an interview which I doubt although a frame work
document will go that far to an instructional type of insight with in
this type of matter.
In Box 1 and 2 on pages 14 and 15[2] respectively.
The first interview was in regards to a woman who was abused by
her husband as well as what turned in to these beatings. The
family of her husband said she was not doing her work in
accordance to her husband’s family’s wishes and ways, although it
was satisfactory to her own family.
The interview author immediately went on to opinion, “That
women were often beaten in this particular culture.”
Which may well be true.
But because it is also the underlining job to help these people too.
It could be suggested to seek out an interview from a wife that was
not beaten as often to discover if there were any stark differences
in the view or relationship related reasons that could be
summarized from this extended view.
The second box was of a woman that said, she was not married
but it was directly inferred by the interviewer that she probably
was, as well as her leading a life of a single woman who worked at
traditional and non traditional agriculture based trades, her sister
lived right across from her with her husband.
People, it was noted harassed her even her own family such as her
nephews throwing bottles at her house. It was told to the
interviewer who made it a point to say, “That she did not seem
dirty, crazy or a thief as others said she was.” The interviewer was
then joined by her male relatives who stated not to listen to her. It
was also noted that she called the police on occasion about people
harassing her.
This is also a very complicated story, but the interviewer has
already stated in the very first paragraph that the woman was
probably married, in the end the same interviewer called her a
truthful person.

20
So what exactly is being said in this case? One fact I would have
thought, depending on the cultural practices of this woman’s
community could it be, “That she knew something that was not
favorable about a member of her family or her community that
could range from rape, a theft to even the murder of a child.”
If this was the case and the over all view was to not prosecute she
may have been under her own personal moral obligation to have
spoken out, even if just to her own family that this was wrong. It
may not have even been any one in her family that was guilty. But
word may have spread and because she was from a family from
whom may have been of good standing she was warned and maybe
even harassed which in turn she called the police in fear only for
her own safety. This is also a very realistic possibility. But how
could this fact if totally over looked and the woman even being
discredited by the interviewer for a separate issue be seen by some
one who reads the interview.
It is almost as if a crime if this was the case has been committed
right in box two.
Here is where the case builds as to what the reason is.
Because there is no real need for an educated interviewer from a
foreign land to make up their own versions it is a bit odd that this
happens.
Not just in this case but in just about every interview you read. It
would make one wonder what it is these NGO types are really up
to. A cult or a first world cultural trend or practice?
Some what un-likely but not actually true.
As you continue on their will be a pattern that may develop but the
reasoning is far beyond a science fiction by line of secret cults and
plots to take over the third world.
Part of the realistic reasoning of why this happens is lack of
planning and lack of a belief in how societies function and the
importance of planning at every level.
How can you regulate interviews in foreign lands that in most
cases the information although public, no one really cares or needs
to care about the facts or intricate details about some poor persons
story in their own land.

7
..
..
..
..
Most.. have their own poor and pay little attention to them in their
own nations.
To create a public awareness as has been the new trend as of late,
to say, “Everyone there is a child starving or a poor person who has
no roof over their house and it is raining out side right now.”
Can create interest but if there is not a proper frame work in place
or a more intricate planning mechanism then no matter what any
one attempts to do this will not work.
From the interviewers perspective the comments just made would
not in any way be constructive. From his or her perspective, you
were not there and as was stated in box 2, the male family all of a
sudden showed up and the fact that the Chanka Bia has already had
experience with the police.
From the interviewers stand point people like me were lucky she
even was able to get any information at all.
There is also the fact of global connectivity that means for the
interviewer or the next person that goes to that nation the report
might be looked at and what was said could be used as a negative
in the future towards those who do this type of international work
with the poor.
Every day this fact is playing out over and over again, information
is gathered, decisions are made based on the information, the poor
receive a service and they still remain poor.
One of the facts that this type of watch dog NGO represents is a
break in the normal chain of business when it comes to the poor
and the critique of their issues. It is in our formula based on what
was ascertained as necessary and needed in the world of poverty
and international sustainability to bridge the change. In the fact
that we do not need to have first hand access to the poor to
function and prove effective we also see the use of virtual
interfaces for in nation communication in the future by conducting
interviews and fact find via virtual connections, as well as relying
on in nation personal to conduct our business.
This also limits the ability for Inappropriate Intra-Household Care
Practices and other tricks of the trade to interfere with our view of
what we think might be going on at any given time.

22
The living connection is to be severed and at the same time giving
the fact finding session more time to focus on the person. Based
on what we believe is a social condition that is a natural fact of all
people that has been thrown out of sync for the poor based on the
break down of the normal way in which these types of conditions
of people have been readjusted to fit into a changing world.
The importance of what exactly a rural or urban participant
believes from his ort her view no matter how far fetched his or her
problem may be is the fundamental starting point in how if it can
be explained and understood can then be planned in or out of their
condition to see change that starts to occur.
A fictitious example.
The water is dirty down by the river do not drink it with out
treating it.
People are still drinking the dirty water down by the river.
What can be done?
It may in fact be a historical reason that they drink the water as
their grandparents did. Maybe there are stories about the river
some one good was saved some one bad drowned.
So hence the river is strong.
If I drink from the river I am strong. But the river is now polluted.
Yes I know, but I have drunk from the river and I did not get sick.
Each side is expressing truth. If we say you will get sick and the
person doesn’t get sick , then to next person you were wrong even
if the next person gets sick. They would just believe they were not
strong enough. The person who says they drink from the river
could be lying and they get their water from some where else to
drink and go through the motions of getting water from the river
and use it only to wash their clothes.
This makes them seem strong to every one else but they are lying.
So if we asked them are there any stories or legends about this
river and it’s water or beliefs as to why some people don’t get sick.
You can find out a great deal.
Now based on what ever was found out it could then be suggested
maybe they could do a ceremony and bless some water pots by
painting a color on them or tying some cloth around it.

7
..
..
..
..
This.. would keep the strength and then in the now special water pot
they could treat the water.

If and interviewer for what ever reason as in Box 2 has to

contradicted them selves or simply lied then in some ways the
Inappropriate Intra-Household Care Practices has already taken
hold and corrupted the interviewer.
This is how this happens.
If it was a lie that some of the people really don’t drink the water
and every one else who does, gets sick. Then the policy maker and
the service plan decision maker doesn’t have any of the real facts
and hence what ever is done to combat the fact of health problems
for some people in a community who drink dirty river water even
though the overture to provided water treatment methods will
never solve the problem.
This type of reasoning is also not meant to change the business of
international sustainability in any way.
Or promote other organizations to follow suit with this type of
reporting and researching method or ideal.
But it is a formula that is unique that has many particulars that
might make duplication by other organizations not and easy task
even if they have more experience or knowledge in the nation if it
is not explained and some point demonstrated and then planned
into programs.
The real truth of the matter becomes the solution.
Why would some one lie about the water?
Is the same answering to, “Why did the interviewer present the
Box 2 interview with so many inconsistencies?”
Because as has been of late, answers to provide less funding there
is a fact that some where along the line this type of reasoning has
seeped in.

24
The Conclusion

To state to the third world nations at large that yes in many ways
this fact of possibility has been seen and the answer has been to
give less money.
But the bottom line is also the own security of each donor nation in
the fact that if this was in some small way true then it will not be
long until the after affects or the full run of the hidden plan
reaches the door steps of other nations.
In many ways nations have made statements and complaints about
those who come into their nation under the guise of organizations
that are there to help. But the real facts still remain with in the
people of the nation and their real truth of what they believe is
going on.
Another fact is if the racial divide of those who come onto a nation
to fact find and the difference between them as far as race ,culture
and what the individual goal and purpose is in each.
If the pattern has been for so long the same pattern of what the in
nation at risk person says in an interview as well as how the
interviewer interprets the information. Then there are no guidelines
in this intimate exchange and it can only be changed from the top.
The same structure of what can be seen as corruption by both
partiers; the poor person and the NGO researcher asking the
question.
The poor hear of great sums of money that their nation receives
and see’s little change the NGO Researcher hears of the
tremendous salaries that their executive bosses receives even
though they do most of the work.
Many NGO researchers are also young so they are still at an
impressionable time in their life.
If it could be driven by a goal both could be manipulated.

In 2009 as we stand only part of what could be seen worked over

all in the dubious nature of what could be seen as just a different

7
..
..
..
..
view.. by a party that is out side of this ring of functional poverty.
The over all fact that this spread to first world nations was the
greatest factor in what could have happened next.
If the poor want to still be poor for the power that poverty yields
on the world, if the NGO researcher wants to yield its report in a
targeted way to lead those who make the decision in a certain
direction as these 1997 to 1999 reports seen 10 years later most
certainly did.
Than the fact of the higher rule of third world government,
philanthropy as well as how far the average general public can
actually help at any level, has been the main reason once it could
be seen, as a possibility based only on the imprinted actions of all
parties in what has changed.
The end result has been modified and is in a continual modification
in how by the removal of funds from the over all story can now
force a new type of direction that over time may prove to be more
effective then any thing done thus far.
It is not that what has been invested in the poor in as far as time
and resources has been wasted but it has been more of a fact
finding mission of getting to the bottom of poverty issues and now
inserting a plan of action that will effect the root cause even if this
cause is discretionary and not seen by all.

HOL GS hopes that by putting this thought in to action, based

on a different type of explanation, the guiding force can see
vision and start to understand what the new meaning of the
new actions are based on and either plan or change
accordingly.

26
7